Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

So Big Ben Roethlisberger was in a motorcycle accidentFollow

#1 Jun 13 2006 at 5:13 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
I've been watching with interest how the sports world is treating this story. There seems to be a general agreement that a sports star like BR should have been wearing a helmet, and that he has a responsibility to the team due to his value. When I heard that argument, my thought was that becasue he is wealthy he'd be a prime candidate to be allowed to drive a motorsicle san brain bucket. Why? Because unlike a poor Hell's Angel, Roethlisberger has the money and insurance to cover the medical expenses should he have been left a vegitable.

It's the poor who need to be covered in bubble wrap and let out to play only in rubber rooms with no sharp edges since we as a society have to pay for their stupidity. But a rich dude can afford all the costs that a helmet-less existence can charge, thus he should be free to do as he wills.

Any disagreements with my conclusion?

Totem
#2 Jun 13 2006 at 5:21 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Btw, I got my new Suzi Gixxer 1k up to 150 mph yesterday, but had to stop there since the engine isn't completely broken in yet. I'm limited to 10,000 rpm for another 200 miles, but when I do, hoo-boy! 3,500 more rpm to use!

Things go by very quickly at 150. Very quickly. And no, I never claimed to be smart or sane.

Totem
#3 Jun 13 2006 at 5:24 PM Rating: Good
***
2,196 posts
Just be sure to post your road rash pics when you wiiiiiiiiipe outtttttttttt!! Smiley: yikes
____________________________
'Lo, there do I see, the line of my people, back to the beginning, 'lo do they call to me, they bid me take my place among them, in the halls of Valhalla, where the brave...may live...forever.

X-Box 360 Gamer Tag - Smogster
#4 Jun 13 2006 at 5:25 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
It's the poor who need to be covered in bubble wrap and let out to play only in rubber rooms with no sharp edges since we as a society have to pay for their stupidity. But a rich dude can afford all the costs that a helmet-less existence can charge, thus he should be free to do as he wills.


/agree
#5 Jun 13 2006 at 5:33 PM Rating: Good
I get your point, but I get theirs too. You see, these people are under contract by a company and it is in the company's best interest that if they are going to do something dangerous (ex: like riding a motorcycle) they atleast do it as safe as possible (with a helmit).

Movie studio's will actually put clauses in their actors contracts that forbid them from riding motorcyles during a shoot. I don't think the NFL is that strict, however.

However, I'm a firm believer in natural selection. If you ride in a car without a seatbelt, or if you ride a motorcycle without a helmit, and suffer an injury that could have been permited had you chosen to do so: you're retarded.

Regardless of how much money you have.

And if you're a young quarterback, in the prime of his career, just won a superbowl, and you get in a motorcyle accident without a helmit on. Well, that's a tradgedy. Albeit, a retarded one.

____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#6 Jun 13 2006 at 6:25 PM Rating: Decent
**
703 posts
What I don't understand is you can ride a motorcycle with no helmet with all kinds of bugs and debris flying around not to mention no protection what-so-ever if you hit something or get hit, but, while driving my car or riding in a car, surrounded by metal frames, bumpers, air bags etc, I am required by law to strap myself to it. I'll agree that seat belts save lives, but don't helmets, too?
#7 Jun 13 2006 at 6:28 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
GamingMaven wrote:
don't helmets, too?


Not always. My dad was wearing a helmet and he died anyway.
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#8 Jun 13 2006 at 6:34 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Princess Tare wrote:
GamingMaven wrote:
don't helmets, too?


Not always. My dad was wearing a helmet and he died anyway.

Smiley: frown

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#9 Jun 13 2006 at 6:37 PM Rating: Decent
**
703 posts
Princess Tare wrote:
GamingMaven wrote:
don't helmets, too?


Not always. My dad was wearing a helmet and he died anyway.


Ohh, so very sorry, Tare. /comfort
#10 Jun 13 2006 at 7:05 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
****
5,677 posts
If you were forced to wear a helmet at work all day, would you want to wear one in your free time?


#11 Jun 13 2006 at 7:05 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,453 posts
While I don't advocate riding without a helmet, I don't dispute his right to do so. As a highly paid athelete, I'm surprised his contract didn't have some stipulation regarding his riding - I guess if its not a guaranteed contract they don't have as much leverage in that area.

Still, you have to be something of a muttonhead to ride without a helmet.

As a side note, I've had my VFR up to 150 many times. But that's about all she'll do. My DRZ400SM however tops out around 95, and while that's considerably slower than 150, the front end becomes so twitchy at that speed that its a MUCH more nerve-wracking experience.

Irrelevant side note: A buddy of mine hit a deer on his Vmax, while on the far side of 130. Cut it right in half. Bent his forks and mangled various bits and pieces of his front end, but didn't crash.

#12 Jun 13 2006 at 11:34 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Things go by very quickly at 150.


I enjoy the road narrowing sensation, myself. The rain really hurts though.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#13 Jun 14 2006 at 12:14 AM Rating: Good
The faster you go, the smaller you get.

Fact.



(Ask Einstien)
#14 Jun 14 2006 at 3:32 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Back in the 70s I was a member of the UK Motorcycle Action Group (MAG) and vehemently protested against the proposed law making a helmet compulsory.

Our slogan was "Helmets Yes, Compulsion No". We lost. The law came in.

My view has softened with the sight of countless (mostly) teenagers exteriorising their medullary cortex across Her Majesty's highways. They're 18 or 19 and know themselves to be invincible. Until, that is, they get over-enthusiastic with their right-wrist, or (more often) some old duffer pulls out into their path.

No, they aren't a panacea (sorry to hear that Tare), but given the number of fatal incidents that would otherwise be merely embarassing, I can understand the reasoning behind the law.

That said, I prefer education to legislation, and don't like personal choices to be over-ridden by some **** of a politician.

I suppose my over-riding view is that Darwin's applies (take the warning labels of stuff and make the world a better place), and anyway, this guy plays 'catch' for a living. Pfft.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#15 Jun 14 2006 at 6:28 AM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Back in the 70s I was a member of the UK Motorcycle Action Group (MAG) and vehemently protested against the proposed law making a helmet compulsory.


I was learning how to walk and poo in containers.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#16 Jun 14 2006 at 6:30 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Smasharoo wrote:


I was learning how to walk and poo in containers.
Don't worry - you'll get the hang of it eventually.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#17 Jun 14 2006 at 9:05 AM Rating: Decent
****
4,575 posts

it doesn't seem related to how rich or poor you are. some people will just be dumb regardless.

we all sit here and think how much our life would be better with more money, yet we hear all the stories about the rich celebrities getting drunk, doing drugs, ending up in rehab, ruining their career.

i heard he lost all his teeth. so at age 24, prime of his life, he has no teeth. his bones will heal and he'll play ball again, but hopefully his false teeth will be a constant reminder of a decision he made one day that he didn't have to make.

it's true what he said, you can get injured in a car or even walking down the street. but given that his team mates, other sports celebrities, all chastised him for getting this motorcycle at such an important time in his career, it just seems like what they said came true.

now in his defense, someone hit him while he was going the speed limit. but it just seems harsh anyway, considering how things might be different if he were in a car instead of a motorcycle and had the same accident.

#18 Jun 14 2006 at 9:16 AM Rating: Good
****
6,760 posts
I like the Education vs Legislation concept, at least for the public. Looking at it from an NFL owner or coach's point of view, I see it differently though. Big Ben is a vital and highly paid employee of the Pittsburgh Steeler organization. Being as they have a vested interest in his health, which faces enough risk at his job, requiring him to wear a helmet while riding his motorcycle is reasonable in my opinion. A lot of these guys get paid loads of money to play a game, and play it well. They're physical well-being is a huge factor in how they produce for their employer.

I don't know if there was something in his contract stipulating that he needed to wear a helmet while riding his motorcycle or not, however after this incident I would expect that most teams will probably consider putting it in. I know I would. Telling a biker that they flat out can't ride at all would be too much, but expecting them to take reasonable safety precautions is certainly acceptable.

It sounds like he's going to recover though, which is good. He's still got plenty of years ahead of him in the NFL. And also plenty more years to ride his motorcycles. Perhaps after this close call, he'll be wearing a helmet from now on.
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#19 Jun 14 2006 at 9:18 AM Rating: Good
****
6,760 posts
bluegayle wrote:

i heard he lost all his teeth. so at age 24, prime of his life, he has no teeth. his bones will heal and he'll play ball again, but hopefully his false teeth will be a constant reminder of a decision he made one day that he didn't have to make.


NFL.com wrote:
Doctors did not discuss Roethlisberger's condition in detail, at the request of his family, but the quarterback's only major injuries were to his face: a broken upper and lower jaw, a loss of two teeth, a broken nose, broken facial bones and various cuts and bruises.

Jaw injuries can vary greatly in nature and, because of the rather limited protection provided by a football helmet, have the potential to sideline a player for a lengthy period. But the surgeons who operated on Roethlisberger for seven hours June 12 said all of his fractures were successfully repaired.



____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#20 Jun 14 2006 at 9:31 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
****
5,677 posts
Kakar the Vile wrote:
Perhaps after this close call, he'll be wearing a helmet from now on.

I predict not only that, but he'll also become a spokesperson for proper motorcycle safety, maybe even establishing a charitable foundation.
#21 Jun 14 2006 at 10:31 AM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
Jawbox wrote:
Kakar the Vile wrote:
Perhaps after this close call, he'll be wearing a helmet from now on.

I predict not only that, but he'll also become a spokesperson for proper motorcycle safety, maybe even establishing a charitable foundation.


Now, now, christopher reeve stars never only endorse charities that they themselves are effected by
____________________________
Do what now?
#22 Jun 14 2006 at 10:42 AM Rating: Good
Kakar the Vile wrote:
bluegayle wrote:

i heard he lost all his teeth. so at age 24, prime of his life, he has no teeth. his bones will heal and he'll play ball again, but hopefully his false teeth will be a constant reminder of a decision he made one day that he didn't have to make.


NFL.com wrote:
Doctors did not discuss Roethlisberger's condition in detail, at the request of his family, but the quarterback's only major injuries were to his face: a broken upper and lower jaw, a loss of two teeth, a broken nose, broken facial bones and various cuts and bruises.

Jaw injuries can vary greatly in nature and, because of the rather limited protection provided by a football helmet, have the potential to sideline a player for a lengthy period. But the surgeons who operated on Roethlisberger for seven hours June 12 said all of his fractures were successfully repaired.

With this information, a helmet would have done fu[/Aqua]ck all for this guy, unless he was wearing a full-faced helmet which is actually very rare for cuiser riders. I'd easily estimate that 98% of cruiser riders do not wear full-faced helmets which are the only kind that offer any protection for your jaw. Fu[Aqua]ck helmet laws and their communistic ways. It's up to the individual to make their own decisions.
#23 Jun 14 2006 at 11:10 AM Rating: Good
I heard on the radio this morning that he doesn't have a motorcycle license and the temporary license he did have was expired.

I agree with Elderon, my mother rides a Harley and if she wants to go without a helmet so be it. They ride over to Iowa just so they can cruise without helmets, and the beanie lid she wears in Nebraska is barely a helmet (not D.O.T. approved).

I wouldn't ever ride without one personally, but I don't ride very often.
#24 Jun 14 2006 at 11:32 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,700 posts
Kakar wrote:
I don't know if there was something in his contract stipulating that he needed to wear a helmet while riding his motorcycle or not, however after this incident I would expect that most teams will probably consider putting it in. I know I would. Telling a biker that they flat out can't ride at all would be too much, but expecting them to take reasonable safety precautions is certainly acceptable.


I will gaurantee you there was something in is contract restricting or prohibiting his riding. You say it is too much to tell someone to ride, is it too much to tell someone they cant surf **** at their desk? Seriously, if you sign a contract to work for someone you have to follow thier rules. He more than likely decided to ignore whatever he was told because he believed himself to be a "safe" rider.

Quote:
i heard he lost all his teeth. so at age 24, prime of his life, he has no teeth. his bones will heal and he'll play ball again, but hopefully his false teeth will be a constant reminder of a decision he made one day that he didn't have to make.


Bones heal, but how many plastic surgery's can you have before you have to retire? He takes a Troy Aikmen* shot and he is out for the season getting his face plastered back together.

* - for those that remember the shot he took against the cardinals that set him back drastically, career threatening even

Edited, Jun 14th 2006 at 12:32pm EDT by Kronig
#25 Jun 14 2006 at 11:48 AM Rating: Decent
According to sports radio this morning, he had the same clause as Kellen Winslow did in his contract.

Namely that, while not required to wear a helmet (if the law doesn't require it), the team has the option to not pay him his salary if he gets injured while not wearing one.

It's unlikely the Steelers are going to not pay their stud QB, even if they have the option.

My personal opinion is that it should be the choice of the rider. My in-laws wear beanies when they ride their Harley, and my wife wears a half-helmet when she rides.
#26 Jun 14 2006 at 12:35 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Do they also have the clause where they can't play basketball in their own driveway?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 232 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (232)