Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Place your vote and win!Follow

#1 May 24 2006 at 11:09 AM Rating: Decent
Story

Quote:
PHOENIX - An Arizona political activist is placing his bets that a proposal to pay one lucky voter $1 million will drive people to the polls.

Dr. Mark Osterloh, a Tuscon ophthalmologist who has run unsuccessfully for governor and the legislature, filed paperwork Monday to put the idea before state voters on the 2006 ballot.

"Who do you know that doesn't want to be a millionaire? What's the worst thing that could happen? Everybody who's eligible to vote could be voting," he said.

...

"We want to make sure that we get everybody voting so we get truly representative government," he said. "If people don't vote, they don't get represented."


I don't think the type of people who would only vote because of a lottery would be the type of people I'd want deciding things.
#2 May 24 2006 at 11:19 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
What's funny to me is that many people who admit they don't vote say they don't because "one vote can't make a difference anyway." Yet they're more likely to buy a lottery ticket? Interesting thought process.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#3 May 24 2006 at 11:20 AM Rating: Good
***
3,118 posts
Wow. This guy's a fuc[Darkkhaki][/Darkkhaki]king genius. I would totally register and vote if it was like the lotto. Granted, I wouldn't bother looking at the buttons when I pushed them so it would end up being completely random. You push buttons when you vote, right? If it's more like a form you fill out I might be less inclined.
#4 May 24 2006 at 11:21 AM Rating: Decent
Jacobsdeception the Sly wrote:
You push buttons when you vote, right? If it's more like a form you fill out I might be less inclined.


Depends on the place. Where I vote, you fill in circles similar to a scantron sheet.
#5 May 24 2006 at 11:21 AM Rating: Decent
*
51 posts
Professor CrescentFresh wrote:
Story

Quote:
PHOENIX - An Arizona political activist is placing his bets that a proposal to pay one lucky voter $1 million will drive people to the polls.

Dr. Mark Osterloh, a Tuscon ophthalmologist who has run unsuccessfully for governor and the legislature, filed paperwork Monday to put the idea before state voters on the 2006 ballot.

"Who do you know that doesn't want to be a millionaire? What's the worst thing that could happen? Everybody who's eligible to vote could be voting," he said.

...

"We want to make sure that we get everybody voting so we get truly representative government," he said. "If people don't vote, they don't get represented."


I don't think the type of people who would only vote because of a lottery would be the type of people I'd want deciding things.
Maybe not.

Is there an acceptable incentive or gimmic to get people to the polls? Or is trying to connive people to vote who won't also take the time to learn about the canidates and the issues would only dumb down American politics further. Maybe those that would vote regardless of freebies or contests are the 'informed people'? Not many people vote though - it's kinda sad.

I know!

There should be a trivia contest that gives out cool prizes to people who can answer enough questions correctly...and of course the questions are facts about the election.
#6 May 24 2006 at 11:25 AM Rating: Decent
DonnyDD wrote:
Is there an acceptable incentive or gimmic to get people to the polls?


Sure. It is called the opportunity to participate in the election. If that alone isn't enough of an incentive, let them stay at home.
#7 May 24 2006 at 11:30 AM Rating: Good
***
3,118 posts
Quote:
Depends on the place. Where I vote, you fill in circles similar to a scantron sheet.

Sweet! In that case, whoever is answer 'C' would win hands down.
#8 May 24 2006 at 1:14 PM Rating: Good
***
3,128 posts
I'd vote several times ;)
#9 May 24 2006 at 2:07 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
I don't think they should win just for voting. They should be given a random question like what stand a specific candidate have on a certain issue. If they get the random question right they elligible to win the money pot. If not, hey at least they voted too.
#10 May 24 2006 at 2:20 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
I don't think the type of people who would only vote because of a lottery would be the type of people I'd want deciding things.


That's hilariously ironic since that's exactly the way it is now. True, the politicians promise pay offs of much more than $1 million though. Ted Kennedy will sell everyone of your paychecks, your kids' paychecks, and your grandkids' paychecks to a constituency as little as say illegal Mexican immigrants for votes.
#11 May 24 2006 at 2:29 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Anyone remember this?

Quote:
Michigan Republicans want local prosecutors to throw the book at Michael Moore, after the Fahrenheit 9/11 director doled out ramen and underwear to college students. The gifts were given in exchange for the students' promises to vote—not necessarily for John Kerry—in November. Is it illegal to bribe someone to vote, even if the person doing the bribing doesn't tell the bribee which candidate to choose?

Regardless of the briber's intentions, paying for turnout is illegal in federal elections. As long as there is a federal candidate on the ballot, no one may offer something of value—whether it's a $100 bill or a package of Top Ramen—to get someone to the polls. The ban was part of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which included a section specifically forbidding anyone from offering or accepting payment "either for registration to vote or for voting." This has been interpreted to cover all bribes geared toward coaxing voters to their respective polling stations.
#12 May 24 2006 at 2:32 PM Rating: Decent
trickybeck wrote:
Anyone remember this?


I must have missed that at the time. Interesting.
#13 May 24 2006 at 2:42 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Samira wrote:
What's funny to me is that many people who admit they don't vote say they don't because "one vote can't make a difference anyway." Yet they're more likely to buy a lottery ticket? Interesting thought process.

See, you can buy lots of lottery tickets, but unless you have some good costumes and fake IDs you can only vote once or twice.

I think that still makes the odds roughly 2,567,302:1 that you'd affect an election than a lottery, though. The best way of that seems to be to throw in with 5 co-workers you don't trust.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#14 May 24 2006 at 7:10 PM Rating: Good
I've got a better idea. Instead, let's take the $1 million and use it to pay bounty hunters to track down and beat the crap out of random nonvoters.....televised live.

Frankly, it would be more entertaining, I'd be a winner every time the show was on, and they could finance it (and probably free college for my kids) with the advertising revenue.

The motivation level would probably be higher, too. Especially among the elderly.
#15 May 24 2006 at 8:59 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
TStephens wrote:
let's take the $1 million and use it to pay bounty hunters to track down and beat the crap out of random nonvoters.....televised live.


How about nonrandom nonvoters? Paris Hilton could use a smack in the mouth. Smiley: smile

____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 250 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (250)