BAMFollow

Orion if I recall correctly.

Lvl 110 Progen Warrior.

Make with the guild/name.

Gimme a break. Read the "About Us". Their whole goal is discrediting any word uddered by anyone they don't like.

Read the article, my point is there. I don't have to hold your hand through it, I don't have the time.

It would be like me citing Ann Coulter's personal diary.

EnB.... I don't think I made it much past the 30's. mostly because it took too long to get anywhere, having to manually afterburn from place to place, iirc.


Now EVE absolutely ROCKED. I sometimes miss my old Thorax cruiser. Nothing like 5 or so rail guns firing off simultaneously to bring a smile to the ears :)

Beta tested Eve and it was an absolute steaming pile. Horrible game.

Then tried it a year later and it was a completely different game. Easily enjoyable. Good for those that like space type stuff and are casual MMO~ers. World of Warcraft (especially the asylum guild) is where it is at though.

Race?

Miner/Trader/Fighter

Corporation.

What are you flying?

Details Dana!

Um. Not to be obvious or anything, but isn't attempting to discredit someone's logic about topic A by pointing to other statements about topic B *also* doing exactly what you just said? Aren't you scattershotting BS out there in an attempt to distract the viewer/reader/whatever from the facts at hand?


The point is that in this particular case, O'Reilly's "shtick" was to use facts and logic to argue his point. Letterman's was to make a funny joke. If we're going to catagorize arguments from the left and right in that manner, then I think the point is made quite clearly. Don't you?

Eh? Not following you here.

So I pointed out a logical fallacy in your initial argument, and you respond with *another* one?


Look. I am contributing. I just find it incredibly amusing that whenever Conservatives dare to pull out *gasp* facts to support their arguments, the Liberals sorta roll their eyes, make a big show of joking about it, and claim that the Conservative in question is somehow wrong for daring to argue the point in the first place. Meanwhile, they almost *never* support their own positions with anything more then clever words.


That's the point here. And it's exactly what Letterman did in this case. It's what Galloway did when he appeared before Congress. It's what the majority of all Liberal talking heads do when they discuss virtually any issue. It's all platitudes, assumptions, and rhetoric. And when someone dares to argue using logic and facts, they get slamed for being too argumentative, or too serious, or too biased. After all, we shouldn't actually think about politics. We should just make jokes about it, and the guy with the best sounding one liners is the guy we should follow...


Got it.

Gbaji your every key stroke is an abortion.