Remember that Google case? :: Free Realms

Quote Reply

#27 Jun 03 2006 at 8:18 AM Rating: Decent

gbaji

Encyclopedia

35,568 posts

Dronadesh wrote:

And how about the privitization of the internet? That's a really big issue there.

*cough* It is privatized. If it wasn't, they wouldn't need to ask various content and service providers for records...

Critical thinking really is dead, isn't it?

____________________________

King Nobby wrote:

More words please

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#28 Jun 03 2006 at 11:21 AM Rating: Good

Smasharoo

Lunatic

30,086 posts

*cough* It is privatized. If it wasn't, they wouldn't need to ask various content and service providers for records...

Right, just like the airwaves are privatized beause they have to ask the networks about news sources.

Makes good sense, Luigi.

____________________________

Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#29 Jun 04 2006 at 1:38 AM Rating: Decent

gbaji

Encyclopedia

35,568 posts

Smasharoo wrote:

*cough* It is privatized. If it wasn't, they wouldn't need to ask various content and service providers for records...

Right, just like the airwaves are privatized beause they have to ask the networks about news sources.

Makes good sense, Luigi.

You're just full of bad logic today, aren't you?

First off. Broadcast and wire communications are totally different media with totally different rules.

Second. Obtaining records of use by customers and obtaining info on sources in a news story are also totally different things.

Third. Journalism, and sources thereof, do not constitute even a tiny fraction of the entirety of the "airwaves", privatized or not.

Fourth. Licensing and regulation by the government does not remove privatizaation. If that was the case, then *nothing* would be privatized.

Fifth. Apples and oranges are different. You *really* need to learn this.

____________________________

King Nobby wrote:

More words please

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#30 Jun 04 2006 at 2:46 AM Rating: Good

Smasharoo

Lunatic

30,086 posts

Fifth. Apples and oranges are different. You *really* need to learn this.

Sixth, mt post made perfect sense, compares directly, adn completely refutes yours.

Seventh, you're an idiot and I'm a msochist for bother to read your fumbling attempts at replies.

Eigth, numbered lists of inane drivel aren't any more impressive or convincing than 1999 pargraphs of inane drivel.

You're wrong. Happens. Grow the **** up and learn to accept that move on.

Just kidding.

You'll never be able to accept it, which is what makes you cute, and youre little attempts at arguing so adorable. Like a little kitten pushing a chess piece with it's paw. Aww, it almost looks like you're actually playing the game for just a minute.

Sadly, though, no.

____________________________

Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

▲ Page top

Remember that Google case?Follow