porps wrote:
what im trying to point out is that THIS particular post did not mention drug addiction in any way. It mentioned, drugs and the use of drugs yes. I didnt see him talk about his cravings for his next fix or how he had to beat some old lady up in the street to pay for his acid. What i do see is presumptious narrow minded people who cannot accept that other people lead different lifestyles and have different opinions to themselves. What i see is people who have made their mind up that 'drugs are baaad mmmmkay' yet the only argument they have to support this statement is '@#%^ off'. If however you know this person in real life, or he has freely admitted that he is a drug addict in his previous posts then i retract my first post.
No, i didnt come here for a battle of wits, i thought i made that perfectly clear when i said 'i didnt come here to engage in a battle of wits'. Perhaps i should have phrased it '..particuarly with an unarmed opponent' but i wasnt sure you would be able to understand a word as long as particuarly, and did not want to confuse you in case you replied with another swear word or insult. Really, i dont think i can handle that, i was deeply, deeply hurt by your last remarks.
Well my little love-muffin.
I could have pointed out that AH's spew of posts about near-OD experience and wild boasts about having consumed enough hallucinogens to fell a herd of Elephants gives us an insight into his puerile addictive behavio
Ur.
I could have politely suggested you spend more time reading historical threads to understand the context, personal dynamics and petty vendetti that keep the wheels of Forum=4 turning.
I could even have suggested that you keep a low profile until you understand the mind-set and Rules of Engagement of "we".
I could have suggested that you take your Fist out of your mother's ****** and replace it with rusty razor-wire while choking on your Dad's gonhorroeic phallus.
You waltz into a room that has a sign on the door that reads "Not for the Faint of Heart" with no armo
Ur, and no weaponry whatever (A significant ******* of intellect, wit and/or violent anger are pre-requisite). You then wonder why you are treated like an ant in my Earl-Grey.
So in hindsight, given your naïveté, lack of spatial awareness and (frankly) disappointing inability to make a point. . .
Fu
[/Aqua]ck Off, cu[Aqua]nt.