Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Explaining French anti-americanism (an attempt to)Follow

#27 Jun 19 2006 at 9:48 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
It would just sort out their internal problems .. two languages


I once dated a girl from Belgium. She spoke both French and Flemish. She was teh hawt. Oh the memories. Smiley: inlove


#28 Jun 19 2006 at 9:53 AM Rating: Decent
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:

[gravelly voice]Ne me quitte pas
Il faut oublier
Oublier le temps
de malentendu[/gravelly voice]


/bow /clap /love

____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#29 Jun 19 2006 at 10:06 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:

[gravelly voice]Ne me quitte pas
Il faut oublier
Oublier le temps
de malentendu[/gravelly voice]


/bow /clap /love


"La Ville s'endormait" ftw.

Best song ever written in teh Fr3ncH
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#30 Jun 19 2006 at 10:15 AM Rating: Decent
Well, I gotta say I'm impressed by your collective knowledge of 7h3 fr3nch 50ng5.

no, really.

____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#31 Jun 19 2006 at 10:21 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
As well as the classics (Brel, Piaf, Aznavour etc.) I'm a huge fan of Calogero. His 3rd album's like a Froggy version of Coldplay meets Embrace with The Edge playing guitar.

Have most of Patrick Bruel, Anggun and Florent Pagny's stuff for easy listening.

And I still maintain the the world's best gangsta rap comes from France - IAM, Shurik'n, Akhenaton etc.

But I'd still rather listen to Katie taking a dump than listen to Johnny Halliday Smiley: oyvey
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#32 Jun 19 2006 at 10:33 AM Rating: Decent
It's been 20 years since I was in Europe. In general it seemed that at that time Americans were well received, espcially by those who lived through WWII. The exception seemed to be in German towns near an American military bases. I guess our soldiers weren't doing much to promote good will.

I got a chance to visit France and they were pretty friendly in the North, but Paris was a different story. I freind of my mother, who is French-Canadian, asked for directions in Paris (in fluent French) and the guy replies (in English) "I'm sorry Madam I do NOT speak English!" and walked away. Stinkin Parisians!
#33 Jun 19 2006 at 10:41 AM Rating: Decent
Nobby wrote:
As well as the classics (Brel, Piaf, Aznavour etc.) I'm a huge fan of Calogero. His 3rd album's like a Froggy version of Coldplay meets Embrace with The Edge playing guitar.

Have most of Patrick Bruel, Anggun and Florent Pagny's stuff for easy listening.

And I still maintain the the world's best gangsta rap comes from France - IAM, Shurik'n, Akhenaton etc.

But I'd still rather listen to Katie taking a dump than listen to Johnny Halliday Smiley: oyvey


******* hell... I thought no one outside France had ever heard of these people. I'm shocked.

Funny story (not really "funny" tbh) but Patrick Bruel's mum was my teacher in Paris when I was a 7 year-old. He was just beggining to be famous at that time, and once came into class cos he had forgotten his glasses at home, and came to pick them up from his mum. All the girls were besotted, and all the guys were like "Meh, he's not all that!".

As for Gansta rap, man I love IAM, and of course Akh is their coolest member. Another funny story (I'll stop now) is that my bro and I met them in New-York when they were recording "L'Ecole du Micro d'Argent". They invited us to the studio, and him to a club that evening (I was like 16, so couldnt go). So yeah,I smoked a joint with Akh and Shuriken in a NY recording studio.

Ever heard of NTM? Pretty cool too.

And yeah Johnny Halliday sucks, but he's Belgian! or Swiss, whatever...
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#34 Jun 19 2006 at 10:48 AM Rating: Decent
****
4,632 posts
I recall going to Madrid, Spain with a college group a day after the attacks on 3/11. (The day we left was the day the attacks occured, got there the day after)

Safe to say it was a fairly amazing experience, and sort of scary. There were signs and chants that were basically saying the equivalent of "We hate Americans".

Yet, we still met a share of amazing people that were perfectly nice and good to hang around with.

People don't necessarily share the same opinion, and you're a fool if you think they do. Damn the media, whatever it says.
#35 Jun 19 2006 at 10:54 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:

@#%^ing hell... I thought no one outside France had ever heard of these people.
I just soak up whatever's playing on the radio (usually NRJ or Skyrock) while footling around France, then nip into Carrefour and buy the albums from bands I like.

You know Patrick Bruel was in "When Harry Met Sally"? (He was Meg Ryan's love interest when she was in Paris)

RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
As for Gansta rap, man I love IAM, and of course Akh is their coolest member. Another funny story (I'll stop now) is that my bro and I met them in New-York when they were recording "L'Ecole du Micro d'Argent". They invited us to the studio, and him to a club that evening (I was like 16, so couldnt go). So yeah,I smoked a joint with Akh and Shuriken in a NY recording studio.
Flash *******. "Revoir un Printemps" is always in my car CD changer. (Apart from that shi[Aqua][/Aqua]tty track with Beyonce I still think it's their best.)

RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
Ever heard of NTM? Pretty cool too.
I have their 1st album ("Authentik"?) and "Paris sous les Bombes", but since Joey Starr turned into the king of sell-outs I've not listened to 'em much. I have some FF stuff and trying to get my head around Manau's music (but their celtic Breton sound does my head in)

Any other recommendations welcome.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#36 Jun 19 2006 at 11:20 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
****
5,677 posts
First, my thanks to the OP. Frankly, I'm starving for that kind of perspective on the U.S., and it's difficult to come by.

RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
But most of the reasonably-minded people of my generation don't hate America. They don't hate Americans. They just hate the current US administration. Mostly because it shattered all their youthful illusions of America being the Big Friendly Giant, slightly clumsy, but deep down doing good things for the world.


I just wanted to add that while I certainly appreciate the widespread opposition to W and his cronies, it's important to remember that he and his policies did not arise out of a vacuum. Don't forget that the Big Friendly (sleeping) Giant was unceremoniously *****-slapped out of its peaceful slumber by some rather nasty little terrorists.

So when looking for what's to blame for America's ****** foreign policies, don't forget to also point a finger at Osama et. al for making the Friendly Giant rather grumpy and looking for someone to stomp.
#37 Jun 19 2006 at 12:38 PM Rating: Decent
Nobby wrote:
I just soak up whatever's playing on the radio (usually NRJ or Skyrock) while footling around France, then nip into Carrefour and buy the albums from bands I like.

You know Patrick Bruel was in "When Harry Met Sally"? (He was Meg Ryan's love interest when she was in Paris)


******* hell, I just checked it on DVD and it's true!! Damn...

the dvd is my girlfriend's, ofc

Nobby wrote:
Flash *******. "Revoir un Printemps" is always in my car CD changer. (Apart from that shi[Aqua][/Aqua]tty track with Beyonce I still think it's their best.)


I really like some of it, but the one before (L'Ecole...) was such a "slap in the face" when it came out at the time that it has more emotional force for me. But both kick ***, undoubtedly.

Nobby wrote:
I have their 1st album ("Authentik"?) and "Paris sous les Bombes", but since Joey Starr turned into the king of sell-outs I've not listened to 'em much. I have some FF stuff and trying to get my head around Manau's music (but their celtic Breton sound does my head in)

Any other recommendations welcome.


NTM's "Back dans les back" and "J'appuie sur la gachette" are their best imo. And yeah, they are sell-outs for sure, but those albums were also kinda pioneering at the time. In France anyway.

FFF is cool too, but I'm not a big fan of Manau. Celtic traditional music and hip-hop just dont seem to mix very well. Who would've thought?

Other cool stuff, well "Saian Supa Crew" is quite amazing. Dont be fooled by their ****** name, they are brilliant. "KLR" and "X-raisons" are great. Give it listen before tho, its kind of an acquired taste.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#38 Jun 19 2006 at 12:45 PM Rating: Decent
Jawbox wrote:
I just wanted to add that while I certainly appreciate the widespread opposition to W and his cronies, it's important to remember that he and his policies did not arise out of a vacuum. Don't forget that the Big Friendly (sleeping) Giant was unceremoniously *****-slapped out of its peaceful slumber by some rather nasty little terrorists.

So when looking for what's to blame for America's sh*tty foreign policies, don't forget to also point a finger at Osama et. al for making the Friendly Giant rather grumpy and looking for someone to stomp.


Of course. And most Frenchies understand that. The headline of "Le Monde" on the 12th July 2001 was "Nous sommes tous Americains" (We are all Americans). The French helped in Afghanistan, and more or less everyone in France supported that.

Then came Iraq, and things went downhill from there. After that, well it becomes a question of foreign policy, and its a whole new debate. But I guess most French people think that 9/11 doesnt justify everything that followed. But thats a whole new can of worms. No one in Europe can understand fully the trauma that was 9/11, no matter how much we theorise it. Frenchies dont understand the extent to which it affected the American psyche.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#39 Jun 19 2006 at 1:53 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
So when looking for what's to blame for America's sh*tty foreign policies, don't forget to also point a finger at Osama et. al for making the Friendly Giant rather grumpy and looking for someone to stomp.
The thing is for the first six months after 9/11 all but the most rabid anti American APPROVED of G.W's actions, it seemed considered and appropriate, give that most of the British Military winced and ducked expecting a wayward nuke hitting London only to be greeted with a shrug and a "Blue on Blue" comment.

The problems came when Bush let Religion and capitalist greed (read oil) get in the way of good judgement and used the worst ever display of political spin to try and persude the West that Iraq was

A. Tied in with the whole "Axis of Evil" when in reality it was a tin pot dictatorship struglling to impose anything on it's own people let alone a superpower.

B. Stockpiling vast amounts of WMD aimed at the west and on a hair trigger, which was a blatent lie and even his own security agencies where telling him that is wasn't true.

In retrospect it may be for the good of the region but it will take 30-40 years for it to sort itself out where as if they had continued the isolation policy it would have been over and done with once the big cheese had kicked the bucket.

As an Englishman i see the french the way the Scottish see us, with open distain and hidden fondness, with Americans i often find myself shaking my head and wondering if the schooling really is that bad, but i can't help liking those i meet.



#40 Jun 19 2006 at 2:01 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,730 posts
Tarv wrote:
with Americans i often find myself shaking my head and wondering if the schooling really is that bad, but i can't help liking those i meet.


At least we know to capitalize our fecking 'I'. Otherwise I agree with you.
#41 Jun 19 2006 at 2:04 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Your remark would carry more weight if it wasn't for your insistance in missing the letter U from so many words. Smiley: tongue
#42 Jun 19 2006 at 2:05 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
tarv of the Seven Seas wrote:
Your remark would carry more weight if it wasn't for your insistance in missing the letter U from so many words. Smiley: tongue
WoUrd!
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#43 Jun 19 2006 at 4:54 PM Rating: Good
**
839 posts
Quote:
You could simplify it even more by saying that the views of those who've experienced other countries are less judgmental than those who rely on politicians and global media machines for their 'facts', or think that living on a Military Base overseas allows you to absorb the local psyche.


/Absolutely agree

After living in the UK for one and a half years and Germany for five years, my views on many subjects have been altered for the better. I relocated to follow employment opportunities and was able to live among the citizens, thereby avoiding the military base mentality.

Though my time overseas is over for the moment, it is absolutely not forgotten. I made good friends, met my wife, traveled to many additional places including France, and very importantly learned to see the USA through the eyes of other cultures. I would not trade those years for anything.

One of the interesting aspects of living abroad is feeling that sometimes people are the same everywhere, and other times noticing how diverse cultures truly are under the surface. As a Yank (Auslander), I had very few bad experiences with the native inhabitants. I did NOT experience anti-Americanism at all. Every country I visited had features to be admired and features that I could live without. If only the best features could be combined...

I was living in Germany (Cologne area) during 9-11, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Dubya's unfortunate reelection. The national outpouring of sympathy and support after 9-11 was amazing! The support was still there through Afghanistan. Iraq, on the other hand, was where the United States lost it. Many people were already skeptical of the whole WMD theory, and didn't see what Iraq had to do with Osama and terrorism. The unfolding of events was disheartening for me. It felt like the government had made a wrong turn and I was just along for the ride, powerless to do anything.

Then the election came and I thought surely we would be rid of Dubya and his cronies. I registered for the overseas vote and watched election polls like a hawk. There were many good natured comments from my German and Swedish colleagues about making sure I voted correctly. I cast my vote and waited for election day, hoping that Americans would wake up and rectify the leadership situation. Needless to say, the result was not satisfactory. To me, it was as if over 50 percent of the American population didn't have a clue! (beats head against wall)

Please note that I am normally independent and would vote for the best candidate. Also, I am not unpatriotic, and I do support the troops. They are risking their lives for our country, and though the cause may be misguided, they still have my gratitude.

In summary, after having lived abroad, I would recommend it for all, and wish it could be made mandatory. I realize that I was extremely lucky to be able to travel with my job, and many don't have that kind of opportunity. The people I met did not hate Americans. They didn't agree with much of our current political agenda, but Americans as individuals were treated well. (except for that tourist info woman in Calais - she was teh rude)

...That got really long - more like 3 or 4 cents.

#44 Jun 19 2006 at 5:48 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
tarv of the Seven Seas wrote:
In retrospect it may be for the good of the region but it will take 30-40 years for it to sort itself out where as if they had continued the isolation policy it would have been over and done with once the big cheese had kicked the bucket.


This totally depends on how Real Politik you want to approach the issue though.

Sure. Responding only to the attack and those directly responsible makes sense. However, sometimes noticing the cause of things and making changes to prevent them from re-occuring is important as well.

As long as the status quo was maintained in Iraq, the US would have troops stationed in Saudi Arabia enforcing the UN resolutions there. As long as we had western troops in Saudi Arabia, the Islamic fundamentalists would continue to see that as an afront to Islam and an impeachment of Saudi authority over the holy cities of Mecca and Medina, and would continue to conduct attacks to remove those troops.

Regardless of what you saw or heard or think, that's the *real* reason we needed to remove Saddam from power. The Republicans understood this back in the 90s, where the Democrats did not. Or perhaps did, but did not think that things would go so far as they did. They were wrong. 9/11 was the result. I think that given that, perhaps giving the Republicans a bit of latitude to try a different approach would be fair, right?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#45 Jun 19 2006 at 5:52 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
gbaji wrote:
I am the annoying bigoted type of Yank alluded to in this thread
Fu[Aqua][/Aqua]cking moran.

What a tiny, tiny view of the world you have.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#46 Jun 19 2006 at 5:57 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
tarv of the Seven Seas wrote:
Quote:
So when looking for what's to blame for America's sh*tty foreign policies, don't forget to also point a finger at Osama et. al for making the Friendly Giant rather grumpy and looking for someone to stomp.
The thing is for the first six months after 9/11 all but the most rabid anti American APPROVED of G.W's actions, it seemed considered and appropriate, give that most of the British Military winced and ducked expecting a wayward nuke hitting London only to be greeted with a shrug and a "Blue on Blue" comment.

Well I would certainly hope so. The Afghanistan campaign was actually a legitimate undertaking. Thanks for the help there btw.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#47 Jun 19 2006 at 6:36 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Nobby wrote:
gbaji wrote:
I am the annoying bigoted type of Yank alluded to in this thread
Fu[Aqua][/Aqua]cking moran.

What a tiny, tiny view of the world you have.


Ah. Yes. The view of the world that entangles the US in a situation that results in a massive terrorist attack is the "big view". Got it...


Can I ask you a question? Does your big, wide, worldview come with an assumption that your own viewpoint is the only one that's right, or did that cost extra? Am I the only one who sees the irony of namecalling someone about the narrowness of their views purely because their views aren't the same as your's?

Best to check that plank in your eye there Nobby. It's getting out of control...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#48 Jun 19 2006 at 6:57 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
gbaji wrote:
Ah. Yes. The view of the world that entangles the US in a situation that results in a massive terrorist attack is the "big view". Got it...
Read that back to yourself. Slowly. One word at a time.

There it is!


gbaji wrote:
Can I ask you a question? Does your big, wide, worldview come with an assumption that your own viewpoint is the only one that's right
Nope.
I see reasoned arguments from a number of perspectives. None, however have ever come from your posts.

All you spout is blinkered sound-bites that ignore any perspective other than a General Custer gung-ho approach to world affairs.

I know 12 year olds who propound more robust arguments than you. But you use many many, many words to mask your ignorance, lack of intellect and inability to explore any viewpoint other than what Fox News tells you.

You know, you embody the stereotype that makes non-Americans think that USA is the most dangerous state on the planet. The biggest kid in the schoolyard who's never been challenged, and relies on brute ignorance and stonewall arguments.

I was devastated by 9/11, as were all decent folks. But do you want to know something? Much of the rest of the world has put up with bombings of its civilians and found out the hard way that machine-gunning any apparent target makes things worse.

Thankfully, most Americans I know have more sense, and are utterly ashamed of scum like you.

Seriously. "If a woman hasn't been physically injured, she can't have been raped?" Says it all. What's worse is that your arguments about National Defense are more bizarre, immature and harmful than your mysogenistic rants about women.

I'm confident that your demise is imminent, probably at the hands of an intellectually superior domestic appliance.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#49 Jun 19 2006 at 7:15 PM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
Reason #174 for invading Iraq. This time, it's the *real* one!


So now, you're trying to appease Islamic fundamentalists by saying the US troops should withdraw from Saudi Arabia... by invading a Muslim country!

Hurray! I'm glad someone figured it out. Stupid democrats...

gbaji wrote:
However, sometimes noticing the cause of things and making changes to prevent them from re-occuring is important as well.


And that was gabji's moment of genius.

...

It's gone now.

The "cause" of Islamic terrorism is not that there are US troops in Saudi Arabia. Nor is it Chechnia. Nor even Palestine, or the Egyptian government, or the Saudi one. All these are excuses. Not causes.

The "cause" for Islamic Terrorism is a rotten ideology thats been allowed to spread itself through a combination of extreme poverty, lack of education, and oppressive regimes. Thats what causes people to lose themselves in a stupid, barbaric and middle-ages doctrine.


Don't get me wrong, I'm all for sorting out Palestine and Chechnia, and having Democratic governements in the Middle-East. We don't even need to invade them, just to stop subsidising them. Of course then, we might get lots of Islamic governemnts elected. But, thats democracy for you.

Edited, Jun 19th 2006 at 8:16pm EDT by RedPhoenixxxxxx
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#50 Jun 19 2006 at 9:59 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
So now, you're trying to appease Islamic fundamentalists by saying the US troops should withdraw from Saudi Arabia... by invading a Muslim country!


Um. They were already pissed off enough to fly airplanes into buildings. What part of that do you not get?

Moving from Saudi Arabia into Iraq shifts the issue from a global one to a regional one. Mujahadeen in Somalia don't care much about Iraq. Mujahadeen in Sudan don't care much about Iraq. Mujahadeen in Malasia don't care much about Iraq. They do care about western boots on Saudi soil. Every single one of them.

It's why 9/11 happened. Why do you think 75% of those who conducted the attacks were Saudi? Why do you think Bin Lauden (a saudi native) was the one planning it? Why do you think he was able to activate his network of freedom fighters worldwide to aid in attacking us?

Quote:
The "cause" of Islamic terrorism is not that there are US troops in Saudi Arabia. Nor is it Chechnia. Nor even Palestine, or the Egyptian government, or the Saudi one. All these are excuses. Not causes.


You are correct. Which is why there are various Islamic Terrorist groups scattered all over the world, each with their own agenda affecting different regions. It would take a major common cause to get them to actually join forces for something. That was US troops on Saudi soil. It is most definately *not* US toops on Iraqi soil. See the difference?

You're making a false argument. I'm not talking about Islamic Terrorism in general. I'm talking specifically about the 9/11 attacks. I'm talking specificaly about the succession of terrorism attacks coordinated around the globe by Al Qaeda. While Islamic Fundamentalism has many root causes, that specific set of attacks occured for one reason and one reason only: We had troops in Saudi Arabia. Period.


While it was a questionable policy to ignore this issue prior to 9/11, and I do hold Clinton responsible for the policies that resulted in that attack, I can understand why he made the decisions he made. He was balancing the damage an attack on Iraq would cause versus the damage that simply maintaining the UN sanctions was causing among fundamentalists like Bin Laden. Prior to 9/11, there's no sure way to know what will happen if we just keep doing what we're doing, but we *knew* that invading Iraq will cause problems. After 9/11 though, you now know what maintaining the status quo is doing. You know the level of violence that will result. At this point, you cannot allow the status quo in Iraq to continue unchanged. The cost is too high.


Look. Do any search on Bin Laden. Read *any* site that contains some kind of reasonable biography of him, and the terror network he built. Every single one I've run across agrees with what I'm saying. 9/11 occured because we had troops on Saudi soil. It's not exactly a huge leap of logic to conclude that since we have US troops on Saudi soil because we have to have them there to enforce UN sanctions in Iraq, that any effort to remove the cause of the 9/11 attacks must involve a change in status in Iraq. It's just not rocket science...

Edited, Jun 19th 2006 at 11:00pm EDT by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#51 Jun 20 2006 at 12:29 AM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
"I recall going to Madrid, Spain with a college group a day after the attacks on 3/11. (The day we left was the day the attacks occured, got there the day after)

Safe to say it was a fairly amazing experience, and sort of scary. There were signs and chants that were basically saying the equivalent of 'We hate Americans." --DodoBird

Niiiiice. Yeah, that's intelligent. Blame and hate up on the 'Mericans for Arab Muzzies bombing a train station. Considering their long lived problems with the Basques, I still stand amazed that the Spanish folded so quick in the face of adversity. Sangria swilling pu55ies.

Totem
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 368 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (368)