NWS and You :: Free Realms

Quote Reply

#27 Dec 08 2005 at 8:50 PM Rating: Excellent

Kaolian

View User Forum

Leet Haxör

29,919 posts

I generally operate like this. 1st no [NWS] (or if it has been a long while since their last), They get their post edited and a PM warning. Second, I give them a public warning. 3rd, I karma camp the **** out of that post... you get the picture. Of course, depending on the content and any attempts to pass something horrible off as a legitimate link, responses do vary on a case by case basis.

____________________________

Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#28 Dec 08 2005 at 8:55 PM Rating: Good

Kastigir

Sage

7,861 posts

Angsty wrote:

Kastigar pwns bandwidth usage in KBytes presently, but it's not a huge number.

Is it an alarming like "I have some spyware doing a number on you" type of thing, or just a large amount of usage? If it's the former, I wanna know so I can attempt to correct the issue.

____________________________

People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome. ~River Tam

Sedao

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#29 Dec 08 2005 at 8:59 PM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1717978557855

Scholar

874 posts

Quote:

Kastigar pwns bandwidth usage in KBytes presently, but it's not a huge number.

Jacobsdeception, of course, provides the most hits to the site.

No, I mean spam connection to your VNC portal?
Look in yer logs(yea, there is a major FTFY in there) for VNC and see if your getting sh[b][/b]it like this..

Quote:

1/12/2005 11:52 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 11:52 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 11:52 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 11:52 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 11:53 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 11:53 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 11:54 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 11:54 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 11:55 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 11:56 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 11:56 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 11:57 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 11:57 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 11:58 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 11:58 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 11:58 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 11:59 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 11:59 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 12:00 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 12:00 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 12:01 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 12:01 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 12:02 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 12:02 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 12:03 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 12:03 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 12:04 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 12:05 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 12:05 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 12:06 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 12:06 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 12:07 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*
1/12/2005 12:07 Invalid attempt from client 68.186.249.*

EDIT: Different IP's every time. And I'll remove the IP address last octet.

We use VNC at work and are getting the same thing. as well as some other tower sites that have the server installed on them.

New virus? Someone dragneting with a VNC request program?

Edited, Thu Dec 8 21:03:34 2005 by Molish

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#32 Dec 08 2005 at 9:05 PM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1717978557855

Scholar

874 posts

Smart. Guess I'll have to build that stupid nix box and finally use a real piece of equipment to seperate my internal network.

What you using for the SSH connection? I got Secure CRT, which is pretty good on the bandwith.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#34 Dec 08 2005 at 9:16 PM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1592278016622

1,751 posts

NWShttp://www.globalclassroom.org/s_rainbo.gif

Did I get it right?

~Blix

Edited, Thu Dec 8 21:18:56 2005 by TheBlix

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#35 Dec 09 2005 at 9:18 AM Rating: Good

xythex

View User Forum

Sage