Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Iran - America **** yeah!Follow

#1 Jan 13 2006 at 2:02 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
This is exactly what America needs.

Look at it like this. You are America, the worlds motherf[/b]ucking super power. You kicked the ****'s ***. You built the hydrogen bomb and had the balls to drop it on those slant eyed rice eaters who had the nerve to f[b]uck with you. You stood toe to toe with the USSR and they were the one that crumpled. You are the shining light of democracy and freedom.

But you got soft in victory like Rocky in his third movie. You defeated everyone that tried testing you. Now it is just you on top but now you are scared to lose, there are no clear defined enemies. So you get in a war and it turns out to have no clear victories and you are slowly losing face. Hell even Canada your ever compliant side kick is starting to talk trash about you. This will not stand!

So what do you do? You need to re-establish the fact that you are not to be f[/b]ucked with. You need to be careful though. Pick the wrong target and you sink yourself. Everyone that is talking jive now will gather at you and attack like a pack of jackals. You need someone that deserves it. Then you need to beat the merciless sh[b]it out of them as an example so the world recognizes your flex. Like Rocky going back to basics after losing to Clubber Lang.

This is where Iran comes in. No one likes Iran, a Muslim theocracy that has been talking sh[/b]it for 28 years. You have already had them on warning for like forever so its not like they didnt have it coming. So this week when Iran expels IAEA, breaks the seals on its reactors and starts talking jive your ears perk up.

This is your chance. The moment. The time for pure unadulterated sh[b]
itkicking. No nation building, no appeasing the locals, no regime changes. Pure Shock and Awe as only the Americans can do it. America has 130,000 brave troops right next door? Why not? A quick ride at sonic speeds a couple thousand pounds of high end explosive guided by the most sophisticated guidance technology on Gods (and by God I mean the real one, our one) Green Earth. In and out with no worry about taking care of the people we just violated. No endless talk and liberal negotiating, we tried that with North Korea it didnt work. We will negotiate once have asserted ourselves and bombed them back to their Prophet and put the fear of Allah (which I hear is arabic for Uncle Motherf[/b]ucking Sam). When we can negotiate from an unquestioned position of power. If anyone ******* about point to the smoking crater that was Iran and ask them if they have a problem.

America F[b]
uck Yeah!


so what do you think, for a first try could I play the part of a jingoistic troll that plays on patriotism?
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#2 Jan 13 2006 at 2:09 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I'd throw in some comments about how if only Britian had defeated Hitler back when they had the chance. That way, we'll know that anyone who objects to attacking Iran also loves Hitler.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#3 Jan 13 2006 at 2:10 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
so what do you think, for a first try could I play the part of a jingoistic troll that plays on patriotism?


You need to misspell a few more words here and there, add some references to "Towel Heads" and "Camel Jockeys", as well as allude to their obviously hidden assistance in harboring/funding Bin Laden and his cronies.

But good for a first try.
#4 Jan 13 2006 at 2:13 PM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
Hopefully GWB reads this forum.
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
#5 Jan 13 2006 at 2:25 PM Rating: Decent
GWB only trolls the Asylum when he’s recuperating from a bicycle ride.
#6 Jan 13 2006 at 2:26 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Lord xythex wrote:
Hopefully GWB reads this forum.



Read?

You think rather highly of the man it appears.

____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#7 Jan 13 2006 at 2:31 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
bodhisattva wrote:
Lord xythex wrote:
Hopefully GWB reads this forum.



Read?

You think rather highly of the man it appears.



He's the president. He can have one of his cronies read it for him.
#8REDACTED, Posted: Jan 13 2006 at 5:02 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) **** America.
#9 Jan 13 2006 at 5:13 PM Rating: Good
Satire aside, that's what we should have done in Iraq. Destroy enemy, get rid of dictator, see ya later. In and out....6 weeks tops.
#10 Jan 13 2006 at 5:13 PM Rating: Good
***
3,101 posts
Smiley: oyvey

Another banal Sephiroth name followed by yet another sub-par post.
#11 Jan 13 2006 at 5:20 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Another banal Sephiroth name followed by yet another sub-par post.


O RLY?

Look, I'm not arguing the validity of America invading Iraq. I'm just saying a quick in-and-out would have been better than just bogging down in a country that hates us for years. It's a little harder to maintain the image of liberator when you set up camp for years. So fuc[b][/b]k off cnut. Smiley: lol
#12 Jan 13 2006 at 5:23 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
I'd also throw in a bit about tossing all the objectors in Gitmo, because if you don't agree you hate freedom and should go back to where you came from.
#13 Jan 13 2006 at 5:54 PM Rating: Good
***
3,101 posts
allenjj wrote:
Quote:
Another banal Sephiroth name followed by yet another sub-par post.


O RLY?

Look, I'm not arguing the validity of America invading Iraq. I'm just saying a quick in-and-out would have been better than just bogging down in a country that hates us for years. It's a little harder to maintain the image of liberator when you set up camp for years. So fuc[b][/b]k off cnut. Smiley: lol


I wasn't refering to your post at all, but actually the man who posted before you.
#14 Jan 13 2006 at 5:56 PM Rating: Decent
Someone Who Hates America wrote:
I'd also throw in a bit about tossing all the objectors in Gitmo, because if you don't agree you hate freedom and should go back to where you came from.


That better not be sarcasm I detect or it is Gitmo for you!
#15 Jan 13 2006 at 5:58 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
I wasn't refering to your post at all, but actually the man who posted before you.


Oh....well then......rate-ups for j00? Smiley: blush
#16 Jan 13 2006 at 6:16 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
I'd also throw in a bit about tossing all the objectors in Gitmo, because if you don't agree you hate freedom and should go back to where you came from.


Hah! Now you're soundling like Michael Savage on a tirade.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#17 Jan 13 2006 at 6:17 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
gbaji wrote:
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
I'd also throw in a bit about tossing all the objectors in Gitmo, because if you don't agree you hate freedom and should go back to where you came from.


Hah! Now you're sounding like Michael Savage on a tirade.

How unlike you to miss the point. Smiley: dubious
#18 Jan 13 2006 at 7:13 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
But! I got the point. Really! Um... Yeah. ;)

"evil Flea"=="Mr. Savage" (sniper kitty optional)
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#19 Jan 14 2006 at 1:59 PM Rating: Default
Satire aside, that's what we should have done in Iraq. Destroy enemy, get rid of dictator, see ya later. In and out....6 weeks tops.
-----------------------------------------

and that is what we would have done if Hussin was the objective. but he was not.

saudi arabia has the largest supply of sweet crude, iraq has the second.

the reason russia fell, the reason china is not much further along in their industrial evolution is because both lacked a natural source of energy that was cost effective to exploit.

we are not in iraq to take care of Hussin, we are there to make sure no one else does.

get it yet? amerka *** yeh, where oppressing our enemys is worth dieing for...well....worth your kids dieing for, and woth killing their kids for......

and whats up with that silly "great satan" crap. well oppress his **** to if he gets in our way.
#20 Jan 14 2006 at 2:10 PM Rating: Good
bodhisattva wrote:

This is your chance. The moment. The time for pure unadulterated sh[/b]itkicking. No nation building, no appeasing the locals, no regime changes. Pure Shock and Awe as only the Americans can do it. America has 130,000 brave troops right next door? Why not? A quick ride at sonic speeds a couple thousand pounds of high end explosive guided by the most sophisticated guidance technology on Gods (and by God I mean the real one, our one) Green Earth. In and out with no worry about taking care of the people we just violated. No endless talk and liberal negotiating, we tried that with North Korea it didnt work. We will negotiate once have asserted ourselves and bombed them back to their Prophet and put the fear of Allah (which I hear is arabic for Uncle Motherf[b]ucking Sam). When we can negotiate from an unquestioned position of power. If anyone ******* about point to the smoking crater that was Iran and ask them if they have a problem.

America F[b][/b]uck Yeah!



IN!
#21 Jan 14 2006 at 3:48 PM Rating: Good
shadowrelm wrote:
and that is what we would have done if Hussin was the objective. but he was not.


Call me an idealist, but I'd like to think that our initial objective in remaining in Iraq after toppling the regime was to stabilize the area, rather than creating a power-vacuum that would create more problems than before. Again, not arguing the validity of the invasion or our continued prescence there, but I think perhaps our motives are not quite so evil as you'd like to make them out to be.

shadowrelm again wrote:
get it yet? amerka *** yeh, where oppressing our enemys is worth dieing for...well....worth your kids dieing for, and woth killing their kids for......


I like that statement...oppressing our enemies. I'm no Sun Tzu, but isn't that kind of the point? What else should we do with our enemies? Smiley: oyvey



Shadowrelm, I am proud of you for making a post without using the moral majority anywhere in it, but you're still an insufferable **** who complains about everything without presenting any better solution.



Edited, Sat Jan 14 15:52:36 2006 by allenjj

Edited, Sat Jan 14 15:53:18 2006 by allenjj
#22 Jan 14 2006 at 10:52 PM Rating: Default
sadly i was born in america i do not support america in its current state with that ****** bush in office. however i do support americas old ways . so much like the samurai that were killed off and faded away as history moved forward so shall i die as a defender of the old american way and fight to the death against bush and his communist ways.yes im only 18 but i cant stand to see the way he has sent america into the toilet
#23 Jan 14 2006 at 11:09 PM Rating: Decent
Ashuran wrote:
sadly i was born in america i do not support america in its current state with that ****** bush in office. however i do support americas old ways . so much like the samurai that were killed off and faded away as history moved forward so shall i die as a defender of the old american way and fight to the death against bush and his communist ways.yes im only 18 but i cant stand to see the way he has sent america into the toilet


John, is that you?
#24 Jan 14 2006 at 11:33 PM Rating: Decent
shadowrelm wrote:

and that is what we would have done if Hussin was the objective. but he was not.

saudi arabia has the largest supply of sweet crude, iraq has the second.

the reason russia fell, the reason china is not much further along in their industrial evolution is because both lacked a natural source of energy that was cost effective to exploit.

we are not in iraq to take care of Hussin, we are there to make sure no one else does.


SR fails at critical thinking once again.

Iraq has very little to do with Oil. You want to know what Iraq is really about?

1. Burger King, McDonalds, Sears, Wal-Mart, JC Penny, Microsoft, Ford, Joes Construction company, Caterpiller, Snyder trucking, John Deere, and countless of other multibillion dollar American Corperations.

2. Military staging point right between our dearest friends Syria and Iran. But not only those countries but pretty much smack dab in the middle of war-torn middle east. You can put a years worth of wages on the bet that a permanent military base or three will be constructed in Iraq, and win.

3. Cheap Labor

4. An Americanized ally in the middle east that everyone doesn't hate, unlike our Jewish associates.

No one else really wanted to even fu[b][/b]ck with or cared about Saddam except the US and UK administrations. Finally, USSR had plenty of resources, they failed because of internal corruption, assassinations, ect.

#25 Jan 15 2006 at 10:01 AM Rating: Default
rimesume

the only thing the middle east has of interest to us is oil. cheap labor we can and are getting from china. most people in the middle east not only could not afford to buy a big mak, they wouldnt because of their religion. some would, but most wouldnt.

currently, american bussiness are paying chinese workers about 50 cents an hour with no benifits of any type. this is why wallmart is under attack ATM.

and it is not about US needing the oil either as much as it is about making sure china and russia dont get a foot hold and start becomming powerfull again.

any coinecidence that the attack on Iraq came AFTER the meeting of energy companies to form our energy policy? AFTER a washington think tank stated that within 50 years, the demand for oil would be greater than the entire output of oil world wide? AFTER the food for oil scandle in Iraq where countries like Russia were getting oil outside of the stated pipeline mandated by the U.N.? AFTER Chinas big explosion in industry?

it is not about getting the oil, it is about making sure our enemys do not get it.

you should go see Syeriana, it is based on actual events.
#26 Jan 15 2006 at 2:14 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
it's also about stopping France selling oil not supplied under OPEC thus weakening the US dollar.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 251 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (251)