Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

France still burningFollow

#28 Nov 08 2005 at 11:23 AM Rating: Excellent
Mistress of Gardening
Avatar
*****
14,661 posts
I haven't been readin much on it, but my hubby says it's important to pay attention to it just to observe because that is what will happen in the US eventually as the separation between the rich and the poor becomes wider and wider. But then he's got some other really wild ideas that scare me sometimes.
____________________________
Yum-Yum Bento Box | Pikko Pots | Adventures in Bentomaking

Twitter


[ffxivsig]277809[/ffxivsig]
#29 Nov 08 2005 at 11:30 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,128 posts
Your husband is a Commie. I bet he owns a Che Guevara T-Shirt and has a goatee. Leave him for a real man.Smiley: wink

Edited, Tue Nov 8 12:04:12 2005 by fhrugby
#30 Nov 08 2005 at 11:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Pikko Pots wrote:
I haven't been readin much on it, but my hubby says it's important to pay attention to it just to observe because that is what will happen in the US eventually as the separation between the rich and the poor becomes wider and wider. But then he's got some other really wild ideas that scare me sometimes.


Yet... oddly, France is a nation that has all those things for the poor that the US should have but doesn't. You know. Socialized medicine, free housing, all the goodies. Apparently, not everyone is satisfied with what the government will give them though. Maybe it's not the gap between rich and poor that they're upset about but the lack of freedoms?


Your husband is right. This may very well happen in the US if we continue to follow the shining liberal example that is Europe.

Ok. This is France though, so I'll give the rest of Europe a bit of credit. In small font of course!
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#31 Nov 08 2005 at 11:56 AM Rating: Good
I have to agree with Gbaji on this one.
#32 Nov 08 2005 at 12:18 PM Rating: Good
***
3,101 posts
gbaji wrote:



Your husband is right. This may very well happen in the US if we continue to follow the shining liberal example that is Europe.



You mean because "free trade" and the ability to outsoure to china and india, the destrcution of labor unions, and a flat tax have nothing to do with the seperation of the rich and the poor.
#33 Nov 08 2005 at 12:22 PM Rating: Good
***
1,700 posts
Quote:
You mean because "free trade" and the ability to outsoure to china and india, the destrcution of labor unions, and a flat tax have nothing to do with the seperation of the rich and the poor.


America is of course the first and only country to do this throughout the history of the world ...
#34 Nov 08 2005 at 12:23 PM Rating: Decent
I think you missed the point, fenderputy. Stratification isn't as much the problem as social engineering (such as telling people what they can and can't wear for instance).

Stratification has a more detrimental effect on the economy. However, the liberal policy towards immigration can also be as much to blame for the current issues of stratification as well as the rise of organized labor in politics. With our poor immigration policy, we have seen a rise in the population in unskilled labor over the past thirty years like this country has never seen before. In this sense, the French policy towards immigration has been an equal failure. What we see is imperical evidence in France.

Edited, Tue Nov 8 12:43:12 2005 by Lefein
#35 Nov 08 2005 at 12:26 PM Rating: Good
Poor people usually aren't pissed about the things they don't have, most especially those receiving some sort of government support.

They're pissed about the things other people DO have.

I've read about this being proven in studies but I'm not about to research links, so scoff if you like, but...

The average person, would rather be the only person with $10 in a room full of people who have $5 each instead of being one of ten people who have $500 in a room where some people have $1000 or more. It's all about status and standing.
#37 Nov 08 2005 at 12:39 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
Quote:
the issue is one of religous identity and mistreatment of immigrants, not economics


In addition, the increased tension between Muslims and the West fanned by the flames of the war on terror is a factor. I blame Bush.
#38 Nov 08 2005 at 1:34 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,784 posts
YSU:
Quote:
you would know that the riots are happening mainly because of poor immigrant housing, right wing nationalist propaganda, the recent ban on headscarves in schools.. the issue is one of religous identity and mistreatment of immigrants, not economics.


Exquisite Bullshi[/i]t!!!


Everyone knows that the real reason for the riots in France is the cancellation of the 24hr Jerry Lewis channel, as announced in President Chirac's nationally televised speech 13 days ago.
#39 Nov 08 2005 at 1:50 PM Rating: Good
***
3,128 posts
congrats on 1000 posts RedjedBlue
#40 Nov 08 2005 at 1:59 PM Rating: Excellent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Youshutup wrote:
If you knew anything about anything at all gbaji, you would know that the riots are happening mainly because of poor immigrant housing, right wing nationalist propaganda, the recent ban on headscarves in schools.. the issue is one of religous identity and mistreatment of immigrants, not economics.



*cough* I didn't mention economics (except negatively). In fact, I said it had *nothing* to do with a gap between rich and poor. That was the argument I was debunking.

What *I* said was that it was about rights and freedoms. Things like whether they could worship they way they wanted and live their lives the way they feel they should. It's about people feeling persecuted for being "different".


My whole point was that it's not all about economics. You can provide all the government assistance you want, but if you still treat your immigrants like outsiders mooching off the government dime, then they'll hate and resent you for everything you do for or against them. That's the lesson that France is learning...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#41 Nov 08 2005 at 2:11 PM Rating: Good
***
3,128 posts
The problem stems from the congregation of one minority into a separate community from the mainstream where they form the mistaken view that they are special and therefore deserve special treatment. When the proverbial “Man” treats them just like everyone else, i.e. like crap, they then take affront and demand they get treated differently then everyone else. In order to prove they are different from everyone else, they act like complete savages and crybabies and claim that it is the fault of everyone but them. In the end they usually do get special treatment because the squeaky wheel gets the grease. The positive reinforcement of their negative actions insures that minority communities across the globe will repeat this sort of action ad infinitum.
#42 Nov 08 2005 at 2:22 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
gbaji wrote:


My whole point was that it's not all about economics.


Then what the hell was that little tidbit about this happening in the US if we follow euro lefty values.
#45 Nov 08 2005 at 4:54 PM Rating: Default
As usual you numbnuts choose to simply ignore the truth of what's occuring in France. This is nothing more complicated than the Muslims attacking western society. Islam is at war with the rest of the world whether the world is ready to recognize it or not. France has capitulated time after time to muslims and the muslims have viewed that capitulation as a sign of weakness and what we're seeing is the response.

Achileez
#46 Nov 08 2005 at 4:57 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
Quote:
Achileez


Bless you.
#47 Nov 08 2005 at 6:11 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
Gbaji is the best troller on these boards bar none. I used to get suckered in too. Smiley: lol

Or maybe I am giving him too much credit?
#48 Nov 08 2005 at 7:01 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Youshutup wrote:
And it's always the same argument gbaji, because you believe socialism to be incompatible with liberty, and economic and political liberty to be the same thing. Nevermind that this should have been a discussion about the French belief that secularism is the best way of ensuring freedom and that these angry immigrants want help that could only ever be provided by government involvement..



Hehe. Um... Because I do believe that socialism is incompatible with liberty. And I happen to believe that's a good chunk of what's causing the problems in France right now. It's a textbook case of the flaws of socialism.

You start with the promise of "free benefits" to citizens. All is good. But then the costs to maintain those start to rise. Immigration becomes a problem because people will want to come to your country to enjoy those benefits. Over time, more of the population will become stratified as each "group" believes that the others is taking more then their fair share. Unemployement rises, increasing the need for those benefits, but making no one particularly happy. This begins a process of social warfare, not so much between classes, but between any group that can claim more "right" to goods and benefits then another. They begin to use lobbying for legal changes that give their group more advantage then others. Over time, an underclass will develop, made up of those groups scapegoated into being at fault for whatever the problem of the day is. That underclass will be subject to arbitrary legistlation from the majority to make it's life as hard as possible as punishment. This will eventually result in rioting and violence by that underclass.


That pretty much it?

Look. There are a host of problems with socialism. One of them is the simple fact that you've now made the government at fault if there's not enough "whatever" to go around. You've also made the government the legal process, not only by which benefits are provided but also through which complaints must travel. This works great as long as the people as a whole trust the system and believe that it is fair. But when people decide that it's not fair (right or wrong), the result is civil unrest aimed at the government itself. Because they see the government as the instrument of oppression against them. It's not exactly the ideal that some would like to paint it as.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#50 Nov 08 2005 at 7:29 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Youshutup wrote:
lalalalalala I'm not listening lalalalalalalalalalalala


Muahaha! You can't help yourself... Neener!
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#51 Nov 09 2005 at 2:31 AM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
Look. There are a host of problems with socialism. One of them is the simple fact that you've now made the government at fault if there's not enough "whatever" to go around. You've also made the government the legal process, not only by which benefits are provided but also through which complaints must travel. This works great as long as the people as a whole trust the system and believe that it is fair. But when people decide that it's not fair (right or wrong), the result is civil unrest aimed at the government itself. Because they see the government as the instrument of oppression against them. It's not exactly the ideal that some would like to paint it as.



but.. there kinda really is enough to go around.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 201 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (201)