Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Reply To Thread

Explaining French anti-americanism (an attempt to)Follow

#1 Jun 19 2006 at 5:56 AM Rating: Excellent
First of all, this is a relatively serious post, so if you're looking for a stupid, badly written, incomprehensible post, look no further!

I was bored last night and started browsing forums on some well-repected French newspaper's website (Liberation). And I was schocked by how stupid people were on there. Not as stupid as here, granted, but they actually take themselves seriously. And I found a lot of posts that were quite, well, anti-american. And then I thought of the Alla people. And of how the US has been getting a lot stick since Bush got elected. And I know that you Americans pretend that you don't care if half of Europe hates you, but we all know that deep down inside you tough-skin-stiff-upper-lip-macho-jock exterior, you do have a soft side. A soft side, that cares.

So, i thought I would try to explain some of it, since it is quite a complex, diverse and relatively new phenomenon.

I'll start with my grand-dad.

He grew up during WWII, and his brother (17 at the time) was shot by the Germans a week before the armistice, because our family was in the resistance. My grand-dad hated the Germans. So much so that he forbid his daughter (my mum) from learning it at school as a second language. But he loved America and Americans. Eventough he was quite a hardcore leftist (almost a commy), he "excused" all the "bad stuff" America did (the Contras, Reagan, Vietnam, etc...) because he had such a strong emotional link with the Libération.

The generation after that (my parents), had this emotional link too, eventhough it was not as "personal", because slightly more distant.

And then it comes to my generation. We know, well, most of us, the history. But we don't have that strong "emotinal" link to it. Jut like you guys know we helped you during the War of Independence, but don't actually have an emotional link to it. It's History. But not personal history.

And so we arrive to anti-americanism today. Of which, there are different kinds:

- The hardcore leftist: France, and Europe, has a strong link with leftism, much more than in the US. In France, in Italy, in Spain, you still find people that think that Communism should've won, that it was a better system, and that regard Castro and Chavez as "heroes". These people find the American economic system greedy, superficial and unfair, and American society shallow and inegalitarian. These people are "hardcore" in their opinions, like gbaji. And, most likely, have never travalled outside France. They are blinded by an old ideology and an outdated outlook on the world, and nothign will change their mind. Good news is, they will die pretty soon. The young generation of "anti-globalisation people" will hopefully travel a bit, and are anyway more opposed to the economic system than to the country.

- The hardcore rightists: In teh long tradition of De Gaulle, these people still think that France is a superpower (cue laughs), and can do without the US. Eventhough they like the conomic system, they are jealous of America's position in the world, and feel "oppressed" by their "domination". Basically, they wish it was France. The good enws is that these are old values too, which are slowly dying. It takes a lot of mediation to still think France is an important country in the world.

- And then, you have my generation, stuck in the middle. 60% of the music I listen to is American. 80% of the films I see are Americans. I eat American brands, wear American clothes, use American expression, and love (some of) the US shows that make it here. I've been to the US three times (a week in New-York, a road trip from San Fran to Phoenix, and a two-week Basketball camp (The Dee Brown and Robert Parish camp) in Boston. I loved every minute of it, and thought the Americans were amazingly friendly and welcoming (though it was in the 90s, admitedly). Some were kinda silly (I was asked if we had TVs in France), but most were lovely people.

We grew up being told Americans were the "good guys", fighting for freedom against the nasty Russians. And most of us grew up looking up to the US. You only had to see how much Europeans loved Clinton, and how they defended him during the oral-sex-is-not-sex-gate.

And then came Bush. And thats were it all went wrong: the rise of the religious right, the war in Iraq, Guanta, Abu Graib, Halliburton, Donald "Old Europe" Rumsfeld, Kyoto, etc, etc... The media obviously had a field day reporting every minute story that somehow comforted the view that the US governemnt were a bunch of corrupted, big-business-loving, inhuman, religious fanatics. And we all know how easily propaganda spreads.

But most of the reasonably-minded people of my generation don't hate America. They don't hate Americans. They just hate the current US administration. Mostly because it shattered all their youthful illusions of America being the Big Friendly Giant, slightly clumsy, but deep down doing good things for the world.

But that's it. It's only a question of politics, and of media brainwashing. They dont see, or rather, they are not shown, "the other side" of America. And you can bet that when Bush (finally) goes, and a better administration comes in, all of this will fritter away.

And we will go back to the old sweety love-hate relationship, like the French have with English. We make fun of them, but deep down we like them.

A mate once asked me if I was gonna move to the US with my girlfriend, while we were talking about cool places to live. I asked him why the US, and he answered: "Because its exaclty the same as here. Except bigger!"

I think thats quite a good way to sum up how French people feel about America. A cousin thats bigger and can kick your *** easy, but wouldnt no matter how much you teased him. But when you're told that your cousin starts bullying people around, taking hard drugs, and acting like a nasty over-powered jock on steroids, its bound to hurt. You remeber the good times. And hope he'll get off the crack soon.

Anyway I was thinking about all this last night, and thought I'd write it down.

Next week, why Muslims hate America!
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#2 Jun 19 2006 at 6:30 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Superb post.

Double Nobby Rack tm

That fits with my experiences of France and USA (and to a great extent, UK).

You could simplify it even more by saying that the views of those who've experienced other countries are less judgmental than those who rely on politicians and global media machines for their 'facts', or think that living on a Military Base overseas allows you to absorb the local psyche.

You mention De Gaulle - In the 70s I met a number of Froggies who genuinely believed that USA and UK stood by while old Big Nose and La Resistance single-handedly defeated Hitler and saved the free world.

I've had this discussion over recent months in a number of bars and Cafes in France (OK, mostly Haute Normandie which seems to have a clearer social memory of June '44). Yes, there's a superficial thread of anti-Americanism, but on delving deeper, it all boils down to Bush & Rumsfeld. Whether it's the 20-something graduates or the 40-something blue collar workers, they all admit to an admiration for the USA as a nation and as people.

I do find that the view is different in the Black Banlieux of Paris & Rouen. There they hold Bush, Bliar and Chirac in equal contempt. The only people they seem to hate more are De Villepin and Sarkozy Smiley: wink

Just my 2 Euros.

I'll avoid pointing out that your post is grammatically better than 90% of the US posters, as that would be inflammatory, and you know how I detest conflict Smiley: sly
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#3 Jun 19 2006 at 6:43 AM Rating: Good
***
3,118 posts
Quote:
You could simplify it even more by saying that the views of those who've experienced other countries are less judgmental than those who rely on politicians and global media machines for their 'facts', or think that living on a Military Base overseas allows you to absorb the local psyche.

/nod

I've rarely been subject to anti-americanism in most of my travels. All the EU folk I've met have been very accommodating and nothing like what the media or stereotypes portray. Of course I've never been to Frahnce, though I assume that it's people are every bit as kind as everywhere else I've graced with my presence('cept Paris, I hear that place sucks).
#4 Jun 19 2006 at 6:48 AM Rating: Decent
Nobby wrote:
Superb post.

Double Nobby Rack tm


/blush

Nobby wrote:
That fits with my experiences of France and USA (and to a great extent, UK).

You could simplify it even more by saying that the views of those who've experienced other countries are less judgmental than those who rely on politicians and global media machines for their 'facts', or think that living on a Military Base overseas allows you to absorb the local psyche.


Completely. It's funny how people who have the strongest dislike for foreigners are those that have never been abroad. And you can't underestimate the power of the media in creating, instead of reporting, "public opinion".

Nobby wrote:
You mention De Gaulle - In the 70s I met a number of Froggies who genuinely believed that USA and UK stood by while old Big Nose and La Resistance single-handedly defeated Hitler and saved the free world.


Hehe. In the same vein, I talked to a few Swiss people who argued hand-on-heart that the reason Hitler didn't invade them during WWII was that he was scared of them, and their "civil army". Basically all Swiss people own a gun they get for doing military service (compulsory), and are allowed to use them if they get invaded. And they really think that Hitler was scared that his Panzers would be shot down by civilian Swiss hiding in the mountains with their 20-year-old gun. Heh.

Nobby wrote:
I've had this discussion over recent months in a number of bars and Cafes in France (OK, mostly Haute Normandie which seems to have a clearer social memory of June '44). Yes, there's a superficial thread of anti-Americanism, but on delving deeper, it all boils down to Bush & Rumsfeld. Whether it's the 20-something graduates or the 40-something blue collar workers, they all admit to an admiration for the USA as a nation and as people.

I do find that the view is different in the Black Banlieux of Paris & Rouen. There they hold Bush, Bliar and Chirac in equal contempt. The only people they seem to hate more are De Villepin and Sarkozy


Yeah, the banlieues are a bit more complex. But they feel so disaffected that they hate almost everything: They hate the "croissants" French, as we were called in other thread, they hate French politicians, they hate politics in general, but they also hate their country of origins since they are made to feel they dont really belong there. They hate the Saudi/Egyptian/Israeli governement, but they also hate the fundamentalists Islamics that made civil war in Algeria. They "hate" America, but are the biggest consumers of American good in France. All in all, they are just a bit lost, and pretty angry about it.

I think the "banlieue" problem is much worse than in the UK, but thats another topic all together.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#5 Jun 19 2006 at 7:39 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
And they really think that Hitler was scared that his Panzers would be shot down by civilian Swiss hiding in the mountains with their 20-year-old gun.
I can't speak for the Swiss you talked to but it's pretty commonly figured that Hitler didn't invade Switzerland partially because the effort and tie-up of troops to rout the Swiss holed up in their mountians just didn't make it practical. Sharp-shooting was (is?) a national sport in Switzerland at the time anyway so I'd assume many of them were better armed than a single rifle.

Now, of course, it also wasn't practical because the Swiss allowed Hitler to use their rail lines for transporting non-military goods and the whole banking situation. So it boiled down to "Why ruin a good thing just so I can take troops off the actual hostile front and tie them up chasing snipers in the Alps?"
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#6 Jun 19 2006 at 8:10 AM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
Now, of course, it also wasn't practical because the Swiss allowed Hitler to use their rail lines for transporting non-military goods and the whole banking situation. So it boiled down to "Why ruin a good thing just so I can take troops off the actual hostile front and tie them up chasing snipers in the Alps?"


Yeah. Switzerland acted as though it had been invaded anyway, so no point in wastin troops there.

Still, if there is one thing worst than losing WWII, surely it has to be staying "neutral". I mean, you're faced with the biggest evil the world has ever seen in, and... nope, we won't take a stance. Either way is good. Cashier is over there, thanks for queuing.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#7 Jun 19 2006 at 8:14 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,254 posts
Quote:
"Why ruin a good thing just so I can take troops off the actual hostile front and tie them up chasing snipers in the Alps?"


Is that like "Why would I tie up half of my resources in an attack on a country that is at least nominally an ally?".
#8 Jun 19 2006 at 8:38 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
As a Canadian, Americans are best viewed as your whiskey drunk friend that you brought to the party and you are constantly having to apologize for.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#9 Jun 19 2006 at 8:39 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Queen bodhisattva wrote:
As a Canadian, Americans are best viewed as your whiskey drunk friend that you brought to a party you weren't invited to in the first place, and you are constantly having to apologize for.
FTFY
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#10 Jun 19 2006 at 8:42 AM Rating: Decent
You gotta love our down-to-earth-friend-of-the-people politicans.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#11 Jun 19 2006 at 8:42 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
The thing about being Canadian is that you can sneak in and people don't even notice.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#12 Jun 19 2006 at 8:43 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Queen bodhisattva wrote:
The thing about being Canadian is that you can sneak in and people don't even care.
Call me Mr Fixer Smiley: grin
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#13 Jun 19 2006 at 8:43 AM Rating: Good
No mention of Canada. Huh.

Then I smite you with A French Erotic Film.
#14 Jun 19 2006 at 8:44 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,254 posts
Nobby wrote:
Queen bodhisattva wrote:
As a Canadian, Americans are best viewed as your whiskey drunk friend a Kennedy that you brought to a party you weren't invited to in the first place, and you are constantly having to apologize for.
FTFY
#15 Jun 19 2006 at 8:47 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
The US is our trading partner, our neighbour, our ally and our friend... and sometimes we'd like to give them such a smack!
Rick Mercer, "This Hour Has 22 Minutes"

Americans should never underestimate the constant pressure on Canada which the mere presence of the United States has produced. We're different people from you and we're different people because of you. Living next to you is in some ways like sleeping with an elephant. No matter how friendly and even-tempered is the beast, if I can call it that, one is effected by every twitch and grunt. It should not therefore be expected that this kind of nation, this Canada, should project itself as a mirror image of the United States.
Pierre Trudeau

Edited, Jun 19th 2006 at 9:48am EDT by bodhisattva
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#16 Jun 19 2006 at 9:06 AM Rating: Good
Queen bodhisattva wrote:
The US is our trading partner, our neighbour, our ally and our friend... and sometimes we'd like to give them such a smack!
Rick Mercer, "This Hour Has 22 Minutes"

Americans should never underestimate the constant pressure on Canada which the mere presence of the United States has produced. We're different people from you and we're different people because of you. Living next to you is in some ways like sleeping with an elephant. No matter how friendly and even-tempered is the beast, if I can call it that, one is effected by every twitch and grunt. It should not therefore be expected that this kind of nation, this Canada, should project itself as a mirror image of the United States.
Pierre Trudeau


Pierre Trudeau make a good point, but he seems to be a little too aquainted with the intracacies of sleeping with an elephant. I wonder if he got the lion's share of lube in cabinet.
#17 Jun 19 2006 at 9:09 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Why so ornery, tubs?
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#18 Jun 19 2006 at 9:10 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
Still, if there is one thing worst than losing WWII, surely it has to be staying "neutral".
Yeah, I know it was amazing how the United States jumped right into the war to rescue Poland. And the rest of Eastern Europe. And France. And China. And the Pacific Rim. Smiley: dubious

In any event, I'm fairly confident that the Allied pilots who used Switzerland as a crash site so they could be returned home with an "offical rebuke" for violating neutral airspace were grateful that Switzerland didn't declare itself as war and become held Axis territory. I'm not sure that putting your nation under the Axis thumb by declaring war when you're surrounded by Germany, Italy and Vichy France would have been a particularly noble move.

I'm not really defending Switzerland as a whole. For one thing, they had some shady dealings to be sure and, for another, I don't really give a rat's *** about Switzerland. But saying simply that they were a "nominal ally" or whatever is taking a pretty simplistic view.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#19 Jun 19 2006 at 9:14 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
Completely. It's funny how people who have the strongest dislike for foreigners are those that have never been abroad. And you can't underestimate the power of the media in creating, instead of reporting, "public opinion".


It's the same here. Since Americans on the whole don't travel outside the US very often except on business, it's hard to get people to think seriously about the concerns others might have about our motives, our interests and our capacity for misplaced action.

Hell, half the people on this board are convinced that Iraq was a third-world country before Desert Storm. Had they been there? No; and the ones who had were in the military for the most part.

But then people here tend to think Costa Rica is a third-world country, too. Canada? *Maybe* second-world. The UK? Grudgingly first-world, but we're still better because everyone's on the dole there.

Provincial attitudes + tremendous military and economic power = understandable fear and loathing, even from our allies.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#20 Jun 19 2006 at 9:15 AM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
Still, if there is one thing worst than losing WWII, surely it has to be staying "neutral".
Yeah, I know it was amazing how the United States jumped right into the war to rescue Poland. And the rest of Eastern Europe. And France. And China. And the Pacific Rim. Smiley: dubious


And the Russians too :)

Jophiel wrote:
In any event, I'm fairly confident that the Allied pilots who used Switzerland as a crash site so they could be returned home with an "offical rebuke" for violating neutral airspace were grateful that Switzerland didn't declare itself as war and become held Axis territory.


True.

Jophiel wrote:
I'm not sure that putting your nation under the Axis thumb by declaring war when you're surrounded by Germany, Italy and Vichy France would have been a particularly noble move.


It would have extremely noble. But completely suicidal and retarded.

Quote:
I'm not really defending Switzerland as a whole. For one thing, they had some shady dealings to be sure and, for another, I don't really give a rat's *** about Switzerland.


No one does. That's why I'm petioning that we just cut it up in three, and give the French bit to France, the Italian bit to Italy, and the German bit to Germany. And then we can do the same with Belgium.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#21 Jun 19 2006 at 9:17 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
You really want Belgium? Can't you just steal their chocolate and call it a day?
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#22 Jun 19 2006 at 9:22 AM Rating: Decent
Samira wrote:
You really want Belgium? Can't you just steal their chocolate and call it a day?


Not really. It would just sort out their internal problems (two languages, two people, two administrative centres, and they all hate each other), and it would be one less country to learn when doing States of the EU (poor kids got 25 now, we only had 12 when I was at school \o/).

Apart from that, we steal all their best stuff anyway: french fries, mussels, Tintin, Asterix, Johnny Halliday, Jacques Brel...
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#23 Jun 19 2006 at 9:26 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Just to add to the OP.

A serious point:

If you travel through other countries being loud, opinionated, boastful and intolerant of local customs and manners, you will be perceived as an cu[Aqua][/Aqua]nt.

Very few Americans I know behave that way, but when I do see that behavioUr here or in continental Europe, it's the annoying, shouty yanks who think the hatred is for being American, when it's simply because they're behaving like **********

These are also the same minority that spam the media with tales of European xenophobia and ingratitude.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#24 Jun 19 2006 at 9:26 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
Samira wrote:
You really want Belgium? Can't you just steal their chocolate and call it a day?


Not really. It would just sort out their internal problems (two languages, two people, two administrative centres, and they all hate each other)


Pu[Aqua][/Aqua]sses.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#25 Jun 19 2006 at 9:44 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
Jacques Brel...

[gravelly voice]Ne me quitte pas
Il faut oublier
Oublier le temps
de malentendu[/gravelly voice]
#26 Jun 19 2006 at 9:46 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
[quote=Nobby]Very few Americans I know behave that way, but when I do see that behavioUr here or in continental Europe, it's the annoying, shouty yanks who think the hatred is for being American, when it's simply because they're behaving like ******************
All the Americans I see trekking through Peru usually seem very pissed off and angry about their surroundings, only want to speak English and treat all the locals like children. In contrast, the Euros all walk around dirty, with a backpack they bought in Cuzco, and are the friendliest bastards ever, butchering Spanish and Quechua alike and making themselves pretty well-liked.

Then again, we're third-world.
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 356 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (356)