http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/03/07/embryos.ruling/index.html wrote:
LONDON, England -- The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that a British woman has no right to use frozen embryos to have a baby without the consent of the man who provided the sperm.
The court upheld a UK law that says permission from both parents is needed at every stage of the in vitro fertilization (IVF) process, as well as for the storage and implantation of the fertilized eggs.
The court upheld a UK law that says permission from both parents is needed at every stage of the in vitro fertilization (IVF) process, as well as for the storage and implantation of the fertilized eggs.
I think the "man" (I use this term loosely) in this case needs a bullet to the head . This "Don't want the financial and emotional responsibility of blah blah blah" is utter crap.
He is single-handedly denying a woman the right to bear children. Once these embryos are destroyed.... as a male of the species I can't even fathom the kind of loss one would be feeling at that point.