Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Exactly where do think you're going?Follow

#27 Jun 15 2006 at 10:43 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
10,802 posts
The One and Only Katie wrote:
I'm of the "pull off the main road and find the nearest mall to shop at until traffic dies down" camp.


Smiley: laugh /ditto When I used to live in San Diego, I worked in downtown right on C Street, I'd hit Horton Plaza for about an hour to let the traffic die. Then I'd mosey my way up to Fashion Valley, grab a bite to eat there for about 30 minutes. Then I'd head home.
#28 Jun 15 2006 at 10:47 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
This happened to me today, and I found that my knee-jerk reaction includes gving the standard italian gathered "WTF" hand, and calling them whores.
#29 Jun 15 2006 at 12:18 PM Rating: Good
***
3,118 posts
Quote:
Actually, Joph, groups of dudes in one of those Harley-ish biker clubs* typically seem to drive their bikes a little more smoothly and not as crazy.
Around here those are the only sort of bike clubs we have. They do, in fact, lumber along at a rather smooth and fluid pace. Often times you'll see them continue on right past red-light, stop signs, and various intersections in a long stream of bikes and leather, completely disregarding other traffic. Seems to be a very popular activity on Sundays for some reason. You'll literally see 100+ bikes at a time on busy days.
#30 Jun 15 2006 at 12:29 PM Rating: Good
Jacobsdeception the Sly wrote:
Quote:
Actually, Joph, groups of dudes in one of those Harley-ish biker clubs* typically seem to drive their bikes a little more smoothly and not as crazy.
Around here those are the only sort of bike clubs we have. They do, in fact, lumber along at a rather smooth and fluid pace. Often times you'll see them continue on right past red-light, stop signs, and various intersections in a long stream of bikes and leather, completely disregarding other traffic. Seems to be a very popular activity on Sundays for some reason. You'll literally see 100+ bikes at a time on busy days.
They do not disregard traffic in most cases JD. There is a reason why it appears they are:

Safety for the bikers in pack riding works like this:

Say there is a green light ahead at an intersection. If it is a busy intersection 2 bikers (usually the tail gunners) will fly up and block the intersection on the right and left sides with their bikes. Then, the pack will proceed as a unit through the intersection regardless of the colour of the light until the whole pack is through, then the blockers will pickup the tail end, and usually wave thanks to the waiting traffic.

If the light is red, then the pack will stop completely, wait for the light to turn and for the blockers to be in place. They will then procee

d. If the pack is smaller and they are at an intersection that is not so busy, the same process as above is followed, less the blockers. If the pack comes to a stop sign, then the whole pack will stop, wave any cars through (on a 4 way stop), then when the decision is made to continue, blockers are in place and the pack proceeds.

All of this holds true with huge organized rides as well, with the exception that the blockers are police bikes instead of regular bikers. If you followed a pack, you would also notice that there are hand signals that travel through the whole pack as well, such as in the case of if a person is walking down the side of the road, or there is a cyclist, the pack will change from the staggared formation to a single line to pass this person safely.

People get pissed off that they have to wait for bike packs, but they usually have no concept of why certian things are done. The next time you are stopped by a pack of bikes, look at it as a no-charge bike parade.

Here is a link describing the rules of pack riding and all the hand signals pack riders use, to give you a better idea.
#31 Jun 15 2006 at 12:38 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Elderon the Wise wrote:
Say there is a green light ahead at an intersection. If it is a busy intersection 2 bikers (usually the tail gunners) will fly up and block the intersection on the right and left sides with their bikes. Then, the pack will proceed as a unit through the intersection regardless of the colour of the light until the whole pack is through, then the blockers will pickup the tail end, and usually wave thanks to the waiting traffic.
[...]
People get pissed off that they have to wait for bike packs, but they usually have no concept of why certian things are done.
Or care. If being with your pack is so important to you, pull off the road and wait if folks get left behind at the light. The only vehicles I see as having a valid reason to ignore traffic signals and make people wait on them are emergency vehicles and funeral processions. "Bike parades" don't count as either.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#32 Jun 15 2006 at 12:49 PM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
Or care. If being with your pack is so important to you, pull off the road and wait if folks get left behind at the light. The only vehicles I see as having a valid reason to ignore traffic signals and make people wait on them are emergency vehicles and funeral processions. "Bike parades" don't count as either.
The police and traffic departments beg to differ. Motorist safety is more important than your's or anyone's schedule. The people in the back of the pack do not have the training to know how to lead the group behind them safely, and pulling over 50 bikes to wait for the other half of the pack would cause a bigger traffic jam than simply stopping traffic for an extra light.

Motorcyclists know that riding in a group is safer than riding alone since there is less chance to get squashed from not being seen by those idiots who drive their cars while making coffee, playing PSP, reading a map and chatting on the phone.

If it really bothers you, try talking to your local or state PD and see what they have to say. Even better, try cutting in while honking, etc. If there happens to be a cop around, YOU will be charged with dangerous driving. If there isn't a cop around, you best be driving a car you don't care much about. Smiley: lol
#33 Jun 15 2006 at 12:57 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Elderon the Wise wrote:
Even better, try cutting in while honking, etc. If there happens to be a cop around, YOU will be charged with dangerous driving. If there isn't a cop around, you best be driving a car you don't care much about. Smiley: lol
Huh. Well, if the idea of a bunch of dudes beating up my car because I'm annoyed that they need special privledges to cruise around in "the pack" doesn't foster goodwill, I can't imagine anything else that would. Smiley: dubious
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#34 Jun 15 2006 at 1:01 PM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
Elderon the Wise wrote:
Even better, try cutting in while honking, etc. If there happens to be a cop around, YOU will be charged with dangerous driving. If there isn't a cop around, you best be driving a car you don't care much about. Smiley: lol
Huh. Well, if the idea of a bunch of dudes beating up my car because I'm annoyed that they need special privledges to cruise around in "the pack" doesn't foster goodwill, I can't imagine anything else that would. Smiley: dubious
Nope, they would beat your car or you for putting their lives in danger. Nothing to do with "wanting to ride with a pack".

Aside from that, do you get angry at police who escort groups or oversized vehicles through town and either hold up or redirect traffic for that purpose? Do you get angry at the guy who holds the sign at a construction site making you slow down or stop? This is no different.

Jophiel, I hope you are trying to play devil's advocate because otherwise I'll be very disappointed with your ignorance and arrogance. People's lives are more important than anything you have cited.



Edited, Jun 15th 2006 at 2:02pm EDT by Elderon
#35 Jun 15 2006 at 1:15 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Elderon the Wise wrote:
Nope, they would beat your car or you for putting their lives in danger. Nothing to do with "wanting to ride with a pack".
You were the one who recommended me responding by honking and driving into the procession. I started this little chapter by saying that motorcyclists annoyed me because their erratic driving habits required far more caution from me to avoid injuring them.
Quote:
Aside from that, do you get angry at police who escort groups or oversized vehicles through town and either hold up or redirect traffic for that purpose? Do you get angry at the guy who holds the sign at a construction site making you slow down or stop? This is no different.
You mean aside from the fact that oversized construction vehicles and road crews are up to something more productive than a leisure activity? To put it more into perspective, I'd feel exactly the same if traffic was being held up by a procession of antique cars out on a cruise.
Quote:
People's lives are more important than anything you have cited.
I never advocated trying to put their lives in danger, either. Again, I started by mentioning the additional measures one has to put into caution around bike riders. I didn't say "I don't care if I run them down or not" I said that I would feel rightfully annoyed to be held up by a bunch of guys demanding special privledges for a recreational activity out on the public streets.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#36 Jun 15 2006 at 1:18 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I'll also mention that I'm speaking in the hypothetical (so I assume I am playing DA in a sense) given that I've never actually been held up by a mob of cycles.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#37 Jun 15 2006 at 1:19 PM Rating: Default
A couple weeks ago I was driving down the road and someone passed me and flipped me off, so I flipped him off. When we got to a red light he pulled up next to me and said something I didn't hear, so I was like "lol" And then he pulled over, jumped out of his truck and tried to fight me. He was at least 50 and his right arm was in a cast, so I was like "lol" again.



What was that about coitus?
#38 Jun 15 2006 at 1:28 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
A couple of days ago, two teens girls died on a street here in Chicago. One of the interpreters is dating a CPD officer, and he told her that 4 kids had been speeding around in a new black Lexus, and stopped at an intersection revving the engine and calling out, showing off. When a car pulled up next to them, they were "checked" by a local gang, the Latin Kings. When they failed to throw up the appropriate gang sign, the Kings chased their car to shoot them (apparently standard on the South Side), and they swerved into a light pole while trying to get away. The two boys were wearing their seat belts, and the two girls were not. Both were flung through the air into the street, and died on impact upon hitting the pavement. Their bodies were left on the road until later that night, almost three hours after the accident because they couldn't localize the parents for proper ID.

People that drive aggressively are di[/Bisque]cks who don't know what they're getting themselves into. You can't think that all you'll get is the finger. There are some crazy fu[Bisque]cks out there.
#39 Jun 15 2006 at 1:29 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
I never advocated trying to put their lives in danger, either. Again, I started by mentioning the additional measures one has to put into caution around bike riders. I didn't say "I don't care if I run them down or not"
Good to hear it. It was a hypothetical situation anyway based on what I have seen other "irritated" motorists try in the past. Not pretty.

Quote:
I said that I would feel rightfully annoyed to be held up by a bunch of guys demanding special privledges for a recreational activity out on the public streets.


1) Be annoyed at the triathalons that block off portions of city streets
2) Be annoyed at cyclist races
3) Be annoyed at festivals that cordon off 5 city blocks for weeks at a time.

The fact is that there are many LEISURE activites that occur on PUBLIC streets. PUBLIC meaning everyone gets equal access to them, and in the case of motorcycling, very small areas are blocked off for very short periods of time. You have the same right as a citizen to get public streets blocked for LEISURE activities as the next citizen. Permits are only required in the case of long closures, and police are suggested in cases where there are very large numbers of people's safety involved. Remember that police officers are just regular people too, they do not have some magic wand that makes them any better at blocking traffic than the experienced ride leaders for a bike pack. In the case of the club I ride with, our chapter has the Canadian equivilent of a "State Trooper" as a member, so technically, we could stop you for 10 mins at an intersection and you wouldn't have a leg to stand on.

The point is, it all boils down to you don't like waiting for bikers because you do not see motorcycling as a valid recreational activity and bikers and equal citizens with the same rights you do. You are not alone in this ignorance, as there are many people who just do not get it. A cycling race stopping traffic is fine because you deem it "acceptable" in your personal opinion book, yet those bad biker guys are a bane to society! A bane!

Welcome to 1930.
#40 Jun 15 2006 at 1:34 PM Rating: Default
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
A couple of days ago, two teens girls died on a street here in Chicago. One of the interpreters is dating a CPD officer, and he told her that 4 kids had been speeding around in a new black Lexus, and stopped at an intersection revving the engine and calling out, showing off. When a car pulled up next to them, they were "checked" by a local gang, the Latin Kings. When they failed to throw up the appropriate gang sign, the Kings chased their car to shoot them (apparently standard on the South Side), and they swerved into a light pole while trying to get away. The two boys were wearing their seat belts, and the two girls were not. Both were flung through the air into the street, and died on impact upon hitting the pavement. Their bodies were left on the road until later that night, almost three hours after the accident because they couldn't localize the parents for proper ID.

People that drive aggressively are di[/Bisque]cks who don't know what they're getting themselves into. You can't think that all you'll get is the finger. There are some crazy fu[Bisque]cks out there.


Deport all of the hispanics imo.
#41 Jun 15 2006 at 1:36 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Elderon the Wise wrote:
1) Be annoyed at the triathalons that block off portions of city streets
2) Be annoyed at cyclist races
3) Be annoyed at festivals that cordon off 5 city blocks for weeks at a time.
I am Smiley: grin
Quote:
The point is, it all boils down to you don't like waiting for bikers because you do not see motorcycling as a valid recreational activity and bikers and equal citizens with the same rights you do.
The same rights as me would involve them taking a stop sign one at a time and yielding to other traffic. Like I do in my car.
Quote:
A cycling race stopping traffic is fine because you deem it "acceptable" in your personal opinion book, yet those bad biker guys are a bane to society! A bane!
No, I just said the cyclists would annoy me as well. Even more so if they didn't have a scheduled event with noted street closing and instead just traveled in a pack and had their cycling buddies block off interesections.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#42 Jun 15 2006 at 1:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Jophiel wrote:
Elderon the Wise wrote:
1) Be annoyed at the triathalons that block off portions of city streets
2) Be annoyed at cyclist races
3) Be annoyed at festivals that cordon off 5 city blocks for weeks at a time.
I am Smiley: grin


Good, at least you are not a prejudiced biggot! Smiley: grin

Quote:
Even more so if they didn't have a scheduled event with noted street closing and instead just traveled in a pack and had their cycling buddies block off interesections.
This actually happens quite often in areas heavy in cyclist enthusiasts. In my area, those cyclists are blocking off streets every weekend, and also occasionally employ motorcyclists to block roads so that they can keep their momentum.

Jophiel wrote:
Quote:
The point is, it all boils down to you don't like waiting for bikers because you do not see motorcycling as a valid recreational activity and bikers and equal citizens with the same rights you do.
The same rights as me would involve them taking a stop sign one at a time and yielding to other traffic. Like I do in my car.
Groups of 2 bikes and singles heed those rules just like any motor vehicle, at least they should be. As the group gets larger, it's now classified as a recreational activity that requires special saftey measures not covered by regular traffic signalling. If you want to get super technical and **** about it, this requires a police escort of 1 police motorcycle. Since this is not economical in most cases, the power is deligated to the organization's Officers (of which my chapter has 4 whom are always present on group rides).


In summary, I'm glad that you hate everyone equally and I've clearly explained the difference between the safety of recreational road use vs. regular traffic road use and the biggotry faced by bikers who like to partake in the sport. I've decided that you do not have a clear argumentative platform other than the "I don't like my roads being used by anything but regular road traffic!", to which I say, ha ha, too fuc[Aquamarine][/Aquamarine]king bad, chin up, best foot forward an all that. Smiley: wink2
#43 Jun 15 2006 at 1:53 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Elderon the Wise wrote:
I've decided that you do not have a clear argumentative platform other than the "I don't like my roads being used by anything but regular road traffic!"
Well, duh!

I'm not paying highway taxes for the benefit of a bunch of tattooed beer-bellied long-hairs to go blocking my access to the video store! Smiley: motz
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#44 Jun 15 2006 at 1:55 PM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
Elderon the Wise wrote:
I've decided that you do not have a clear argumentative platform other than the "I don't like my roads being used by anything but regular road traffic!"
Well, duh!

I'm not paying highway taxes for the benefit of a bunch of tattooed beer-bellied long-hairs to go blocking my access to the video store! Smiley: motz
I resemble that remark! Smiley: mad
#45 Jun 15 2006 at 2:10 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Can I just say that this thread suddenly cracked me up as quintessential Asylum? A couple users get bored, fu[/Aqua]ck each other's sh[Aqua]it up for a while and then settle back down. If this exchange ever gets brought up again it'll probably be in the form of a ribbing when I call Elderon a tattooed, beer bellied long-hair.

If either of us had been a non-Asylumite, the exchange would have ended with claims of elitism brought on by post-counts and other peacock like displays of retardery. This place rocks sometimes Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#46 Jun 15 2006 at 2:18 PM Rating: Good
**
811 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Elderon the Wise wrote:
I've decided that you do not have a clear argumentative platform other than the "I don't like my roads being used by anything but regular road traffic!"
Well, duh!

I'm not paying highway taxes for the benefit of a bunch of tattooed beer-bellied long-hairs to go blocking my access to the video store!


You can always stay hopeful that they won't be wearing helmets.
#47 Jun 15 2006 at 2:19 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Jophiel wrote:
retardery

Good thing I'm not a n00b, or I'd make fun of you making up words.
#48 Jun 15 2006 at 2:19 PM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
If either of us had been a non-Asylumite
Jophiel wrote:
claims of elitism
Smiley: lol The irony.
#49 Jun 15 2006 at 2:21 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Good thing I'm not a n00b, or I'd make fun of you making up words.
It's a perfectly cromulent word...
Elderon wrote:
The irony.
I wear it like a badge, hombre.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#50 Jun 15 2006 at 2:25 PM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
Elderon wrote:
The irony.
I wear it like a badge, hombre.
I just wear the shirt.


Edit: Time for a new tard me thinks.



Edited, Jun 15th 2006 at 3:30pm EDT by Elderon
#51 Jun 15 2006 at 4:35 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Quote:
I could never understand the really huge rush. Maybe if I was the sole car standing inbetween traffic and liberty I'd understand, but sorry. If I see nothing but bumper to bumper taffic infront of me, I'm not touching my accelerator unless my car feels ****** and doesn't want to start moving by letting go of my breaks alone.

That's exactly what I was doing. Simply coasting at idle velocity will save lots of gas and brake wear, and is a generally more pleasant driving experience (especially for your passengers.)


But I have a special place in my heart for people who get angry for absolutely petty reasons. Working at a video store will do that.


Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 222 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (222)