Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Fu&@ Cu^% Sh*! Do&^%$ Mother F^%$#@!Follow

#1 Jan 13 2006 at 7:47 AM Rating: Decent
Smiley: banghead

Fu[/b]cking great

Link

Quote:
N.J. smoking ban advances to a final vote
As a panel sent the measure to the full Assembly, restaurants, bars and bowling alleys objected to the casino exemption.
By Elisa Ung
Inquirer Trenton Bureau

TRENTON - A ban on smoking in all indoor public places in New Jersey except casino floors was passed by an Assembly panel yesterday and appears poised for full Assembly approval Monday.

Acting Gov. Richard J. Codey has said that if the Assembly signs off, he will sign the legislation into law. The state Senate has already approved the ban.

The casino-floor compromise has angered owners of restaurants, bars and bowling alleys, and they lined up yesterday to tell the Assembly's Health and Human Services Committee that it would hurt or kill their businesses. click link for more article goodness



So this should be made a law by Monday by a fu[b]
cking substitute Governer.

NYTimes wrote:
As recently as last spring, the measure had stalled, but then Mr. Codey made the issue a key objective of his final months in office and overcame a major obstacle by negotiating the exemption for casinos. Until Mr. Codey's concession, South Jersey legislators and their allies were poised to block the bill because of the effect it was expected to have on casino business.

Over the weekend, Mr. Codey managed to deter a final effort to defeat the ban by making telephone calls to several lawmakers who opposed it. "The way to do things in life is with the personal touch," he said, adding that the bill would be a hallmark of his 17 months in office



I know smoking is gross and unhealthy. Unfortunatly there are many of us [including myself] that exercises their right to do whatever the f[/b]uck they want and smoke in a bar. Do I smoke in a preschool? No. Do preschoolers come to a bar? I sure as heck hope not! Problem solved.

I know that this makes some Waitstaff and Bartenders happy but you would be suprised how many of them either smoke or do not give a sh[b]
it. They just do their job and keep their traps shut. As for patrons that do not smoke but go to bars. They know what they are getting into. My girlfriend doesn't smoke, when we go out she may mention "the bar is smokey huh" and go about her night of cheer and merriment. Its a Bar! Not an operating room!

Most places I have been to in recent months do a great job of clearing out the smoke via air cleaners. Of course there are some places with no ventilation; if anything just force places with poor air quality to update to something more then an oscilating fan.


Smiley: oyvey



[:coffee:]

#3 Jan 13 2006 at 8:08 AM Rating: Decent
Aw man. I had no problem with people smoking and killing themselves slowly in bars and such, but this makes the process much too slow. I guess I better get to work... *loads rounds into chamber*














Yes, I'm teasing.
#6 Jan 13 2006 at 8:32 AM Rating: Good
**
638 posts
I can see where some employees didn't like working around smoke. I used to work at a Ruby Tuesday, about a year ago, and every single one of the employees that worked there smoked, but a lot of them felt that if they weren't smoking a cigarette, they shouldn't have to smell second-hand smoke. It didn't bother me, but there are a good number of people that will complain about it. I was eating Taco Bell in my buddies car yesterday and he lit up a cig. He then said, "Aww, ****, man. Does the second hand smoke bother you when you're eating?" "No." "Oh, okay. A lot of people say it does, even though they smoke, too."

If a bar/restaurant owner establishes that it's okay to smoke in his bar, it's his damn perogative. That's why he's called the "owner."
#7 Jan 13 2006 at 8:33 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Here where I live we disallowed smoking in all public places, including bars, quite awhile ago.

Everyone got over the initial "shock" quite quickly and have adapted well.

Having worked in a bar for about 6 years, I gotta admit it would have been nice not to have had to deal with smoke in the face, dirty ashtrays and those 'accidental' burns that happen when you have drunk people smoking in crowded places.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#8 Jan 13 2006 at 8:38 AM Rating: Good
**
638 posts
Elinda wrote:
and those 'accidental' burns that happen when you have drunk people smoking in crowded places.
So, you're implying that people burned you out of fun? Smiley: clown
#9 Jan 13 2006 at 8:40 AM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
I don't think there should be any laws dictating what businesses you can smoke in. However, I think places that do allow smoking should be required to provide free lifelong healthcare to anyone on their payroll that is exposed to it. This healthcare would need to have an unlimited lifetime cap with no deductible, it would not be able to exclude any licensed medical facility nor deny any doctor recommended procedure if it relates to any illness that can be directly or indirectly linked to exposure to second hand smoke. In addition they would be required to contribute to a federally funded insurance pool to ensure that said workers are covered even if the place of business ceases to exist.

Let capitalism take care of the problem. When your drink costs $356 businesses that allow smoking will be allot harder to find.

The problem is that smoking puts a huge burden on the public healthcare system. Do you think 60 year old Joe Shmoe pays for 5 years of lung cancer treatment when he is going to die anyway? Who do you think pays for that? Sure smoking should be allowed, but there should be sufficient taxes per pack to cover the drain it causes to society. Something like $30 a pack oughta do it.

There are proven links between smoking and health issues.
Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, et al. (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2001, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, 2004 wrote:
Tobacco use, particularly cigarette smoking, is the single most preventable cause of death in the United States. Cigarette smoking alone is directly responsible for approximately 30 percent of all cancer deaths annually in the United States


Look I could give a crap if you kill yourself smoking, however, it pisses me off that I can't afford healthcare coverage because it costs 8 grand to goto the hospital because they need to recoup the costs from every tom, ****, and harry who spends their entire life doing something they know is likely to kill them slowly, agonizingly, and expensivly, and then expect top notch medical care for free in their last few years of life.
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
#10 Jan 13 2006 at 8:46 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Admiral Sinoras wrote:
Elinda wrote:
and those 'accidental' burns that happen when you have drunk people smoking in crowded places.
So, you're implying that people burned you out of fun? Smiley: clown
No, guess it's more of an implication that if they would have given one seconds notice to what they were doing it wouldn't have happened.

Drunks are sloppy smokers.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#11 Jan 13 2006 at 8:52 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
I realize that smoking doesn't just affect the smoker, but still... I hate being told that I'm not able to do something that (right now) is still perfectly legal.

There are no laws like this in TN, but I'm sure it's coming.
#12 Jan 13 2006 at 9:08 AM Rating: Good
**
638 posts
Off the topic of bans, but still on the smoke topic, I can't even count the number of times a person will come up to me and say "you know, smoking is bad for your health." My usual response is to stomp the cigarette out, over-dramatically, and running in circles flailing my arms about. Smiley: lol
#13 Jan 13 2006 at 9:32 AM Rating: Good
***
3,118 posts
Admiral Sinoras wrote:
Off the topic of bans, but still on the smoke topic, I can't even count the number of times a person will come up to me and say "you know, smoking is bad for your health." My usual response is to stomp the cigarette out, over-dramatically, and running in circles flailing my arms about. Smiley: lol

You're a liar. It would have been more accurate to replace "my usual response" with "It would be funny if I".

I'm kind of curious as to why they will still allow smoking on the casino floors. Does the logic not apply there, are you free from second hand smoke because you are gambling? Why do I get the feeling it's because of the tax revenue produced?

Here in CT, they outlawed smoking in bars a while back. Lucky for us, we have two Native American tribal casinos in the area where the State's silly laws have no jurisdiction. Bar owners state-wide cried up and down how unfair this was and that they'd all go out of business because of all their customers going to smoke and drink at the casino instead of their usual watering holes. As of yet, I've not heard of any places going under because of the smoking ban and all the bars are still hopping.

Edited, Fri Jan 13 09:37:10 2006 by Jacobsdeception
#14 Jan 13 2006 at 9:40 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Just the other day I got in a huge argument with a co-worker about him smoking in the employee restroom on his break. Even though he's a badass 6'7" football player, he doesn't feel he needs to suffer outside in the cold to have a smoke. I don't begrudge him his right to smoke where it is allowed, but I sure as hell take offense when he doesn't return the respect and pollute someplace that all the rest of the employees are forced to go into at some point or another.

I love that they are passing smoking bans. If you choose to smoke, do it someplace where it isn't forcing smoke and carcinogens on people that have made a conscious effort to avoid them. If I don't yank the cig out of your mouth, don't blow smoke in my face.
#15 Jan 13 2006 at 9:41 AM Rating: Good
****
6,760 posts
They banned smoking in public places here a little over 2 years ago. I, too, smoked at the time. I, too, was a little miffed over it. In retrospect I'm glad they did it. It helped me quit smoking, and now I can enjoy a meal or a beer without having to smell cigarettes while doing it.
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#16 Jan 13 2006 at 10:05 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Mistress Nadenu wrote:
I realize that smoking doesn't just affect the smoker, but still... I hate being told that I'm not able to do something that (right now) is still perfectly legal.

There are no laws like this in TN, but I'm sure it's coming.


I imagine the tobacco growing states will be affected last, if at all.

I like the ban, but not for the usual reasons. It gives me an excuse to leave the office for a few minutes with my smoking friends to gossip and/or vent. Much better than using the office email or IM.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#17 Jan 13 2006 at 10:38 AM Rating: Default
Quote:
I'm kind of curious as to why they will still allow smoking on the casino floors. Does the logic not apply there, are you free from second hand smoke because you are gambling? Why do I get the feeling it's because of the tax revenue produced?


The casinos probably argued that if the smokers had to get up from the table and go outside to smoke they would not gamble as much and it would kill their revenue. <shrug>
#18 Jan 13 2006 at 12:13 PM Rating: Good
****
5,492 posts
Sh[b][/b]it..... welcome to my world called California....

no smoking inside any building at all...

sucks ***...

been that way for over 10 years.....

bastages.....
#19 Jan 13 2006 at 12:13 PM Rating: Decent
the only thing i can say is that FL now has a simular law, but no exceptions for casinos. All of the bars, resteraunts, etcs. all said the same thing as yours are now. it will kill their business, etc.

it has not, and the bar/resteraunt next to my school has more people going to it today then it did before the smoking ban.
#20 Jan 13 2006 at 12:16 PM Rating: Decent
Singdall wrote:
the only thing i can say is that FL now has a simular law, but no exceptions for casinos. All of the bars, resteraunts, etcs. all said the same thing as yours are now. it will kill their business, etc.

it has not, and the bar/resteraunt next to my school has more people going to it today then it did before the smoking ban.


There is one bar in Tallahassee that advertises that is is the only place in town that allows smoking. They were always packed when I lived there.

I'm not familiar with the law in FL, is there a way for certain business to be exempt from the smoking ban?
#21 Jan 13 2006 at 12:17 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Jacobsdeception the Sly wrote:
I'm kind of curious as to why they will still allow smoking on the casino floors. Does the logic not apply there, are you free from second hand smoke because you are gambling? Why do I get the feeling it's because of the tax revenue produced?
I'm sure it is. That and the casinos have a powerful lobby that can help "convince" lawmakers to exempt them.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#22 Jan 13 2006 at 12:25 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
California has had that ban in place for quite some time. You get over it, and some bars (dive bars) ignore it. I think there are loopholes in the law also. It's something about a single owner and private bar rights.
#23 Jan 13 2006 at 12:27 PM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Banning smoking in bowling allies has killed one of my most vivid 3-year old memories. That smell of cigerette smoke, alley wax and metal machinery has been ruined.

Casino's too would be devoid of that memorable odor if smoking was disallowed.

Remember when you could smoke on airplanes?
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#26 Jan 13 2006 at 1:21 PM Rating: Decent
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Just the other day I got in a huge argument with a co-worker about him smoking in the employee restroom on his break. Even though he's a badass 6'7" football player, he doesn't feel he needs to suffer outside in the cold to have a smoke. I don't begrudge him his right to smoke where it is allowed, but I sure as hell take offense when he doesn't return the respect and pollute someplace that all the rest of the employees are forced to go into at some point or another.

I love that they are passing smoking bans. If you choose to smoke, do it someplace where it isn't forcing smoke and carcinogens on people that have made a conscious effort to avoid them. If I don't yank the cig out of your mouth, don't blow smoke in my face.


Just quoting you for point of reference.

I live in Los Angeles; we banned smoking everywhere but in your closet under a blanket and in the dark about 8 years ago. Now I smoke, but I try to be respectable about it, I wait till people are done eating; I try not to light up while I'm standing next to small children. I even throw my butts in the trash instead of on the ground.

Flea while I agree with you, there is a time and a place and there is no reason for a smoker to be disrespectful of a non smoker, the same should apply vice versa. Owners of Restaurants and Bars and what not should be able to decide if smoking is okay, and should they decide that, than some non-smoker should not be able to come in and change that policy. If you smoke, then you don’t go to a non-smoking establishment and light up, if you don’t smoke, don’t go to a smoking establishment and expect everyone to put out their ciggy because you are there. It’s simple and respectful to everyone that way.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 222 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (222)