Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Remind me to take my meds before flying.Follow

#27 Dec 08 2005 at 10:45 AM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

A pound of C4 wrapped in easily obtainable yellow cake would put everyone in a several mile radius in danger. How about if it was wrapped in vials of a nerve agent?


Then shooting at the nerve agent was a real good idea.

Also, easily obtainable? Please.

Ceasium 137 is easily obtainable, yelowcake, no.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#28 Dec 08 2005 at 10:46 AM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
Quote:
the airport may of been demolished but farmers 30 miles away are not going to feel tremors.


No, but farmers 30 miles downwind are going to have to deal with the effects of radiation poisoning for a few years.
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
#29 Dec 08 2005 at 10:47 AM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
Mmmmm, yellow cake
____________________________
Do what now?
#30 Dec 08 2005 at 10:49 AM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
No, but farmers 30 miles downwind are going to have to deal with the effects of radiation poisoning for a few years.

Hahahaha.

No.

It was a BACKPACK, not a truck.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#31 Dec 08 2005 at 10:51 AM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
Quote:
Also, easily obtainable? Please.

Ceasium 137 is easily obtainable, yelowcake, no.


Ok then Cesium then. Does it make a difference in this hypothetical situation?
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
#32 Dec 08 2005 at 10:52 AM Rating: Good
Yellowcake

It took me like 5 seconds to find this. It's called froogle...

and sarcasm

Edited, Thu Dec 8 10:54:37 2005 by Frakkor
#33 Dec 08 2005 at 10:56 AM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts


Ok then Cesium then. Does it make a difference in this hypothetical situation?


Not really, neither one would do much if in a tiny bomb set off inside an airport. Just be a pain in the *** to clean up mainly.



____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#34 Dec 08 2005 at 10:56 AM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
#35 Dec 08 2005 at 11:01 AM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Yeah it would be a pain in the *** to clean up.

Fairly sure I mentioned that.

You might have to build a new section of airport.

For it to 'contaminate a city' it would have to become AIRBORNE signifgantly which would require a much large amount of conventional explosive than you could fit in a backpack.

Hell though, what if it had been a Neutron Bomb! Or wrapped in mozzerella. That stuff's sticky.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#36 Dec 08 2005 at 11:16 AM Rating: Decent
**
874 posts
Quote:
Why don't you just continue your tradition of Aslyum fellatio and add a quote of his to your sig? Another notch on the belt for you Molish. Collect them all!


Not my fault you suck @ teh int3rW3bs.
Smash has been trolling like a **** since he made his "grandeur" appearance on the "scene" again.
That’s what he does. Obviously a good job of it too.

Have fun trying to argue with our favorite bi-polar.
#37 Dec 08 2005 at 11:20 AM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
Have you ever set off a firecracker in a bowl of flour? I'm pretty sure a backpack sized bomb would do a decent job of dispersing the material. Especially if there was a breeze and he was on a thin jetway several dozen feet off the ground.
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
#38 Dec 08 2005 at 11:23 AM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Have you ever set off a firecracker in a bowl of flour?


No, but I've done threat assements of the impact of various classes of ordinance if used by terrorists.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#39 Dec 08 2005 at 11:38 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
JennockFV wrote:
We had a similar case in the UK after the July bombings. An illegal immigrant ran from police when asked to stop into a tube station. The police, fearing he was another suicide bomber, killed him.

There is a balance to be made between protecting ourselves and the rights of individuals. I do not wish to be the one to make that choice. It seems if you overprotect, this happens. If you do not have enough security, bombings happen.


He was 'technically' illegal in as much as he was a legal migrant whose work visa had expired. Does that make his life worthless?

No.

But he was a Brasilian electrician, so he deserved to die.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#41 Dec 08 2005 at 12:35 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,700 posts
Quote:
S'funny, I know a Brazillian guy who almost always wears a t-shirt with "please don't shoot me" written on it. Living in our country in these times I imagine there'll soon be quite a market for them.


Or lack there of once people start getting shot because they are considered terrorist and the shirt is just a ploy ...
#42 Dec 08 2005 at 1:09 PM Rating: Good
***
3,128 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
If he was reaching into his backback 100 yards from anyone, yeah, I'd have wiated untill the bomb went off.


Shrapnel can travel at lethal speeds much further than 100 yards. However, 100 yards is an awful long distance to hit a moving target with a handgun. I doubt the Marshall was certified to shoot a suspect in a crowded area from that distance.

Smasharoo wrote:

The guy had a BACKPACK. The airplane was in zero danger unless he had a pound of Californium.


A bomb that can fit in the sole of a shoe can take down an airplane and also kill people, grenades are not that large and are quite lethal. A backpack can hold a large amount of explosives such as dynamite etc. which combined with shrapnel can be very deadly to unprotected soft targets in a very large area of effect.
#43 Dec 08 2005 at 2:50 PM Rating: Default
Hey Genius Smash:

What would you be saying if he hadn't shot him and the guy had a bomb on him? You'd be sitting here like the little ***** you are complaining about how the guy shoulda pulled the trigger, and that's what you get for having incompetent employees, and we need more tax money to increase salaries so we can get better quality air marshalls. SO STFU ALREADY! Your words are worthless cheap shots, that's all you have ever been able to accomplish in my view.

#44 Dec 08 2005 at 3:30 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Quote:
Smash has been trolling like a **** since he made his "grandeur" appearance on the "scene" again.
That’s what he does. Obviously a good job of it too.

Have fun trying to argue with our favorite bi-polar.


For fu[/b]ck's sake, get his di[b]ck out of your *** already. Who the f[/b]uck are you and who is "our"? How long have you been hanging on to that **** of an afterthought RACK and PP's quote? Why do I remember reading that sig over and over yet can't think of one f[b]ucking word you've ever uttered? How many more questions can I ask before I have to start a new paragraph? If I don't indent, does that weaken the importance of these questions?
#45 Dec 08 2005 at 3:34 PM Rating: Good
**
559 posts
Quote:
If I don't indent, does that weaken the importance of these questions?

yes
#46 Dec 08 2005 at 3:36 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
soulshaver wrote:
Quote:
If I don't indent, does that weaken the importance of these questions?

yes


ha

but you still answered it.

+1 NephSmiley: tongue
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#47 Dec 08 2005 at 4:23 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Well. A few points that I got from the initial story.

He was on a causway between the plane and the terminal. I don't know what your airports are like, but every one I've been to, these things are *not* 100 yard away from crowds of people. They are typically about 60 to 70 feet long, running straight into the plane door at one end, with a 90 degree turn at the end that leads to the terminal. So if he's at the midpoint of that causway, he's likely maybe 30-40 feet from the plane, and probably no more then 20 feet from the terminal. Most airports are laid out so that planes park nose into the terminal, with the causway running parallel to the terminal building wall. This would mean that there's only the thin wall of the causesay, maybe 10-15 feet of empty air, and then the outer wall of the terminal between the bomb and usually a pretty densly packed group of people. That's not terribly much to blow through.


As to saftey. Since the causway has a turn in it before it gets to the terminal, it would be nearly completely safe to fire at a suspect running from the plane to the terminal. Bullets travel in a straight line. You'll hit the turn in the causeway, but not anyone in the terminal. It was the ideal time and place to fire at someone with a bomb if you were going to do it.


And. Just a thought. Instead of saying we shouldn't have skymarshals with guns on airplanes. How about we not have bi-polar people on airplanes instead? You don't have a legal right to fly on a plane. Deal with it.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#48 Dec 08 2005 at 8:49 PM Rating: Decent
**
362 posts
So to show we're not giving in to the terrorists, we should let him set off his bomb. Killing the guy before he could endanger hundreds would be letting the terrorists win, so, to show them how tough we are, we're going to let them blow up whatever they want. That'll teach them to mess with us. We should also appologise for getting our pesky buildings in the way of their planes. Our bad.

Edited, Thu Dec 8 20:52:58 2005 by Denogginizer
#49 Dec 08 2005 at 9:19 PM Rating: Decent
**
874 posts
Quote:
For fu[/b]ck's sake, get his di[b]ck out of your *** already


Sorry kitty, but Smashs' d[/b]ick is the last thing I want near me. You know how old he is? Poor bast[b]ard has been around the block one to many times fer me.

Quote:
Who the fu[/b]ck are you and who is "our"?


I'm just a ghost that likes to rattle the shutters every so often.
Our? I got a frog in me pocket. ARE YE FU[b]
CKING BLIND ER WHAT LAD?!?

Quote:
How long have you been hanging on to that **** of an afterthought RACK and PP's quote?


A long time. Just like a few others who can't be bothered to update their sig with the "new & trendy" forum content. In essence, sh[/b]it was better when lil cat fu[b]ckers like you weren't here.

Quote:
Why do I remember reading that sig over and over yet can't think of one fuc[/b]king word you've ever uttered?


Well, that's cuz I don't have a post count over 1K yet. Come on lad, use yer brain and remember the first rule of the assylum. No one under 1K is to be noticed.
Stop trying to s3x0rs m3!oeon1!I'm under posts....er....age...

Quote:
How many more questions can I ask before I have to start a new paragraph?


Ask the grammar *****, their always somewhere about.....
Like fu[b]
cking Batman.

Quote:
If I don't indent, does that weaken the importance of these questions?


Nawww, is just makes it easier to skip over your post, Like Gbaji's!

See, I actually helped ya out abit and broke it up so everyone can enjoy your ignorance as much as I do.
#50 Dec 08 2005 at 10:32 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

And. Just a thought. Instead of saying we shouldn't have skymarshals with guns on airplanes. How about we not have bi-polar people on airplanes instead? You don't have a legal right to fly on a plane. Deal with it.


Actually I do.

It's covered by some legislation you told me didn't exist back when you said companies could just not hire any black people if they felt like it.

The law is confusing and beffudling to you, isn't it?

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#51 Dec 08 2005 at 10:47 PM Rating: Decent
Molish. I know, I'm not supposed to stare but bob-damn its hard. I've never seen a two legged dog with di[b][/b]ck in its *** and a grin on its face.

Now back to the thread. From the story it sounded as if he was endangering people. I mean, these ARE trained US air marshals. They aren't going to be shooting up the airport unless it the situation truly did present it self as hazardous to the surrounding society. However, I also do agree that Osama IS infact laughing his *** off right now.

Edited, Thu Dec 8 22:49:25 2005 by LtGoose
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 273 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (273)