Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

It's Kind of Sad. - A rantFollow

#1 Dec 16 2005 at 3:23 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
The usual small town cry story.

The pulp and paper mill in my home town closed. No surprise, you could have seen it coming from a decade ago. Still 340 jobs (not to mention jobs that relied on that industry such as logging companies, etc) like that gone in a community of 16,000 is a big blow.

It is frustrating though. My main gripe is with the union and the employees. The company was upfront and said "look you have to be so productive in order to stay open, you currently arent hitting production quotas so either step up or be prepared" and the workers pretty much said "they're bluffing", guess what they weren't. The workers also striked for higher wages when they were already getting above industry pay.

Then the township which owns its own electrity company of which the mill is the biggest customer refused to give a deal to the mill on the price of power to help keep it cost effective.

There other factors such as an overabundance of news print lowering its price, the conservative provincial govt ended subsidies to building of new logging roads, etc.

So the last six months have been a mad dash to save it but the union seemed unwilling to budge in anyway. So today the mill closed. Worse the Union (in a small petty gesture) has stopped the Corporation that owns the mill from selling its logging rights which cover vast tracts of crown land to other lumber operations in the area. Since the crown land is in the possession of the company for 20 years per contract that means abig bloody nose to all the logging companies in the area that could easily have logged it and hauled it to any number of mills in the surrounding 300 kms.

Now you have to listen to all these untrained, unskilled mill workers that had mint jobs that paid extremely well that came with amazing benefits complain about getting fired for Christmas. Boo fu[b][/b]cking hoo.

Edited, Fri Dec 16 15:27:09 2005 by bodhisattva
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#2 Dec 16 2005 at 3:26 PM Rating: Decent
bodhisattva wrote:

Now you have to listen to all these untrained, unskilled mill workers that had cushy mint jobs that paid extremely well with benefits complain about getting fired for Christmas. Boo fu[b][/b]cking hoo.


On the bright side, at least they won't have to smell like paper mill anymore. That has got to be one of the worst smells.

We had a similar situation in a town where I used to live. Atkins, AR home of Atkins pickles. They decided to move the company to a different location but they still market it as Atkins pickles. That's a slap in the face.
#3 Dec 16 2005 at 3:27 PM Rating: Good
There once was a time when unions were necessary to have workes treated fairly. That time has come and gone. Now it is just a license to be a whiney, lazy *****.
#4 Dec 16 2005 at 3:32 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
Elderon the Wise wrote:
There once was a time when unions were necessary to have workes treated fairly. That time has come and gone. Now it is just a license to be a whiney, lazy *****.


What's left to stop people from taking those rights away from you again?
#5 Dec 16 2005 at 3:33 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
crossbeams out of skew on the treddle?
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#6 Dec 16 2005 at 3:34 PM Rating: Decent
Elderon the Wise wrote:
There once was a time when unions were necessary to have workes treated fairly. That time has come and gone. Now it is just a license to be a whiney, lazy *****.


Here here!

Quote:
Now you have to listen to all these untrained, unskilled mill workers that had mint jobs that paid extremely well that came with amazing benefits complain about getting fired for Christmas. Boo ******* hoo.


It is sad but in a want to smash someones face sad. It is tough to think of what drives people to do this to themselves. Above industry pay and they bi[b][/b]tch. Well it could not happen at a better time, ***** them for trying to "stick it to the man" (which seemed to be an inapproprate action in this case.)

I believe the MTA of New York City went on strike at noon today. If so imagine the commute home for 10s of thousands of workers, one of them being my girlfriend. They were going to strike because they demanded a 5% raise in salary over 3 years instead of 3% over 5 years and 1 more sick day. Smiley: oyvey
#7 Dec 16 2005 at 3:35 PM Rating: Good
fenderputy the Shady wrote:
Elderon the Wise wrote:
There once was a time when unions were necessary to have workes treated fairly. That time has come and gone. Now it is just a license to be a whiney, lazy *****.


What's left to stop people from taking those rights away from you again?


I am the 'them', not the 'you', so I could care less.
#8 Dec 16 2005 at 3:36 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,700 posts
Quote:
There once was a time when unions were necessary to have workes treated fairly. That time has come and gone. Now it is just a license to be a whiney, lazy *****.


I have to disagree with you here to an extent, this blanket statement is correct in the view of say a production employee, but Unions are still highly needed for maintenance employees.

My father is a mill-rite (spelled that horrible wrong i'm sure)for a local tire production plant, him and all 30 of his maintenance co-workers are the first to get screwed and if at all possible laid off in a pinch.

Retards at the plant think that maintenance only cost them money and that production is where the cash cow is, the cow cannot produce milk if it is not eating properly or it has blockages in its bowels ...

His salary is not the problem, its the conditions in which he works and the fact they try to lay off high-seniority people in order to bring in some freak off the street to fill a production spot.

In short, some places, Unions are the only reason plants are still running. They protect the people who keep the machine running and pumping out the money they desire.

#9 Dec 16 2005 at 3:36 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
My brother is a mill worker.

When he was 20 he got on at a mill that produced wood products like your everyday 2x4's etc. By the time he was 23 he was the Union rep for the mill. He could see it going down hill and jumped ship a year before it went under due to mismanagement. He got hired at the newly opened strand board mill. He is already worried because thanks to affirmative hiring and a sort of sense of entitlement the mill is populated by unskilled labourers who feel they deserve high wages for little work. Thus the same problem is popping up, the mill is not as productive as the company hoped (even by minimum estimates) not by a long shot. If the mill isnt making money in 10-15 years after start what are the chances you think its going to meet the same fate as the one that just closed?
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#10 Dec 16 2005 at 3:38 PM Rating: Good
***
1,625 posts
Unions are the downfall of American Manufacturing as we know it.

No where on earth can a 300lb person make $25.00 assemblying a cruise control switch for a Buick Century, with five union regulated 30 minute breaks and a one hour paid lunch.

And we ***** when these jobs are sent overseas where a 150 lb person is happy to make $2.50 an hour and works 4 times as hard with no breaks and a 15 unpaid lunch. Corporations can either continue to survive or go bankrupt
#11 Dec 16 2005 at 3:40 PM Rating: Good
Kronig wrote:
Quote:
There once was a time when unions were necessary to have workes treated fairly. That time has come and gone. Now it is just a license to be a whiney, lazy *****.


I have to disagree with you here to an extent, this blanket statement is correct in the view of say a production employee, but Unions are still highly needed for maintenance employees.

My father is a mill-rite (spelled that horrible wrong i'm sure)for a local tire production plant, him and all 30 of his maintenance co-workers are the first to get screwed and if at all possible laid off in a pinch.

Retards at the plant think that maintenance only cost them money and that production is where the cash cow is, the cow cannot produce milk if it is not eating properly or it has blockages in its bowels ...

His salary is not the problem, its the conditions in which he works and the fact they try to lay off high-seniority people in order to bring in some freak off the street to fill a production spot.

In short, some places, Unions are the only reason plants are still running. They protect the people who keep the machine running and pumping out the money they desire.



The cure for this is not a union, it is better management. Plants with poor management should fail and be forced to shutdown. Basic economics would dictate that this would move skilled workers to a plant with good management, who would grow and expand rather than be losing 1/2 it's potential skilled workforce to the crappy plant where because management stinks, will never offer the atmosphere that the workers want or deserve.

Times are a chaingin'. **** or get off the pot.
#12 Dec 16 2005 at 3:42 PM Rating: Good
bodhisattva wrote:
My brother is a mill worker.

When he was 20 he got on at a mill that produced wood products like your everyday 2x4's etc. By the time he was 23 he was the Union rep for the mill. He could see it going down hill and jumped ship a year before it went under due to mismanagement. He got hired at the newly opened strand board mill. He is already worried because thanks to affirmative hiring and a sort of sense of entitlement the mill is populated by unskilled labourers who feel they deserve high wages for little work. Thus the same problem is popping up, the mill is not as productive as the company hoped (even by minimum estimates) not by a long shot. If the mill isnt making money in 10-15 years after start what are the chances you think its going to meet the same fate as the one that just closed?


My sentiments exactly.
#13 Dec 16 2005 at 3:43 PM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
Quote:
His salary is not the problem, its the conditions in which he works and the fact they try to lay off high-seniority people in order to bring in some freak off the street to fill a production spot.


Can the "freak" off the street do the job just as effectivly for less money?


The people I feel bad for in bodhi's story are the ones who sat in the back of the room, the ones who said quietly "is this really a good time to rock the boat" maybe this job isn't so bad just the way it is and if I didn't like it I would just go find another one. After all it could be allot worse, like if there was no mill and I had no job and benefits.

The ones who really don't even want to be a part of the union.
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
#14 Dec 16 2005 at 3:44 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,700 posts
Quote:
The cure for this is not a union, it is better management. Plants with poor management should fail and be forced to shutdown. Basic economics would dictate that this would move skilled workers to a plant with good management, who would grow and expand rather than be losing 1/2 it's potential skilled workforce to the crappy plant where because management stinks, will never offer the atmosphere that the workers want or deserve.

Times are a chaingin'. sh*t or get off the pot


I concur, but the union still keeps the jobs of the people working there is my point.

#15 Dec 16 2005 at 3:46 PM Rating: Good
Lord xythex wrote:
Quote:
His salary is not the problem, its the conditions in which he works and the fact they try to lay off high-seniority people in order to bring in some freak off the street to fill a production spot.


Can the "freak" off the street do the job just as effectivly for less money?


The people I feel bad for in bodhi's story are the ones who sat in the back of the room, the ones who said quietly "is this really a good time to rock the boat" maybe this job isn't so bad just the way it is and if I didn't like it I would just go find another one. After all it could be allot worse, like if there was no mill and I had no job and benefits.

The ones who really don't even want to be a part of the union.


To add to this point, my old man has been in a union for 30+ years, and is a millright working in the maint. department (like the guy posted above). When it comes time for the union to negotiate their new contract he says that the people who are usually ******** and wating to go on strike are the people who are under 30 years of age. Most old timers know that they have something good. It's the new lazy generation brining them down.
#16 Dec 16 2005 at 3:47 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Elderons original statement about unions is kind of a blanket statement. So I am not going to touch it.

I think Unions are great because they allows the employees to argue from some position of authority. However they have to realize they have a stake in the company as well. That it isnt Union vs Corporation.

Unions and economics and all that isnt my area of expertise or even of interest but to make a blanket statement of my own unions are good and there is nothing wrong with them but the average worker and the union itself must realizing that things have been changing slowly for the last 20 years and the change is only getting more rapid. In order to stay competitive they are either going to have to accept certain things or die out.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#17 Dec 16 2005 at 3:47 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,700 posts
Quote:
Can the "freak" off the street do the job just as effectivly for less money?


Any monkey can push a button and at least half the time move out of the way of a machine before it smashes them, but no someone right off the street cannot be just as effective as someone who interned for 4 years to work on specialized machinery and has been in the industry for 25+ years.

With your thinking, should you be fired tomorrow and be replaced by someone with 1% of your experience that is willing to make half your salary?

I guess it really does sting a little more when the table is turned eh?
#18 Dec 16 2005 at 3:47 PM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
Quote:
but the union still keeps the jobs of the people working there is my point.


And that is 100% of the problem. It should be the workers keeping their own jobs by providing knowledge and a service to the company at a better value than any "freak" off the street can.
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
#19 Dec 16 2005 at 3:50 PM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Elderon the Wise wrote:
There once was a time when unions were necessary to have workes treated fairly. That time has come and gone. Now it is just a license to be a whiney, lazy *****.

Funny, but I feel the same way about Affirmative Action.



Trollin', trollin', trollin',
Keep them puppies rollin',
Trollin', trollin', trollin',
Rawhide!
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#20 Dec 16 2005 at 3:51 PM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
Quote:
With your thinking, should you be fired tomorrow and be replaced by someone with 1% of your experience that is willing to make half your salary?


EXACTLY! If it only takes 1% of my experience to do my job I am overqualified for it and obviously grossly overpaid. There is no question I should be replaced in that situation. I earn my money by being more effective than anyone willing to do my job for less. My job takes 100% of my experience. If it took less I would be looking for a more challenging job, or coming to the realization I am not reaching my full potential and should be paid accordingly.
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
#21 Dec 16 2005 at 3:52 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Kronig wrote:
With your thinking, should you be fired tomorrow and be replaced by someone with 1% of your experience that is willing to make half your salary?
Someone with only 200 posts?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#22 Dec 16 2005 at 3:52 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
bubspeed wrote:
Unions are the downfall of American Manufacturing as we know it.

No where on earth can a 300lb person make $25.00 assemblying a cruise control switch for a Buick Century, with five union regulated 30 minute breaks and a one hour paid lunch.

And we ***** when these jobs are sent overseas where a 150 lb person is happy to make $2.50 an hour and works 4 times as hard with no breaks and a 15 unpaid lunch. Corporations can either continue to survive or go bankrupt



Ummm ... you’re complaining about your standard of living being higher then China's. American Workers have a higher standard of living because of unions and closed borders. I ***** about outsourcing because it's inevitable that someone, whose standard of living is 8 times higher then the rest of the world, will get sold short under the guise free trade and outsourcing. This view benefits the big man and fu[/b]cks the little one.

My father is union. He works for Sasco (one of the largest electrical contractors in the US) under the electrical union, Local 11. Currently people pay out the *** for Sasco to do their jobs, because they KNOW union work is better then NON-UNION.

If you think American workers are crap, then fix the education system. Trying to compete with countries that can out-produce for cheaper prices is retarded.
#23 Dec 16 2005 at 3:53 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,700 posts
Quote:
And that is 100% of the problem. It should be the workers keeping their own jobs by providing knowledge and a service to the company at a better value than any "freak" off the street can.


The problem is there is no such thing as employee loyalty anymore. People put in 30 years and 2 weeks before they retire they are fired for "poor peformance" and screwed out of everything they worked for in their life. Corporations do not care about people, only the bottom-line. You may or may not agree with this, and you may think I am full of s[/b]hit, but it happens and quite frequently.

Look in the news lately, Verizon is ******** the hell out of their managers in order to save money on their merge. Ford is buttf[b]
ucking the hell out of their employees as well right now trying to stay competitive in the market. Instead of cutting cost and making products that are more attractive and reliable to consumers, they are putting the pinch on their employees, because they can.

You should earn your position to be at a company, but companies do not honor your effort to stay there. If they feel you can be replaced more efficiently, they do it, and the government (no matter who is in charge) lets them do it.

#24 Dec 16 2005 at 3:56 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,700 posts
Quote:
I bi[/b]tch about outsourcing because it's inevitable that someone, whose standard of living is 8 times higher then the rest of the world, will get sold short under the guise free trade and outsourcing. This view benefits the big man and fu[b]cks the little one.


QFT
#25 Dec 16 2005 at 3:57 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
Kronig wrote:
Quote:
And that is 100% of the problem. It should be the workers keeping their own jobs by providing knowledge and a service to the company at a better value than any "freak" off the street can.


The problem is there is no such thing as employee loyalty anymore. People put in 30 years and 2 weeks before they retire they are fired for "poor peformance" and screwed out of everything they worked for in their life. Corporations do not care about people, only the bottom-line. You may or may not agree with this, and you may think I am full of s[/b]hit, but it happens and quite frequently.

Look in the news lately, Verizon is ******** the hell out of their managers in order to save money on their merge. Ford is buttf[b]
ucking the hell out of their employees as well right now trying to stay competitive in the market. Instead of cutting cost and making products that are more attractive and reliable to consumers, they are putting the pinch on their employees, because they can.

You should earn your position to be at a company, but companies do not honor your effort to stay there. If they feel you can be replaced more efficiently, they do it, and the government (no matter who is in charge) lets them do it.



With the destruction of unions this behavior will become more common.
#26 Dec 16 2005 at 3:59 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Overlord Demea wrote:
Elderon the Wise wrote:
There once was a time when unions were necessary to have workes treated fairly. That time has come and gone. Now it is just a license to be a whiney, lazy *****.

Funny, but I feel the same way about Affirmative Action.


I believe a lot of social problems come from disparity in wealth. I believe that anyone that tackles the problem by say "they should lift themselves out of the mud" and then whines and ******* about crime, drugs, is just shooting themselves in the foot. It is in your best interests to help lift people out of the cycle of poverty.

I do however think that handing out welfare cheques is not the way to lift them out of the mud. I also don't believe that setting aside jobs for them whether they deserve them or not helps either.

There I have been "trolled" into a response :P
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 227 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (227)