Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Reply To Thread

Why would you leave a gun where a little kid can get it?Follow

#1 Jan 24 2006 at 1:40 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,395 posts
Story

Quote:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - An 8-year-old boy accidentally shot a 7-year-old girl in the arm on Tuesday with a handgun he pulled from his backpack at a day-care center, police in suburban Montgomery County, Maryland, said.

The wounded girl was flown to a local hospital with a non-life-threatening injury, police spokesperson Lucille Baur said. There were six children at the For Kids We Care day-care center at the time the shooting and no one else was injured, she said.

The shooting happened just before 7 a.m. as the boy was handling the gun, which he brought to the center in his backpack, Baur said. Officers were investigating how the boy happened to have the weapon.



Luckily, this is one of the few times something like this happened but someone didn't get killed. Seriously, if you have a gun, why not keep it locked up and the ammo separate from it? How could you possibly leave a loaded gun where a little kid could get a hold of it?
____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#2 Jan 24 2006 at 1:43 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,135 posts
Quote:
How could you possibly leave a loaded gun where a little kid could get a hold of it?


Let’s face it; kids are expensive as hell to have around. What with feeding them and putting clothes on their backs and the like.

Far cheaper to just let them shoot each other and stick on in the ground.

I blame Bush
#3 Jan 24 2006 at 1:46 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Natural selection?

It's natures way of saying "people this dumb shouldn't have offspring."

Feel sorry for the other kid though... But having said that, it is America, the kids dad will probably sue and he'll be set for life.

#4 Jan 24 2006 at 1:47 PM Rating: Decent
Stupid people shouldnt breed. Any parent stupid enough to keep guns in the home and not have them locked inside a huge *** gun safe (ie:not those pretty ones with easily broken glass) should be shot. When we have children all our guns will go inside a safe with the ammunition kept in a seperate safe.
#5 Jan 24 2006 at 1:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
What if a wolverine broke into the house and raped his sister while the kid was fumbling with the gun safe, huh? Then you liberals would be all "Why didn't this kid have a gun available"?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#6 Jan 24 2006 at 1:49 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
nevermind, that's Germantown.

/shrug




Somtimes your only purpose in life is to serve as a warning to others.


Edited, Tue Jan 24 13:58:46 2006 by Kelvyquayo
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#7 Jan 24 2006 at 1:50 PM Rating: Default
****
9,395 posts
Personally, I think that the only good reasons to have a gun are:

1. Hunting(real hunting where you eat what you kill, none of that sport hunting crap)

2. Being a police officer

I don't see the need for anyone to own a handgun unless they're a cop. Can anyone give me a good reason to own a handgun? And No, Those Bulls[b][/b]hit shooting tournaments don't count.



Edited, Tue Jan 24 13:53:42 2006 by UndeadShroom
____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#8 Jan 24 2006 at 1:52 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
I'm just thankfull the parents are liable for situations like these.
#9 Jan 24 2006 at 1:52 PM Rating: Default
****
5,135 posts
His Excellency UndeadShroom wrote:
Can anyone give me one good reason to own a handgun if you're not a cop? And no those bulls[b][/b]hit shooting tournaments don't count.



To shoot back at the cop that's shoot at you!

Duh
#10 Jan 24 2006 at 1:53 PM Rating: Default
Meh, I have a hand gun that Mr.Katie bought me shortly before he left for Kuwait. It definantly made being alone alot easier. Then again I'm paranoid like that and had a hot wire around my fence and all my windows nailed shut.
#11 Jan 24 2006 at 1:53 PM Rating: Decent
I don't know, this story makes me jealous more than anything. That little b[b][/b]itch got a free ride in a helicopter!
#12 Jan 24 2006 at 2:00 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Katie wrote:
Meh, I have a hand gun that Mr.Katie bought me shortly before he left for Kuwait. It definantly made being alone alot easier. Then again I'm paranoid like that and had a hot wire around my fence and all my windows nailed shut.

Jesus. What if there's a fire and you need an alternate exit?


As for this kid, it sounds like he's modeling. Before wackos get all up on my sac let me tell you it's age-appropriate behavior. If the gun is treated as a showpiece and an object of pride and its danger never explained (for example, the father brought it out to show to a friend and wasn't aware his kid was watching), the feeling that this is an item to show off is sucessfully modeled and likely to be imitated. The kid probably knew he was doing something wrong, (which is why he hid it in the backpack, much like you would anything you knew you weren't supposed to have) but the urge to show off was too much for him. Of course this is all supposition on my part.

Although he is clearly to blame, he's not developmentally equipped yet to understand that this particular action could have such a grave consequence, and one that is graver still.

In short, I blame Jophiel.
#13 Jan 24 2006 at 2:00 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
I'm just thankfull the parents are liable for situations like these.
Outside of America that someone is "Liable" wouldn't be of any comfort.

sometines Americans make me feel pretty sick Smiley: oyvey
#14 Jan 24 2006 at 2:02 PM Rating: Good
***
3,118 posts
His Excellency UndeadShroom wrote:
Personally, I think that the only good reasons to have a gun are:

1. Hunting(real hunting where you eat what you kill, none of that sport hunting crap)

2. Being a police officer

I don't see the need for anyone to own a handgun unless they're a cop. Can anyone give me a good reason to own a handgun? And No, Those Bulls[/b]hit shooting tournaments don't count.



Edited, Tue Jan 24 13:53:42 2006 by UndeadShroom


Absolutely! Nobody needs guns at all. They are a waste of metal and dangerous too. Everyone knows that you are completely safe and that you don't need to worry for the safety of your family, yourself, or property. This world is so full of such wonderful people that I'm surprised the gun was ever implemented in an environment full of aggression, like war.

Hunting you don't need a gun for either. Many hunters do just fine with a Bow & Arrow. Also, if you ever happen to stumble upon some rabid animal you can always beat it with a stick or a rock right?


Fuc[b]
king dolt. . .
#15 Jan 24 2006 at 2:03 PM Rating: Default
Windows break Flea m'dear. A blanket over the broken glass and I'm out.
#16 Jan 24 2006 at 2:07 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
Absolutely! Nobody needs guns at all. They are a waste of metal and dangerous too. Everyone knows that you are completely safe and that you don't need to worry for the safety of your family, yourself, or property. This world is so full of such wonderful people that I'm surprised the gun was ever implemented in an environment full of aggression, like war.

Hunting you don't need a gun for either. Many hunters do just fine with a Bow & Arrow. Also, if you ever happen to stumble upon some rabid animal you can always beat it with a stick or a rock right?


******* dolt. . .
That would be the reason that deaths due to firearms increases exponentially with the total number of guns availible.

I.e the more guns there are, the less safe it is.
#17 Jan 24 2006 at 2:09 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Tarv, while detailing his posting location, wrote:
A sleak grey messenger of death

Quit that!!! Smiley: mad

Quote:
Windows break Flea m'dear. A blanket over the broken glass and I'm out.

Until you're foiled by the window screen. Those things never come out when you want them to.

Edited, Tue Jan 24 14:16:00 2006 by Atomicflea
#18 Jan 24 2006 at 2:10 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
tarv of the Seven Seas wrote:
Quote:
I'm just thankfull the parents are liable for situations like these.
Outside of America that someone is "Liable" wouldn't be of any comfort.

sometines Americans make me feel pretty sick Smiley: oyvey


So you're a guns shoot people person? Who/what should be found liable if not the parents? I would rather keep my freedom to own a gun (I own several), and hold a couple irresponsible parents liable, then to have my freedoms stripped away because blame is passed on the weapon itself.

#19 Jan 24 2006 at 2:13 PM Rating: Default
How weak do you have to be not to be able to get the screen off the window?
#20 Jan 24 2006 at 2:13 PM Rating: Good
***
3,118 posts
tarv of the Seven Seas wrote:
That would be the reason that deaths due to firearms increases exponentially with the total number of guns availible.

I.e the more guns there are, the less safe it is.

I'm sure that if Phasers, or whatever the hell they used in StarTrek, were made available you would also see an exponential increase of Phaser related deaths. The simple act of owning a gun doesn't instantly make the world a less safe place. Mishandling those guns or being careless with them certainly does.
#21 Jan 24 2006 at 2:20 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
So you're a guns shoot people person? Who/what should be found liable if not the parents? I would rather keep my freedom to own a gun (I own several), and hold a couple irresponsible parents liable, then to have my freedoms stripped away because blame is passed on the weapon itself
No i'm a "Americans think everything is ok so long as you have someone to blame" person.

Quote:
I'm sure that if Phasers, or whatever the hell they used in StarTrek, were made available you would also see an exponential increase of Phaser related deaths. The simple act of owning a gun doesn't instantly make the world a less safe place. Mishandling those guns or being careless with them certainly does.
Wrong.

look up the stats or even the word Exponentially punchy.

it works like this in round figures

10 guns = 0.000001 deaths per 1000

100 guns = 0.000025 deaths per 1000

1000 guns = 0.000325 deaths per 1000

10000 guns = 0.004500 deaths per 1000

get it? more guns = less safe.
#22 Jan 24 2006 at 2:34 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,395 posts
Quote:
Absolutely! Nobody needs guns at all. They are a waste of metal and dangerous too.


I said Police officers need guns, as do the military.

Quote:
Everyone knows that you are completely safe and that you don't need to worry for the safety of your family, yourself, or property. This world is so full of such wonderful people that I'm surprised the gun was ever implemented in an environment full of aggression, like war.



I pity you if you need a gun for your family's safety...


Quote:
Hunting you don't need a gun for either. Many hunters do just fine with a Bow & Arrow.


A crossbow that you can buy in a store is great for hunting. I said I'm ok with having a rifle for hunting, as long as you eat what you kill.

Quote:
Also, if you ever happen to stumble upon some rabid animal you can always beat it with a stick or a rock right?


If you come across a rabid animal, and you have enough time to aim your rifle at it and shoot it, it hasn't seen you yet and you obviously have enough time to just turn around and walk away.
____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#23 Jan 24 2006 at 2:41 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Can anyone give me a good reason to own a handgun? And No, Those ******** shooting tournaments don't count.


If you are a hunter, lets say of bear for instance, and you like to use baits, a handgun is almost a necessity. I went out to refill a bear bait once and had a 400 lb. bear coming to eat my ***, if I wouldn't have had a .357 mag loaded in my holster I'd have been dinner. Rifles are too slow and cumbersome and no where near powerful enough for that situation.
#24 Jan 24 2006 at 2:41 PM Rating: Decent
UDS wrote:
I said I'm ok with having a rifle for hunting, as long as you eat what you kill.




Ewww dude. What kind of sick-o are you? I can't believe you'd suggest I eat a person, even if they are homeless and seasoned just right.

What, none of you have ever had to perform community service?
#25 Jan 24 2006 at 2:41 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Katie wrote:
How weak do you have to be not to be able to get the screen off the window?

Not weak, maybe you're just in a hurry. Sneaking back into your bedroom, trying to get away from a fire, same difference.
#26 Jan 24 2006 at 2:44 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
tarv of the Seven Seas wrote:
Quote:
So you're a guns shoot people person? Who/what should be found liable if not the parents? I would rather keep my freedom to own a gun (I own several), and hold a couple irresponsible parents liable, then to have my freedoms stripped away because blame is passed on the weapon itself
No i'm a "Americans think everything is ok so long as you have someone to blame" person.


As I said before, better the blame to be placed on the parents then to be placed on the weapon itself. I for one own several guns and have never shot anyone. I'm not going to shoot anyone either. Why should my gun and my person be held responsible for some as[/b]shats lack of ability to keep track of their kids or their guns. Like Katie said, responsible parents should have guns in safe places, out of reach of children. Jesus Christo ... jump the gun lately?
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 323 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (323)