Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

File under "engage brain before opening mouth"Follow

#27 May 17 2006 at 12:53 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
Queen bodhisattva wrote:

Note for Everyone other than Ambrya: No one messes with Ambrya but me, is that clear?


Bodhi, you're welcome to mess with me anytime you want. Smiley: sly

#28 May 17 2006 at 12:57 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
Eske wrote:
Quote:
I just feel this is the verbal equivalent of walking up to a pregnant lady whom you don't know and touching her belly without invitation. You don't know it's all right with her. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't, but you don't know. Either way, it's invasive, and common sense--indeed, common courtesy--demands that you just don't do it.


Another bad analogy. These are words, not touch.


Hence the phrasing "verbal equivalent." Reading comp 4tw.

Quote:

Nor does 'common courtesy' dictate that you don't do it.


Actually yes, yes it does. And it's the assumption that it doesn't which makes it seem like so many Americans are just downright vulgar in their behavior.

I'm done responding to you, Eske. You're determined to take a simple question of workplace ettiquette and turn it into an "OMGzorz!!!! Everyone's sooo PC!!! PC is bad!!!" rant, and I really have no interest in serving as your soapbox, thanks for playing.



Edited, Wed May 17 02:05:29 2006 by Ambrya
#29 May 17 2006 at 12:59 AM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Quote:
Um...I did. And I never indicated anything other than that was MY interpretation of the way such a remark could come across.


And what if your interpretation is wrong?

Quote:
And again, you miss the point. We never considered it a barb. We merely considered it "tacky." As in, lacking in any sense of social grace. Which, should you choose to actually read the original post, was the question that I posed--whether or not such a remark was tacky.


If you read carefully, I didn't say that you consider it a barb, I said that you are trying to re-write it into one by saying "All I see is your ethnicity". That is the barb in question. And if THAT is what you are hearing, then yes, you do see it as a barb, not tacky. In the OP you say one thing yes, but your language indicates something else.

For the rest of what you said, I don't care if certain people take offense to it. For the purpose of the argument, I care about why they are offended by it, and whether that explanation is founded in reason.
#30 May 17 2006 at 1:02 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
In any kind of professional environment to say "those glasses make you look japanesey" is not the brightest statement, especially when you are less than familiar with the person.

Not blatantly racist or hurtful, just a idiotic f[Bisque][/Bisque]ucking thing to say. The type of thing you would only expect out of the mouth of a stupid pollack.

So mother in laws vag, diagonal, sideways, some shape I havent thought of? Also is it still in working condition. Make with the details.

____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#31 May 17 2006 at 1:06 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
Queen bodhisattva wrote:

So mother in laws vag, diagonal, sideways, some shape I havent thought of? Also is it still in working condition. Make with the details.


I have no idea what possible condition my mother-in-law's anatomy might be in, and no interest in speculating, sorry.

#32 May 17 2006 at 1:09 AM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Quote:
I'm done responding to you, Eske. You're determined to take a simple question of workplace ettiquette and turn it into an "OMGzorz!!!! Everyone's sooo PC!!! PC is bad!!!" rant, and I really have no interest in serving as your soapbox, thanks for playing.


Cute. Everything seems so much worse when you tack on 43 exclamation points and an OMGzorz, doesn't it?

Seems like you're so stuck in your shell that you're willing to ignore the whole point of what I'm saying in favor of your abridged 1337-speak version.

Everything I've said is a commentary about your initial post. My discussion about PC-ness is there because I'm probing the reason behind the response. You're the one getting all huffy and defensive.

It seems like you were just looking for some positive support from the other posters, and weren't equipped to deal with a dissenting opinion.
#33 May 17 2006 at 1:33 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
God I hate it when threads get bogged down like this.

The general concensus is 'mentioning someones heritage is ok as long as no negative connotation is given. However the person in Ambryas example is an idiot for saying japanesey, even if no negative connotation was meant, because its just a stupid facking thing to say"


However you two will continue to argue tangents, semantics and make me wear out my scroll button. Shame on both of you.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#34 May 17 2006 at 2:26 AM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Queen bodhisattva wrote:
God I hate it when threads get bogged down like this.

The general concensus is 'mentioning someones heritage is ok as long as no negative connotation is given. However the person in Ambryas example is an idiot for saying japanesey, even if no negative connotation was meant, because its just a stupid facking thing to say"


However you two will continue to argue tangents, semantics and make me wear out my scroll button. Shame on both of you.


Err...sorry. I suppose I tend to get a little incessant in internet discussions.

I'll agree to that consensus, hehe. Apologies to Ambrya for getting a tad over-zealous.
#35 May 17 2006 at 2:56 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
Queen bodhisattva wrote:

However you two will continue to argue tangents, semantics and make me wear out my scroll button. Shame on both of you.


So sorry for boring you, Bodhi. I would have indulged your more salacious remarks had they not involved my mother-in-law. *shudder*

#36 May 17 2006 at 4:45 AM Rating: Decent
Being a female is not "a patently obvious and irrefutable fact"....in my defense, he looked like a perfectly lovely woman and once I found the....extra....I stopped.


Mostly.
#37 May 17 2006 at 7:05 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,254 posts
I knew two guys, who I'm fairly sure never met, both were half jewish and half mexican.

Both of them refered to themselves as "Spikes", so this must be a fairly common thing. Everyone seemed to find it quite hilarious and take it in good humor.

I think that if a co-worker said that my shirt made me look particularly WOP-ish (WOPey?) I would either be stunned, or put on my worst New York accent and said somthing like "Hi, my name is Guido, nice to meet you."

Which would have been equally un-funny.
#38 May 17 2006 at 8:20 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Ambrya wrote:
Queen bodhisattva wrote:

However you two will continue to argue tangents, semantics and make me wear out my scroll button. Shame on both of you.


So sorry for boring you, Bodhi. I would have indulged your more salacious remarks had they not involved my mother-in-law. *shudder*


You never bore me Ambrya, frustrate maybe but not bore.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#39 May 17 2006 at 8:30 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
I think that's a little deliberately obtuse. There's a world of difference between making an observation on a patently obvious and irrefutable fact, and making an assumption about something as vague and potentially sensitive as ethnicity.


If you're allowed to make hyperbolic analogies to make your point, then so am I.

The person in question didn't know about your husband's ethnicity. All he said was that the glasses made him look more Japanesey, without knowing that he is, in fact, half Japanese. Okay.

If he'd said they made him look kinda Latino, or sort of Italian, would he have been offended? And don't say neither of you was offended in the slightest; if that were true then by your third post you would have said "Okay, just checking. I had a different take on it." Instead you're going on and on about how it really, truly wasn't appropriate, which is a PC way of saying mildly offensive.

And no, it is not AT ALL like touching someone without their permission. Had the person put his hands to your husband's face and pulled his eyes out into a slant, THAT would have been the equivalent of touching someone else without their permission.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#40 May 17 2006 at 10:05 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Princess Tare wrote:
You never know, we might see some Poluvian kids around this forum one day. Smiley: wink


Perolish!!!! Smiley: mad
#41 May 17 2006 at 10:19 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
It always amazes me that folks take such offense to what others deem offensive. If a remark makes you pause because you feel it's inappropriate, you let the person know that you felt that way. At that point, if they just want to breate you for the invalidity of your feelings, then they just get to be the pompous asses they are and it doesn't reflect on you one bit.

I've been called Asian many times, and I've always thought to myself "more cultures than Asian ones have slanted eyes", but pretty much just kept to clarifying that I am, in fact, not Asian. If the person insists that I must have "some Asian, somewhere" then I take that as an excuse to go into my fu[Black][/Black]cking family tree and outline the fact that my grandmother on my mother's side was indigenous (no, Bodhi) and that's where the eyes come from, and that the puffiness/no lid aspect that they deem Asian is from my Italian side. At this point, it does become annoying where before it was just innapropriate.

The first time I ever became truly aware of my race was when a guy I dated introduced me as such. Until then, I hadn't noticed he looked at me that way. You may think it's obvious to someone born into a different culture that they are different, but people come into ethnicities sometimes the same way others come into sexualities, and like sexualities, not everyone is at the perfect state of enlightenment and comfort that makes it okay to say whatever the hell you please. Does this mean you won't? Of course not, but it also doen't make it any less insensitive.

Edited, Wed May 17 11:27:17 2006 by Atomicflea
#42 May 17 2006 at 10:58 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Pretty soon no one will be able to talk to anyone else about any damn thing. But by God! we'll be so sensitive we'll bruise in a hard rain.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#43 May 17 2006 at 11:02 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Sam, in some places it's already that bad. Smiley: frown
#44 May 17 2006 at 11:17 AM Rating: Good
IMHO, there's a subtle difference between a statement being awkward and/or insensitive and a statement that is blatantly offensive and/or bigoted.

For example, the OP's comment reminded me of an incident where someone who hadn't seen my wife for several months took a look at her and said "Congratulations! It's about time- when are you due?", to which my wife coldly replied that she wasn't pregnant. It's a faux pas (to kinda steal from another post's title), one that is embarassing to some, and not a little awkward, but can be excused and passes without much incident.

However, if the OP had stated their friend was making racist jokes in front of them, it becomes a more serious social transgression.

Personally, I shrug off the minor stuff. Some things are said innocently and without intent. As has been mentioned in this thread already, it's the intention behind the statement that counts, and is often a matter of context.
____________________________
Longtail | Evilynne | Maevene | Kornakk | Steelbelly
#45 May 17 2006 at 12:11 PM Rating: Good
***
3,118 posts
If it makes you feel any better Ambrya, I like Japanese people and I think you have a nice rack. =)
#46 May 17 2006 at 1:21 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Samira wrote:
Pretty soon no one will be able to talk to anyone else about any damn thing. But by God! we'll be so sensitive we'll bruise in a hard rain.

Any mixture and clash of cultures comes with its accompanying drama and period of calm. San Francisco is a very cosmopolitan city, but that doesn't mean that all of its inhabitants of color feel 100% assimilated.

Is it part of American culture to resent politeness? I can't understand why this is any different than telling anyone they look fat, which is another perfectly obvious yet rude thing.
#47 May 17 2006 at 1:41 PM Rating: Good
***
2,196 posts
What about the Eskimos? Can we still make fun of the Eskimos? Just askin' Smiley: tongue
____________________________
'Lo, there do I see, the line of my people, back to the beginning, 'lo do they call to me, they bid me take my place among them, in the halls of Valhalla, where the brave...may live...forever.

X-Box 360 Gamer Tag - Smogster
#48 May 17 2006 at 1:43 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Inuit!!!!!
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#49 May 17 2006 at 2:03 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Quote:
Is it part of American culture to resent politeness? I can't understand why this is any different than telling anyone they look fat, which is another perfectly obvious yet rude thing.


Because "fat" has a negative connotation, while someone's race should not.
#50 May 17 2006 at 2:07 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Thank you.

Courtesy may be a lost art in the States, but quite obviously condescension is not.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#51 May 17 2006 at 2:08 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
All I know is for me personally, I don't get bothered or annoyed if someone states the obvious to me.

"Hey Nad, you look like an ugly, fat, drunken Irish chick that I used to date!"

"Really?? When was it, might have been me!"

That's kind of the stuff I hear a lot, anyway.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 228 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (228)