Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

The carrot and the stickFollow

#1 Jun 29 2006 at 9:24 AM Rating: Decent
Though in this case, it's more the carrot and the Big Bad **** ***** With Metal Spikes.

On the one hand, Hamas seems closer to recognising Israel, albeit implicitly:

Quote:
However, a Hamas member who helped negotiate the agreement, Ziyad Dayeh, said Hamas support for a two-state solution was nothing new for Hamas.

"When talking about a Palestinian state in the occupied territories of 1967, it means there would be another state on the other part of Palestine. It means, yes, practically, a two-state solution, and it's not a new thing - it has been offered by Sheikh Ahmed Yassin before," he said.


On the other, Israel is launching the tanks in Gaza, and capturing a third of their governement:

Quote:
Israel arrested one-third of the Palestinian cabinet on Thursday, moving against the Hamas-led government while preparing to expand a military offensive into Gaza to free a soldier abducted by militants.

Hundreds of Palestinian gunmen wielding automatic rifles and anti-tank weapons took up positions waiting for Israeli forces to open a second front in the northern Gaza Strip, a day after tanks and infantry pushed into the south of the territory.


So near, and yet so far...

____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#2 Jun 29 2006 at 9:36 AM Rating: Good
WWIII officially broken out yet? Palestine vs. the world?

The Russians have also launched special forces to go after the towelheads that killed some of their soldiers. Looks like the world has had enough.
#3 Jun 29 2006 at 9:37 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Recognizing a nation's right to exist = Good
Kidnapping soldiers from said nation = Bad

Makes sense.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#4 Jun 29 2006 at 9:41 AM Rating: Decent
Do you guys think we'll see a peaceful solution to this problem in our lifetime? Like a proper Paletinian state at peace with itself and Israel?

I used to think yes, but just like a bad panto, it never seems to be going anywhere.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#5 Jun 29 2006 at 9:44 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
5,677 posts
I don't think there was ever any chance at a peaceful resolution. Way too much religious fanaticism on both sides.
#6 Jun 29 2006 at 9:45 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
Do you guys think we'll see a peaceful solution to this problem in our lifetime? Like a proper Paletinian state at peace with itself and Israel?
Of course not. Palestine's got a memory like an elephant, and they don't seem to get tired. Israel's no better.
#7 Jun 29 2006 at 9:48 AM Rating: Good
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
Do you guys think we'll see a peaceful solution to this problem in our lifetime? Like a proper Paletinian state at peace with itself and Israel?
Of course not. Palestine's got a memory like an elephant, and they don't seem to get tired. Israel's no better.
In that case, someone get on the Horn of Gondor and call in Legolas to pop a few arrows in the back of it's big grey neck.
#8 Jun 29 2006 at 9:51 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Elderon the Wise wrote:
In that case, someone get on the Horn of Gondor and call in Legolas to pop a few arrows in the back of it's big grey neck.
Sure, because violence has achieved so much. Smiley: dubious
#9 Jun 29 2006 at 9:52 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Do you guys think we'll see a peaceful solution to this problem in our lifetime? Like a proper Paletinian state at peace with itself and Israel?


Sure, as soon as Isreal moves to Angola.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#10 Jun 29 2006 at 9:53 AM Rating: Good
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Elderon the Wise wrote:
In that case, someone get on the Horn of Gondor and call in Legolas to pop a few arrows in the back of it's big grey neck.
Sure, because violence has achieved so much. Smiley: dubious
It overthrew the tyranny of Sauron. Sheesh!
#11 Jun 29 2006 at 9:54 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Do you guys think we'll see a peaceful solution to this problem in our lifetime? Like a proper Paletinian state at peace with itself and Israel?


Sure, as soon as Isreal moves to Angola.


Anti-Semite!! Smiley: laugh
#12 Jun 29 2006 at 10:23 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:

Do you guys think we'll see a peaceful solution to this problem in our lifetime? Like a proper Paletinian state at peace with itself and Israel?


Sure, as soon as Isreal moves to Angola.

Anti-Semite!! Smiley: laugh

Well, can you really blame the Pales when someone drove up and dumped truckfuls of Jews on their land and told them to live there?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#13 Jun 29 2006 at 10:25 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Debalic wrote:
Well, can you really blame the Pales when someone drove up and dumped truckfuls of Jews on their land and told them to live there?
I was joking Deb. I once mentioned to Smash that it was practically impossible to hold a view sympathetic to Palestine in this country without being labeled an anti-semite, so now I make it a point to call him that whenever he expresses that point of view (with which I do happen to agree).
#14 Jun 29 2006 at 10:28 AM Rating: Default
The worst is using the "It's our Land cos it's in the Bible" argument. That's so freaking stupid. You'd think after all these years of evolution, people would slightly less retarded. But no.

I know its a complicated issue, but bringing the religious dimension into it devalues everything.

PS: I'm not anti-semite, I'm a quarter Jewish. So there.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#15 Jun 29 2006 at 10:39 AM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts


I know its a complicated issue, but bringing the religious dimension into it devalues everything.


That'd be true if people hadn't built Mosques on top of Churches that were built on top of Temples.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#16 Jun 29 2006 at 11:28 AM Rating: Decent
Smasharoo wrote:


I know its a complicated issue, but bringing the religious dimension into it devalues everything.


That'd be true if people hadn't built Mosques on top of Churches that were built on top of Temples.


Exactly, they're just making it even worse with their petty religious squabblings. If we had converted them all to Christianity, like Coulter had said, all these problems would be gone by now.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#17 Jun 29 2006 at 11:35 AM Rating: Decent
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:


I know its a complicated issue, but bringing the religious dimension into it devalues everything.


That'd be true if people hadn't built Mosques on top of Churches that were built on top of Temples.


Exactly, they're just making it even worse with their petty religious squabblings. If we had just turn the location into a glass parking lot, all these problems would be gone by now.


/agree
#18 Jun 29 2006 at 11:47 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
If we had converted them all to Christianity,
What do you recommend, mass lobotomies? Do try to be practical.
#19 Jun 29 2006 at 11:49 AM Rating: Decent
Smasharoo wrote:


I know its a complicated issue, but bringing the religious dimension into it devalues everything.


That'd be true if people hadn't built Mosques on top of Churches that were built on top of Temples.


first thing in a long time smash has stated i agree 100% with.

as to a peaceful solution in our lifetime, i doubt it. this has been going on in one form or an other since the creation of islam and doubt it will ever end.
#20 Jun 29 2006 at 11:57 AM Rating: Decent
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
If we had converted them all to Christianity,
What do you recommend, mass lobotomies? Do try to be practical.


A mass pilgrimage to Jerusalem?
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#21 Jun 29 2006 at 8:14 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Debalic wrote:
Well, can you really blame the Pales when someone drove up and dumped truckfuls of Jews on their land and told them to live there?


And even worse when some 80% of them didn't originally live in the area at all!

Quick history lesson: The majority of those who we today call "Palestinians" were in fact living in areas of Eqypt, Syria, and Jordan when the UN established the nation of Isreal. The actual people living on that actual land at that actual time were a mix of Jewish, Christian, and Muslims. It wasn't until after the UN dumped truckfulls of Jews and those Jews brought their money and their western ways and irrigated the desert and made it capable of supporting more people that folks suddenly appeared out of the desert wanting to live there. This exodus from the surrounding nations was supported officially by those countries (they didn't really want the Palestinians in their countries anyway). In many cases, they were forcibly pushed out of Egypt, Syria, and Jordan and tossed into the new country, specifically to up the number of Muslims in the region so they could create a religious conflict where one didn't really exist before.

And that's not counting the percent of Palestinians who've become Palestinians just since the war in 73 which created the UN run refugee camps. Cause if you're poor and you head into the camps, you get free food and money from the UN! Those refugee camps have literally the highest population growth *(by a good and seemingly miraculous margin!) of any area on earth. So either there's something magical in the food, or there's a whole lot of people showing up to get whatever they can from the UN by being recorded as a "Palestinian".


It *is* a very complicated issue. But the first notion you need to get out of your heads is that this has anything to do with some thousands of years old conflict. It really doesn't. The issues between the Muslims and Jews, and the Jews and Palestinians specifically really only go back less then a century. It has far more to do with the setting of national borders in the region and the displacement of tribal cultures then anything to do with religion. It's just that in this case, the nation happens to be held by westernized Jews, and the tribe happens to be the Palestinians.

If Iraq was controlled by Jews, I'm pretty sure a lot more people would have heard of the "plight of the Kurds" long before the 91 gulf war. The religious factor is really only after the fact. It's simplistic to assume that because there's a religious difference, that must be the root cause of the conflict. However, as I pointed out, the issue the Kurds in Iraq have had to face over the last 6 decades or so are virtually identical to those of the Palestinians. You just didn't hear about them because they weren't of a different religion. It's literally a case of the preconceptions reinforcing themselves.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#22 Jun 29 2006 at 8:40 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

It's simplistic to assume that because there's a religious difference, that must be the root cause of the conflict.


As simplistic as assuming that a resolution authorizing the President to use forxe is the same as supporting a premtive war?

Probably not. I mean you'd have to rock ******* stupid to be that far gone, I guess. I mean what kind of completely mindless numbskull would leap to "They voted yes so they love the war OMG!!!11eleven!!

Anyway, I'd reply to more of your badly cut and pasted pablum, but it doesn't actually advocate anything at all. Next time just post "I know how to use google, but not my brain." In fact, just replace all of your posts with that and save everyone a lot of time.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#23 Jun 29 2006 at 9:30 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
PS: I'm not anti-semite, I'm a quarter Jewish. So there.


Just had the feeling to cut in here (I just read the Asylum's threads) but I had to ask... is it 1/4 chopped down there?
#24 Jun 30 2006 at 4:33 AM Rating: Decent
Slywalker wrote:
Just had the feeling to cut in here (I just read the Asylum's threads) but I had to ask... is it 1/4 chopped down there?


Luke, je suis ton pere!

Crap, misread. Anyway, I managed to escape before they brought the axe out. Thank God. Or not.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#25 Jun 30 2006 at 8:29 AM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
as I pointed out, the issue the Kurds in Iraq have had to face over the last 6 decades or so are virtually identical to those of the Palestinians. You just didn't hear about them because they weren't of a different religion.


and probably because Iraq isn't the West's sqeeky clean innocent offsping while the rest of the countries middle east are our delinquent step kids.


also the fact that we armed Israel to the teeth.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#26 Jun 30 2006 at 9:02 AM Rating: Good
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
Luc, je suis ton pere!
Fixed. And you call yourself French.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 367 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (367)