teens are terrorists?Follow

Sorry, but you have yet to have an actual intellectual conversation. All you do is come here and post "flash, bang, whizz" remarks about 9/11 conspiricies, and stupid sh[/orange]it like this. Please come up with something new, as your material is old, and extremely sh[salmon]itty, and very unoriginal.

Edited, Jun 7th 2006 at 5:05pm EST by Metastophicleas

Your deffffffffinition sucks.

Did you even read the article? Or did your tin hat filter that out?

If you can't understand why teen criminals (and I'm sure adult as well) are being compared to terrorists, then you're an absolute moron. You need to spend a few nights in some BAD neighborhoods, and not your luxury apartment in the good part of town.

Where I grew up, there were shootings several times per days, and that isn't a big name bad neighborhood. It's not as known as LA or NY. Hell, we're here in little ol' VA...nothing bad ever happens here. Yeah, these jackfu[/red]ckingas[red]ses aren't terrorizing anyone...GTFO.

An intellectual conversation starts with a well formed idea with grounds in reality, and factual information to back it up, not with a "NEWSFLASH" type headline, like the stupid bullsh[red][/red]it that I've seen you post.

ROFLMAO

Ever consider that the "newsflash" headline was the very topic of conversation? I made a statement that "this is amazingly rediculous", reffering to the video. I indicated what I thought was rediculous in the topic title "teens are terrorists?". What exactly isn't based in reality? My opinion that teen criminals (or any criminals) and terrorists are different?

"criminal" is a very broad catagory. and there are multiple deffinitions of a "terrorist". Sure terrorists are criminals, and some criminals may be terrorists, but it's ubsurd to say that drug dealers and street criminals in a particular city are all terrorists, no matter what kind of bad experiences you may have had with them. (and to assume that I lived in suburbia safe from gangs, violence, and drugs is an assumption that has no basis in reality and no "factual information to back it up".)

so then you're saying that anyone who comits crimes on the street or anyone who deals drugs is a terrorist? because that's the people whom the article points out. I already brought this up in my previous post but you seemed to have overlooked it.

EDIT: to clarify, you are saying criminal = gang member

Edited, Jun 7th 2006 at 6:42pm EST by Dronadesh

FTFY

Now stop splitting hairs and GET THE FU[salmon]CK OUT you cu[purple][/purple]nt!

Let me break it down for ya' my nizzle in the heezy wheezy fo' shizzle with the Jimmy Rizzle, ya dig?



This is not intellectual conversation. This is a one line blurb in a vaguely titled thread and a link to some site somewhere out on the interweb, which I have no intention of clicking. Intellectual conversations require intellectualizationism.
I understand you are trying to be sarcastic, witty, humorous, or something other than stupid, but alas you have failed. Sadly this is how I read the remainder of that post, as well as the majority those authored by you.

If this is your idea of debate then you seriously need to sue your teacher. Actually I may be wrong. During the last presidential debates, didn't Bush open with "This is rediculus. Check out this vid!"? You may be on to something.


1. You should be slapped for saying Gbaji and intelligIble conversations without a negative in the same sentence.

2. Gbaji posts more to hear himself talk when he reads it back to himself afterwards.

3. I honestly believe that Joph only replies to you to point out how stupid you are, give me a chuckle, and pharm posts. I could be reaching with that one though.

What you are refering to is called 'idle chatter'. It happens a lot in bars all across America on a daily basis. Things like the news and the weather are talked about a lot, you should fit right in 7 years from now.

If I even had an inkling that you had no clue what the fu[Aqua][/Aqua]ck you were talking about before, this right here solidifies it. Until you can handle typing up a coherent, well thought out post that presents some thought or idea I will continue to assume you are a ****** and summarily rate you accordingly. To you, sir, I say Good day.





I said Good Day!


*storms off*

I'm tired, kind of skimmed through the thread that happened while I was out to dinner with the girlfriend.

So basically I am too tired to properly articulate how absolutely frustrating a thread like this is for me. It's not even like he is despicable like Varus or plain retarded like SR. Dronadesh is just an average guy who happens to have the reasoning skills of a f'ucking chimp and rhetorical style that is as elusive in its failure to make a stance on anything as a greased deaf guy.

Basically the boy ain't smart but he sure as hell likes to think he is. I find that self affirming idiocy absolutely detestable.

Kudos on getting him subdefault,

You can't prove your point but damned if that somehow makes you wrong, right?

So, if you don't like 90% of the posters here, why don't you go away?

Your viewpoints and ideas are picked apart, easily I might add, and every thread that you've started in the Asylum has been sub-defaulted. So, if I were you (thankfully I'm not), I'd pack my "thoughts" and move back to whatever gaming forum you came from to get yourself rated back up by the idiots that liked you to begin with, 'cause the only thing that you're going to do here is get rated down for not coming up with anything that we haven't heard before, nor care about.

Game, set, match!