Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Liberal bias!Follow

#52 Jun 02 2006 at 1:32 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,463 posts
Smiley: jester
#53 Jun 02 2006 at 2:48 AM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Me = drunk = ignore this post. Along with the other 7000ish.

Edited, Fri Jun 2 03:50:41 2006 by Demea
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#54 Jun 02 2006 at 3:22 AM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
Bodhi wrote:
Sometimes you get me so angry that I want to Not-Torture you until the broom breaks off in your ***.


Allmost quote worthy.
#55 Jun 02 2006 at 4:08 AM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

Reading gbaji's thoughts on torture makes his stance on date rape become much more clear.


#56 Jun 03 2006 at 8:06 AM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
trickybeck wrote:
Reading gbaji's thoughts on torture makes his stance on date rape become much more clear.


Ah... So it's somehow *wrong* when talking about legal responsibility for actions to actually use the correct legal definiotions for those actions. That makes so much more sense!


I know that we live in a world where it's become commonplace to use exagerated labels for things purely to increase the impact of what we say, but it's even more scary to me that so many people don't even realize when they're doing it. And worse, debase people for committing the horrible crime of *not* participating in the mass media circle jerking exageration game?

Look. I call it abuse instead of torture because that's what it is. Others call it torture instead of abuse because torture is a stronger word, so it makes their position seem stronger. Which rationale seems more "honest" to you if you were to look at this objectively? It's not really that hard. I'm frankly amazed that people can't get this. There are specific definitions for things. Insisting on using the wrong ones doesn't make you more right, or your arguement stronger. It just makes you one voice in a sea of ignorant voices.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#57 Jun 03 2006 at 8:27 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
You'd almost have a point if it wasn't for the fact you are wrong.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#58 Jun 03 2006 at 8:38 AM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Queen bodhisattva wrote:
You'd almost have a point if it wasn't for the fact you are wrong.


Interesting. So now we're redefining "facts"?

Does the insanity ever end? How does it feel to be a poster child for the bumpersticker generation?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#59 Jun 03 2006 at 8:42 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
gbaji wrote:
Does the insanity ever end?


It doesn't.

____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#60 Jun 03 2006 at 9:07 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
Does the insanity ever end?
Is it just me, or is this funny coming from a guy posting on a message board called the asylum.



Edit, what is worst is that they are a regular poster.

Edited, Sat Jun 3 10:08:24 2006 by dirges
#61 Jun 03 2006 at 3:29 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,463 posts
Come on Bod. Gbaji made a case here, which he's actually been developing this whole thread:

Quote:


Ah... So it's somehow *wrong* when talking about legal responsibility for actions to actually use the correct legal definiotions for those actions. That makes so much more sense!


I know that we live in a world where it's become commonplace to use exagerated labels for things purely to increase the impact of what we say, but it's even more scary to me that so many people don't even realize when they're doing it. And worse, debase people for committing the horrible crime of *not* participating in the mass media circle jerking exageration game?

Look. I call it abuse instead of torture because that's what it is. Others call it torture instead of abuse because torture is a stronger word, so it makes their position seem stronger. Which rationale seems more "honest" to you if you were to look at this objectively? It's not really that hard. I'm frankly amazed that people can't get this. There are specific definitions for things. Insisting on using the wrong ones doesn't make you more right, or your arguement stronger. It just makes you one voice in a sea of ignorant voices.




And Bod, you just automatically gainsayed him - with no thought to your post.

Almost like you were botting for postcount....

Hmmmmm, how do you get one of those programs?

#62 Jun 03 2006 at 3:43 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
I don't debate with gbaji just like I don't debate with Shadowrelm or Varus. To debate them I would actually have to take them seriously.

____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#63 Jun 03 2006 at 4:34 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Interesting. So now we're redefining "facts"?

You say "we" as if other people do it.

At least you included yourself and didn't say "you're". Good to see you're at least marginally aware of what might kill other people from laughing too hard to breath and have some compassion. You old softie.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 268 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (268)