Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Even robot roaches are bugged by spamFollow

#1 Jan 10 2006 at 4:12 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Bugged bugs now buggier than ever! On the up side: now there's a use for roaches.

Quote:
"We had an incident last week where we sent a roach into an duct to test for an air leak, when we asked the roach to turn right, it responded by asking for our email addresses and offered to send us viagra in return."


Smiley: laugh

Edit: finally read my own article. /blush

Edited, Tue Jan 10 16:18:34 2006 by Samira
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#2 Jan 10 2006 at 4:18 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
Quote:
"They are not very nice insects," Holzer confesses. "They are a little bit smelly, and there's something about the way they move their antennae. But they look nicer when you put a little circuit on their backs and remove their wings."


Smiley: dubious
#3 Jan 10 2006 at 4:26 PM Rating: Good
***
1,863 posts
Bullsh[b][/b]it.

1) I can't imagine any reason at all why a control system strapped to an insect would need to be capable of receiving SMTP-based email messages at all, let alone from the outside world.


2) http://www.leopard.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/research.html

That link goes to the English homepage of Isao Shimoyama - the researcher mentioned in the article. Specifically it goes to the page detailing his research.

He works mainly on something called MEMS, which is a kind of micro-assembly project. Some of his research is based on insects because the structure of such small creatures is personally fascinating to him and he'd like to be able to duplicate it synthetically. Nowhere will you find remote controlled cockroaches.


3) The only link on Google News about this amazing new innovation is to the UK Inquirer, which in turn links back to the URL listed above. This suggests that the url is a primary source for this information. The other links regular Google returns either cite the original article or blatantly copy paragraphs from it.


4) The article is theoretically written by `ERIC TALMADOE` and has an AP tag. The article does not appear on the AP wires at all. Also, a google search for `Eric Talmadoe -cockroach -roach` turns up no relevant results. He must have an amazingly low profile.
#4 Jan 10 2006 at 4:32 PM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
Wingchild wrote:
Bullsh[b][/b]it.


Um, duh?

I assumed it was a joke from the beginning.
____________________________
Do what now?
#5 Jan 10 2006 at 4:46 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Maybe, but both Holzer and Shimoyama show up on Google searches as being affiliated with the University of Tokyo in micro-robotics.

Probably a coincidence, though. The scrub that wrote the article is definitely the one to search out.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#6 Jan 10 2006 at 6:09 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
****
6,543 posts
Recieving any kind of email message that way seems doubtful, but it would not surprise me if they found a way to control the very simple functionings of a creature that can live a week without it's head.
____________________________
Galkaman wrote:
Kuwoobie will die crushed under the burden of his mediocrity.

#7 Jan 10 2006 at 6:13 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Wingchild wrote:
Bullsh[b][/b]it.

1) I can't imagine any reason at all why a control system strapped to an insect would need to be capable of receiving SMTP-based email messages at all, let alone from the outside world.


2) http://www.leopard.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/research.html

That link goes to the English homepage of Isao Shimoyama - the researcher mentioned in the article. Specifically it goes to the page detailing his research.

He works mainly on something called MEMS, which is a kind of micro-assembly project. Some of his research is based on insects because the structure of such small creatures is personally fascinating to him and he'd like to be able to duplicate it synthetically. Nowhere will you find remote controlled cockroaches.


3) The only link on Google News about this amazing new innovation is to the UK Inquirer, which in turn links back to the URL listed above. This suggests that the url is a primary source for this information. The other links regular Google returns either cite the original article or blatantly copy paragraphs from it.


4) The article is theoretically written by `ERIC TALMADOE` and has an AP tag. The article does not appear on the AP wires at all. Also, a google search for `Eric Talmadoe -cockroach -roach` turns up no relevant results. He must have an amazingly low profile.

You truly are a "Guru" among men.

/salute
/single tear
/wipes tear away with American flag bandana

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 208 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (208)