yet another teacher boinks student...Follow

I got the "greek" reference **** nut but you failed to answer my question.

here's the thing. The age of consent varies from state to state, country to country and even generation to generation. While we may think 14 is too young here and now, there are other places that do not think the same way. And it was not long ago that 14 was a normal age to marry. Granted, we're not talking marriage here, we're talking sex, but if it was common for people to marry at 14, than communities thought people 14 were of a consenting age. Which is one reason why I feel if the student, be it girl or boy, was not personally screaming out as a victim, and went into the sexual relationship willingly,then I look at it as purely "statutory" rape, which I think would be less "penance" time

If they're talking about 14-year-olds, you have a point. My understanding, though, is that 14 is pretty long in the tooth by their standards. Am I wrong?

I guess but I dont know. What age is too young? 13? 10? Where do you draw the line? Puberty? If so then that opens the door to some pretty young girls and boys. Personally I dont think an adult should be having a sexual relationship of any kind with a minor. Call me old fashion but it just doesnt sit right with me. In fact it makes me ill. Which is why I think it is such a travesty this woman will spend zero time in jail. She preyed apon on of the most vulenerable groups amoung us and we are letting her get away with it. Do you all honestly think this was the 14y/o's idea or that maybe just maybe this woman talked him into it and used the fact that she was much older, and a teacher to do it??

The other point that hasnt been made is that this woman was in a position of authority and trust. Im almost certain this kids parents would never have sent him to school if they thought his teacher was going to hit on him.



Edited, Wed Nov 23 13:07:58 2005 by DamthebiTch

Quote:
Is really it a crime if the "victim" is glad it happened?


if someone were to consider suicide and 'want' to die, would it be a crime for someone to murder him/her? the murderer wouldn't get away with it.
i know were not talking about a murder, were talking about sex between a teacher and pupil, but both of these are crimes and both of them include victims who wanted it to happen, but the murder wouldn't go unoticed.

anyway, who said anything about the pupil being glad about it?

It's hard to grasp because I remember having good looking teachers when i was at around that age, and if it were me, I likely wouldn't want her to be in trouble because of it. That's all.

And to be honest, i don't see this the same way that i probably would if the genders were reversed... now that i think of it that way... never mind.

I know that as a men we all want to think at when we were 14 we were all ready to handle this kind of thing but truth be told we werent. Do you honestly believe that this kid wont be affected negativly later in life by this? I dont. Just because an individual is capable biologically to have sex doesnt mean they are ready emotionally and psycologically to deal with the ramifications of having sex.


You also have to consider that the original reasons for our laws restricting minors from consenting to sex has very little to do with protecting their fragile selves, or some idea that they aren't psychologically able to handle it. Those sort of rules and laws are the holdovers from a time when marriages were arranged by the parents, and those minors could have "value" by marrying them off. Clearly, you didn't want your 15 year old daughter going off and banging the stableboy and ruining her value in marrying her off to a wealthy nobleman. Those laws originally had *nothing* to do with protecting the minors themselves, and everything to do with protecting a parents rights to control the lives of their offspring.[/quote]

Here's a news flash it isnt the 1400's and there is absolutly no reason to be having sex with kids. I would hope in the hundreds of years since the origin of these laws that we have come to realize that there are consequences for the children having sex at a very young age and few of them are good consequences.

And lets put this into perspective. At 14 you cant drive, vote, see a rated R movie, you cant even get your ear pierced without parental consent, but it's ok for some adult to con this kid into having sex? I dont buy it.



14 y/o boys are vulnerable emotionally and psycologically. The ability to get an erection has nothing to do with readiness to have sex. To be honest it isnt the actual sex act that I have the biggest problem with. This wasnt 2 kids fooling around and experimenting this was an adult woman using her position to take advantage of an immature kid. It's wrong no matter how you slice it.



Did I say she should go to prison for the rest of her life or even 15 years? I just think no jail time is extremely leanient.
The only reason she isnt in jail is because she is a woman. Had a male teacher done the same thing he gets at a minimum 5 years, and would have the sexual offender tag on him the rest of his life. My wife's brother is in jail right now doing 10 years for exposing himself to a minor. He never touched her just showed her his ******.



You're right we should just line up all the kids as the get through puberty and give them all a good education. We could use **** stars, make movies out of it. There's a huge market for this kind if thing, so there's money to be made.

Kids drink at this age too and not all end up being alchoholics, yet it's still illegal to give them booze.

A 14 year old being propositioned by and having sex with an adult, especially a teacher who is someone they're supposed to respect and trust, is far different than a 14 year old ******** another 14 year old.

This teacher was WAY at fault. I've seen it written in the rape threads around here "this is not about sex, it's about power". The teacher abused hers, she'd best end up in jail.

If this was a male teacher and a female student would responses here be different?

I dont know about others, but I have already stated it would not make a difference to me if the sexes were reversed, so long as the younger party member involved was *willing and consented*