Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

camero concept carFollow

#1 Jan 31 2006 at 5:09 PM Rating: Default
omg, im buying one.

call it a midlife crisis if you want, my wife is, i dont care, im buying it. not asking persmission either.

gotta wait till 2008.....ARGHHH.......i can do it.........
#2 Jan 31 2006 at 5:41 PM Rating: Decent
*
152 posts
Who the hell doesn't know how to spell Camaro?

Edit: Langauge filter > Me

Edited, Tue Jan 31 17:43:29 2006 by Illnino
#3 Jan 31 2006 at 5:46 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Mehh.
American cars Smiley: frown

All fine until you hit a bend.

When (apart from the GTO) are you gonna make a car that can corner like a European Car?

Get that fixed and you'll RULE THE WORLD (if it isn't for those meddling kids)

I'll stick with my order for a Merc SE Kompressor Coupe
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#4 Jan 31 2006 at 5:47 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Quote:
Who the hell doesn't know how to spell Camaro?


start nitpicking shadowrelm's spelling, and you'll be in for a long night.



So, this one?

Looks neat. I don't know a whole lot about cars (some guy I am) but I like it. The interior looks pretty peculiar.
#5REDACTED, Posted: Jan 31 2006 at 6:01 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) All fine until you hit a bend.
#6 Jan 31 2006 at 6:11 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
shadowrelm wrote:
it will corner almost as well as a corvette.
Hahahaha! I borrowed a Stingray that handled like a shopping trolley compared to a British Family Saloon.

Like I said - If you think a Corvette can corner you need to try out an Alfa Romeo, a Lotus or a Maserati on a bendy alpine road.

Yep - some Yank cars have awesome power to weight ratios, acceleration etc. But they're designed for straight roads.

US cars handle like pregnant pigs.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#7 Jan 31 2006 at 6:18 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

The problem with the new ratings display is I can't tell how close Shadowrelm is to subdefault.


#8 Jan 31 2006 at 6:29 PM Rating: Decent
*
152 posts
Quote:
need to get your priorties in order i think.


Says someone claiming they're going to buy a craptastic GM?
#9 Jan 31 2006 at 6:31 PM Rating: Default
Like I said - If you think a Corvette can corner you need to try out an Alfa Romeo, a Lotus or a Maserati on a bendy alpine road.
--------------------------------------------

after 1985, corvettes went to an all alluminum chasis with the engine relocated farther behind the front wheels. they lowered the center of gravity too.

the corvette today is nothing like its ancestors. it is a racing machine that will out corner everything but the most exotic production cars like the lamborghini or ferrari, and even then, the cornering is so close to those, you need very sensitive instruments to tell the differance.

this camaro will not have the light weight alluminum frame the vette does, and the center of gravity is about an inch higher, but from the picture you can see the front wheels, like the vette, are mounted far foward of what normal cars are, making the weight of the engine and transmission more centered to the middle of the vehical.

adn like the vette, it has the same 4 wheel independant suspension, with the same wide tires mounted very high on the platform into the fender wells. and like the vette, it has the same light weight alluminum engine pumping out a whopping 400 hp.

it WILL corner better than most eurotrash, like the bmw and mercedes, and as good as most higher end european sports cars.

and most importantly, it will blow away just about all of them in raw power. you just cant beat the sound of tires spinning so fast there is no squeling, and the smell of a fog of burning rubber gently waifing around the sides and front of the car just before the melted rubber sticks like glue to the heated asphault and launches the car so fast, you feel a couple G,s pushing you back into your seat.

my first car was a 1969 camaro with a 350 engine i opened up and put a small block 400 crankshaft into, amoung some other things, creating a 383 cu inch small block pumping out close to 450 hp.

ahh the good old days. when every one knew what eldabrock, holly, mallory and crane ment, adn no one gave a crap what kind of radio you had.

but i guess with a rice burner, and most eurotrash, you had no engine to be proud of, so you had to find something else to "hop up", hehehe
#10 Jan 31 2006 at 6:43 PM Rating: Good
***
2,324 posts
Nobby wrote:
shadowrelm wrote:
it will corner almost as well as a corvette.
Hahahaha! I borrowed a Stingray that handled like a shopping trolley compared to a British Family Saloon.

Like I said - If you think a Corvette can corner you need to try out an Alfa Romeo, a Lotus or a Maserati on a bendy alpine road.

Yep - some Yank cars have awesome power to weight ratios, acceleration etc. But they're designed for straight roads.

US cars handle like pregnant pigs.


Vettes are untouchable in the price range. Pregnant pigs? maybe in the 60's.

When you start comparing 6 digit cars to a Vette, maybe you get a win light.

However, a Vette can be modified to outperform many of those eurotrash cars, for 10s of thousands of dollars less, and not sound like a "sex toy on steroids" while doing it.

Phoo-ey on your crumpets and tea, cams and gasoline for the win!

#11 Jan 31 2006 at 7:16 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Nobby wrote:
shadowrelm wrote:
it will corner almost as well as a corvette.
Hahahaha! I borrowed a Stingray that handled like a shopping trolley compared to a British Family Saloon.

Like I said - If you think a Corvette can corner you need to try out an Alfa Romeo, a Lotus or a Maserati on a bendy alpine road.

Yep - some Yank cars have awesome power to weight ratios, acceleration etc. But they're designed for straight roads.

US cars handle like pregnant pigs.

Yes, here in the states we have enough land for straight roads!
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#12 Jan 31 2006 at 7:24 PM Rating: Good
Pregnant pigs make for a smooth ride!
#13 Jan 31 2006 at 7:37 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Not being funny

I drive quite a few cars and even High end US cars don't corner well.

Just sayin'
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#14 Jan 31 2006 at 7:40 PM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Nobby wrote:
Not being funny

Are too!
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#15 Jan 31 2006 at 7:41 PM Rating: Good
I'm not arguing with ya Nobster. I tend to agree. My Ford Ranger has a tighter turning radius than most cars...and that's just plain sad.
#16 Feb 01 2006 at 10:53 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,574 posts
Quote:
Mehh.
American cars icon

All fine until you hit a bend.

When (apart from the GTO) are you gonna make a car that can corner like a European Car?

Get that fixed and you'll RULE THE WORLD (if it isn't for those meddling kids)

I'll stick with my order for a Merc SE Kompressor Coupe


BMW > Mercedes as far as I'm concerned. The ride is smoother, handle nicer, and the nicer models look damn fine, though the SLK Kompressor(SP?) are pretty hot, despite what I may think.

M3 or M5 would be my choice, and yes, American cars can't do **** compared to any European car, those rice burners can't, either.
#17 Feb 01 2006 at 11:22 AM Rating: Decent
I've been viewing some of the Top Gear series that some people have taped and put on Google Video- I'm not going to discount bias, (though they held an Australian car over the equivalent level Jaguar model in one episode) but it seems that a lot of American cars pale in comparison to the stuff that's created over on the other side of the ocean insofar as sports cars go.


I want an Ariel Atom Smiley: yippee

I mean, yes, I'd have to wear a helmet for the car, but having the equivalent of 600+ horsepower (and 0-60 in 2.7 if you can shift fast enough) just sounds too fun.
#18 Feb 01 2006 at 11:26 AM Rating: Good
Personally I would prefer to see the 6.1l, 425 hp SRT/8 Hemi driven Challenger come to production, but then I have always been a Mopar man, myself. Give me an SRT/10 over a Z06 any day.

That thing got a HEMI? Sweet.
#19 Feb 01 2006 at 11:30 AM Rating: Good
Gah! Cars suck. Motorcycles are far better in cornering, acceleration, handling, et cetera, et cetera.

If you pit the fastest car in the world against the fastest bike, the bike will be finished the race before the car even gets up to speed. Here's an example.
#20 Feb 01 2006 at 11:32 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
Personally I would prefer to see the 6.1l, 425 hp SRT/8 Hemi driven Challenger come to production, but then I have always been a Mopar man, myself. Give me an SRT/10 over a Z06 any day.

That thing got a HEMI? Sweet.

Now I finally know how you guys feel when I talk purses. Smiley: frown

Except you, Pat! Smiley: grin


And you, DSD.

Edited, Wed Feb 1 11:33:54 2006 by Atomicflea
#21 Feb 01 2006 at 11:36 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,574 posts
Quote:
Gah! Cars suck. Motorcycles are far better in cornering, acceleration, handling, et cetera, et cetera.

If you pit the fastest car in the world against the fastest bike, the bike will be finished the race before the car even gets up to speed. Here's an example.


Corvette's are crap, they're all looks. My brother in his Saturn SL2 can give one a run for it's money.

Put that bike up against an M3 or M5, we'll see who wins.
#22 Feb 01 2006 at 11:41 AM Rating: Good
GreatBadger wrote:
Put that bike up against an M3 or M5, we'll see who wins.

I can honestly say that if you put that little thought in to guild chat, Nadenu making a house call to convince me will not get you an extended stay.

There is no way in the realm of possibility that an M3 or M5 can beat an equally "tuned" street bike in a heads up anything (with the exception of how many people you can fit comfortably). It simply can't happen. Perhaps if you knew f'uck all about anything other than how to work the mouse with one hand around your d;ck you'd be able to pick up on that.
#23 Feb 01 2006 at 11:42 AM Rating: Good
GreatBadger wrote:
Put that bike up against an M3 or M5, we'll see who wins.
Honestly, you are making yourself look stupid here. it is impossible for a car to beat a bike. Here is an article explaining why. If you understood the physics behind it and actually rode one, you would understand why.
#24 Feb 01 2006 at 11:48 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,574 posts
You're right, I don't know bikes, and have yet to nor will ever ride one due to the danger of wiping out and getting crushed by another vehicle, head trauma, ripping skin off any given part of my body (The "bike" clothes may protect against this?), or some other risk involved with going 80+ MPH without a shell around you in the event of something happening.
#25 Feb 01 2006 at 11:49 AM Rating: Decent
Elderon the Wise wrote:
GreatBadger wrote:
Put that bike up against an M3 or M5, we'll see who wins.
Honestly, you are making yourself look stupid here. it is impossible for a car to beat a bike. Here is an article explaining why. If you understood the physics behind it and actually rode one, you would understand why.


Or maybe not...


*edit*

I'm not saying all cars can, but this one can because it lacks (among a lot of things) those problems that other cars have. I'm just poking at your "impossible for a car to beat a bike" comment.


Edited, Wed Feb 1 11:58:25 2006 by Althrun
#26 Feb 01 2006 at 11:58 AM Rating: Good
Althrun the Silent wrote:
Elderon the Wise wrote:
GreatBadger wrote:
Put that bike up against an M3 or M5, we'll see who wins.
Honestly, you are making yourself look stupid here. it is impossible for a car to beat a bike. Here is an article explaining why. If you understood the physics behind it and actually rode one, you would understand why.


Or maybe not...
So putting what the host deems the "fastest thing on 4 wheels" against a little 600cc bike is an even match? You would have to go against a 750cc minimum to put it on an even playing field. Do note that that little 600cc did beat the car off the line. Now imagine if it was a "real" bike. Smiley: rolleyes
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 280 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (280)