Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Liberals butt hurt over alitoFollow

#1 Jan 26 2006 at 11:36 AM Rating: Sub-Default
Quote:
A filibuster is a radical tool. It's easy to see why Democrats are frightened of it. But from our perspective, there are some things far more frightening. One of them is Samuel Alito on the Supreme Court.


http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/26/opinion/26thur1.html?ei=5090&en=784f1dd599ca969d&ex=1295931600&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=print

Achileez
#2 Jan 26 2006 at 11:41 AM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Pubs say he will bring balance to the courts.

just like the Council said Anakin would bring balance to the force.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#3 Jan 26 2006 at 11:43 AM Rating: Good
Kelvyquayo, Eater of Souls wrote:
Pubs say he will bring balance to the courts.

just like the Council said Anakin would bring balance to the force.


Smiley: lolSmiley: lolSmiley: lol
#4 Jan 26 2006 at 11:47 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
Liberals butt hurt over alito


A few years from now it will be "All the US butthurt over Alito"
#5REDACTED, Posted: Jan 26 2006 at 11:50 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Bloodwolf,
#6 Jan 26 2006 at 11:52 AM Rating: Good
***
3,826 posts
It won't affect me really, but when he overturns Roe v. Wade, it's not going to stop women from having abortions. It'll just be more gruesome and less sterile, and probably in a seedy back-alley.
#7 Jan 26 2006 at 11:53 AM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
is this gona turn into another abortion thread?


well, at least fetuses won't be butthurt in the near future.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#8 Jan 26 2006 at 11:54 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
Not evil, just overbearing.
#9 Jan 26 2006 at 11:59 AM Rating: Good
***
3,826 posts
Nah, that wasn't my intent. I guess it's just silly, in my opinion, for the President to select someone to be on the supreme court.

The judges are suppossed to be unbaised, so I can't understand why they are selected by the President, who has to act bais to his party or face loss of support.
#10 Jan 26 2006 at 12:04 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

The judges are suppossed to be unbaised, so I can't understand why they are selected by the President, who has to act bais to his party or face loss of support.


Probably because the earlier method of pissing into a shot glass from 30 yards the most accurately yeilded even worse results. Someone has to pick them. Might as well be the Executive with aproval from the Congress.

Oh wait, forget that lst part, that's not important, I forgot.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#11REDACTED, Posted: Jan 26 2006 at 12:07 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) chubby,
#12 Jan 26 2006 at 12:10 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,395 posts
Quote:
Because we all know conservatism is evil.


It is...
____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#13 Jan 26 2006 at 12:11 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
achileez wrote:
Judges are supposed to interpret the constitution strictly that's it.
Wouldn't that pretty much be the definition of "unbiased" in this case?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#14 Jan 26 2006 at 12:13 PM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Judges could be elected. That would make it democratic, but we'd end up with a bunch of handsome dumb judges.

I would have liked for one of the committee members to have asked Alito pointblank about his opinions and intentions concerning abortion rights. The question along with the disclaimer "no answer, means a no vote".

I know he could give a false answer but it's better than just avoiding the important questions all together.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#15 Jan 26 2006 at 12:14 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Judges are supposed to interpret the constitution strictly that's it. Unlike Ginsburg judges are expected to recognize precedent not create it.

Wow, who sold you that line of bullsh[b][/b]it?

Judes are supposed to make laws. That's what they do. It's theLegislature's job to recognize prescedent.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#16REDACTED, Posted: Jan 26 2006 at 12:24 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Smashed,
#17 Jan 26 2006 at 12:49 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Negative that's the legislative branches job. The judicial branch (judges) interpret laws.

I'm quite sure you've drunk yourself stupid.


Hi.

I was offering a humerous vision of the characiture of liberal judges you belive is accurate.

Try to keep up.

Hire someone if it's too much.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#18 Jan 26 2006 at 1:31 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,254 posts
The president is suposed to choose the memebers of the court because our founding fathers did not support a party system and frankly I don't think that they would be too pleased to have such nutters running around appointing people just because they were of the same party.
#19 Jan 26 2006 at 3:28 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
It doesn't matter if they chose freakin Kermit the Frog. All you guys are going to do is ***** anyways, so let's just fast forward to the part where the Femmes show us dem bewbies! Woot!
#20 Jan 26 2006 at 3:36 PM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
NephthysWanderer the Charming wrote:
It doesn't matter if they chose freakin Kermit the Frog. All you guys are going to do is ***** anyways, so let's just fast forward to the part where the Femmes show us dem bewbies! Woot!
Yeppers and if abortion is illegalized, we can all get prego, and get really big milk-filled boobs. Can't touch em though, those babies are SENSITIVE!!
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#21 Jan 26 2006 at 4:04 PM Rating: Good
***
3,826 posts
I'll drink some lactate to that. Mmm, fresh from the teet.
#22REDACTED, Posted: Jan 26 2006 at 4:25 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Smashed,
#23 Jan 26 2006 at 4:28 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
achileez wrote:
Smashed,

Quote:
Hire someone if it's too much.


Are you trying to pimp out your mom again?

Achileez




I bet you had that classic George W. Bush "Oh yeah, I just said that, I'm bad <head bobbling>" look of squinty-eyed, grinning satisfaction, didn't you?



Edited, Thu Jan 26 16:32:42 2006 by Kelvyquayo
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#24 Jan 26 2006 at 5:06 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
****
6,543 posts
Silly liberals, the only way for there to be balance in the courts is to pack with bobbly-headed yes men that will do whatever the kin-er...president tells them. That way there are no silly fillibusters or argueing or voting on anything! Phh, who needs checks and balances anyway?
____________________________
Galkaman wrote:
Kuwoobie will die crushed under the burden of his mediocrity.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 229 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (229)