Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Freedom? On the march. Still.Follow

#1 Jun 30 2006 at 4:26 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=worldNews&storyID=2006-06-30T163519Z_01_IBO047875_RTRUKOC_0_UK-IRAQ.xml&archived=False


BAGHDAD (Reuters) - U.S. soldiers may have raped an Iraqi woman and murdered her and three members of her family including a child, U.S. military officials said on Friday.

Confirming the launch of another major investigation into the alleged killing and abuse of Iraqi civilians by U.S. troops, one officer said the incident in March just south of Baghdad had initially been blamed on insurgents active in the area.

The probe is the latest in a series in recent weeks since the revelation of investigations into the killings of 24 people at Haditha in November. Commanders are cracking down on rogue soldiers in a bid to regain the trust of ordinary Iraqis and of their new government after three years of growing resentment.


"What's that you say General? Crack down on rapes? Aww come on, do you have any idea how much paperwork that will take? ******* press, I swear to god...."

They're all heros though.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#2 Jun 30 2006 at 4:31 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
I was listening to the story of a woman the other day who is enlisted, and didn't want to return to Iraq because she was so sure she'd be raped. I suppose that after a while the situation must make you feel like an animal, but there definitely has to be a point where you decide to just throw your morals to the wind.
#3 Jun 30 2006 at 5:21 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,453 posts
Quote:
but there definitely has to be a point where you decide to just throw your morals to the wind.


Well, no, really there isn't. They're just criminals.

#4 Jun 30 2006 at 5:27 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Well, wait, wait, wait.

Aside from the gunshot wounds, were there any marks?
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#5 Jun 30 2006 at 5:37 PM Rating: Good
****
5,311 posts
Quote:
Washington hopes to leave a pro-American Iraq once its troops leave and seems keen to repair damage to its image.
Perhaps if the soldiers were better trained how to act from the moment they enter armed service Washington could worry about things like a plan for withdrawal rather than their f'ucking PR campaign.
#6 Jun 30 2006 at 6:52 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
T.W.O.T. sucks.

Smiley: frown

____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#7 Jul 01 2006 at 4:28 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
"I was listening to the story of a woman the other day who is enlisted, and didn't want to return to Iraq because she was so sure she'd be raped." --FleaJo1

At the risk of being perceived as out of touch and anachronistic or simply a curmudgeonly mysogynist, I'd like to say this woman's reason is precisely why women in the combat arms branches is a bad, bad idea. The WACs or WAVEs was a much better way to integrate females into the military.

Feel free to pile on.

Totem
#8 Jul 01 2006 at 4:36 PM Rating: Default
When these men are found guilty, we should turn them over to the Iraqi rioter's to do with as they please.
#9 Jul 01 2006 at 9:02 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,632 posts
Totem wrote:
"I was listening to the story of a woman the other day who is enlisted, and didn't want to return to Iraq because she was so sure she'd be raped." --FleaJo1

At the risk of being perceived as out of touch and anachronistic or simply a curmudgeonly mysogynist, I'd like to say this woman's reason is precisely why women in the combat arms branches is a bad, bad idea. The WACs or WAVEs was a much better way to integrate females into the military.

Feel free to pile on.

Totem


Go troll elsewhere, you goddamned out of touch anachronistic mysongynist.

I didn't know it was possible to have so many words I don't know the meaning of in a single sentence before your post. Smiley: bowdown
#10 Jul 02 2006 at 11:31 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
When these men are found guilty, we should turn them over to the Iraqi rioter's to do with as they please.


Because that's really how you demonstrate due process of law to them.

Quiet, you dumb ****. If we have soldiers (and I'd be quite startled to learn that we don't, considering the constituency of our armed forces) who have behaved in this manner, then it's our responsibility to hand out justice in the matter. We can't unkill or unrape victims, but we can deal with the criminals ourselves instead of washing our hands of the matter and handing them over for acts of revenge.

Honestly, what would you achieve by handing them over to rioters other than to reward the rioter behavior and endorse that mindset? Rapists, murderers and the like; they know their actions carry heavy penalties. They don't commit those heinous acts for lack of fear of the penalty. They commit the acts for lack of ability to really connect the act to the penalty in their own minds. Only in a society where the act itself is what is feared instead of the penalty will crimes like this vanish. Education, understanding and compassion are the tools that will get us there. Until that time, we will make do with process of law, not mob rule. Civilization does have some benefits, you know...
#11 Jul 02 2006 at 11:40 AM Rating: Good
****
5,311 posts
Quote:
this woman's reason is precisely why women in the combat arms branches is a bad, bad idea.
Because it's unrealistic to expect our soldiers to not be rapists?
#12 Jul 02 2006 at 12:03 PM Rating: Good
Samira said

Quote:
Well, wait, wait, wait.

Aside from the gunshot wounds, were there any marks?

Smiley: drool2 I lol'ed
#13 Jul 02 2006 at 1:22 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Totem wrote:
The WACs or WAVEs


In English, please?
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#14 Jul 02 2006 at 1:26 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Yanari wrote:
Because it's unrealistic to expect our soldiers to not be rapists?


They're under a LOT of stress Yan. If you were over there, you'd rape people too, stop being so judgemental. If women enlist, it should be under the assumption that they'll be raped. They're putting themselves in that position.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#15 Jul 03 2006 at 5:05 AM Rating: Decent
Nexa wrote:
Yanari wrote:
Because it's unrealistic to expect our soldiers to not be rapists?


They're under a LOT of stress Yan. If you were over there, you'd rape people too, stop being so judgemental. If women enlist, it should be under the assumption that they'll be raped. They're putting themselves in that position.

Nexa


Yeah!!

Just like all those godamn Iraqis that keep getting in the way of our bullets. Those are not free, you know!! We pay for them with our taxes! And those selfish bastards just take them in the chest and then sell it at the black market.

And that's when they're not busy doing their ghey PR stunts in Abu Graib.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#16 Jul 03 2006 at 9:01 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Nexa wrote:
Yanari wrote:
Because it's unrealistic to expect our soldiers to not be rapists?


They're under a LOT of stress Yan. If you were over there, you'd rape people too, stop being so judgemental. If women enlist, it should be under the assumption that they'll be raped. They're putting themselves in that position.
Listen girls, if they didn't expect to be raped, they shouldn't have joined. I mean, they joined the mostly male army. Didn't they know?

Tot3m, you dumbass.
#17 Jul 03 2006 at 2:47 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
So, one of the soldiers involved has "a personality disorder."

Sure, he's a rapist and a murderer (allegedly). I'd say that qualifies. Oh, and grats him on an honorable discharge due to his "disorder" - should that not have been a medical discharge?
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 310 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (310)