MentalFrog wrote:
Ambrya wrote:
oasnative wrote:
True. Never would of thought of that...
Okay, I don't normally go after the grammar, but this one I've seen about a half dozen times in the last couple days and it's driving me nuts.
WOULD HAVE. Not "would of." Same goes for COULD HAVE and SHOULD HAVE.
All right, I'm done now.
Edited, Tue May 2 09:47:18 2006 by Ambrya While we're on the subject...
It's "a lot" not "alot". It's two words retards not one, alot isn't even a word. How much? A whole lot! Fu[Aquamarine][/Aquamarine]ckers.
i just have to add my little rant to this...
there - "The plate is over there." (a place, directive)
their - "It is their plate." (possive, showing possession)
they're - "They're angry that you took the plate." (contraction of they are)
now i know my spelling might not be all correct, but those three words ARE. ^.^b
texas isn't too bad. denton is awesome, houston isn't, and conroe is "so-so."