Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

It's Kind of Sad. - A rantFollow

#27 Dec 16 2005 at 3:59 PM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
Quote:
Someone with only 200 posts?


Smiley: bah
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
#28 Dec 16 2005 at 4:04 PM Rating: Good
***
1,625 posts
QUOTE:


Ummm ... you’re complaining about your standard of living being higher then China's. American Workers have a higher standard of living because of unions and closed borders. I ***** about outsourcing because it's inevitable that someone, whose standard of living is 8 times higher then the rest of the world, will get sold short under the guise free trade and outsourcing. This view benefits the big man and fu[/b]cks the little one.

My father is union. He works for Sasco (one of the largest electrical contractors in the US) under the electrical union, Local 11. Currently people pay out the *** for Sasco to do their jobs, because they KNOW union work is better then NON-UNION.

If you think American workers are crap, then fix the education system. Trying to compete with countries that can out-produce for cheaper prices is retarded.[/quote]


-----------------------------------------------------------------

I am not complaining about my standard of living being higher then China. I just think some american workers, particulary those who are unionized and protected, may be a bit lazy and underproductive.

Free trade and capitalism works and I support it. I have personally been laid of from a lucrative sales position on a whim from corporate headquarters. My division wasn't making enough money even though I personaly was doing quite well. It sucked at first but made me stronger in the long run. Its called adapting, which is something Unions don't really do well.
#29 Dec 16 2005 at 4:11 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
bubspeed wrote:


I am not complaining about my standard of living being higher then China. I just think some american workers, particulary those who are unionized and protected, may be a bit lazy and underproductive.


Sure thing buddy:

bubs earlier wrote:
Unions are the downfall of American Manufacturing as we know it.

No where on earth can a 300lb person make $25.00 assemblying a cruise control switch for a Buick Century, with five union regulated 30 minute breaks and a one hour paid lunch.


This actually is a description of America's standard of living being higher then somewhere else. Furthermore corporate investment in capitol has lessened the need to have intelligent American workers in factories. It's actually the economic reason to have capitol.

bubs wrote:
Free trade and capitalism works and I support it.


When the hell did I say capitolism doesn't work? Do you even know what "free trade" is?
#30 Dec 16 2005 at 4:23 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,700 posts
OMG,


I just called customer support for a software we use and I spoke to a .... white person!!!11!!!!!111! No India for you!

In my ethics class this fall we talked about corporations sending IT and support jobs to India/other places ad nauseum.

Just figured I would add this to the thread ...



I apologize.
#31 Dec 16 2005 at 4:25 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
10,802 posts
Something like that happened in my area. Pirelli Tires closed down their factory and a bunch of union workers who had really good pay were out of a job. Pirelli threatened to close the factory before and the Union was figuring that it was negotiation tactic. Not that time.

Within a year of the factory closing, divorces, bankruptcies and domestic violence restraining orders sky-rocketed in this area. The only things down were morale and the economy.

Quote:
Now you have to listen to all these untrained, unskilled mill workers that had mint jobs that paid extremely well that came with amazing benefits complain about getting fired for Christmas.


It was the same here but since 3 of California's main prisons are within driving distance, a lot of the workers went to go work for the prisons or to some of the other food factories in the area.
#32 Dec 16 2005 at 4:28 PM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
Kronig wrote:
With your thinking, should you be fired tomorrow and be replaced by someone with 1% of your experience that is willing to make half your salary?
Someone with only 200 posts?


Your replacement has arrived.
#34 Dec 16 2005 at 5:41 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
It was the same here but since 3 of California's main prisons are within driving distance, a lot of the workers went to go work for the prisons or to some of the other food factories in the area.


Prisons are food factories? What are they making, Soylent Green?
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#35 Dec 16 2005 at 5:47 PM Rating: Good
I believe we have been over all of this before, but as some of you are new and some of you are stupid, here goes...

As a former member of 3 different labor unions, having done work in several industries supported by said unions, and also the family member of people working in various assorted unions in different industries, I can say with a great degree of certainty that there is nothing which can be pointed to in the history of the American worker which has done more to enable our current economic woes and employment uncertainties than the advent of the Labor movement in this country.

/breath

I am not going to get in to it again. Search my numerous posts on the subject if you are intrigued. Anyone arguing the opposite is an idiot and doesn't deserve a response.
#36 Dec 16 2005 at 5:48 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Prisons are food factories? What are they making, Soylent Green?

Only in Texas.
#37 Dec 16 2005 at 7:17 PM Rating: Decent
**
362 posts
I've been waiting for something like that to happen to the sports industries for a while. The higher they demand to be paid, the higher the ticket prices and fewer people can go to the games. You hear about some of these salaries being shelled out for "talent" and it worries me. Bodhi, sorry about your town.
#38 Dec 16 2005 at 8:12 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
fenderputy the Shady wrote:
My father is union. He works for Sasco (one of the largest electrical contractors in the US) under the electrical union, Local 11. Currently people pay out the *** for Sasco to do their jobs, because they KNOW union work is better then NON-UNION.


Are you positive about this? See. Cause I'd beg to differ. It seems more to me that people pay out the *** for Sasco to do their jobs because they are contractually obligated to do so, and don't have a choice, or the union will go on strike and shut them down.


If someone is willing to "pay out the ***" for your work, they'll do so whether you are a member of a union or not. The *only* purpose for a union is to get people to pay out the *** for work that the would otherwise not pay that much for. Why on earth do you think that unions have to strike and create contacts to force pay and benefits for their workers? If the work was really that valuable, the union would be unecessary.


Unions had a value back in the 30s, 40s, and 50s, back when the issues were demanding worker safety and breaking the "company controlled" markets in some small towns (the old idea of owing your soul to the company store). With todays labor laws, the unions aren't needed for any of that stuff anymore. Worker saftey is managed by OSHA, not union demands. Overtime laws, fair market laws, and anti-trust laws have made the abuses that many companies did back then a thing of the past.

Unions haven't had to strike over any issue other then pay in something like 40 years. That should tell you something about their purpose today. It's not about workers "rights", it's about taking advantage of a monopoly of labor in an area to force pay and benefits at higher levels then the market would naturally provide for the labor. That's why they are a problem. They create an artificially high labor cost in industries saddled with union labor, in turn passing that cost on to everyone else. Additionally, they further reduce the competitiveness of those operations using union labor, increasing the likelyhood that those operations will end up being shut down rather then continue paying wages to their workers that are killing the bottom like of US businesses.


Unions aren't even good to those in the unions. Sure. The Union itself does fine, but the workers who are inevitably laid off when a factory is forced to close due to the high labor costs aren't exactly benefiting. They'd have been better off in the long run if they'd not been in a union, and had just been paid what the market could bear. They might have made a bit less money, but their jobs would be more secure and long term.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#39 Dec 17 2005 at 4:31 AM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
There once was a time when unions were necessary to have workes treated fairly. That time has come and gone. Now it is just a license to be a whiney, lazy *****.
I am in one of the few industries that are not allowed a Union, my bosses in the last 5 years have introduced the following:-

1. A reformed pay structure that means i get payed upto £5000 less than the guy sat next to me who is the same rank as me.

2. Removed a substantial benefit, that compensated when you where forced to spend the next 3 years in another part of the country. in a 3 year period it would amount to about £6-7000 in lost earnings in the new structure at the time that such incidents increase.

3. Restructured the appointment system for units so that they are allowed to draft people who will never join you as part of the unit so that they can avoid admitting shortfalls in manpower, which increased the workload by 10%

4. Required us to become firemen to cover for striking Firemen who where asking for substantial wage increases despite being on 33% more than us already.

5. Invited us to lose our lives in an illeagal war on a soveriegn country that was no threat to us in the name of oil.

who says Unions are not required.....
#40 Dec 17 2005 at 7:34 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Same as there are good employers and bad employers, there are good Unions and crumby ones. Seems that most of your experiences are of self-protection groups that are in denial about basic profit and loss mathematics. We have some like that here.

(National Union of Mineworkers a case in point. In the 70s and 80s they used their brute power to force uneconomic mines to stay open producing coal at 300% of the import cost. Surprise surprise, by 1990, no UK Coal Industry in the UK and tens of thousands laid off)

Without any Union representation workers are just trteated like dirt by employers.


With shi[i][/i]tty irresponsible Union representation workers are just treated like dirt by the Union.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#41 Dec 17 2005 at 4:04 PM Rating: Decent
*
233 posts
Quote:
crossbeams out of skew on the treddle?


I didn't expect a kind of Spanish Inquisition...





NO ONE EXPECTS THE SPANISH INQUISITION!

Edited, Sat Dec 17 16:15:15 2005 by Shopee
#42 Dec 17 2005 at 4:09 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,324 posts
Elderon the Wise wrote:
There once was a time when unions were necessary to have workes treated fairly. That time has come and gone. Now it is just a license to be a whiney, lazy *****.



Fu[b][/b]ckin "A" Bro! You can price yourself right out of a job.

Unions were obsolete decades ago.


edit= I forgot I wanted to be a pottymouth

Edited, Sat Dec 17 16:13:08 2005 by Weebs
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 213 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (213)