Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Once there was this boy who...Follow

#1 Nov 21 2005 at 3:08 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,784 posts
Once there was this boy who
Got into a tryst with J.C Penney's Mannequin
But when they finally made love
The security guards caught him gyrating all over her body
He couldn't quite explain it
He'd almost just came there


Mmm Mmm Mmm Mmm
Mmm Mmm Mmm Mmm






Teen's Mannequin Love-In

A teenager has been charged with indecent exposure after he was caught trying to have sex with a female mannequin on display at an arts centre.

Security guards found Michael Plentyhorse, 18, sprawled with the dummy on the floor with his trousers and pants down.

Police spokesman Loren McManus said: "There was inappropriate activity between him and the mannequin.

"That's the only way I know how to put it."

Guards said they had noticed several times before that the dummy's clothes had been removed at the centre in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, US.

If convicted, Plentyhorse may be registered as a sex offender.

Hope Matchan, of the prosecutors' department, said: "People might say it's relatively harmless.

"But I certainly would want to know if this person was my neighbour."


Linky


I'm only going to justify this, if the 'Mannequin' looked like *NWS* Kim Cattrall.



Opps silly internets it trickses us!









Edited, Mon Nov 21 23:08:10 2005 by RedjedBlue
#2 Nov 21 2005 at 3:10 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Slap a NWS on that last image Smiley: mad
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#3 Nov 21 2005 at 3:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
His name is just too perfect.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#4 Nov 21 2005 at 5:29 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
somebody watched this movie a few too many times
#5 Nov 21 2005 at 5:41 PM Rating: Decent
**
289 posts
Or they went to the real source and took the myth Pygmalion to heart.
#6 Nov 22 2005 at 11:48 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
I was going to try to make another "Mannequin" joke, but I couldn't think of one. Just for the hell of it then, Kim Cattrall as a Vulcan.
#7 Nov 22 2005 at 11:52 AM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
I was going to try to make another "Mannequin" joke, but I couldn't think of one. Just for the hell of it then, Kim Cattrall as a Vulcan.



Kirsty Alley was hotter as one

well, half Vulcan half Romulan..
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#8 Nov 22 2005 at 11:56 AM Rating: Good
***
3,118 posts
Could someone please explain to me how performing sexual acts with inanimate objects qualifies as being a sex offender? There's an entire fuc[b][/b]king industry that make this exact act possible, including making dolls for that purpose. The FBI going to start tracking where those are shipped and convict them too?
#9 Nov 22 2005 at 12:02 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
Quote:
Could someone please explain to me how performing sexual acts with inanimate objects qualifies as being a sex offender?


It doesn't, you can breathe easily. I think you will find the public exposure bit is the clincher.
#10 Nov 22 2005 at 12:03 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
I think it's more a matter of putting your 'peter' on somones private property...





..and btw.. Ashley Judd in StarFleet uniform owns them all


Edited, Tue Nov 22 12:05:13 2005 by Kelvyquayo
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#11 Nov 22 2005 at 12:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Jacobsdeception the Sly wrote:
Could someone please explain to me how performing sexual acts with inanimate objects qualifies as being a sex offender?
Doing it in public in an arts center?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#12 Nov 22 2005 at 12:14 PM Rating: Good
***
3,118 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Jacobsdeception the Sly wrote:
Could someone please explain to me how performing sexual acts with inanimate objects qualifies as being a sex offender?
Doing it in public in an arts center?
Maybe I'm just not understanding the proper definition of sex offender. Don't you usually have to sexually offend someone first? Granted, I'm sure there's some law that he's broken, but to cause a guy that kind of misery for the rest of his life over something so trivial is a bit much. Being convicted as a sex offender isn't something that you will ever live down in the US. In my mind, sex offender = Rapist, Skeeterphile, Catholic Priest. Not some wierd kid who either made a really bad judgment call or has some odd fetish. If it's for public exposure, then just take a look at any Girls Gone Wild video.
#13 Nov 22 2005 at 12:20 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
You may be right. But it's the only thing I can think of. Another article I found while looking to see where this event occured had no mention of a sex offender label being slapped on him.

A Sioux Falls man is charged with indecent exposure after being found partially unclothed and lying on the floor with a female mannequin in the Washington Pavilion.

Michael James Plentyhorse, 18, 708 N. Dakota Ave., was discovered by a Pavilion security officer at 4:35 p.m. Monday in the Washington High School Alumni Room, police said.

The guard observed Plentyhorse with his pants and underclothing down and lying next to the half-naked female mannequin, a police report states.

“There was inappropriate activity between him and the mannequin. That’s the only way I know how to put it,” Sioux Falls police officer Loren McManus said.

Security staff at the Pavilion say they have noticed the same mannequin has previously been found undressed on several occasions, McManus said.

No drugs or alcohol appear to have been involved.


They even gave his address in case you want to chip in and send the guy a RealDoll Smiley: wink2
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#14 Nov 22 2005 at 12:23 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
the half-naked female mannequin



but can an innanimate object really be "naked" and "female"?

Smiley: confused

Edited, Tue Nov 22 12:34:17 2005 by Kelvyquayo
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#15 Nov 22 2005 at 12:30 PM Rating: Good
It's all liberal media hype. A conspiracy, even.
#16 Nov 22 2005 at 12:31 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
It serves for the story. I doubt the judge would be impressed if you tried to argue philosophy and it has nothing to do with the actual exposure charges. Had he been sitting naked on a bare floor, the charges would be the same, the story just wouldn't elict as many giggles.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#17 Nov 22 2005 at 12:52 PM Rating: Good
***
3,128 posts
Quote:
Guards said they had noticed several times before that the dummy's clothes had been removed at the centre in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, US.



What I find amusing is that he developed a bond to that one particular mannequin.

#18 Nov 22 2005 at 12:53 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
Quote:
Maybe I'm just not understanding the proper definition of sex offender. Don't you usually have to sexually offend someone first?



From what I understand taking a **** on the side of the road is considered indecent exposure, and is therefore a sexual offence. Would one prosecuted to the fullest extent then have to walk door to door informing people of his presence?
#19 Nov 22 2005 at 1:03 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
fenderputy the Shady wrote:
Quote:
Maybe I'm just not understanding the proper definition of sex offender. Don't you usually have to sexually offend someone first?



From what I understand taking a **** on the side of the road is considered indecent exposure, and is therefore a sexual offence. Would one prosecuted to the fullest extent then have to walk door to door informing people of his presence?

He's right. Most people think of rape, sodomy, oral copulation and lewd acts with a child, but it varies state to state.
#20 Nov 22 2005 at 2:59 PM Rating: Decent
well at least now his parents know what to get him for christmas
#21 Nov 24 2005 at 1:49 AM Rating: Default
Maybe the boy is Pinnochio and even though he's turned into a real boy, he still hasn't lost his puppet-urges for hawt doll booty.
#22 Nov 24 2005 at 1:54 AM Rating: Default
@#%^ing DRK
*****
13,143 posts
Did you see the picture? That mannequin is obviously a ****.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 229 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (229)