- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Marriage is a union between a man and a woman.
Marriage is a union between a man and a woman.Follow
dictionary.com wrote:
mar·riage
n.
1. a. The legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife.
n.
1. a. The legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife.
Asylum Dictionary wrote:
Sh[/i]it Troll
shi[/i]t*troll n.
1: see above
shi[/i]t*troll n.
1: see above
Edited, Wed Dec 7 05:08:49 2005 by Danalog
Do what now?
Travis DOES NOT rock.
Discuss.
Discuss.
I wholeheartedly agree with Nadenu and Dana.
On an unrelated note, I have noticed Dana playing more often. Is the a bi-product of the impending nuptuals (or if I am wrong on my recollection that there are impending nuptuals, is it a bi-product of getting laid regularly?)?
playing?
Do what now?
I thiink it could make sense to say that Man is the union of women and marriage... based on my exeriances with women trying to rush into marriage...
prolly why I'm still single
prolly why I'm still single
Does anyone else here like Ice cream? My favourite type is Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough.
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust
The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning
Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
Dana wrote:
playing?
Yeah, with the trolls and such. It seems to me you took a break from it for a while, and have come back recently with some BAMmage worthy of at least journeyman status.
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
Dana wrote:
playing?
Yeah, with the trolls and such. It seems to me you took a break from it for a while, and have come back recently with some BAMmage worthy of at least journeyman status.
Ah, I see.
I was over-busy/stressed/etc for a while, didn't feel like posting much. Doing better now though.
Do what now?
UndeadShroom the Wise wrote:
Does anyone else here like *** cream? My favourite type is "Huge chocolate d[/b]ick flavoured, dripping from my own a[b]ss hole after a good long, bloody-fart producing a[b][/b]ss pumelling session".
Fixed for accuracy.
Elderon, that ftfy made me feel all urpy. 
Yanari the Puissant wrote:
Elderon, that ftfy made me feel all urpy.
Well it -was- for Undeadshroom.Quote:
dictionary.com wrote:
mar·riage
n.
1. a. The legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife.
mar·riage
n.
1. a. The legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife.
mar.riage
n.
1. a. The legal union of two consenting adults as life partners.
Amazingly enough Dictionairy definations reflect the world around us, to use the second defination riht now would be wrong since it can't happen.
Doesn't have any reflection of what should happen though.
after all you Americans still insist on dropping the "u" from Colour, it might be in your dictionarys but it's still not "English".
Quote:
after all you Americans still insist on dropping the "u" from Colour, it might be in your dictionarys but it's still not "English".
Considering the Latin word is "color," I'll stick with that.
Oh and we also like to pluralize (not pluralise) some words by changing the "y" to an "ie." We're funny that way.
Quote:
Considering the Latin word is "color," I'll stick with that.
Oh and we also like to pluralize (not pluralise) some words by changing the "y" to an "ie." We're funny that way.
Oh and we also like to pluralize (not pluralise) some words by changing the "y" to an "ie." We're funny that way.
Again not saying how you spell is wrong or that you should do it differently, i am saying that it's not English if you do.
/hyjack on.
dictionary.com should have wrote:
mar·riage
n.
1. a. The legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife except in Belgium, Canada, the Netherlands, Spain and soon to be South Africa. Also in Massachusetts but without federal recognition.
n.
1. a. The legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife except in Belgium, Canada, the Netherlands, Spain and soon to be South Africa. Also in Massachusetts but without federal recognition.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
dictionary.com should have wrote:
mar·riage
n.
1. a. The legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife except in Belgium, Canada, the Netherlands, Spain and soon to be South Africa. Also in Massachusetts but without federal recognition.
n.
1. a. The legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife except in Belgium, Canada, the Netherlands, Spain and soon to be South Africa. Also in Massachusetts but without federal recognition.
Nope, see, you're endearing, too! Damn it, I am just full of love.
Pssst! Hey, Tarv! Over here.
Some of us had done a masterful job of COMPLETELY F[b]UCKING IGNORING[/b] the original troll monster, and almost let the thread die.
What gives man?
And don't make me remind you that you lost claim to the language the moment we kicked your pasty-white, bland food eating asses back across the pond.
Some of us had done a masterful job of COMPLETELY F[b]UCKING IGNORING[/b] the original troll monster, and almost let the thread die.
What gives man?
And don't make me remind you that you lost claim to the language the moment we kicked your pasty-white, bland food eating asses back across the pond.
marriage, a definition made by how the word is commonly used.
like ***, for instance. once a cigarette, and now a homosexual.
definitions are not absolute. and when we, as a people, use our prejudice to try to turn a definition into a law, we, as a people, are discrininating. prejudice. pure and simple.
this is no differant than not allowing Black people to drink from the same fountain as whites.
you can not take a definition in a dictionary, and design a law around it. quite the opposite. you design laws to protect the freedoms of people, THEN DEFINE the words so the laws intent is not lost or diminished.
the definition you see for the word is not a law. it is merely how that WORD is commonly used. if society changes how it usses a word, the definitions change also. this is the way it has been since dictionaries were first printed.
if man wants to make it a law that marriage cannot be performed between members of the same sex, then call it what it is. DISCRIMINATION. dont hide your chicken **** behind the transient definitions of a particular word as it is defined on any particulat day.
but that is what the conservative right does. they hide prejudice and discrimination behind layers of camoflauge so you dont see then for what they are.
a pack of biggots. just like the biggots that barred blacks from mainstream society in our past. same ugly face, just a new layer of camo.
like ***, for instance. once a cigarette, and now a homosexual.
definitions are not absolute. and when we, as a people, use our prejudice to try to turn a definition into a law, we, as a people, are discrininating. prejudice. pure and simple.
this is no differant than not allowing Black people to drink from the same fountain as whites.
you can not take a definition in a dictionary, and design a law around it. quite the opposite. you design laws to protect the freedoms of people, THEN DEFINE the words so the laws intent is not lost or diminished.
the definition you see for the word is not a law. it is merely how that WORD is commonly used. if society changes how it usses a word, the definitions change also. this is the way it has been since dictionaries were first printed.
if man wants to make it a law that marriage cannot be performed between members of the same sex, then call it what it is. DISCRIMINATION. dont hide your chicken **** behind the transient definitions of a particular word as it is defined on any particulat day.
but that is what the conservative right does. they hide prejudice and discrimination behind layers of camoflauge so you dont see then for what they are.
a pack of biggots. just like the biggots that barred blacks from mainstream society in our past. same ugly face, just a new layer of camo.
Don't blame him, blame the pusscu[/b]nt that rated this back over sub-default.
Edited, Thu Dec 8 09:31:15 2005 by xythex
Edited, Thu Dec 8 09:31:15 2005 by xythex
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere
Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere
Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
In any case, dictionary.com actually has this definition:
Edited, Thu Dec 8 10:39:44 2005 by Patrician
dictionary.com wrote:
mar·riage
1.
a. The legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife.
b. The state of being married; wedlock.
c. A common-law marriage.
d. A union between two persons having the customary but usually not the legal force of marriage: a same-sex marriage.
1.
a. The legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife.
b. The state of being married; wedlock.
c. A common-law marriage.
d. A union between two persons having the customary but usually not the legal force of marriage: a same-sex marriage.
Edited, Thu Dec 8 10:39:44 2005 by Patrician
that's one lame-*** trolling job, quoting a dictionary that proves your point wrong.
-1
try harder next time?
(re: the OP, if you're slow)
Edited, Thu Dec 8 10:40:56 2005 by Danalog
-1
try harder next time?
(re: the OP, if you're slow)
Edited, Thu Dec 8 10:40:56 2005 by Danalog
Do what now?
Quote:
Considering the Latin word is "color," I'll stick with that.
Then call it latin then because in English it is colour.
Recent Visitors: 233
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (233)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Marriage is a union between a man and a woman.
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC