Quote:
I understand politics. I know that people play the game that way. Doesn't make it right.
See, I don't think you do. It's possible you're being deliberately obtuse, of course.
Quote:
Weather [sic] any of us like it or not, we're at war. It's time to get over the petty squabbling and constant posturing that's being done. People need to buck up and face it that their opinions of weather [sic] we're doing the "right" thing or not, and realize that we're committed, and we need to finish the mission, if for no other reason than to make sure that those that died already, didn't die a wasted death because of a wasted effort from those that support them.
Wasted lives don't get un-wasted because we resolutely throw more lives on the bonfire. "I'm too arrogant to admit I was wrong" is not a valid reason to continue on a misguided path.
If we're not doing the "right" thing, we need to rethink what we are doing.
Quote:
We need to get behind those that are over there and show them the same commitment and loyalty that they show to us, nevermind politics. Call me an idealist, but I don't give a **** what you think about me anyway.
First of all, "idealist" is hardly an insult; nor is it the label I'd apply to your rather jejeune understanding. Second, you're confusing the troops with the policy makers, again. No one is criticizing or ostracizing or castigating the troops. We reserve that for the, you guessed it, politicians.
Quote:
Oh, and I never said that they went on to be huge success after war, however my point stands, MacArthur and Patton were soldiers that led their war efforts, rather than the politicans in Congress.
Well, if they weren't successful it's kinda pointless to bring them up, isn't it? Aside from that, they led the war effort on the battlefield - not in the war rooms in Washington. Again, it's that little bit of difference between policy makers and soldiers.