Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Remember that Google case?Follow

#1 May 31 2006 at 10:50 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
The one where the feds wanted Google's search records for a child pornography case and Google said "Hell no" and the feds said "C'mon, it's not like we can connect them individual users"...?

CNN wrote:
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The attorney general and the FBI director have asked the nation's leading Internet service companies to keep a variety of customer information and other data for two years, much longer than the companies do now, the Justice Department confirmed Tuesday.
[...]
One thing the Justice Department wants is some type of subscriber information, such as the Internet address assigned to a person when logging on to a service provider, according to two sources familiar with a meeting that was held last week between the government and the Internet companies.

The online industry is expected to strongly oppose any request to retain these types of records because of privacy concerns for their customers.
[...]
Justice Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said government and private industry officials are continuing to discuss the privacy issues involved and some of the concerns raised by the companies at the meeting Friday at the Justice Department.

The meeting, first reported by CNET News.com, included representatives from Verizon, Comcast, AOL (which is owned by Time Warner, as is CNN.com), Microsoft, Google and the U.S. Internet Service Provider Association, the sources told CNN. Companies involved refused to comment on the meeting.

The original request for the record retention came as part of the Justice Department's efforts to fight child pornography. During a speech last month, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said he would press the CEOs of Internet service providers about retaining records.

During last week's meeting, though, the FBI "made clear they wanted [information on subscribers] for other reasons as well. ... Terrorism was mentioned," one of the sources said.
Complete Story

Boy, you can just give away any details of your life and activities once the specter of terrorism is raised, huh?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#2 May 31 2006 at 10:54 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
It's like you want Niobia to post here. Smiley: mad
#3 May 31 2006 at 11:26 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Ma'am....I', goin need to be seeing your panty drawers. Ya know, terrorism and stuff.
#4 May 31 2006 at 12:22 PM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
Flea wrote:
Holly: Engage drive. Drive engaged. Initialise ignition sequence. Ignition sequence initialised.
Rimmer: Get on with it!
Holly: Takes time, this. One slight error in any one of my 13 billion calculations, we'll all be blown to smithereens. Here we go then. Ten... nine... eight... six... five... four...
Rimmer:You missed number seven!
Holly: Did I? I've always had a bit of a blind spot for sevens.
Rimmer: We're going to die.
Holly: No problem. I'll start lower down. One, blast off.


Flea is a Red Dwarf fan? Who woulda thunk?
#5 May 31 2006 at 12:37 PM Rating: Default
GitSlayer wrote:
[quote=Flea]Holly: Engage drive. Drive engaged. Initialise ignition sequence. Ignition sequence initialised.
Rimmer: Get on with it!
Holly: Takes time, this. One slight error in any one of my 13 billion calculations, we'll all be blown to smithereens. Here we go then. Ten... nine... eight... six... five... four...
Rimmer:You missed number seven!
Holly: Did I? I've always had a bit of a blind spot for sevens.
Rimmer: We're going to die.
Holly: No problem. I'll start lower down. One, blast off.[/
quote]

Flea is a Red Dwarf fan? Who woulda thunk?


Who isn't a Red Dwarf fan?
#6 May 31 2006 at 12:49 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Kaelesh the Puissant wrote:


Who isn't a Red Dwarf fan?
Smeg-Head
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#7 May 31 2006 at 12:58 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
The online industry is expected to strongly oppose any request to retain these types of records because of privacy concerns for their customers.


Like those records ever would ever could disappear anyways.

Not to mention, how about when government becomes ISP Provider itself?

http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-wifi31.html
#8 May 31 2006 at 1:53 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Boy, you can just give away any details of your life and activities once the specter of terrorism is raised, huh?


Well, if you have nothing to hide, why would you worry. Stop trying to protect evil doers.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#9 May 31 2006 at 2:24 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Well, if you have nothing to hide, why would you worry. Stop trying to protect evil doers.

Thank you!

Oh, and to all you people complaining about the guv'ment spying on you...

9-11!
#10 May 31 2006 at 2:36 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
OMG 9-11! 9-11! 9-11! 9-11! 9-11!!!!!!!!!

Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#11 May 31 2006 at 2:41 PM Rating: Good
***
2,824 posts
Was that a rainbow? I think Joph is coming out!
#12 May 31 2006 at 2:42 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:

9-11!
9th November? Smiley: confused
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#13 May 31 2006 at 2:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
That was my 9-11 Security Alert Ranking System!

There's some south suburb of Chicago (I don't recall which -- it's down Cicero Ave a ways) that actually has a big sign with the color codes on it and an arrow pointing to the day's ranking. I'm sure that's made all the difference these past five years towards keeping America safe.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#14 May 31 2006 at 2:44 PM Rating: Decent
baelnic the Braindead wrote:
Was that a rainbow? I think Joph is coming out!


Roy G. Biv
#15 May 31 2006 at 2:49 PM Rating: Good
***
2,824 posts
Jophiel wrote:
There's some south suburb of Chicago (I don't recall which -- it's down Cicero Ave a ways) that actually has a big sign with the color codes on it and an arrow pointing to the day's ranking. I'm sure that's made all the difference these past five years towards keeping America safe.


I haven't given much thought to the color codes lately. I do remember when a customer mentioned it was an orange day a few years back. My response was, "What's an Orange day?" To which I got the response, "Quit joking, I'm serious."

Really what the hell good does a threat level meter do?

Today's forcast is 52 with a falling Barometer and Orange threat level, and now for the traffic.
#16 May 31 2006 at 2:53 PM Rating: Good
***
2,824 posts
Nobby wrote:
9th November?


Man I never get used to European dates. I still record football matches incorrectly because I get the dates switched up in my head.

The World Cup is in June right? Germany opens on June 9th and not on September 6th? Smiley: lol
#17 May 31 2006 at 2:55 PM Rating: Decent
baelnic the Braindead wrote:
Nobby wrote:
9th November?


Man I never get used to European dates. I still record football matches incorrectly because I get the dates switched up in my head.

The World Cup is in June right? Germany opens on June 9th and not on September 6th? Smiley: lol


You can handle referring to 'soccer' as 'football' but you can't handle the date format?

The super bowl is late January or early February.
#18 May 31 2006 at 3:03 PM Rating: Good
***
2,824 posts
Quote:
You can handle referring to 'soccer' as 'football' but you can't handle the date format?


I only call it football so Nobby won't call me a cnut. I can't handle that Smiley: cry
#19 May 31 2006 at 3:05 PM Rating: Good
baelnic the Braindead wrote:
Quote:
You can handle referring to 'soccer' as 'football' but you can't handle the date format?


I only call it football so Nobby won't call me a cnut. I can't handle that Smiley: cry
He's only pointing out the obvious that everyone already knows anyway. Cnut.
#20 May 31 2006 at 5:18 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,463 posts
Ever see "Brazil" - remember how terrorists attacked all the time, but people in restaurants went right on eating, ignoring it?





Hmmmm
#21 May 31 2006 at 8:38 PM Rating: Decent
*
220 posts
Quote:
Well, if you have nothing to hide, why would you worry. Stop trying to protect evil doers.


The life of Howard Hughes comes to mind, and a federal investigation sparked by a competing airline to secure profits by using corrupt congressman. If the government can access any of our private information, whats to say they can't stop the next great energy invention because of oil companies ties to the government.

The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either.
-Benjamin Franklin
#22 May 31 2006 at 9:56 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

The life of Howard Hughes comes to mind, and a federal investigation sparked by a competing airline to secure profits by using corrupt congressman. If the government can access any of our private information, whats to say they can't stop the next great energy invention because of oil companies ties to the government.


Learn

To

Identify

Sarcasm

Idiot
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#23 Jun 02 2006 at 12:06 PM Rating: Good
If the person really had a new method of creating energy, he could expose it somewhere, somehow, if he really wanted to. If the oil companies pay him to shut up, that would be that person's decision :-\
#24 Jun 02 2006 at 12:34 PM Rating: Good
***
2,880 posts
Goody. It's the gradual rape of the internet. Can't forget to toss out that "terrorism" buzzword.
#25 Jun 02 2006 at 3:44 PM Rating: Decent
well might be time to setup a proxy server or start using one of the many free proxy linker sites on the web. i can deal with a little bit of advertising (got to love FF and no script and adblock to stop those too) to hide all my web surfing info from anyone.

well from my ISP at least and many others too for that matter.
#26 Jun 03 2006 at 6:53 AM Rating: Good
And how about the privitization of the internet? That's a really big issue there.

Edited, Sat Jun 3 08:06:45 2006 by Dronadesh
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 381 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (381)