Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Giant SushiFollow

#1 Jun 19 2006 at 7:16 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
So those wily Japanese (and Norwegians - how wierd an alliance is that? Ninja Vikings ftw) look set to reverse the moratorium on commercial Whaling.

We all know that for years the Japanese have been hunting whales for "Scientific Research" (e.g. how do you get a hundred ton aquatic mammal onto 5,000 dinner plates).

What's the fuss? Where are the "Herring Liberation Army?" When did you see Shrimps rescued from aquaria?

Stupid fu[Aqua][/Aqua]cking whales.

And did you know. . . the Whale is not a Fish?
It is, in fact, technically an insect
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#2 Jun 19 2006 at 7:26 AM Rating: Good
@#%^
*****
15,953 posts
Nuke The Whales!

...gotta nuke somethin'
____________________________
"I have lost my way
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"

#3 Jun 19 2006 at 7:28 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Nobby wrote:
So those wily Japanese (and Norwegians - how wierd an alliance is that? Ninja Vikings ftw) look set to reverse the moratorium on commercial Whaling.
It's not quite tha bad. The Japanese alliance has a 51% majority in their attempts but they need a 75% majority to actually end the moratorium.

At least, that's how I read it:
Quote:
A slim majority of nations on the International Whaling Commission voted Sunday in support of a resumption of commercial whaling, but pro-whaling nations still lack the numbers needed to overturn a 20-year-old ban.

The resolution, approved 33-32 with one abstention, declares that the moratorium on commercial whaling was meant to be temporary and is no longer needed.

But to reverse the ban imposed in 1986, another vote supported by 75 percent of the 70 IWC members would be required.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#4 Jun 19 2006 at 8:30 AM Rating: Decent
Why are whales insects?
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#5 Jun 19 2006 at 9:10 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
5,677 posts
I am in favor of any proposition resulting in the demise of Coddy...

#6 Jun 19 2006 at 9:15 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Fish seem like the easiest animal to eat. Why is that? I was watching "Madagascar" the other day, and when the lion is trying not to eat the zebra, the penguins teach him to eat sushi. He declares it "Better than steak". I suppose the Little Mermaid had a brief scene where they tried to make it horrid to eat fish ("Le poisson, le poisson..."), but it doesn't seem to resonate much.

#7 Jun 19 2006 at 9:29 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
I suppose the Little Mermaid had a brief scene where they tried to make it horrid to eat fish ("Le poisson, le poisson..."), but it doesn't seem to resonate much.
Finding Nemo didn't advocate fish eating!

But did anyone speak out about the krill? Nooooo.... no one cares about the krill and the big, krill-eating whale Smiley: mad
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#8 Jun 19 2006 at 9:35 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Its okay to eat fish
cause they dont have any feelings - Nirvana
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#9 Jun 19 2006 at 9:51 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Jophiel wrote:
But did anyone speak out about the krill? Nooooo.... no one cares about the krill and the big, krill-eating whale Smiley: mad
Dude, didn't you watch "Pinocchio"? Whales are scary ebil!
#10 Jun 19 2006 at 9:54 AM Rating: Decent
Clams have feelings too - NOFX
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#11 Jun 19 2006 at 10:07 AM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
O Oysters, come and walk with us!"
The Walrus did beseech.
"A pleasant walk, a pleasant talk,
Along the briny beach:
We cannot do with more than four,
To give a hand to each."

The eldest Oyster looked at him,
But never a word he said:
The eldest Oyster winked his eye,
And shook his heavy head--
Meaning to say he did not choose
To leave the oyster-bed.

But four young Oysters hurried up,
All eager for the treat:
Their coats were brushed, their faces washed,
Their shoes were clean and neat--
And this was odd, because, you know,
They hadn't any feet.

Four other Oysters followed them,
And yet another four;
And thick and fast they came at last,
And more, and more, and more--
All hopping through the frothy waves,
And scrambling to the shore.

The Walrus and the Carpenter
Walked on a mile or so,
And then they rested on a rock
Conveniently low:
And all the little Oysters stood
And waited in a row.

"The time has come," the Walrus said,
"To talk of many things:
Of shoes--and ships--and sealing-wax--
Of cabbages--and kings--
And why the sea is boiling hot--
And whether pigs have wings."

"But wait a bit," the Oysters cried,
"Before we have our chat;
For some of us are out of breath,
And all of us are fat!"
"No hurry!" said the Carpenter.
They thanked him much for that.

"A loaf of bread," the Walrus said,
"Is what we chiefly need:
Pepper and vinegar besides
Are very good indeed--
Now if you're ready, Oysters dear,
We can begin to feed."

"But not on us!" the Oysters cried,
Turning a little blue.
"After such kindness, that would be
A dismal thing to do!"
"The night is fine," the Walrus said.
"Do you admire the view?

"It was so kind of you to come!
And you are very nice!"
The Carpenter said nothing but
"Cut us another slice:
I wish you were not quite so deaf--
I've had to ask you twice!"

"It seems a shame," the Walrus said,
"To play them such a trick,
After we've brought them out so far,
And made them trot so quick!"
The Carpenter said nothing but
"The butter's spread too thick!"

"I weep for you," the Walrus said:
"I deeply sympathize."
With sobs and tears he sorted out
Those of the largest size,
Holding his pocket-handkerchief
Before his streaming eyes.

"O Oysters," said the Carpenter,
"You've had a pleasant run!
Shall we be trotting home again?'
But answer came there none--
And this was scarcely odd, because
They'd eaten every one.
#12 Jun 19 2006 at 10:18 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
Why are whales insects?


You know, six legs, body divided into head, thorax, abdomen. Oviparous sexual reproduction.

Pretty simple, really.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#13 Jun 19 2006 at 10:30 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Samira wrote:
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
Why are whales insects?


You know, six legs, body divided into head, thorax, abdomen. Oviparous sexual reproduction.

Pretty simple, really.
See? And they live on Bananas.

I can't take credit - a Classic Peter Cooke sketch from 1960 (recreated here in 1980 with John Cleese).
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 438 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (438)