Remember the Duke LAX rape case?Follow

"Try actually READING my fu[red][/red]cking posts next time" - Polish disclaimer (It's Bodhi approved!)



Are you somehow under the impression that everyone knew this was nothing more then showboating for another election year for specific politicians? Thank you Mrs. Oblivious!


History is doomed to repeat it's self. Least those of whom remember the past champion for the present to ensure out futures.

Edited, Jun 22nd 2006 at 10:59am EDT by Molish

Well, aside from the fact that this has nothing to do with what I said, yes, I think everyone who thinks (so excuse yourself now if you like) realized that on the DA's part it was political grandstanding.

Which, again, has nothing at all to do with the basic situation. When a woman decides to come forward with knowledge and evidence of a crime, she is probably not going to spend a lot of time thinking about whether it's an election year.

Other than that, I really can't be bothered to sort out the soggy mess you spew. /shrug

Another morning without coffee. Would you care to eulicidate the straw man in her reply? You know, if you can.

"Try actually READING my @#%^ing posts next time" - Polish disclaimer (It's Bodhi approved!)



Ugh, fine. But remember


My basic argument - This woman is going to set dangerous precedence’s in new rape cases because this story was so sensationalized.



Sammy was Gbaji enough to take one point and try to make a case out of it, and a poor one at that(thus, she created a straw man argument because she had nothing better to go on). She was able to divert my attention from the main point of my argument with a poorly thought out one liner. Kudos, ol'girl. Granted, she didn't use 100000000000 words to make that case, which I'm thankful for. However, never did I say it was new. That why I was so adamant about her having brought it up, mob mentality sucks.



I responded to that one point with a retort that basically said "Wow, thanks for point out something that was blaringly fu[/red]cking obvious. Why don't I return the favor?"
I then explained why was adamant about it being brought up earlier.

sammy wrote:

Well, aside from the fact that this has nothing to do with what I said, yes, I think everyone who thinks (so excuse yourself now if you like) realized that on the DA's part it was political grandstanding.

Which, again, has nothing at all to do with the basic situation. When a woman decides to come forward with knowledge and evidence of a crime, she is probably not going to spend a lot of time thinking about whether it's an election year.

Other than that, I really can't be bothered to sort out the soggy mess you spew. /shrug

Since I have given you a blow by blow account of why that does, in fact, have everything to do with your tiny portion of my argument, this is nothing but bullsh[red]it menstruation for the forums biggest ******.

Edited, Jun 22nd 2006 at 11:28am EDT by Molish

"I felt a great disturbance in the Force...as if a million Polish voices cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced."

Nice of you to take it on the chin, and the face and a little bit in the hair. You're such a trooper.

/andimspent

That’s it? Good god, no wonder your girlfriend left you. Sad, sad, sad....
A breakfast burrito takes longer then you.



So, what your trying to say is "/butthurt"

Got ya, my job here is done.

Edited, Jun 22nd 2006 at 11:54am EDT by Molish

My response to you was this: she is not setting the dangerous precedent. She is reporting a crime. She cannot be held accountable for the use of her situation by others intent on furthering their own agendas.

That is not a straw man. That is a simple fact.

Hey, I thought I saw some potential in the kid. *shrug*

Ok, in that context that is perfectly true.

But my argument was in the context of this case from the beginning. From that context, then your argument here falls apart. From what we've been spoon fed by the media so far, the "facts" are piling up against her. If it was to come out that she was nothing more then a gold diggin *****, then this will be a blow to women who are sexually assaulted. What could arise from it? New, Gbaji type laws? Nothing at all? I don't know. But I do worry. I worry for you and every other woman in this nation.

This slapfight is embarassingly bad.

Uh huh, yeah. We'd worry about you, too, if we thought you were man enough to be a threat.