Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

The x-mas conundrumFollow

#27 Nov 21 2005 at 11:24 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xmas for further reading.

Christmas was the result of transliteration, so thinking that x is wrong there is more out of ignornace, or just not knowing an admittedly obscure fact.


Just because some incredibly obscure fact out of nowhere doesn't mean that people are interpretting it differently.

People DO use Xmas as an abbreviation, people DO use it disrespectfully, people DO use it as a means to remove "Christ" from "Christmas" as most people DO NOT know ancient Greek. It is not the semantics that is of question, it is the motivation behind it.

The "fu[b][/b]cktards" are the ones who assume that people act denotatively.
#30 Nov 21 2005 at 11:37 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
I was talking to Jacob. Smiley: smile
#31 Nov 21 2005 at 11:41 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
The One and Only Proroc wrote:
Nig[/yellow]ger

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nig[yellow]ger_(word)

So it is ok to go around calling black people this because eventhough people take offense to it the real meaning of the word was never meant to be offensive?



Edited, Mon Nov 21 11:35:27 2005 by Proroc
You're kidding right? This is no comparison what-so-ever. ****** is not an abbreviation for black people.

Besides, my argument remains and you haven't addressed it. Do you hear people actually say "x-mas" - I don't. I only see it in writing which, to me, says it's just an abbreviation.

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#32 Nov 21 2005 at 11:44 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
NephthysWanderer the Charming wrote:
People DO use Xmas as an abbreviation, people DO use it disrespectfully, people DO use it as a means to remove "Christ" from "Christmas" as most people DO NOT know ancient Greek. It is not the semantics that is of question, it is the motivation behind it.
Regardless of whether or not they knew the Greek origins, pretty much anyone I've known to use it (actually, all of them so far as I know) used it assuming it was a perfectly valid abbreviation. No disrespect, no attempts to "remove Christ" -- they've just seen it and figured it was an okay thing to do.

I won't say no one uses it disrespectfully but, as the saying goes, never attribute to malice what can be explained as ignorance.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#33 Nov 21 2005 at 11:44 AM Rating: Decent
It is only an example of how people take words and twist them from thier real orginal meanings to use them how they wish. I will see if I can dig up some info such as this on Xmas. I know for a fact there was a case at a school that the school was calling it Christmas and there was a mother in rage saying it should be called Xmas because of seperation of church and state.

#34 Nov 21 2005 at 11:47 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
The One and Only Proroc wrote:
Nig[/yellow]ger

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nig[yellow]ger_(word)

So it is ok to go around calling black people this because eventhough people take offense to it the real meaning of the word was never meant to be offensive?



Edited, Mon Nov 21 11:35:27 2005 by Proroc


You're really reaching. Means a lot to you to be offended by this, does it?
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#35 Nov 21 2005 at 11:52 AM Rating: Decent
Samira wrote:
The One and Only Proroc wrote:
Nig[/yellow]ger

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nig[yellow]ger_(word)

So it is ok to go around calling black people this because eventhough people take offense to it the real meaning of the word was never meant to be offensive?



Edited, Mon Nov 21 11:35:27 2005 by Proroc


You're really reaching. Means a lot to you to be offended by this, does it?


No it actually doesn't. I was ignorant to the orginal meaning of Xmas. I had only heard it used in regards to what I mentioned above. I only replied with this because I was trying to prove a point that words do stray from thier orginal meanings.



Edited, Mon Nov 21 12:03:36 2005 by Proroc
#36 Nov 21 2005 at 12:11 PM Rating: Good
***
3,118 posts
NephthysWanderer the Charming wrote:
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xmas for further reading.

Christmas was the result of transliteration, so thinking that x is wrong there is more out of ignornace, or just not knowing an admittedly obscure fact.


Just because some incredibly obscure fact out of nowhere doesn't mean that people are interpretting it differently.

People DO use Xmas as an abbreviation, people DO use it disrespectfully, people DO use it as a means to remove "Christ" from "Christmas" as most people DO NOT know ancient Greek. It is not the semantics that is of question, it is the motivation behind it.

The "fu[b][/b]cktards" are the ones who assume that people act denotatively.
Just because someone is ignorant of an abbreviation that's been in common usage in more than one language across multiple continents for over 2,000 years doesn't make it any less so. While it's true that anything can adopt a new meaning over time, it doesn't change the fact that the majority use X-mas as an abbreviation.

I hear people use words all the time and that doesn't then give those words new meaning. Just last week I heard a man refer to another man as "remedial" in an effort to insult his intelligence. I believe the insult was taken from high school where the slow kids were sent to what is called remedial classes where we went to school.
#37 Nov 21 2005 at 12:19 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
1,174 posts
I don't celebrate Christmas, really.
I don't put decorations up in my house, or listen to christmas music, or get a tree, or put up lights, or wear both red and green at the same time...

Typically, i hate traditions.
I think that doing something because thats what always has been done is kind of a weak reason to do something. I've just never understood tradition. I'd rather do something different.

-However-. The family christmas gathering is one of only a few big traditions i do partake in. I love buying presents for my family and friends, I like getting presents as well. I love all the tasty desserts and food that shows up that time of year. I like seeing so much of my family all at once, and I like seeing them all look happy, which they always do this time of year.

I'm not a christian. I was raised as such, but had what you may call a "crisis of faith" or whatever at a certain point, and basically left the church... i'd elaborate, but it's a tangent and is not important.

As far as i'm concerned, Christmas is just a time of year to be giving, to reconnect with family, and eat more than necessary.

The bottom line is that I kind of celebrate it because that's what my family does that time of year, so I guess it's tradition.

____________________________
Wolfpack Linkshell
#38 Nov 21 2005 at 12:24 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
The One and Only Proroc wrote:
Samira wrote:
The One and Only Proroc wrote:
Nig[/yellow]ger

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nig[yellow]ger_(word)

So it is ok to go around calling black people this because eventhough people take offense to it the real meaning of the word was never meant to be offensive?



Edited, Mon Nov 21 11:35:27 2005 by Proroc


You're really reaching. Means a lot to you to be offended by this, does it?


No it actually doesn't. I was ignorant to the orginal meaning of Xmas. I had only heard it used in regards to what I mentioned above. I only replied with this because I was trying to prove a point that words do stray from thier orginal meanings.



Edited, Mon Nov 21 12:03:36 2005 by Proroc


Of course they do. That's one of the ways in which language changes.

In this instance, you may be correct in asserting that the term "Xmas" is beginning to be used in the way you suggest: as a purely, even militantly, secular interpretation of "Christmas". However, obviously there are many people who don't use it that way at all; so to assert that the transition is complete, and that you are free to yell at people who use it as a perfectly synonymous term and call them heathens and whatnot, is a miscalculation.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#39 Nov 21 2005 at 12:53 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Quote:
In this instance, you may be correct in asserting that the term "Xmas" is beginning to be used in the way you suggest: as a purely, even militantly, secular interpretation of "Christmas". However, obviously there are many people who don't use it that way at all; so to assert that the transition is complete, and that you are free to yell at people who use it as a perfectly synonymous term and call them heathens and whatnot, is a miscalculation.


Because Lord knows, you can't address a group of people. You have to address everyone. Smiley: rolleyes


B/c the difference between "can" and "can't" is important.

Edited, Mon Nov 21 12:54:18 2005 by NephthysWanderer
#40 Nov 21 2005 at 1:00 PM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
I celebrate Christmas, and I'm not Christian.

Since when has Christmas had anything to do with Jesus?
____________________________
Do what now?
#41 Nov 21 2005 at 1:02 PM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
I mean, a pagan holiday that was co-opted by christianity that's basically gone back to being a pagan holiday, how cool is that?
____________________________
Do what now?
#42 Nov 21 2005 at 1:08 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
NephthysWanderer the Charming wrote:
Quote:
In this instance, you may be correct in asserting that the term "Xmas" is beginning to be used in the way you suggest: as a purely, even militantly, secular interpretation of "Christmas". However, obviously there are many people who don't use it that way at all; so to assert that the transition is complete, and that you are free to yell at people who use it as a perfectly synonymous term and call them heathens and whatnot, is a miscalculation.


Because Lord knows, you can't address a group of people. You have to address everyone. Smiley: rolleyes


B/c the difference between "can" and "can't" is important.

Edited, Mon Nov 21 12:54:18 2005 by NephthysWanderer


I have no idea what point you're trying to make. His assertion was that the term "Xmas" is secular, and he went further and asserted that anyone using the term "Xmas" should "fu[/i]cking go to work on that day and ignore the damn holiday all together just don't start giving it lame *** names."

Are you saying that he was addressing only those people who mean it in a secular way? Because his understanding at the time of his statement seems to have been that it was purely a secular term for [i]everyone who used it
. Hence, the group he was addressing was everyone who uses that abbreviation.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#43 Nov 21 2005 at 1:16 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
He is clearly directing his comment at those who are "not willing to call it Christmas", not for abbreviations sake, but those who are taking "Christ" out and inserting and X for secular sake.

His statement can still be valid either way, his target just became smaller due to things outside of his understanding.

I would put money on the fact that 99% of the people who use Xmas have no freakin clue that it is technically an appropriate abbreviation. Anyone willing to put money on a made-up statistic that will never be researched? Huh?

That's what I thought. Smiley: mad
#44 Nov 21 2005 at 1:23 PM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
I use X for both "chris" and "trans"
An old housemate of mine we called Xtina for that reason, she didn't seem to mind
____________________________
Do what now?
#46 Nov 21 2005 at 1:42 PM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
NephthysWanderer the Charming wrote:
He is clearly directing his comment at those who are "not willing to call it Christmas", not for abbreviations sake, but those who are taking "Christ" out and inserting and X for secular sake.
Many people celebrate Christmas without Christ in it, but still call it Christmas.

Just how does one even pronounce x-mas? Is it 'ex-mass' or 'zzeh-mass'(kinda like the x sound in xylophone)?

If Christmas for non christians is going to undergo an evolutionary name change we ought to step in right now and change it to something a bit more meaningful or at least something with a nicer sound to it.

I suggest "Race Day".

(now you ask "what race"?)

The Human Race of course.Smiley: grin

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#47 Nov 21 2005 at 1:43 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
I suppose I'm just used to being around a more literate group of people. I've never run into this sort of confusion before now.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#48 Nov 21 2005 at 1:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
Samira wrote:
I suppose I'm just used to being around a more literate group of people. I've never run into this sort of confusion before now.


Same here. I thought everyone who used XMas knew that that's a valid way of saying it
____________________________
Do what now?
#49 Nov 21 2005 at 1:44 PM Rating: Good
Are you saying the asylum is full of unliterate people?
#50 Nov 21 2005 at 1:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Unliterate? That's unpossible!
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#51 Nov 21 2005 at 1:50 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Every definition of Xmas discusses this misunderstanding specifically. It is more prevalent than you would think.


Never underestimate the power of ignorance amongst humans.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 213 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (213)