Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Teddy R. said it bestFollow

#1 Nov 13 2005 at 3:31 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
16,160 posts
"In the first place we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the man's becoming in very fact an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag, and this excludes the red flag, which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization, just as much as it excludes any foreign flag of a nation to which we are hostile...We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language...and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."

Theodore Roosevelt 1907

Totem
#2 Nov 13 2005 at 3:38 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I've heard that twice now on the radio in the past two or three days. You guys have a newsletter of pithy quotes you pass around weekly?

Regardless of whether or not you agree with the passage, it makes me smirk when people attribute this stuff to great leaders. Like I'm supposed to find the views on immigration from a fat, rich white frat boy from Harvard at the turn of the century especially pressing or relevant? Maybe if he had something to say about rhino hunting or how to showboat to the press when you find a frightened bear cub. That's news you can use!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#3 Nov 13 2005 at 3:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Joph wrote:

Quote:
liberal butthurt



Yeah, I see what you mean.
#4 Nov 13 2005 at 3:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
TStephens wrote:
/easily taken
Smiley: laughSmiley: laughSmiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#5 Nov 13 2005 at 3:44 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Of course that quote was used in a time when national unity was still uncertain. Which is why the pledge of allegiance, national anthem etc were implemented in the 1890-1930 era.

____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#6 Nov 13 2005 at 3:44 PM Rating: Good
You had me at easily.
#7 Nov 13 2005 at 4:52 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
. . . and the fact that every "American" I meet tells me that they're Irish/Polish/English/Hungarian etc. means what precisely?

Like the USA, England is a Mongrel nation - it's true inhabitants wiped out by insurgents over centuries. I am English and British and proud of that.

I'm also firecely proud of my Norman heritage (Father's side) and the others that came down the geneological pipe line (Lithuanian, Greek, Austrian and Italian that I know of).

When I still had my faith, I was equally proud to be a Christian.

Thank fu[i][/i]ck I'm not an American bound by Teddy "Hitler" Roosevelt's premise that to be American you must also deny your ancestry, your faith and your personal identity.

ToUtem - Thanks for the edjamacashun. Never realised that Roosevelt was Chirac's speech-writer.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#8 Nov 14 2005 at 8:00 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Quote:
Thank **** I'm not an American bound by Teddy "Hitler" Roosevelt's premise that to be American you must also deny your ancestry, your faith and your personal identity.

/nod

I am American, but this is an idiotic premise. If I gave up my language, culture, and heritage, I wouldn't be any good at my job, nor would we have a way of communicating with the constant influx of immigrants that are brand-spanking new to this country.

What people seem to cling to is this idea that assimilation is something that happens overnight. These people aren't running away (in most cases) from a government that wants to harm them, but from poor economic conditions. As such, they see the United States as a step up economically and a way to help at home. Very few mean to stay. You know what happens? Assimilation. It's slow, but it happens. You may never learn the language or learn it at a avery basic level, but one day you realize you can't go back home. You're too "Americanized". You like your car, your TV, and you're used to the way things are run here. Then you or your children meet and marry someone from here, either a second-generation immigrant like them that was raised here, or another American, and guess what? Now your grandchildren grow up speaking only English, and they don't know about your holidays or your history. In about three generations, your grandchildren will consider themselves Americans of Mexican heritage instead of Mexicans. A couple of generations more, and maybe not even that.

Patience, gringos. Rome wasn't built (or destroyed) in a day.

Edited, Mon Nov 14 08:18:29 2005 by Atomicflea
#9 Nov 14 2005 at 10:36 AM Rating: Decent
To understand the quote, you must understand the word "before"..

If you put your previous culture or history *before* being an American, then it is no bueno. There's nothing wrong with being proud of who you are or where you're from, but if you are more proud of that than being an American then why come here at all? A lot of people come here to suckle on the teet, but the people that are proud of this country are the ones who aspire to make it better.

One of the greatest Presidents ever wrote:
Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country.


Edited, Mon Nov 14 10:48:07 2005 by Lefein
#10 Nov 14 2005 at 10:48 AM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
this country is too large and whoever's in charge had better take the elevator down and put more than just change in our cup, or else we. are coming. Up.





am I gay for knowing that line?
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#11 Nov 14 2005 at 12:35 PM Rating: Decent
Liberal tactic number 1 discredit the messenger and no one will take the message seriously. Don't you know you're not supposed to speak like that in this new world order.

Achileez
#12 Nov 14 2005 at 12:36 PM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
Jophiel wrote:
I've heard that twice now on the radio in the past two or three days. You guys have a newsletter of pithy quotes you pass around weekly?


Um, yes... they're called Talking Points =P
____________________________
Do what now?
#13 Nov 14 2005 at 12:51 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,863 posts
Old and busted: Melting Pot

New hotness: Balkanization
#14 Nov 14 2005 at 12:57 PM Rating: Good
***
1,974 posts
Talking points.



People that eat dogs.
#15 Nov 14 2005 at 1:58 PM Rating: Good
Wingchild wrote:
Old and busted: Melting Pot

New System: Canada Jr. The New and Improved Cultural Mosaic
#16 Nov 14 2005 at 2:16 PM Rating: Good
My grandfather, on my father's side, stepped off a boat with his parents and siblings some 80-odd years ago. Not a one of them spoke English and not a one of them had any special skills that might make him or her more desireable a hire than the countless other FOBs that were massing on the East Coast. My grandfather and his siblings learned English. Great-gramma never did, but great-grampa learned enough to get by. My grandfather moved west, joined the army, married a cute Norwiegen girl, had American kids, and so forth and so on.

I am an American. My father was born here, my son was born here. I do not know enough of the heritage of any of my grandparents to call myself anything more than that. I, like Nobs, once had my faith to get in the way of rational thought, but have since lost it, as well.

Cry for me, laugh at me, comiserate with me over a pint and a pipe, no matter. I am what I am and I know it.

So why the ramble? No idea.

The problem we face today with our immigrant populations is no different from the problems faced by "Americans" of previous generations during migratory waves. We look around and see "them". People who are among us that stick to their own enclaves. They place supreme import on maintaining their cultural identities for their children and so on. They learn bits and pieces of the language to get by. They gain the toehold in America for their seed.

Their children attend schools and learn English. They integrate more in to society. They will grow up and produce the next generation of "Americans".

Still the question remains, why the ramble?

The bible says there is nothing new under the sun. The pop song says its all just a little bit of history repeating. The cynic would say same sh;t, different day. I say those who do not learn from the mistakes of history are doomed to repeat them. That is not to say "Close the borders!!!", that is to say take your country for what it is. Allow newcomers to be who they are. Assimilation comes naturally. Accept it as it happens. Forcing it on a population will only breed resentment the likes of which can be seen by fire light nightly in French cities.
#17 Nov 14 2005 at 2:30 PM Rating: Good
A question to all you Americans and your self-branding;

If a Candadian calls themself a French-Canadian, you know that 99% of the time it means they are from or directly descended the Eastern Provinces, most notably Quebec or New Brunswick, and will usually primarily speak French as a first language. There is a whole culture that come with it too. To be crystal clear, French-Canadian has nothing to do with France and trying to state that it does will generally get you tar and feathered.

Now, this to me is very different from [insertcountryhere]-Americans because they are indicating where they immigrated from. Why would people bother to brand themselves as an outsider as opposed to simply being American and teaching their children about their heritage? Does it have to do with opposing the American melting-pot philosophy, or some sort of disdain immigrants have for the country?

Please clarify this.

#18 Nov 14 2005 at 2:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
Why would people bother to brand themselves as an outsider as opposed to simply being American and teaching their children about their heritage?
Because that brand is part of their heritage? And, for that matter, what is "American" aside from a mix of different cultures? Do we all wear cowboy hats? Coonskin caps? Colonial three-pointers? Eat hotdogs and say "How about them Mets?"
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#19 Nov 14 2005 at 2:48 PM Rating: Good
Well, again, America's west has been settled quite thoroughly and we are having a burgeoning population. LEGAL immigrants are fine. Yours and my forefathers actually followed a process to come here. Our forefathers did import their culture and make a permanent impact on the face of Americana. There has been and never will be a problem with that.

The problem isn't people like your great grandfather, the problem is with Pedro the janitor who doesn't know a lick of English nor does he care to. The problem is with the rapidly declining nature of our education system supporting non-english speaking children who get puked out of the system rather than sculpted by it. The problem is people who hop a river and spew a baby right into the US welfare state. It's easy for a lot of you up north to point the blame and raise the mighty staff of Xenophobia on people who are truly concerned.

You should take a drive through Houston Texas sometime and flip radio stations. There are more Tejano spanish speaking radio channels here than English. There are more spanish TV channels than there are National Geographic/Discovery Channel type programming here. This nation is unquestionably bending over backwards to cater to a demographic in a way that has almost no historic precedent. The threat is real. You don't have to go to the White Power websites to see that the Mexican population will outpopulate all other sectors easily within the next century. It has been this unwillingness to integrate into American society that has people worried the most. It's a fu[/u]cking shame.
#20 Nov 14 2005 at 2:52 PM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
Quote:
Why would people bother to brand themselves as an outsider as opposed to simply being American and teaching their children about their heritage?
Because that brand is part of their heritage? And, for that matter, what is "American" aside from a mix of different cultures? Do we all wear cowboy hats? Coonskin caps? Colonial three-pointers? Eat hotdogs and say "How about them Mets?"


I dissagree. Canada is well known for it's acceptace and respect of heritage. What I am tring to say is, people who immigrate to Canada from all over the world are proud to simply say they are Canadian. We have legions for each ethnic group all over the place. For example, in the small town I live in we have a Polish, Ukranian and Italian Legion. We even have churches that cater to each language, however if you were to ask anyone of them what their citizenship was they would say they were Canadian; not Polish-Canadian, not Italian-Canadian. Just Canadian. Also, there is no such thing as an African-Canadian. Ever wonder why?

That's what I'm asking.
#21 Nov 14 2005 at 2:54 PM Rating: Good
Lefein wrote:
Well, again, America's west has been settled quite thoroughly and we are having a burgeoning population. LEGAL immigrants are fine. Yours and my forefathers actually followed a process to come here. Our forefathers did import their culture and make a permanent impact on the face of Americana. There has been and never will be a problem with that.

The problem isn't people like your great grandfather, the problem is with Pedro the janitor who doesn't know a lick of English nor does he care to. The problem is with the rapidly declining nature of our education system supporting non-english speaking children who get puked out of the system rather than sculpted by it. The problem is people who hop a river and spew a baby right into the US welfare state. It's easy for a lot of you up north to point the blame and raise the mighty staff of Xenophobia on people who are truly concerned.

You should take a drive through Houston Texas sometime and flip radio stations. There are more Tejano spanish speaking radio channels here than English. There are more spanish TV channels than there are National Geographic/Discovery Channel type programming here. This nation is unquestionably bending over backwards to cater to a demographic in a way that has almost no historic precedent. The threat is real. You don't have to go to the White Power websites to see that the Mexican population will outpopulate all other sectors easily within the next century. It has been this unwillingness to integrate into American society that has people worried the most. It's a fu[/u]cking shame.


Why do you hate change Lefein?
#22 Nov 14 2005 at 2:56 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Yeah, if you're going to take over a western American culture, it should be with diseased blankets and mass genocides and stuff. Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#23 Nov 14 2005 at 3:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Elderon the Wise wrote:
not Polish-Canadian, not Italian-Canadian. Just Canadian. Also, there is no such thing as an African-Canadian. Ever wonder why?
Not especially, but I don't see titles such as Polish-American or Italian-American as rejecting American culture or identity. I know plenty of "Polish-Americans" and none reject being American; it's just an identity in a large sea of different folks.

African-American is a special case. People have been calling themselves Irish-American or German-American from Day One. African-American is an artifical term we cooked up because it's no longer polite to say "colored" or "negro" or whatever terms that've risen and fallen throughout the last century. Even "blacks" is fairly new and not as "PC". But it's a large socio-economic bloc of people and you've got to call them something.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#24 Nov 14 2005 at 3:10 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
The New Colossus By Emma Lazarus 1883.

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.

"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#25 Nov 14 2005 at 3:16 PM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
Elderon the Wise wrote:
not Polish-Canadian, not Italian-Canadian. Just Canadian. Also, there is no such thing as an African-Canadian. Ever wonder why?
Not especially, but I don't see titles such as Polish-American or Italian-American as rejecting American culture or identity. I know plenty of "Polish-Americans" and none reject being American; it's just an identity in a large sea of different folks.

African-American is a special case. People have been calling themselves Irish-American or German-American from Day One. African-American is an artifical term we cooked up because it's no longer polite to say "colored" or "negro" or whatever terms that've risen and fallen throughout the last century. Even "blacks" is fairly new and not as "PC". But it's a large socio-economic bloc of people and you've got to call them something.


I see. Here we call them "people". Yes, it's a reach, but it seems to work. When the Canadian government does statistics on ethnic population diversity and density, the labels on the graphs/maps indicate the countries of origin such as "British, French, Native, Japanese, Chinese, etc." They feel secure enough to not have to add "-Canadian" to each. Why complicate things and point out the obvious?
#26 Nov 14 2005 at 3:25 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
*Shrug*

Different Strokes 'n all that. I don't see the real harm in it outside of some nebulous "but we're all just people!" chant so why change it? It's like ******** about the Chinese using chopsticks when we prefer using forks.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 164 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (164)