Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Iran - crossing the line?Follow

#1 Jan 15 2006 at 3:24 PM Rating: Excellent
interesting BBS news linky

1) So Iran is talking of providing a conferance where the legitimacy of the holocaust can be discussed ....

2) It is talking to Opec to try and cut oil production, presumably in an effort to show the world it can hurt it unless we concede to its actions.

3) It has provoked such world outrage at its alarming nuclear programme that it is facing possible long term sanctions unless it complies with demands from some world governments.

And so I wonder what will happen in the long term ...

1) Iran will be criticised world wide and also seen as a missinformation/propaganda producer unless it finds that there was a holocaust. Any other result would simply be questioned as a pre-requisite to giving it justification to hurt Israel.

2) It does not matter long term. Raising oil prices short term will only induce more development in energy sources not dependant on oil. We see these today in many pilot schemes run by councils in the UK where they can afford to test such energy. Buses running on gas and electricity.
Short term, yes it will hurt the world, longer term? Make something so expensive, natural market forces dictate an alternative will be found. Kill their own market and Iran will lose its one natural marketable asset. It could end in poverty in a decade.
As a producer of anything, Iran is pitiful. Only half its workforce *can* work ... but thats another matter.

3) The backlash from this is being seen, even now. No government on earth wishes to see nuclear weapons in the hands of fanatics, which it appears by the new campaign to missinform and degradate the holocaust, to ignore its neighbours and the world ... that Iran is. A totally fanatical country with *this* current regime.

I doubt the UN will allow the current Iranian regime to develop nuclear weapons under any circumstances.

Take away Oil revenue and Iran would be forced to wake up to its base economic and social problems, caused by its strict adherance to a religious law. half of which is all based on sheer interpretation and never even mentioned in the koran. Laws designed to keep women underfoot and male clerics in power. It is not competitive in the global markets as a result, unlike other muslim countries (turkey).

My real thought is .. are we witnessing the first of the death throws of a regime that has no viable economic or idealogical basis in a modern world? That it is kicking out and trying to impose a footprint before it is too late for its own survival? Please note, I say modern world, not just US/Europe. The world will put pressure on Iran once the oil money runs out, the global markets ....

Basically I see no future for this regime.

Thoughts?

Edited, Sun Jan 15 15:28:47 2006 by JennockFV
#2 Jan 15 2006 at 6:08 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
1) So Iran is talking of providing a conferance where the legitimacy of the holocaust can be discussed


A conference with who, syria? The UN would show up but only to tell them to go **** themselves.

Quote:
2) It is talking to Opec to try and cut oil production, presumably in an effort to show the world it can hurt it unless we concede to its actions.


Cutting oil production will kill their only way to bring in money as you said, so they would only be hurting themselves and helping us by hardening our resolve to find alternate ways of power.

Quote:
3) It has provoked such world outrage at its alarming nuclear programme that it is facing possible long term sanctions unless it complies with demands from some world governments.


The disgusting thing is we gave them nuclear potentional and expected to keep a 20 some year old playboy to stay in control of a fanactic muslim country. Even if they dont comply what are we going to do? Send half the forces in Iraq to Iran to be completely out manned and unable to go through another occupation due the size of the country and the ability to other countrys radicals to seep in through the massive border.

I aggree with all your points, Iran is going to collapse the instant it trys to throw around it weight. Even once they discover how flawed their workforce is I dont think they will change their 3rd world ways that they have had for hundreds of years.

All civilazations have had their rise and fall and Iran is about to have its fall unless they shape up and get with the 21st century.
#3 Jan 15 2006 at 6:13 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
I expect to be deployed as part of G.W.Bush's war machine in the later months of the year, people in the senior officer ranks are already dropping not very subtle hints about it.

Things like expect the winter deployment to west africa to be slightly more easterly.

Sucks really but i can't afford to be rocking the boat at this stage of my career.

If you see HMS Ocean sinking of the coast of Iran in December, raise a glass for me.
#4 Jan 15 2006 at 6:19 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
I think one of the things that is going to really determine what happens with Iran in the next few years is how israel deals with this latest political crisis. If Areal Sharon (sp) dies or will not recover enough to lead, the strongest opposition party is that led by former israeli PM benjamin netenyaho. He is a very strong war hawk, and has advocated (with no small measure of support) for a preemptive strike against iran's nuclear facilities, similar to the one isreal carried out on the Osirak faciliies in Iraq back in 1981. If he gains power, I do not see an Israeli nuclear strike on Iran out of the question, especially since iran has been funding the suicide bomber attacks on isreal for the last 20 years.

Iran's oil production one way or the other qill not really affect us in the U.s. all that much. their fields and market share are not the largest in the world, and years of embargo on repair parts mean they cannot extract nearly enough of what they do have to make a real difference.

Besides, if Iran looks like it will be testing a nuclear weapon, I'm pretty sure a nimtz class carrier airstrike will eventually make sure that they are not able to do so.


edit: said israel when i should have said iran once.

Edited, Sun Jan 15 23:46:32 2006 by Kaolian
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#5 Jan 15 2006 at 7:11 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
Quote:
Besides, if Iran looks like it will be testing a nuclear weapon, I'm pretty sure a nimtz class carrier airstrike will eventually make sure that they are not able to do so.



Iranian nuclear test site.



Edited, Sun Jan 15 19:11:39 2006 by fenderputy
#6 Jan 15 2006 at 11:03 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Time for Iran to go the way of the Sassanian Empire!

____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#7 Jan 16 2006 at 9:09 AM Rating: Default
1. they hate Israel. hate them. almost every one in the middle east does. this hatred will not end untill an assiryan leads an army against Israel, so the Bible says. and aparrently, it looks to be heading that way. they will denounce any hardship the jewish people of Israel endure to raise support for attacking them.

2. its their oil. WE forced the limits opec imposses on the middle east as a reason not to invade them and TAKE it. something we had actually planned on doing after the gas crises in 1970. we were going to invade Saudi Arabia. a military presence there, and opec assurances there would be no more embargos were the trade offf for us not invading their country and stealing what belongs to them.

3. we appointed ourselves the dictator of who does and does not get nuclear capability. eventually, nuclear proliferation will happen throughout the world. there is no stopping it. and Iran has just as much right to develop nuclear capability as anyone else in the world.
now, weather Israel lets them is another story. Israel WILL attack them if they do. they already have in the past. they attacked a nuclear power plant WE, the U.S., were building for Iran back when we were on their side in the Iran / Iraq pissing contest.

as far as all of this going away?

not going to happen in our life time.

the hatred towards Israel and the jewish people is too great. something really really bad is going to happen before its over. really, the only way to end it without blood shed is to remove the israeli people from the middle east.

rights or no rights, that is the only way to end this stupidity. eventually one of these islamic groups or country,s WILL get a nuclear devise and wipe Israel from the face of the earth. untill either Israel decides to leave, which wont happen, or untill they get wiped from the map, which might happen, all we can do is oppress the hell out of them, which is wrong in itself.

three wrongs dont make a right, they just make a simmering problem that will eventually boil over.

welcome to humanity. where stupidity prevails.

my suggestion? develop an alternative energy source and subsidize the hell out of it world wide. turn the entire middle east into another etheopia, a desert full of starving people. without oil, without the money WE are pumping into their economy, that is exactly what it would be.

but to much money to be made by big bussiness, so lets keep playing the oppression game in the name of economics.

more stupidity. its a wonder we survived this long.
#8 Jan 16 2006 at 11:30 AM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Carpet bomb them now for their insolence.

Totem
#9 Jan 16 2006 at 12:40 PM Rating: Decent
Soske wrote:
Quote:
1) So Iran is talking of providing a conferance where the legitimacy of the holocaust can be discussed


A conference with who, syria? The UN would show up but only to tell them to go **** themselves.

Quote:
2) It is talking to Opec to try and cut oil production, presumably in an effort to show the world it can hurt it unless we concede to its actions.
Quote:


Cutting oil production will kill their only way to bring in money as you said, so they would only be hurting themselves and helping us by hardening our resolve to find alternate ways of power.


umm not quite. if you reduce the production, the price per barrle goes up. in otherwords every OPEC contry sees higher proffits for less work and production. to reduce the cost of oil, you increase production.

Quote:
3) It has provoked such world outrage at its alarming nuclear programme that it is facing possible long term sanctions unless it complies with demands from some world governments.


The disgusting thing is we gave them nuclear potentional and expected to keep a 20 some year old playboy to stay in control of a fanactic muslim country. Even if they dont comply what are we going to do? Send half the forces in Iraq to Iran to be completely out manned and unable to go through another occupation due the size of the country and the ability to other countrys radicals to seep in through the massive border.

I aggree with all your points, Iran is going to collapse the instant it trys to throw around it weight. Even once they discover how flawed their workforce is I dont think they will change their 3rd world ways that they have had for hundreds of years.

All civilazations have had their rise and fall and Iran is about to have its fall unless they shape up and get with the 21st century.


your last 2 paragraphs there are very ironic in a sad way. for the past 15+ years i have been making the statement that the ME and for that matter most 3rd world nations, problem is not their location, not their form of government, not the people. it is the mentality of tribes.

almost every nation in the ME is still tribe based laws, areas of action, and governing. this means they are living the way man was living back in the middle ages. why do you think that the majority of the public is undereducated and ignorant to the reality that is life today in the 21st century.

if the ME wants to play with big boy toys, then they need to grow up as a nation and become a nation instead of a colective group of tribes that live in the emaginry boundries of a geographical area on the map that most of them would not have the foggiest clue how to read.

Edited, Mon Jan 16 12:47:43 2006 by Singdall

Edited, Mon Jan 16 12:48:26 2006 by Singdall
#10 Jan 16 2006 at 2:37 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Oil: $100 a barrel soon?

What with that and the attacks on Nigeria's oil installations, I'd order that monkey-***** powered scooter now.

But then I suppose monkey-***** will be outrageously expensive.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#11 Jan 16 2006 at 3:30 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
EH, the natives have been blowing up nigerian oil platforms and taking crews hostage for years now. Shell rolls over, gives them some more money, a new solar powered water treatment center, and a yak, along with promises to clean the polution they make up, then they go continue doing the same old thing for another 3 months until the next villiage decides they want a yak too.

The warri region of the niger delta in particular is pretty much the ultimate hellhole. almost the entire teenage population is A. hopped up on heroin and other easily available drugs coming down from Afghanistan and the like. B. Armed to the teath with cheaply available kalishnakov rifles, and C. have at least early stage aids, so they really don't have anything to lose. Give them a few years down there to get organized and things could go badly realy quick like. Then again the government down there has no compunctions about carpet bombing groups of people larger than 2, so maybe it will balance out?
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#12 Jan 17 2006 at 2:15 PM Rating: Default
Totem wrote:
Carpet bomb them now for their insolence.

Totem


Heh, I totally agree. Not to be prejudice in anyway, but nothing good is going to come out of that area. I say give everyone there a 6 month warning, so as to give the innocents time to relocate, and then just turn the entire Middle East into a glass factory. No nukes, but we have enough weapons to to destroy that place, just do it and get it over with, that way the problem is solved, Permantly. No occupation, no making it better. Its obvious the problem cant be solved, so just get rid of the problem.

waiting for the **** storm that im gonna get for this post!!!
#13 Jan 17 2006 at 4:22 PM Rating: Decent
Maybe the world needs a reminder of what the Nuclear Genie looks like. If Iran continues being bellicose, we should drop a Little Boy right on Tehran's front porch and give them a good view.
#14 Jan 17 2006 at 4:31 PM Rating: Default
China is now the largest exporter of oil from Iran. funny that. it used to be Iraq during their food for oil program till we ended that.

skuttle but was China was helping Iraq with nuclear technology.

here are the facts. Iran has the right to develop nuclear weapons if they choose. all we can do is make it hard for them to do it, and ponie up some kickbacks if they dont.

Israel will not let it happen. cause they know where the first weapon will be tested.

israel will attack them. or we will violate all kinds of international laws and do it ourselves to keep Israel from becomming hated even more in the reagon if that is possible.

there is no international law prohibiting any country from developing nuclear capability. there are laws prohibiting nuclear capable countries from selling that technology to non-nuclear countries.

and we care about what happens in the middle east because 1. oil 2. Israel.

just want to makew sure you all know exactly what we are dieing / killing for when you read about some one in the ME starting a nuclear program.

there is no threat to us. never was. a single nuclear sub in our ******* could totally wipe out any given country in the ME on a couple hours notice, mabe less. at best, mabe one of them could destroy an american city.

we will survive, they will not.

killing them in advance because they MIGHT hurt us is MURDER, no matter how it is spunn. what we are doing in Iraq is MURDER, no matter how it is spunn.

how much oil is your soul worth? false prophets will lead God loving people down the path of damnation. nowhere does it say they will be religious leaders. think about that.
#15 Jan 17 2006 at 4:53 PM Rating: Decent
Israel can start our proxy-crusade for us. That would be the most desirable outcome. Israel strikes first, Syria will try to counter-attack since they have an agreement with Iran. The US will throw its hands up in the air and wave em like they just don't ca-are whilst positioning a carrier strike force for a counter-counter attack.

We don't really have to lift a finger to get what we want. All we need to do is pretend to give a shi[/u]t because Iran's chock full of BO reeking fuc[/u]ktards that can't see the forest for the trees.
#16 Jan 17 2006 at 4:58 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
Israel can start our proxy-crusade for us. That would be the most desirable outcome. Israel strikes first, Syria will try to counter-attack since they have an agreement with Iran. The US will throw its hands up in the air and wave em like they just don't ca-are whilst positioning a carrier strike force for a counter-counter attack.
See my origial post.

Fucktard opinions like this populating the USA make WWIII more likely now than ever before.
#17 Jan 17 2006 at 5:10 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
shadowrelm wrote:
at best, mabe one of them could destroy an american city.

we will survive, they will not.
That'll come as great comfort to the people in the radioactive crater called New York city.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#18 Jan 17 2006 at 5:18 PM Rating: Decent
tarv of the Seven Seas wrote:
Quote:
Israel can start our proxy-crusade for us. That would be the most desirable outcome. Israel strikes first, Syria will try to counter-attack since they have an agreement with Iran. The US will throw its hands up in the air and wave em like they just don't ca-are whilst positioning a carrier strike force for a counter-counter attack.
See my origial post.

Fucktard opinions like this populating the USA make WWIII more likely now than ever before.


Lack of faith in Iranian leadership makes me a fuc[/u]ktard? I'm a pessimist, what can I say? It's not like I get anything out of a war. We're all a bunch of dumbasses for not pushing green energy before now in the first place. Everyone wants to drive a goddamn SUV, so they will send their kids off to die in a desert rather than get a clue.

Frankly, I'm just being realistic. The fact that I called it a crusade in the first place should have indicated that I was rather tongue-in-cheek about the whole thing.
#19 Jan 17 2006 at 5:23 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
I say give everyone there a 6 month warning, so as to give the innocents time to relocate, and then just turn the entire Middle East into a glass factory.


1. That would of course destroy the only reason we have to care about the whole region anyway;

2. Giving the innocents time to relocate would perforce also give the same advantage to the guilty;

3. Stop being a reactionary ******, or at least do it quietly.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#20 Jan 17 2006 at 5:29 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
Israel can start our proxy-crusade for us. That would be the most desirable outcome. Israel strikes first, Syria will try to counter-attack since they have an agreement with Iran. The US will throw its hands up in the air and wave em like they just don't ca-are whilst positioning a carrier strike force for a counter-counter attack.
How the flying fuck is a nuclear exchange to be considered "the best outcome"?

seriously do you honestly think that Nukes flying around the middle east would notcause ripples around the former USSR and China with really unstable leaders sitting with itch triggers aimed at the west.

If the general public in America think that making the middle east into the worlds largest glass lake would not have a kick back on them they seriously need re-educating.
#21 Jan 17 2006 at 6:47 PM Rating: Default
Samira wrote:
Quote:
I say give everyone there a 6 month warning, so as to give the innocents time to relocate, and then just turn the entire Middle East into a glass factory.


1. That would of course destroy the only reason we have to care about the whole region anyway;

2. Giving the innocents time to relocate would perforce also give the same advantage to the guilty;

3. Stop being a reactionary ******, or at least do it quietly.


1.) Kinda the point, I'm glad you didn't miss it.

2.) True, but they will be too spread out to claim themselves a new country and try to build up nuclear weapons again.

3.) I hardly call it being reactionary, when I'm saying to just go ahead and do it. Is what I'm saying retarded, yes, is it the way that we should handle the situation, in reality, no, but hey every man can dream.
#22 Jan 18 2006 at 12:00 PM Rating: Decent
tarv of the Seven Seas wrote:
How the flying fuck is a nuclear exchange to be considered "the best outcome"?

seriously do you honestly think that Nukes flying around the middle east would notcause ripples around the former USSR and China with really unstable leaders sitting with itch triggers aimed at the west.

If the general public in America think that making the middle east into the worlds largest glass lake would not have a kick back on them they seriously need re-educating.


You are assuming that it would escelate to nuclear war. Noone is sure whether or not Iran has "the bomb" yet. The longer we wait, the more we can assure that there would be a nuclear retaliation from Iran. Hopefully, diplomacy will work. It's just a crying shame that Iranians elected a certifiable fanatic as their leader (then again, I wouldn't take any bets that Iranians don't feel the same way about the US as well)

Edited, Wed Jan 18 12:04:47 2006 by Lefein
#23 Jan 18 2006 at 12:36 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
It's just a crying shame that Iranians elected a certifiable fanatic as their leader (then again, I wouldn't take any bets that Iranians don't feel the same way about the US as well)


I think that's a pretty safe bet, since a measurable minority of Americans feel that way about our own leader.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#24 Jan 18 2006 at 1:14 PM Rating: Good
***
1,863 posts
The malcontents can always move for impeachment. I'm sure America would be far better off with Cheney on the throne.
#25 Jan 18 2006 at 1:16 PM Rating: Decent
I sincerly hope that was sarcasm...
#26 Jan 18 2006 at 3:49 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
my suggestion? develop an alternative energy source and subsidize the hell out of it world wide. turn the entire middle east into another etheopia, a desert full of starving people. without oil, without the money WE are pumping into their economy, that is exactly what it would be.


Is it just me, or haven't you been complaining about civilian casualties and such in the M.E. from the Iraq war for like...well, since the beginning? So it's not OK to kill a small percentage of a population, mostly unintentionally, with the hope of eventual stability...but, it is OK to attempt genocide through mass starvation and instability just because it's more indirect (not our fault you're starvin! You guys were ******** Damn it man, if that's the case just let us fight a bit longer, and if it doesn't work out, I'll fully support the mass starvation plan. All we need now is for a couple billion people to switch to an alternative fuel source in the next couple years, and we're golden!
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 230 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (230)