Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Hey, maybe we should look into this whole 'ethics' thingFollow

#1 Dec 08 2005 at 11:13 AM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/08/politics/08ethics.html?ex=1291698000&en=ae1066b53059b522&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss


WASHINGTON, Dec. 7 - In a sign that Republican leaders are increasingly anxious about the image of the House after bribery convictions, Speaker J. Dennis Hastert raised the prospect on Wednesday of new ethics training for lawmakers.

House members and aides said Mr. Hastert broached the subject in a closed-door session with House Republicans while they discussed former Representative Randy Cunningham, the California Republican who pleaded guilty last week in an extensive corruption case that has stunned colleagues.

"The speaker wants members on both sides of the aisle to understand the nuances of House rules," Ron Bonjean, a spokesman for Mr. Hastert, said about the plan.

Mr. Hastert's proposal indicates that senior Republicans, who have previously dismissed criticism of House conduct and links to lobbyists as politically motivated, are taking the question more seriously.


Yeah, that's it. The GOP just didn't understand the full complexity of not abusing power to make their supporters even more wealthy. There was no MALICE or anything....

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#2 Dec 08 2005 at 11:16 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Quote:
Was that wrong? Should I not have done that? I tell you, I gotta plead ignorence on this thing, because if anyone had said anything to me at all when I first started here that that sort of thing is frowned upon... you know, cause I've worked in a lot of offices, and I tell you, people do that all the time.


#3 Dec 08 2005 at 10:40 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Quote:
Was that wrong?


Smiley: laugh
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#4 Dec 08 2005 at 10:46 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,632 posts
I blame it on coffee.
#5 Dec 09 2005 at 12:01 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
No, no, see, it really ISN'T their fault. They misread "ethics" as "ethnics", and they knew they didn't want anything to do with that colored sh[i][/i]it. Perfectly understandable mistake, really.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#6 Dec 09 2005 at 6:59 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Nexa wrote:
Quote:
Was that wrong? Should I not have done that? I tell you, I gotta plead ignorence on this thing, because if anyone had said anything to me at all when I first started here that that sort of thing is frowned upon... you know, cause I've worked in a lot of offices, and I tell you, people do that all the time.


Go, go Costanza!
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 252 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (252)