Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

File under "engage brain before opening mouth"Follow

#1 May 16 2006 at 5:09 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
So, this past weekend, Mr. Ambrya (whom I have mentioned before is half Japanese, and looks it in terms of complexion and the shape of his eyes) got new glasses. On his Caucasian side, he's got a rather long, narrow face (or as he puts it, "mom's meat stretched over dad's bones" -- and no, I don't think he intended that to sound as bad as it did. He was, after all, discussing his parents) and his previous rounded lenses really had a bit of an eggheady/Mr. Peeps thing going on that, while far from objectionable, was just a bit dated. So the new specs are much smaller, rectangular, and all kinds of HAWT! But that's another story.

Today one of his coworkers--someone with whom he rarely speaks--noticed the new glasses and this was the comment they made:

"It makes you look more Japanesey! Is that what you were going for?"

Now, my husband has no issues whatsoever about being half Japanese, but it struck him as being a very inappropriate remark to make to a casual coworker, if for no other reason than it's just really not cool the raise the issue of a virtual stranger's racial identity when the person in question hasn't first raised the issue.

We're both laughing it off as being someone who just put their foot in their mouth without ever thinking about how the words they were speaking might come across, but at the same time, we're both a little aghast that anyone could be that blithely tactless in the workplace.

Makes me wonder what the general consensus is. If you have a casual acquaintance/coworker whose racial identity is by no means a topic of conversation (or for that matter, even a sure thing--he doesn't look so Japanese that one could immediately assume that to be his genetic background) is it tacky or acceptable to bring it up?



Edited, Tue May 16 18:10:31 2006 by Ambrya
#2 May 16 2006 at 5:12 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
What's wrong with Japanesey?

It's not like he said "carefull, you're much more likely to be interned if we go to war with the Nips now"

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#3 May 16 2006 at 5:17 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
I would have objected to that remark more on its tone than its content. Race is not a subject I tend to tiptoe around, peronally.

On the other hand I tend to avoid making personal remarks about co-workers' appearances beyond, "I like that shirt" or the equivalent.

So, would I have said that? No. Would I object to something similar being said to me? No.

I've had people comment that I look Irish, because of my coloring. I'm not, but I understand what they mean and I'm certainly not offended.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#4 May 16 2006 at 5:17 PM Rating: Good
*****
19,369 posts
He should have broke out in song and dance...

I'm turning Japanese
I think I'm turning Japanese
I really think so
#5 May 16 2006 at 5:26 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Unless being Japanese, or being told that you look Japanese, is supposed to be some kind of insult, no, what he said was by no means inappropriate.

Ambrya wrote:
it's just really not cool the raise the issue of a virtual stranger's racial identity when the person in question hasn't first raised the issue.


No, no, no. I disagree completely. Is a person's race some kind of taboo topic that they should hide and keep to themselves? If everyone is equal, then there should be no reason whatsoever to tap-dance around a person's race.

Edited, Tue May 16 18:27:32 2006 by Eske
#6 May 16 2006 at 5:34 PM Rating: Decent
**
574 posts
I agree, if the inclination was one of racism then it is wrong, otherwise there isn't an issue.

Sometimes I think political correctness has distorted the boundaries and scares people into making any kind of judgement based on difference between peoples.
____________________________
The Real Iksar

Madho
Novocane
Poldarn
#7 May 16 2006 at 5:35 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
Eske wrote:
U
No, no, no. I disagree completely. Is a person's race some kind of taboo topic that they should hide and keep to themselves? If everyone is equal, then there should be no reason whatsoever to tap-dance around a person's race.



It's not that it's an issue which needs to be hidden/kept to oneself, but if one doesn't make his or her race an issue, then why should the people around him or her bring it up?

Basically, I think the problem is that by bringing up someone's race in an unsolicited (and for all you know, unwelcome) way, you're conveying the message that the first--and possibly only-- thing you notice about that person is their skin color/eye shape/whatever. You notice that they are "different."

Let's say you have a large red birthmark covering most of your face. It's not a bad thing, you're comfortable with it being a part of you and aren't ashamed of it, but you don't make an issue of it because you want other people to see things in you that AREN'T the birthmark. Would you like a coworker you barely know to come up to you and say, "I like that shirt, it makes your birthmark look smaller" when you wear a new outfit?

Or, let's say, as a woman, you're rather small in the bust department. One day you wear a new outfit, and a coworker you barely know walks up and says, "I like that outfit, it makes you look bustier." Hasn't that coworker basically just indicated that the very first thing he (or she) notices about you is your boobs?

#8 May 16 2006 at 5:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Birthmarks and flat chests, right or wrong, are potentially sensitive features (so to speak, haha). Race, to me at least, just doesn't fit into that category.

Maybe it's the effect of living in a very, very diverse area, but I'm used to people being quite open about their ancestries, and accepting of others'.

Not a taboo subject in my book. If anything his coworker should have been smacked for flagrant use of the word "Japanesey", not because it's an insult but because it's stupid.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#9 May 16 2006 at 5:42 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Ambrya wrote:
Eske wrote:
U
No, no, no. I disagree completely. Is a person's race some kind of taboo topic that they should hide and keep to themselves? If everyone is equal, then there should be no reason whatsoever to tap-dance around a person's race.



It's not that it's an issue which needs to be hidden/kept to oneself, but if one doesn't make his or her race an issue, then why should the people around him or her bring it up?

Basically, I think the problem is that by bringing up someone's race in an unsolicited (and for all you know, unwelcome) way, you're conveying the message that the first--and possibly only-- thing you notice about that person is their skin color/eye shape/whatever. You notice that they are "different."

Let's say you have a large red birthmark covering most of your face. It's not a bad thing, you're comfortable with it being a part of you and aren't ashamed of it, but you don't make an issue of it because you want other people to see things in you that AREN'T the birthmark. Would you like a coworker you barely know to come up to you and say, "I like that shirt, it makes your birthmark look smaller" when you wear a new outfit?

Or, let's say, as a woman, you're rather small in the bust department. One day you wear a new outfit, and a coworker you barely know walks up and says, "I like that outfit, it makes you look bustier." Hasn't that coworker basically just indicated that the very first thing he (or she) notices about you is your boobs?


Both poor examples.

In one, the person who makes the comment about the birthmark is implying that it is a physical flaw by saying that "i like it...it makes your birthmark look smaller". But race is not akin to a physical flaw.

The second one is considered sexual harassment.

A better example is if I'm wearing a particular shirt. It could be any shirt. Point is, it makes me look different than other people, because it is a unique shirt. If someone comes up to me and says, "that shirt makes you look distinct or unique in some way" then I am not going to take offense to that, because it's simply a neutral personal characteristic.

That's what race is. Ideally, there is no reason for anyone to be sensitive about their race, because all races are considered equal. It's a neutral personal characteristic. It may be interesting, have cultural significance, or history. But to suggest that it should be kept hidden or taboo for public discourse is to suggest that there is something negative about it.

EDIT: i'm killing myself with dumb spelling mistakes today...

Edited, Tue May 16 18:45:54 2006 by Eske

Edited, Tue May 16 18:47:53 2006 by Eske
#10 May 16 2006 at 5:43 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Basically, I think the problem is that by bringing up someone's race in an unsolicited (and for all you know, unwelcome) way, you're conveying the message that the first--and possibly only-- thing you notice about that person is their skin color/eye shape/whatever. You notice that they are "different."


They are diffrent you filthy Halfanese lover.

Keep making long posts trying to convince the level headed people that your alarmist garbage is somehow related to someone saying "nice rack" to a coworker though.

You're making a lot of progress.

Really.

I'm *this* close to convinced. If your husband maybe threatened to fly half a plane into me or something I'd come over to your side.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#11 May 16 2006 at 5:45 PM Rating: Decent
**
574 posts
Again I think its the way something is said. For example the same female co-worker could come up and say, "I like that shirt its really flattering". They both would amount to the same thing accept the second phrase is just more palatable to the girl with the small baps.

But when we meet someone the first thing you notice primarily are their looks and any differences to what you consider the "norm". It is how people recognise others normally, as long as you're not overtly rude about someones appearance I don't see it as an issue.
____________________________
The Real Iksar

Madho
Novocane
Poldarn
#12 May 16 2006 at 5:50 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
Samira wrote:


Not a taboo subject in my book. If anything his coworker should have been smacked for flagrant use of the word "Japanesey", not because it's an insult but because it's stupid.


/nod


The context itself doesn't seem all that bad. Much like Samira, I live in a diverse location, and the topic doesn't seem all that taboo. The wording with which this person chose to use however seems immature at best.
#13 May 16 2006 at 5:50 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
They are diffrent you filthy Halfanese lover.


That is quite possibly the best thing since my one University professor who was Mohawk on his fathers side and Finlander on his mothers called himself the "Findian".
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#14 May 16 2006 at 6:28 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
10,802 posts
Queen bodhisattva wrote:
That is quite possibly the best thing since my one University professor who was Mohawk on his fathers side and Finlander on his mothers called himself the "Findian".


My cousin (my family is Filipino) married a guy from a huge Polish family. We teased them mercilessly when we found out they were having a kid asking them if the kid was going to Filipolish or Polipino.
#15 May 16 2006 at 6:31 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Did you talk him out of Hari Kari?
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#16 May 16 2006 at 8:10 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Thumbelyna the Hand wrote:
My cousin (my family is Filipino) married a guy from a huge Polish family. We teased them mercilessly when we found out they were having a kid asking them if the kid was going to Filipolish or Polipino.


You never know, we might see some Poluvian kids around this forum one day. Smiley: wink

____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#17 May 16 2006 at 8:15 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,499 posts
In my opinion, the issue is that a lot of people think that biracial people are supposed to identify with one race over the other.

It can be odd for people you don't really know to say that X makes you look Japanese or anything else because you don't know if that person might be sterotyping you based on what they think Japanese people are like instead of just accepting you for who you are.

I am half Japanese and half White and no one can quite place my racial identity most of the time - but that's cool - makes me feel exotic. HA!
#18 May 16 2006 at 8:22 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

It can be odd for people you don't really know to say that X makes you look Japanese or anything else because you don't know if that person might be sterotyping you based on what they think Japanese people are like instead of just accepting you for who you are.


Well, when they ACTUALLY sterotype you, then worry about it. Someone calling me a male, or Irish, or tall, or exceptionally charming. doesn't ussually make me fly into self righetous indignation. Those are just things that I AM. If they implied I'd behave a certain way because of them, that's a diffrent story.



____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#19 May 16 2006 at 9:11 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

It can be odd for people you don't really know to say that X makes you look Japanese or anything else because you don't know if that person might be sterotyping you based on what they think Japanese people are like instead of just accepting you for who you are.


Well, when they ACTUALLY sterotype you, then worry about it. Someone calling me a male, or Irish, or tall, or exceptionally charming. doesn't ussually make me fly into self righetous indignation. Those are just things that I AM. If they implied I'd behave a certain way because of them, that's a diffrent story.


Exactly. We're just talking about somebody simply saying that you resemble a particular race in appearance. If that's all that's said, but you take it as an insult, then you're either reading too much into the comment in an attempt to be overly PC, or you actually think that there is some negative quality associated with race.

EDIT: That was an attempt to add something, but it appears I just took what Smash wrote and phrased it worse. Damn.

Edited, Tue May 16 22:19:52 2006 by Eske
#20 May 16 2006 at 10:15 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
Eske wrote:


Exactly. We're just talking about somebody simply saying that you resemble a particular race in appearance. If that's all that's said, but you take it as an insult, then you're either reading too much into the comment in an attempt to be overly PC, or you actually think that there is some negative quality associated with race.


You're putting words in my mouth.

I never said my husband, or I, interpretted it as an insult. I said we felt it was INAPPROPRIATE, just as walking up to a woman and commenting on her bust was inappropriate.

It's one thing if someone is trying to make a point of emphasizing their ethnicity in their speech or mode of dress (or whatever), if it's something that they use to define who they are. For instance, if the woman in the busty situation made a habit of talking about her boobs, then she has no business crying foul when someone else acknowledges what she's saying. But to approach someone you don't really know beyond a passing nod at the coffee machine, a person who doesn't make a point of defining himself by or emphasizing his ethnicity (or any other random physical attribute) and then make a remark that indicates that when you look at a person, all you see is their ethnicity (or physical attributes, or whatever it is that makes them different) then yes, we feel that is inappropriate.

Not because it's insulting, but because it's...invasive, maybe? Intrusive, or presumptuous, like you're laying claim to knowledge of that person that they haven't seen fit to share with you. Or maybe it's just plain tacky.

It's not about race, or stereotyping, so much as it is about decorum. It's about respecting the boundaries that quite rightfully belong between casual acquaintances, about not making personal remarks when a level of personal comfort and understanding doesn't exist.



Edited, Tue May 16 23:26:01 2006 by Ambrya
#21 May 16 2006 at 11:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Um, okay. So people with whom I have not specifically shared the fact that I'm female should never make gender specific comments like, "As a woman you've probably been on the receiving end of some pretty lame pickup lines." Cause it would be inappropriate to show any knowledge of the perfectly obvious fact that I'm female.

Got it.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#22 May 17 2006 at 12:31 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
Samira wrote:
Um, okay. So people with whom I have not specifically shared the fact that I'm female should never make gender specific comments like, "As a woman you've probably been on the receiving end of some pretty lame pickup lines." Cause it would be inappropriate to show any knowledge of the perfectly obvious fact that I'm female.

Got it.


I think that's a little deliberately obtuse. There's a world of difference between making an observation on a patently obvious and irrefutable fact, and making an assumption about something as vague and potentially sensitive as ethnicity.

The person in question didn't know my husband was half-Japanese. It's not "perfectly obvious." My husband has a somewhat Asian look which could have been attributed to any number of other ethnicities. It's not as clear-cut as noticing the fact that a woman is a woman.

Furthermore, the person in question didn't know my husband WASN'T sensitive about his ethnicity. Had he been another person, he could easily have been. So in this case, making a presumptuous remark about his ethnicity was simply not a classy thing to do, certainly not in the workplace.

It's about not going where you haven't been invited to go, basically, and in doing so, making assumptions which may or may not be correct, but which are probably best left unmade unless or until you have been invited to make them.

I just feel this is the verbal equivalent of walking up to a pregnant lady whom you don't know and touching her belly without invitation. You don't know it's all right with her. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't, but you don't know. Either way, it's invasive, and common sense--indeed, common courtesy--demands that you just don't do it.

#23 May 17 2006 at 12:31 AM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
I'm putting words in your mouth?

Quote:
But to approach someone you don't really know beyond a passing nod at the coffee machine, a person who doesn't make a point of defining himself by or emphasizing his ethnicity (or any other random physical attribute) and then make a remark that indicates that when you look at a person, all you see is their ethnicity (or physical attributes, or whatever it is that makes them different) then yes, we feel that is inappropriate.


"All you see is their ethnicity"...who said anything about that?

You see, you're adding inflection and subtext to try to make an otherwise innocuous remark seem like a barb.

Why comment on anything relating to a person's appearance then? Why is it any different than an acceptable comment about someone's appearance? (I highlight 'acceptable' because I don't believe that conversation about someone's breasts serves as a good analogy).

I think the discomfort that you have about the issue stem from years and years of ingrained hyper-sensitivity to anything dealing with race. It's the way everyone is, because of the haphazard use of 'political correctness'.

What's the reason for the discomfort? I know why women would feel uncomfortable talking about their breasts in public. It isn't simply because "it's personal", it's because of long-standing social mores.

Those however, don't exist with a person's race. What we have is that people are being wrongly trained to think that something that outwardly characterises a person physically is something taboo.

Edited, Wed May 17 01:41:00 2006 by Eske
#24 May 17 2006 at 12:36 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Hey Squaw! Does your mother in law have a sideways ******?

If so is it serviceable?

Note for Everyone other than Ambrya: No one messes with Ambrya but me, is that clear?


____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#25 May 17 2006 at 12:50 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
Eske wrote:
I'm putting words in your mouth?

Quote:
But to approach someone you don't really know beyond a passing nod at the coffee machine, a person who doesn't make a point of defining himself by or emphasizing his ethnicity (or any other random physical attribute) and then make a remark that indicates that when you look at a person, all you see is their ethnicity (or physical attributes, or whatever it is that makes them different) then yes, we feel that is inappropriate.


"All you see is their ethnicity"...who said anything about that?


Um...I did. And I never indicated anything other than that was MY interpretation of the way such a remark could come across.

Quote:

You see, you're adding inflection and subtext to try to make an otherwise innocuous remark seem like a barb.


And again, you miss the point. We never considered it a barb. We merely considered it "tacky." As in, lacking in any sense of social grace. Which, should you choose to actually read the original post, was the question that I posed--whether or not such a remark was tacky.

Quote:

Why comment on anything relating to a person's appearance then? Why is it any different than an acceptable comment about someone's appearance? (I highlight 'acceptable' because I don't believe that conversation about someone's breasts serves as a good analogy).


There are some issues which are innocuous enough that one can safely remark on them, and some issues which may or may not push buttons, and therefore simple social decorum dictates that one just doesn't go there. Why couldn't the guy in question simply have told my husband his new glasses looked good? Why add on the ethnic remark at all?

In this case, he was lucky...my husband has no issues about his ethnicity. But what if he had? Many Asian cultures tend to feel their racial identity quite strongly, to the point of being quite bigotted toward other Asian cultures. What if my husband had been one of those, and the guy in question had gotten the culture in question wrong, and assumed that my husband was from ethnic background X when actually he was from ethnic background Y, and felt that identity strongly enough to take offense at the assumption?

In that case, the situation could have gotten quite ugly. The person making the remark was lucky, in that he made it to my husband who doesn't have those issues. But basic common sense and common tact says that if you're not dealing with someone whom you have a level of familiarity with, you don't make those kinds of assumptions, and you certainly don't voice them.

Quote:

I think the discomfort that you have about the issue stem from years and years of ingrained hyper-sensitivity to anything dealing with race. It's the way everyone is, because of the haphazard use of 'political correctness'.


No, it's more years and years of ingrained frustration with watching people say completely tactless, obnoxious things without ever realizing that they're being rude and presumptuous. It's like Americans these days have no sense of decorum, no sense of social boundary. They feel they can go forth and spew whatever ***** enters their heads without any regard for how it might be perceived.



Edited, Wed May 17 01:52:40 2006 by Ambrya
#26 May 17 2006 at 12:53 AM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Quote:
I just feel this is the verbal equivalent of walking up to a pregnant lady whom you don't know and touching her belly without invitation. You don't know it's all right with her. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't, but you don't know. Either way, it's invasive, and common sense--indeed, common courtesy--demands that you just don't do it.


Another bad analogy. These are words, not touch. Nor does 'common courtesy' dictate that you don't do it.

The "some people might take offense to it, therefore nobody should do it" argument is a fallacy. Especially if I think that the reason that those people cite for being offended is wrong. So let's do away with that one right now.

Why does it matter whether it's obvious what ethnicity he was or not? The person could either be right or wrong. I'm white. If someone came up to me and said "You look like a black man" i'd think they're crazy, but I wouldn't be offended.

I don't specifically invite anybody to make any comments about my physical appearance, so why is one appropriate and the other is not? The answer is that silly PC hand-wringing that's all the rage.
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 219 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (219)