Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

concerning "the world, part one"Follow

#1 Dec 29 2005 at 9:10 AM Rating: Sub-Default
i do not understand why that thread was moved. it belongs in the asylum, not in "oot". and to argue it doesnt, would be arguing that ALL threads dealing with politics and this country belong in "OOT"


move it back. to do otherwise is just a lame **** attempt at cencorship by someone who didnt particualrly like the content.

if kati can do a thread about **** sex here, i see no point to move that thread out other than PARTISAN POLITICS by whoever moved it. CENSORSHIP.

BTW, he is absolutly correct. we all are create4d equal. adn there is a stink in this country that makes us feel we are better than the rest that needs to change.

he is right about Bush too. when the hurricanes hit, the oil industry recieved an immediate tax break, and a "loan" to cover their losses, while the people in New Orleans were dieing in the street of this great country from lack of food and water all plastered on the media through out the world so every one could see where our loyalties lie.
#2 Dec 29 2005 at 9:11 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Smiley: confused
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#4 Dec 29 2005 at 9:19 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,700 posts
YSU wrote:
Yeah, really. And what is up with having all of GoldenLotus's threads moved to the OOT?


My assumption would be taking out the trash ...



Woohoo I'm still here!

Edited, Thu Dec 29 09:23:38 2005 by Kronig
#6 Dec 29 2005 at 10:34 AM Rating: Good
The movey-thread-thingie button has to be used some time, no? As is it's probably only used maybe once or twice everyother day when someone forgets how to read and posts a topic in the wrong forum. It must be really fun to use... like that time machine from Napoleon Dynamite.
#7 Dec 29 2005 at 10:41 AM Rating: Good
****
6,760 posts
Hardly censorship. Once again Shadowrelm is talking out of his ***. The post was moved, not deleted. I guess the admins figured it was more OOT material than Asylum material. Which, her first post here was as well. At least until it turned into a flame fest, it got moved a bit late if you ask me. By then it was already well into Asylum stuff.

But hey, whatever keeps a grin on your face.
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#8REDACTED, Posted: Dec 29 2005 at 1:13 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Hardly censorship. Once again Shadowrelm is talking out of his ***. The post was moved, not deleted. I guess the admins figured it was more OOT material than Asylum material
#9 Dec 29 2005 at 1:16 PM Rating: Good
*
74 posts
shadowrelm wrote:
it is censorship. move it back.


Censorship is preventing someone from being able to read or view something. I suggest you buy a dictionary, but there is a free one online at www.dictionary.com.

censorship

n 1: counterintelligence achieved by banning or deleting any information of value to the enemy [syn: censoring, security review] 2: deleting parts of publications or correspondence or theatrical performances [syn: censoring]

It wasn't deleted, it was moved.

Which really spoiled all the fun in my opinion. The folks in the OOT forum aren't nearly as imaginative with their flaming.
#10 Dec 29 2005 at 1:19 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
On noes! Censorship!

Kao...grab a cup, Dana, sugar. Darkflame, cream stat!
Cue the harpsichord melody...



IT'S TEA PARTY TIME!!
#11 Dec 29 2005 at 1:21 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
shadowrelm wrote:
Hardly censorship. Once again Shadowrelm is talking out of his ***. The post was moved, not deleted. I guess the admins figured it was more OOT material than Asylum material
-------------------------------------------------

umm, i believe i covered that it was moved, and not deleted in my post, if you bothered to read it. and the point of my post was WHY it was moved, if you could understand what i wrote, assuming you bothered to read it.

it belongs in the asylum. there is no justification for moving it other than some misguided loyalty to the pack of thugs destroying our country atm.
it is censorship. move it back.


You liked the movie Conspiracy Theory didn't you? Unfortunately Shadow, not everyone is out to get you or your ideals.
#12 Dec 29 2005 at 1:54 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
Quote:
Out Of Topic: A forum for the Allakhazam community to babble about non game related subjects.


Since when did OOT threads not belong in the OOT forum? It was after all babble.


Edited, Thu Dec 29 13:55:26 2005 by MentalFrog
#13 Dec 29 2005 at 2:08 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
I totally agree.

Whoever is behind this thread moving stuff.... should just stop.


A person on my FFXI server forum started a thread there once, ony to have it moved to the OOT. Granted the thread wasn't FFXI related, but the problem is, hardly anyone on that forum goes ANYWHERE ELSE. Why the hell would a person on my Server make a thread addressed to a bunch of random OOT people taht he doesn't even know, nor does he check that Forum.


Weak. Leave the CaitSith Forums alone.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#14 Dec 29 2005 at 3:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
ETA until shadowrealm notices the "censorship" in 5...4...3...2...1...

I moved them, If it had just been the one I probably would have left it. since he didn't seem to be stopping, I moved them to show him where his posts would be more likely to not immidiatly be rated down by 40 people. If anyhting they will get more coverage now than they would have before.

Regarding caitsith, caitsith people complained to me about it being there, asked for it to be moved, it was off topic, I moved it. That's what they pay me the big bucks for.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#15 Dec 29 2005 at 3:53 PM Rating: Good
****
6,760 posts
I was going to reply to Shadowrelm's drivel, but I see chrisisanangel took care of it for me.

Kudos.
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#16 Dec 29 2005 at 4:21 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
can't we send SR back to Casters Realm yet?
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#17 Dec 29 2005 at 5:12 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
Regarding caitsith, caitsith people complained to me about it being there, asked for it to be moved, it was off topic, I moved it.


Smiley: mad
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#18 Dec 29 2005 at 8:39 PM Rating: Decent
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Isn't the Asylum "No holds barred forum for deep OOT discourse. Not for the faint of heart."?

I'd say GoldenLotus qualifies.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#19 Dec 29 2005 at 8:42 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
silence Thorfin!!
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#20 Dec 29 2005 at 9:00 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
people focus on the forum description too much. I blame america's educational system for teaching people to read personallym but that's besides the point. If it's no holds barred, doesn't that mean that moving it would be a not barred hold?

____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#21 Dec 29 2005 at 9:04 PM Rating: Default
Censorship is preventing someone from being able to read or view something. I suggest you buy a dictionary, but there is a free one online at www.dictionary.com.
---------------------------------------------

censorship is also putting it someplace where it will get read less. lock the thread, and within a few hours, it rolls off the page.

it belongs in the asylum.

BTW, kaolin, since when is it board policy to molest other posters posts? there are plenty of two bit hacks here im sure, yet they can controll themselves.

if it doesnt, would someone please explain why?
#22 Dec 29 2005 at 9:05 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
people focus on the forum description too much. I blame america's educational system for teaching people to read personallym but that's besides the point and who's da' man muthah FU[b][/b]CKAZZ!!?


Smiley: smile
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#23 Dec 29 2005 at 9:09 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
shadowrelm wrote:

BTW, kaolin, since when is it board policy to molest other posters posts? there are plenty of two bit hacks here im sure, yet they can controll themselves.
if it doesnt, would someone please explain why?


See? i knew it would irritate him! Hey, ShdwRlm, Al gore paid me to edit your post! hahaha!

____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#24 Dec 29 2005 at 9:11 PM Rating: Decent
Kaolian Drachensborn lvl 24 Ranger, Unrest Server
--------------------------------------------

ahhh, i understand now.

why did the ranger cross the road?

because the chicken had him down to 10 percent.

#25 Dec 29 2005 at 9:15 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
bah, rangers never run from chickens! I have a large pile of ranger corpse photos to prove that very point!
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#26 Dec 29 2005 at 9:20 PM Rating: Default
when i played my cleric, us clerics used to have a motto.

it cost less mana to rez a ranger than heal one.

same with nuke happy wizards.

wizards and rangers. a clerics worst nightmare, unless you knew how to "train" them. after a rez or 4, they either left or learned their place.

« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 184 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (184)