What did she expect?Follow

1. Being bludgeoned to death while your family is forced to watch.
2. Getting curbed.
3. Being flayed alive.
4. Watching a Barbra Striesand movie.
5. Falling through the ice in the middle of a lake.
6. Having your children kidnapped.
7. Being stuck in a mall full of zombies.
8. Bears.
9. Locked inside a room on a sinking ship.
10. Black people.

To me, all are more horrifying.

If you had included the ice that would sound almost exactly like my recurring dream.

That's what he gets for moving in next door to a bear and black zombie infested ship-mall captained by murderous kidnappers!

Nexa

Having a ****** around people with penises puts you at risk of being raped. Therefore, I think everyone with a ****** should avoid being in the vicinity of a ***** lest you want to shoulder the burden of responsibility for some random ***** poking you in the ******.

Hell, if you leave your house with your ******, you must want a ***** in it.

Wearing skirts means you're trying to make it easier on the *****.

Penises are for putting in holes. The ****** is one, therefore, putting your ***** in one is no big deal. Rape, schmape.




Asshats.

I'm calling ********* That's a blatant lie Joph.

Maybe your lightsocket just needs a little attitude adjustment? Bottle of Cab and roofie ought to do the trick. Besides, it's asking for it. See the way it's sort of winking at you? Fuc[b][/b]king slutty lightsocket.

Not well, but I can ***** in a lightbulb.

Want to come with?

I'm gonna bite the bullet and say that i'm with gbaji on this one.

Let me clarify:
As far as real rape goes, and i'll explain the distinction in a moment, there is absolutely no issue. The attacker is 100% at fault, and should not be allowed in public again. Ever. Maybe we should start caneing people. Right in the ****.

However, those statistics are absolute ********* so for all events legally defined as rape, there are definately cases where the so-called-victim is very slightly, or partially, or mostly, or even fully at fault.

Now don't get me wrong. If a woman is forced into a sexual act that she doesn't want, it's rape. But the legal definitions of rape and sexual assault have become so vague and all-encompassing over the last 10-20 years that it's really just stupid.

If you're under the influence, you cannot legally give consent to ANYTHING. Therefore, even if you're having sex with your wife of 40 years, if you do it while she's drunk, you just raped her, legally speaking. Its the cases like this that inflate those statistics so incredibly much.
It's the cases like this, where the events of the night that can legally be classified as rape, do not have purely one-sided blame attached.

I don't think gbaji was saying that the woman who gets randomly attacked in the alley by some random vicious rapist and sexually pummelled against her will for hours is at fault.
It's the girl that shows up at her x-boyfriend's apartment drunk as hell literally asking for sex that's the one that gets the shared blame. If you ask her then, she's giving consent, but because she's drunk, she can't legally give consent, so it's legally rape.

I'm going to bite the bullet here and say you don't really know where he's coming from on this one.

As I've stated in other rape threads (how many does this make this month?) - it's usually only the guys who see how a woman "could partially be to blame" for getting raped.

I mentioned in another thread a relative of mine who was given a drugged drink, was raped by multiple men and left naked and passed out in a cornfield in the dead of winter. You know what? She's been told "Well, you should have been more careful."

You're right... no one is ever blaming the victims except in some extremely vague and nebulous rape cases

And that makes you just as wrong as him.

Happy?