Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Darwin > RappersFollow

#27 Dec 06 2005 at 1:30 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Rimesume the Shady wrote:
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:

Ludicrous and oversimplified. Do you not consider a digital artist an artist because his graphics are being drawn by complicated algorithims, and not by paints mixed by his own hand?


Again, the graphics being drawn by complicated algorithims, is the digital artists paintbrush.

The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:

Is filmmaking not an art because the direcotr isn't the only one creating, but rather it's a collaboration of actors, costume designers, lighting technicians, cinematographers, etc?


All the above said people are the tools of the artist. Some tools can be an artist in this situation.

Actors- A very hard job to do well. Even the most amature of a crowed can point out a bad actor/actress. Requires talent.
Costume Designers- Thier "tool" is the clothing and make-up ect. that they decide to use.

The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:

Is a person that makes a collage, or a giant paper-mache statue not an artist because they are recyclying materials?


Tool: Paper-mache is the tool or the paintbrush, the actual thought is from the artists.


Are you failing to complete the comparison because you're as obtuse as you seem, or just lazy? Because if you're lazy, you'll get no help from me. I'm in my post-lunch napping phase.
#28 Dec 06 2005 at 1:37 PM Rating: Good


Quote:
I cannot take rap seriously as an art due to its early stages.


See, it is the early stages of rap that make it musically important. Pioneers, such as Run DMC and later NWA, took forms of music, combined them, and created their own form of expression. It is moments like that which make music move forward, even if you don't particularly care for the genera.

I feel the way you do, sort of, more about pop music than rap. I believe what is going on "underground" pushes music forward, not necesserily pop. There are some exceptions, however, such as some people would consider the Beatles "pop" and they were important musically.



#29 Dec 06 2005 at 1:38 PM Rating: Decent
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Are you failing to complete the comparison because you're as obtuse as you seem, or just lazy? Because if you're lazy, you'll get no help from me. I'm in my post-lunch napping phase.


Touching at best.

That said, how did I fail the compairison or did you just use that post as a oppertunity for a **** poor flame?

I see artists in each of the situations that you came up with. I don't expect you to like them, nor do I care if you do.

I don't see art where someone else makes the music, and another writes the songs. Where is the art? The music composer and song writer of the song are the real artists, the singer(or rapper) in this case is just a tool of said artists.
#30 Dec 06 2005 at 2:16 PM Rating: Decent
Rimesume the Shady wrote:
I can see art(in every sence of the word) in R&B, but Rap is just pure garbage. Considering how well this crap sells in the US tells me how many of my fellow Americans lack even in the smallest amount, what it takes to make art. Many of these Rap "artists" have song writers and rarely(if ever) create or compose the music(I use that word very loosly) they make.

You are NOT an artist if...
You have a song writer(The song writer is the real artist)
If someone makes your music and you just sing(The musician is the artist). Your just a tool not the real artist. Would you consider the paintbrush or the painter the artist?


I see this type of statement from time to time, and as a fan of some, but certainly not all, rap music, I have to disagree. Consider the following definition:

The Dictionary wrote:

po·et·ry n. 1. The art or work of a poet.


Based on this I think we can agree that poetry is art. If not, the rest of my post is moot and you can stop reading now.


Assuming that we can agree, consider the following scenario. The numbered points are presented in chronological order.

1) A poet writes his poetry on paper and allows it to be read silently by others.
2) A poet writes his poetry on paper and recites it aloud to others.
3) A poet recites his poetry in a public place, and there is music playing in the background.
4) A poet recites his poetry in a public place and notices music playing in the background. He likes the way his poetry sounds set to music and decides to recite his poetry so that the syllables of the words coincide to the beat of the music.
5) A poet and a musician know that their individual works sound best when performed together and travel to public places together so that the poet can recite his poems on beat to the musician's music.
6) The musician from #5 cannot perform at a time when the poet would like. The musician gives the poet a CD recording of the music. The poet then recites his poetry in public in time to the recorded music
7) The poet and the musician notice that their art is getting a good reception, but they realize they can't perform everywhere at once. They decide to go into a studio and record their performance and sell the recording.

Now, assuming that we agree that poetry is art, it would follow that you agree that #1 above is also art.

You have already stated that rap music is not art. The following is the definition of 'rap' as given by the dictionary:

The Dictionary wrote:
A form of popular music developed especially in African-American urban communities and characterized by spoken or chanted rhyming lyrics with a syncopated, repetitive rhythmic accompaniment.


This is exactly #7 above. So, my question for you is this, at what point did the poet in the above scenario cease to be an artist? We know that at #1 he was an artist but by #7 he is no longer an artist. Where/how did this happen?

As a side question, is the musician still an artist even though he allows his work to be the backdrop for poetry? Is the resulting work still art at all?

It is perfectly understandable for you to not like rap music, but to claim it is not art is ridiculous.

There are a lot of rappers that I do not like at all but they are all poets. Rakim even delivers many of his raps in iambic pentameter.

Take the following verse by one of my favorite rappers, Common:


Quote:
Let the truth be told from young souls that become old
From days spent in the jungle, where must one go
To find it, time is real, we can't rewind it
Out of everybody I met, who told the truth? Time did
We find kids speakin cuz it's naturally in us
But the false prophets by tellin us we born sinners
Venders of hate, got me battlin my own mind state
At a divine rate, I ain't in this just to rhyme great
See the truth in the thighs of a stripper, the eyes of my *****
If it's only one, then why should it differ
So constantly I seek it
Wonderin why I gotta drink a six pack to speak it
Took a picture of the truth and tried to develop it
Had proof, it was only recognized by the intelligent
Took the negative and positive, cuz niggas got to live
Said I got to get more than I'm given
Cuz truth'll never be heard in religion
After searchin the world, on the inside what was hidden
It was the truth


That is poetry.

None of this means you have to like their work or enjoy listening to it, but it is art.
#31 Dec 06 2005 at 2:25 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
Quote:
I don't see art where someone else makes the music, and another writes the songs. Where is the art? The music composer and song writer of the song are the real artists, the singer(or rapper) in this case is just a tool of said artists.


How is this different than your statement about a director? In movies you have a write, an actor, a makeup artist, and a director. One person wrote it and another acts it out. The singer is the actor for the writer. What's the difference?

Just because people like or dislike it doesn't mean it's not art. So what if people from a different part of the world thinks rap is a joke. What about painters who's style and form was laughed at and considered a joke. That is until they passed on and their art pieces are now considered classics? They were scoffed at and considered a joke. You're doing the same thing with rap. It is an art form believe it or not. Popular art is always imitated by others has this not always been the case?
#32 Dec 06 2005 at 3:31 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
1) A poet writes his poetry on paper and allows it to be read silently by others.
2) A poet writes his poetry on paper and recites it aloud to others.
3) A poet recites his poetry in a public place, and there is music playing in the background.
4) A poet recites his poetry in a public place and notices music playing in the background. He likes the way his poetry sounds set to music and decides to recite his poetry so that the syllables of the words coincide to the beat of the music.
5) A poet and a musician know that their individual works sound best when performed together and travel to public places together so that the poet can recite his poems on beat to the musician's music.
6) The musician from #5 cannot perform at a time when the poet would like. The musician gives the poet a CD recording of the music. The poet then recites his poetry in public in time to the recorded music
7) The poet and the musician notice that their art is getting a good reception, but they realize they can't perform everywhere at once. They decide to go into a studio and record their performance and sell the recording.

Now, assuming that we agree that poetry is art, it would follow that you agree that #1 above is also art.

You have already stated that rap music is not art. The following is the definition of 'rap' as given by the dictionary:


The Dictionary wrote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A form of popular music developed especially in African-American urban communities and characterized by spoken or chanted rhyming lyrics with a syncopated, repetitive rhythmic accompaniment.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This is exactly #7 above. So, my question for you is this, at what point did the poet in the above scenario cease to be an artist? We know that at #1 he was an artist but by #7 he is no longer an artist. Where/how did this happen?


In that scenario the Rapper is an artist but if you add in a step #8 then you get what is realy happening with most of rap music today.

8) The poet decides he doesn't have the mass appeal needed to become a great rapper so he hires some thug to rap his poetry. He then becomes the song writer and the thug is called the "Rapper."



If most rapper's would write their own music then It might be considered art, but as long as they are just reading the words that someone else wrote then they are not Artists. They are the tools a real artist uses to get his message across.
#33 Dec 06 2005 at 3:33 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
Quote:
If most rapper's would write their own music then It might be considered art, but as long as they are just reading the words that someone else wrote then they are not Artists. They are the tools a real artist uses to get his message across.


So an actor who writes their own lines is an artist but one who just goes by the script isn't? I get ya.
#34 Dec 06 2005 at 3:40 PM Rating: Decent
TheDakster wrote:

In that scenario the Rapper is an artist but if you add in a step #8 then you get what is realy happening with most of rap music today.

8) The poet decides he doesn't have the mass appeal needed to become a great rapper so he hires some thug to rap his poetry. He then becomes the song writer and the thug is called the "Rapper."


So, do you think there is no art to be found in the human voice?

Also, do you have statistics to back this up? How do you know that in "most of rap music," the lyrics are not written by the rapper? Not that I really think it matters, I'm just curious. The vocal delivery is art regardless if it was written by the vocalist or not, but I'm just wondering where you find your facts.
#35 Dec 06 2005 at 3:44 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
So an actor who writes their own lines is an artist but one who just goes by the script isn't? I get ya.


But an actor actualy has to have talent in order to perform his part correctly, all a rapper has to do is be able to read.

Quote:
So, do you think there is no art to be found in the human voice?


If they were actualy SINGING then it might be art, but seeing as all their doing is reading then I personaly believe that its not art.


#36 Dec 06 2005 at 3:46 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
Quote:
If they were actualy SINGING then it might be art, but seeing as all their doing is reading then I personaly believe that its not art.


Ever been to a book reading?
#37 Dec 06 2005 at 3:47 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
Also what about a pianoist? Don't they just hit the keys written on the music sheet?
#38 Dec 06 2005 at 3:52 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Ever been to a book reading?


Yeah but anyone who is even halfway literate can read a book and make it sound good. Once again the artist there is the author, the reader is just a tool.


Quote:
Also what about a pianoist? Don't they just hit the keys written on the music sheet?


It takes skill and dexterity in order to hit the keys at the right times in the right order. It takes almost no skill to read some words to music.
#39 Dec 06 2005 at 4:02 PM Rating: Decent
TheDakster wrote:

Quote:
Also what about a pianoist? Don't they just hit the keys written on the music sheet?


It takes skill and dexterity in order to hit the keys at the right times in the right order. It takes almost no skill to read some words to music.


In this case, I am requesting a copy of you reading rap lyrics to music. If you agree, I will select the song and supply you with the instrumental and a copy of the lyrics. I will submit these to you in mp3 format. In return you will submit to me an mp3 of you 'rapping' over the original instrumental that was emailed to you.

After you have returned this to me, I will post 2 mp3 clips to this forum. 1) the original song, 2) your performance of the same song. We can then vote on which one is more appealing. Since skill is not involved at all there should be no noticeable difference between your version and the original in terms of appeal.

Don't worry, I won't post which version is which until the voting is over.

What do you say?
#40 Dec 06 2005 at 4:02 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
Quote:
It takes almost no skill to read some words to music.


It does to put it across the way the writer intended. That's my point.
#41 Dec 06 2005 at 4:07 PM Rating: Decent
TheDakster wrote:
Quote:
So an actor who writes their own lines is an artist but one who just goes by the script isn't? I get ya.


But an actor actualy has to have talent in order to perform his part correctly, all a rapper has to do is be able to read.

Quote:
So, do you think there is no art to be found in the human voice?


If they were actualy SINGING then it might be art, but seeing as all their doing is reading then I personaly believe that its not art.


I still don't believe that all they are doing is reading someone else's lyrics and you still have not provided evidence to back up the fact that this happens in "most" rap music.
#42 Dec 06 2005 at 4:08 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
In this case, I am requesting a copy of you reading rap lyrics to music. If you agree, I will select the song and supply you with the instrumental and a copy of the lyrics. I will submit these to you in mp3 format. In return you will submit to me an mp3 of you 'rapping' over the original instrumental that was emailed to you.

After you have returned this to me, I will post 2 mp3 clips to this forum. 1) the original song, 2) your performance of the same song. We can then vote on which one is more appealing. Since skill is not involved at all there should be no noticeable difference between your version and the original in terms of appeal.

Don't worry, I won't post which version is which until the voting is over.

What do you say?



Only if you also hook me up with the millions of dollers worth of mixing and editing equipment that the mainstream rappers get to use in order to make themselves sound better then they realy do.
#43 Dec 06 2005 at 4:14 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
I still don't believe that all they are doing is reading someone else's lyrics and you still have not provided evidence to back up the fact that this happens in "most" rap music.


I already said that if they write their own words then they are artists, but if they don't then they are not. I don't have any of my Cd cases with me since I'm at work but I'm willing to bet if you look on a majority of the mainstream rapper's CDs that the song credits will be to someone other then the rapper.
#44 Dec 06 2005 at 4:28 PM Rating: Decent
TheDakster wrote:
I don't have any of my Cd cases with me since I'm at work but I'm willing to bet if you look on a majority of the mainstream rapper's CDs that the song credits will be to someone other then the rapper.


I don't have much of what would be considered "mainstream" rap but I do have Kanye West's latest album. He is one of the top selling musicians today. I have read the liner notes and K.West is credited on every track except the intro.

The following are also credited on the album using their real names:
Common credited as L.Lynn
Camron credited as C.Giles
Consequence credited as D.Mills
Nas credited as N.Jones
Lupe Fiasco is credited as W.Jaco
Paul Wall credited as P.Slayton


The only one that I can confirm is not credited by the real name is Jay-Z. Sean Carter does not appear in the credits for the song on which he is featured.

If you want to do some research on your own you can use this page and compare it to your liner notes.
#45 Dec 06 2005 at 4:34 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
don't have much of what would be considered "mainstream" rap but I do have Kanye West's latest album. He is one of the top selling musicians today. I have read the liner notes and K.West is credited on every track except the intro.

The following are also credited on the album using their real names:
Common credited as L.Lynn
Camron credited as C.Giles
Consequence credited as D.Mills
Nas credited as N.Jones
Lupe Fiasco is credited as W.Jaco
Paul Wall credited as P.Slayton


The only one that I can confirm is not credited by the real name is Jay-Z. Sean Carter does not appear in the credits for the song on which he is featured.


Kanye West is only one rapper and just because he may be an artist does not mean that all rappers are artists.
#46 Dec 06 2005 at 4:43 PM Rating: Decent
TheDakster wrote:

Kanye West is only one rapper and just because he may be an artist does not mean that all rappers are artists.


TheDakster wrote:

In that scenario the Rapper is an artist but if you add in a step #8 then you get what is realy happening with most of rap music today.

8) The poet decides he doesn't have the mass appeal needed to become a great rapper so he hires some thug to rap his poetry. He then becomes the song writer and the thug is called the "Rapper."


I gave you examples of 8 rappers and 7 of them are credited using their real names.

You have still not provided any evidence to support your claim that most rappers do not write their own lyrics.

I am now assuming that you have no proof of your claim or you would have used it by now.

I believe that you just dont like rap music and don't want to consider that it can be 'art' if you don't like it. The claim you threw out about rappers not writing their own lyrics is completely unfounded.
#47 Dec 06 2005 at 5:30 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Rimesume the Shady wrote:
Touching at best.

Ew. No.

Quote:
That said, how did I fail the compairison or did you just use that post as a oppertunity for a **** poor flame?

I'm sorry, I was about to respond but I got distracted thinking about how your knuckles probably can't hit the keys right from being dragged around like that all day. What were we talking about....?

Oh, I remember! You failed to follow your train of thought through to its logical conclusion, but then again I bet you don't finish a lot. I won't strain ya.
#48 Dec 06 2005 at 6:36 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Quote:
You are NOT an artist if...
You have a song writer(The song writer is the real artist)
If someone makes your music and you just sing(The musician is the artist). Your just a tool not the real artist. Would you consider the paintbrush or the painter the artist?

So is Aretha Franklin not an artist because Otis Redding wrote "Respect"?

I have as much disdain as anyone for teeny-bopper pop stars that don't write their own music, but a good singer can infuse so much emotion and feeling with their voice that it becomes transcendent.


#49 Dec 06 2005 at 6:44 PM Rating: Good


I am glad you mentioned Otis and Aretha.

Using Otis as an example, Booker T. & the MG's and the Bar-Kays were the house bands of Stax, and they preformed the majority of the music recorded there. Issac Hayes and David Porter wrote the majority of the music. So, it was a team effort, and boy, the emotion in which Otis Redding could sing was incredible. Even songs that other people have previously done, such as "You don't miss your water" are really great.



#50 Dec 06 2005 at 6:48 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Rimesume wrote:
"You just wait and see. That Elvis fellow will be the downfall of Western civilization. Mark my words, Ethel!"
#51 Dec 06 2005 at 8:10 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Patrician wrote:
Playing russian roulette might make a man a badass, but playing on your own.... Smiley: oyvey

Especially when the weapon in question only carries one round. Smiley: rolleyes
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 248 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (248)