Just to highlight how poorly you wrote this:
yossarian wrote:
www.thislife.org show number 227 12/20/2002. I've quoted it several times to you in the past. In response to this specific issue.
That's not a quote though. It's not even a link. It's worthless. I'm not going to dig through some realvideo archive looking for something. You find it. You post it.
Quote:
The senate posed the question "will the US be safer if we invade Iraq?" The answer was no.
Who'd they ask the question of? Who answered it? Where'd they publish this? Did they ask a bum on the street? A stripper? Poll random people in a mall? Do you have any idea how ridiculously vague you're being?
Quote:
Bob Graham, senator from Florida, ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligence committee, asks *the radio show* to please ask the White House to share their evidence contradicting the grand review of intelligence.
Why is a senator asking a radio show to talk to the White House? And is that an actual radio show? Or something named "the radio show". Maybe a bit of clarification as to what they hell you're talking about would help. Why does "*the radio show*" have this important evidence? What evidence do they have? Where did they get it? Why don't they tell Graham and let *him* talk to the White House? Is this some kind of secret tin-foil-hat thing? Maybe they wont tell Graham, but only the White House? Maybe it really doesn't exist? I can't tell a freaking thing from this.
Quote:
As you can imagine, they won't reply to Graham, they won't answer some radio show.
Who's "they"? And why wont they respond to Graham? That's the senator, right? Why would I "imagine" some unamed thing wouldn't talk to a senator. Assuming "they" refers to the anticedent "White House", then no, I really don't "imagine" why the White House would refuse to talk to a senator. Um... But then you say "they wont answer some radio show"...
So a senator asks a radio show to present some evidence to the White House instead of taking it and presenting it himself. But the White house wont talk to the senator because they don't talk to radio shows?
Where on earth did you learn how to write? Is this subject really this confusing and moronic? I'm serious here. I have
no freaking clue what the hell you are trying to say!
Quote:
I've probably posted this at least seven times on this forum. At least once as a direct reply to gbaji claiming no such large scale review ever took place.
Well. You said this 7 times before. That should have cleared it up. Wait! That means you've had 7 chances to re-write this in a manner understandible to humans and have still failed.
Quote:
I always say something about like this:
I don't think we should invade/should have invaded Iraq because we will be less safe. This is not my opinion. It is the conclusion of the best intelligence available to the US Senate, pre-war.
Yes. And my mother always says that life is like a box of chocolates...
That's great. But until you can actually provide any evidence that "this is a conclusion of the best intelligence available to the US senate pre-war", pardon me if I continue to assume that it's just your opinion.
Evidence. Remember? Link? Quote? Source? Something? Something not involving space aliens and tin-foil hats?
Quote:
Rumsfeld actually testified to the senate (this is pre-war) in reply to this report. I'm sure you'll find his statements quite ironic, in retrospect.
Great! So you can provide a link right?
