Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

I hate Ann CoulterFollow

#77 Jun 08 2006 at 6:49 PM Rating: Good
***
3,053 posts
22 years after I was first told to get a bottle of Teething Tablets Smiley: smile

Nothing works as well as those little tablets, when a kid has been crying for 12 hours non stop and mom just wants to sleep. We had been visiting the in-laws and grandpa couldn't put up with a crying infant. I was made to try comfort and breastfeed her all day, long just to try and keep her quiet.

Somewhere I have a picture of me holding her and looking like I was about to fall asleep, just 6 hours into that day.

As to the OP, I refuse to listen to anyone who thinks that attacking others, makes their own views valid.
____________________________
In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare

This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.
#78 Jun 08 2006 at 8:33 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
I refuse to listen to anyone who thinks that attacking others, makes their own views valid.


yet you DO come to this forum! Smiley: schooled
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#79 Jun 08 2006 at 8:39 PM Rating: Good
***
3,053 posts
Kelvyquayo wrote:
Quote:
I refuse to listen to anyone who thinks that attacking others, makes their own views valid.


yet you DO come to this forum! Smiley: schooled


I just keep the sound turn off when I visit, so it must be OK. Smiley: grin

Not being from Howard Co., you wouldn't understand the sarcasm of my statement. Mom was know for streaming how stupid anyone was who didn't agree with her left right views, back when we lived in Columbia.
____________________________
In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare

This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.
#80 Jun 08 2006 at 9:28 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
RedPhoenixxxxxx wrote:
Quote:
The basic argument she was making was that these victims have used their victimhood to provide an unassailable political position for the left completely out of proportion to the larger picture. Thousands of people lost loved ones in the 9/11 attacks, but groups like movon.org have latched on to the small handful that are willing to use their tradgedy as a political rallying point.


If you even had an ounce of integrity you would not say that.

Bush and the neocons have used 9/11 as a "political rallying point". That's all they have done ever since it happened. Not only that, but they actually used it ot make money for their friends. They play the 9/11 card at every possible opportunity, especialy when its election time. And did they lose any loved ones in there? Nope.


You're kidding right? It's an apples and oranges comparison.

There's a huge difference between referring to an attack on US soil and the victims of that attack in a broad manner, and cherry picking specific victims, parading them before the media and using them as a mouthpiece for your political agenda.


This is the key argument Coulter was making. That these arguments could be and should be made by elected members of the Democrat party, not by the victims themselves. Bush didn't parade a bunch of 911 victims in front of the cameras and have them say what our foreign policy should be or how we should react to the 911 attacks. He made his arguments himself. The critical difference is that you can call Bush a moron for his agenda if you disagree with it, and no one's going to respond that you're being insensitive to Bush. But if it's a 911 victim who's making the statements, that is no longer the case.

Which is exactly what Coulter was saying, and interestingly enough, exactly what is proven by the response to her statements. She's attacking the integrity of those victims and she's getting bashed for it. Not because she's wrong and/or they're right, but purely because they are victims and so it's wrong to disagree with them, or attack them. If she's said the exact same things about Gore, or Clinton, we wouldn't be having this conversation...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#81 Jun 08 2006 at 9:41 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
She didn't just attack their integrity; she attacked them. She is the queen of the ad hominem attack; it's what she does. As far as I can tell, it's all she does.

Had she attacked Clinton or Gore, we might not be having this conversation, because we had that one 2-3 years ago. She has not changed her verbiage since then, only her target. In fact, she has not come up with an original thought in all that time, as far as I can tell.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#82 Jun 08 2006 at 9:44 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts


You're kidding right? It's an apples and oranges comparison.


Hi, I realize that you just realized what this meant a week ago or so, but I'd like to point out that just the act of posting it doesn't actually make it the case. Also posting it over and over in every thread doesn't led it any more creedance.

I'll return you to your regularly scheduled fumbling about now.


____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#83 Jun 08 2006 at 10:13 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
Acorntaru wrote:
What I find most funny about this entire thread is the hypocritical critiquing of her speach articulation/choice of wording coming from Asylum regulars.

I am sure the occasional usage of the word "Cnut" used in such a irrelevant, untimely fashion is only that of pure brilliance? Pot, suck off Kettle!

Same reason you hate Ann is the same reason I hate most of you.


And yet none of us are getting paid to be on National talk Radio! Asylumites, I think we're missing out on something. Anne gets paid for her insults. We do them for free.
#84 Jun 08 2006 at 10:16 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
5,677 posts
Acorntaru wrote:
Same reason you hate Ann is the same reason I hate most of you.

But I hate you for a different reason than I hate Ann.
#85 Jun 08 2006 at 10:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
@#$%^& ratesocks.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#86 Jun 08 2006 at 11:12 PM Rating: Decent
**
836 posts
Gbaji wrote:
This is the key argument Coulter was making. That these arguments could be and should be made by elected members of the Democrat party, not by the victims themselves. Bush didn't parade a bunch of 911 victims in front of the cameras and have them say what our foreign policy should be or how we should react to the 911 attacks. He made his arguments himself. The critical difference is that you can call Bush a moron for his agenda if you disagree with it, and no one's going to respond that you're being insensitive to Bush. But if it's a 911 victim who's making the statements, that is no longer the case.


So no one in the Republican party EVER uses people outside of their respective co-workers to argue a point? Please, every time Bush comes up with a ploy to deter America from the real issues, he brings up Gay marriage, and immigration. So I guess next, she is going to bash Micheal Berg for wanting to speak out against Bush, and run for congress. She is on Bushes nuts ALL the time. I have had people on here defend their dear president, but all they do is throw insults instead of actual having a sane arguement. Acting crazy does not equal right.

It is the words she used, NOT that she disagreed with them. You stand behind her, rationalizing the sewage that comes out of her mouth. That's like saying MLK Jr. would have made a bigger impact, if instead of his non-violent approach he requested a murderous revolt. Because..

Gbaji wrote:
So she decides to toss in a few phrases designed to get the goat of the opposition, specifically so that they'll scream about it, the media will focus on it, and her point will be heard by millions of people who'd otherwise never hear it. And at least some of them wont ignore the message simply because of the manner in which it was delivered.


You can still get your point across without being a b'tch about it. In fact it makes her look even more like an ***, that she can't turn of her B'tch switch for a second to actually state her opinion without going all PMS on people. No one can take you seriously if people always expect you to nut up at the slightest disagreement.

I have seen plenty of people get their point across while keeping their cool. She is definately not one of them. I don't give a damn whether someone agrees with me or not, but acting like a b'tch doesn't add validation just because it will turn more heads, or in this case add money to her pocket.



Edited, Jun 9th 2006 at 12:04am EST by kalaria
#87 Jun 08 2006 at 11:31 PM Rating: Decent
Acorntaru wrote:
@#$%^& ratesocks.

Or! Since you are a admin you could easily check the history of my rateups. To the likes of which were performed by others due to my post on my respective gaming server.
Feeling guilty?
#88 Jun 08 2006 at 11:45 PM Rating: Decent
Acorntaru wrote:
Quote:
Feeling guilty?
If anything puzzled.
The word ratesocks is posted with no associated name(s) and you get all defensive. That help?
#89 Jun 08 2006 at 11:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
the ratesock comment was in regards to the two ratebots that have been rateing the sock up.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#90 Jun 09 2006 at 12:07 AM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
And CrescentFresh's attempt to get rateups by pretending to be a sock puppet appears to be a failure!
____________________________
Do what now?
#91 Jun 09 2006 at 12:19 AM Rating: Decent
Danalog the Vengeful Programmer wrote:
And CrescentFresh's attempt to get rateups by pretending to be a sock puppet appears to be a failure!
Back to Natalie I guess...
#92 Jun 09 2006 at 12:31 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,463 posts
Gosh, looking back at this thread, I worry that you people clearly don't hate Anne Coulter enough! This is pretty anemic hate here, people.
#93 Jun 09 2006 at 2:21 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Yeah, that's the thing. Hate is too strong an emotion. I despise her, when I bother to think about her at all.

I wouldn't pull her out of a fire, put it that way.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#94 Jun 09 2006 at 3:49 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,463 posts
That's a little better, letting her burn alive ("she's a witch!" "buuuurn her!").

Personally, I'd try to negotiate a rescue fee. After all, the book sales....
#95 Jun 09 2006 at 4:45 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
There's a huge difference between referring to an attack on US soil and the victims of that attack in a broad manner, and cherry picking specific victims, parading them before the media and using them as a mouthpiece for your political agenda.


So you are saying that these victims are just muppets in the hands of manipulative Democrats. That they lack the brains you obviously have, to think and speak for themselves. That their opinions are not somewhat genuine and heartfelt.

Very nice.

Quote:
This is the key argument Coulter was making.


Yep, and thats why everyone was offended and called her a heartless *****. She basically told those victims they were muppets, manipulated, too stupid to think for themselves, that they didnt have the courage, integrity, knowledge and understanding to make a point they truely believed.

Very nice. And of crouse, Ann knows these things. Just cos she's so superior to these victims, right?

Quote:
That these arguments could be and should be made by elected members of the Democrat party, not by the victims themselves.


And they were made by elected members of the Democratic party. And the victims also expressed their opinion. What is so shocking about people who experienced those horrors to speak for themselvse? What are you, and the *****, so scared of? But in a way you are right, I really cant remember the Republicans ever using War Veterans to slander and throw mud at a political opponent. Swift Boat...


Quote:
Bush didn't parade a bunch of 911 victims in front of the cameras and have them say what our foreign policy should be or how we should react to the 911 attacks.


Neitehr did John Kerry or Hilary Clinton. But don't tell me that the neo-con media don't use the opinions of victims/soldiers/ex-soldiers to make their propaganda. Thats the problem with you Gbaji, you are a one-sided, bad-faithed, close-minded muppet. Not an ounce of integrity or fairness. It's all one-way traffic with you. If only the world was so simple...


Quote:
He made his arguments himself. The critical difference is that you can call Bush a moron for his agenda if you disagree with it, and no one's going to respond that you're being insensitive to Bush. But if it's a 911 victim who's making the statements, that is no longer the case.


Maybe if Bush had shown just the tinest of balls in the whole of his miserable life, people might refrain from calling him a morron. Did he ever fight in a war? Lost some loved ones in a war/terrorist attack? Did he not dodge Vietnam?

The guy is a ***** that is sending 18 year olds to their death in the hell-hole that he himself created. How can you respect the guy? He is the worst kind of person. A coward that pretends he is a hard-man by sending others to die.

Quote:
Which is exactly what Coulter was saying, and interestingly enough, exactly what is proven by the response to her statements. She's attacking the integrity of those victims and she's getting bashed for it. Not because she's wrong and/or they're right, but purely because they are victims and so it's wrong to disagree with them, or attack them. If she's said the exact same things about Gore, or Clinton, we wouldn't be having this conversation...


So, let me get this right, she is attacking the victims integrity in order to make some money by selling her dumb-*** book and you act surprised that people are shocked?

What ******* planet do you live on? Who the **** is she to attack their integrity in such a harsh way? Oh, thats right, the girl so ******* stupid she can't have a rational argument, but instead thinks that all who disagree with her should be killed, that we should nuke the Middle-east, and that violence is a way to resolve a discussion. Great. Brilliant. Respect. Oh, and that gratuitiously insulting victims is a good way to point across.

It's because of complete morons like her and your president that the US is in such ********** That way of thinking is fascist, and is the tool of the weak. She can't engage in a rational debate, so she slanders and threatens.

People wre kinda tolerant when she was bullying people her own size. But bullying war victims in order to be even richer than she already is, is pitiful and sickening.

That you defend her, well, I guess its not surprising.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#96 Jun 09 2006 at 5:44 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
EvilGnomes wrote:
Gosh, looking back at this thread, I worry that you people clearly don't hate Anne Coulter enough! This is pretty anemic hate here, people.

It may be more a matter of not deigning to give the bi[/black]tch that much recognition. Hate is a very consuming emotion and such passion shouldn't be wasted on a cu[black]nt like her.

I do the same, too. Eminem comes to mind.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#97 Jun 09 2006 at 5:47 AM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
Woo-Hoo!! Way to ******* go Phoenixxxx.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#98 Jun 09 2006 at 7:35 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Samira wrote:
Yeah, that's the thing. Hate is too strong an emotion. I despise her, when I bother to think about her at all.

I wouldn't pull her out of a fire, put it that way.


Well yes, I use hate and love more often than I mean them, hahaha. However, I GREATLY dislike her!

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#99 Jun 09 2006 at 8:14 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,784 posts
Coulter is no different, then say Bill Maher or Al Franken, all are great at pushing the buttons of people who disagree with their point of views and entertaining those who do agree with them.

Now the disturbing thing about Ann Coulter, for me, is I cannot decipher whether or not she is really a man. I am about 75% sure, that she is in fact a man, or formerly a man.

It is all in the Adam's Apple folks, those post-ops can never quite hide those Adam's Apples .
#100 Jun 09 2006 at 9:46 AM Rating: Default
Seems that Ann Coulter just makes people look at things in a different way. Sure she is impolite and not political at all, but hey, if u ask a bunch of people if they hate hitler, 100% will say yes. If you ask them why hitler did what he did, i doubt many would have a decent answer. It may be cruel and "mean" to attack these widows, but somebody has to represent the other possible situation. Maybe she doesnt even believe what she says.
#101 Jun 09 2006 at 10:58 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
thingnumberone wrote:
Seems that Ann Coulter just makes people look at things in a different way. Sure she is impolite and not political at all, but hey, if u ask a bunch of people if they hate hitler, 100% will say yes. If you ask them why hitler did what he did, i doubt many would have a decent answer. It may be cruel and "mean" to attack these widows, but somebody has to represent the other possible situation. Maybe she doesnt even believe what she says.


You are the reason that Godwin was born. You complete him.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 204 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (204)