Awesome, the last score or so posts have really touched down on the REAL ISSUES OF THE U.S.; Religion. To all of those who have repeatedly used the fact that 85% of a population is christian to weigh their argument,you are quite hypocritical. The bible preaches human equality, love thy neighbour and the like, yet here are christians claiming that since they are the majority that they should dominate a country in even themost trivial ways. I am not sure if its an ammendment, since i am Canadian, but i know freedom of speech is still viable, although hardly so, in the United States. Seeing as how freedom of speech entails exactly what it states, how is it that 85% of a country can opress the other 15% with their selfrigetous beliefs.
Personally I believe that the phrase/greeting "merry christmas" is a non issue, seeing as how many people would say happy (forgive my spelling) haunnakua, or the like; Some stores and delis especially lol. I can believe in the idea of this though, for the phrase "happy holidays" is far less generalised and is a greeting that can be used without biast, or prejudist.
The real issue is the fact that 85% of a country proclaims to be christian, yet they have no qualms over killing innocent people through war. Also if 85% are christian that means that 85% (give or take 20 percent or so ) of the murders , rapists etc.. are also christian. Some say that they are blasphemers ,or what ever the popular term is at the time, but that is a triviality. If such a high rate of this percentage is willingly commiting sins,and im not talking gluttony even though the u.s. is largely filled with obese people (no offense), how is it that one may even use this "85%" as a fall back to get their way.
Val is right regretably. Many non christians may tresort to names and the like to get their point across, but "Bible thumping christian" is in itself, at least a minor, reality. The majority of christians will indoubtedly fall back on the "Enemy" as their defense. If they loose an argument over evolution or the millions of hypocracies in the bible, it is the "Enimie's " work.
This very enemy in itself is a fallen "archangel", who was created by god, yet not human. If this is true than god is far from perfect as Angels are not as flawed as we, in the eyes of christianity, and therefore would not have this issue. Is there one among us who truly believes that the first cro-magnon men and women have gone to hell for their sins. They did not know any better,there is no bible etched in stone next to an animal on a cave wall. So when cro-magnon men killed one another for survuival, as does all of nature, did they go to hell?Conversely, is heaven filled with stupid "cavemen" who were rigetous? They were human and therefore the same rules apply.
Another person brought up a very interesting point, just because a book has historical events in it does not mean that it is not fictional.Sure maybe Jesus was real, but maybe he was just nice guy who was delusional. Would we not lock a person ,who truly believes they are Jesus reborn, in a mental institution. Or better yet if he broke our laws in doing so, much as the original Jesus did in being perceived as a heritic. So therefore Christiananity could be but a cult held up throught the ages with an ever growing fan base due to the forced ingestion of ced book by parents.
If, for instance, I were to write a loosely defined book of slaughter with a righteous footnote now, and thousands of years later they uncovered it , could i not be the next jesus? Not only this but throughout history one book has spawned countless others , many of these others are radically different, how can this be so if god intervened on the original writing. Being perfect, would he not have gotten it right the first time. Everything since would therefore have been human interference and agenda (Have you read animal farm..... the commandments slowly get rounded out untill finally there is one absolute command!, which is what may happen in years to come if we keep warring over our faith and preaching what we do not pratice.)
These have been my two cents, please read what i have written i do not need someone else miss interpreting my words like when I said kill chrisitianity take it out of the government, i meant just that ,remove it from the government not kill it off entirely....read first then write.....
p.s. if your offended and want to rate me doiwn think...wwjd, then get back to me lmfao....
Edited, Fri Nov 25 20:43:30 2005 by fadedaway