...yes, I am aware that there are other threads that have discussed this topic. But what I have not seen and what I believe is important that has not been said is that this type of "spying" has been done all through the '90s under a super-secret program named "Echelon." And, yes, for those who are keeping score (Shadowrelm, this is you) this occurred under the Clinton watch.
Am I blaming Clinton for doing this? No. If anything, I blame Bush for openly discussing what has been a matter of course for our intelligence community to keep tabs on threats to our open society.
Are there dangers associated with this kind of governmental watchfulness? Obviously yes. However, is it more dangerous than the threat posed by enemies who have already demonstrated that they will go much further than political discussion and begin comandeering airplanes or producing WMD? I submit to you that that is a far greater threat to your personal freedoms and security than a program which has a large system of checks and balances in place to prevent abuses.
Look, in a vacuum the fact that the government is waching your emails and listening to your phone conversations is a scary thing. But we don't live in a vacuum. We live in a world where if there was no oversight of the threats which surround us were not dealt with, the open society in which live would have ceased to exist decades ago. So instead we implement a system which monitors these enemies and puts in place a series of limiters that prevent a fallable governmental process from going too far.
It seems like a fair trade-off to me.
Totem