Insert all words where indicated by <>
Gbaji wrote:
All prisoners, prior to <event>, are "alledged" to be <adjective> Nobby. That's kind of a worthless point to make. At some point you have to <verb> those in charge of <adjective> <person> are doing so based on the best <noun> available to them at the time. If we want to go off on grand conspiracies of detaining <group of people> without good cause, why not start with your <place> <institutional authority> instead?
Fact is that the <political document> specifically allows for the <adjective> of this type in *exactly* the case these <type of person> fall into. If people want to argue that the <political document> is too <adjective> in this area, or allows too much <adjective> to the occupying <noun>, then that's a valid argument to make, and I personally would not necessarily disagree with <noun>. It just bugs the hell out of me when instead of doing that, they try vaily to apply a set of legal <noun> that are *not* the relevant ones in this <noun>.
They're not citizens of the <place> being held within the <cosmic place>. Thus, the rights commonly invoked by the average <celestial being> being pulled over for <adjective> do *not* apply.
They're not <pural noun> as defined under the 3rd Geneva Convention. Thus, they cannot just give their <3 nouns that can be personally given> and refuse anything else while insisting on their <organization> visit.
Fact is that the <political document> specifically allows for the <adjective> of this type in *exactly* the case these <type of person> fall into. If people want to argue that the <political document> is too <adjective> in this area, or allows too much <adjective> to the occupying <noun>, then that's a valid argument to make, and I personally would not necessarily disagree with <noun>. It just bugs the hell out of me when instead of doing that, they try vaily to apply a set of legal <noun> that are *not* the relevant ones in this <noun>.
They're not citizens of the <place> being held within the <cosmic place>. Thus, the rights commonly invoked by the average <celestial being> being pulled over for <adjective> do *not* apply.
They're not <pural noun> as defined under the 3rd Geneva Convention. Thus, they cannot just give their <3 nouns that can be personally given> and refuse anything else while insisting on their <organization> visit.