Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Bush nominates Alito to high courtFollow

#1 Oct 31 2005 at 8:17 AM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/31/scotus.bush/index.html wrote:
Top Democrat says choice could pose a 'lot of problems'

Monday, October 31, 2005; Posted: 8:06 a.m. EST (13:06 GMT)

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush said Monday he has nominated 3rd Circuit Appeals Court Judge Samuel Alito for the U.S. Supreme Court to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.

"Judge Alito is one of the most accomplished and respected judges in America," Bush said from the White House, with Alito by his side. "And his long career in public service has given him an extraordinary breadth of experience."

Alito, a former U.S. attorney who has been a judge for 15 years, is considered a favorite of the conservative movement and is Bush's third pick for O'Connor's seat.

His first, Judge John Roberts, was later nominated and confirmed to replace the late William Rehnquist as chief justice of the United States.

The second nominee, Texas lawyer and White House counsel Harriet Miers, withdrew from the process Thursday after weeks of opposition from both liberals and conservatives, who questioned her qualifications and record.

Legal experts consider the 55-year-old Alito so ideologically similar to Justice Antonin Scalia that he has earned the nickname "Scalito."

In 1991, in one of his more well-known decisions, he was the only dissenting voice in a 3rd Circuit ruling striking down a Pennsylvania law that required women to notify their husbands if they planned to get an abortion.

He also wrote the opinion in 1999 in a case that said a Christmas display on city property did not violate separation of church and state doctrines because it included a large plastic Santa Claus as well as religious symbols.

Alito was put on the circuit court bench by President George H.W. Bush in 1990 after his service as U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey.

He also served as assistant to Solicitor General Rex E. Lee from 1981 to 1985, where he argued 12 cases before the Supreme Court.

He was deputy assistant to Attorney General Edwin Meese from 1985 to 1987.

A Trenton, New Jersey, native, Alito graduated from Princeton in 1972 and earned his law degree from Yale in 1975.

Monday's announcement returns focus to the Supreme Court after a week of political difficulty for the White House and Republicans, with Miers' withdrawal coming a day before a grand jury indicted * Vice President "Fuc[/b]kmaster" Cheney's former chief of staff on charges including perjury and obstruction of justice.

Sen. Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican who chairs the Judiciary Committee, said Sunday he had been consulted by the White House about Miers' replacement but had not been informed of who the president plans to nominate.

Specter said he is "very worried" that Democrats could filibuster a candidate they perceive as an extreme right-wing jurist.

The topic that "dominates the discussion," Specter said, is abortion.

Both sides of the debate want to know in advance how a nominee will vote on the issue, but that is an answer that "no one is entitled to," he said.
Confirmation could be tough battle

"There could be a real tough battle here and a real tough fight, depending on whom the president puts up," said Specter, who supports abortion rights.

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid -- a Nevada Democrat who had recommended Miers -- said Sunday he feared Bush would "try to placate the right wing" with his next nominee, "and that's a mistake."

"If he wants to divert attention ... he can send us someone who's going to cause a lot of problems," Reid told CNN, saying the "radical right wing" was "pushing all his buttons, and he may just go along."

Reid said the choice of Alito "would create a lot of problems."

"That is not one of the names that I've suggested to the president," he said. "In fact, I've done the opposite."

Bush nominated Miers on October 3 to replace O'Connor, often a moderate swing vote, on the high court.

O'Connor, who has announced her retirement, will stay on the court until the Senate confirms her replacement.

A senior administration official told CNN last week that the next choice will be based at least in part on the "lessons learned" from Miers' nomination.

In addition to Miers' perceived lack of conservative credentials, the White House also could consider two other points of criticism on her nomination: her lack of experience as a judge or with constitutional law; and her close ties to the president, which prompted Democratic concerns about her judicial independence.

A poll released Sunday suggests Americans consider experience as a judge as more important than choosing a woman or a conservative.

The CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll of 800 adult Americans, conducted by telephone Friday through Sunday, found that only about one in seven said it is essential that Bush nominate a woman, and one in five said it is essential he nominate a conservative.

But half believe it is essential that Bush nominate someone with experience as a judge.

Sixteen percent said it is essential that the nominee would vote to overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion, and another 16 percent said it is a good idea.

But 42 percent said a nominee who opposes Roe v. Wade would be a bad idea.

The poll had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.

CNN's Dana Bash contributed to this story.


Like him or not you can't argue he has the experience for the position. Will this ultra conservative have a better chance at the bench?

* (Because Dic[/b]k is a dirty filthy filtered word)

Edited, Mon Oct 31 08:44:28 2005 by xythex
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
#2 Oct 31 2005 at 11:52 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Though Samual Alito seems to be well respected he's undeniably very conservative.

-Alito was in the top 3 selections of a list the Christian Legal Society made and suggested to Bush.

-Alito was a dissenter in the 1992 Supreme Court decision upholding Roe vs. Wade in Casey vs Planned Parenthood.

Just some of the scary stuff. He's certainly not the swing vote being lost with O'Connor.

Anyway there's some interesting stuff you can listen to at the NPR site.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#3 Oct 31 2005 at 12:04 PM Rating: Good
I took a look at his picutre and the funny little man in my head put the caption:

Get off my lawn, you damn kids!


right across the top. He's a sour, mean-looking old *******. I know nothing about him other than the article and picture, but sometimes you can judge a book by the cover.
#4 Oct 31 2005 at 12:40 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Looks like the Pubbies might get the fight they've been spoiling for, after all.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#5 Oct 31 2005 at 12:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Typical commentary is that Bush is throwing the far Right a bone to appease them after the Miers fiasco. I can't claim to know the guy aside from what's on all the news wires this morning so I won't pass judgement on him but, like Samira said, it doesn't look like he'll pass through with Roberts-like ease.

From a politics standpoint, the big money question is whether or not a nominee who looks like a far Right appeasement will alienate the moderates and further erode Bush's popularity or if it'll shore up support. From a judicial standpoint, the obvious question is whether or not Alito will be a "good" man for the job. The first is fun to guess about but I'm not really qualified to opine on the second.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#6 Oct 31 2005 at 1:15 PM Rating: Good
If you can take at face value a claim that the religious right has been positioning itself for nearly 2 decades to be in a position to impact the court, then the idea must be accepted that politics be damned with this nomination. As a Republican that does not identify or agree with the Religious Right, I am personally troubled by the idea that the Court is a big enough prize to sacrifice another decade of legislative and executive control.

I do not believe this nomination, this congress or this president will be forgotten any time soon. I am prepared for the backlash, but I am not in any way, shape or form happy that it is approaching inevitibility.
#7 Oct 31 2005 at 1:27 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Except that you'll be taunting me for the follies of the president in 2009.

And I'll be approaching 100k posts
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#8 Oct 31 2005 at 1:39 PM Rating: Good
I stand corrected. The bright spots will be few and far between, but they will be sweet.
#9 Oct 31 2005 at 4:38 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Typical commentary is that Bush is throwing the far Right a bone to appease them after the Miers fiasco. I can't claim to know the guy aside from what's on all the news wires this morning so I won't pass judgement on him but, like Samira said, it doesn't look like he'll pass through with Roberts-like ease.


I think both issues are related. Robert's flew through the appointment process because he was a moderate. He was originally going to be O'Connors replacement. Alito is Rhenquist's replacement in terms of position on issues, and is an appropriate choice in that context.

I'm not sure if Roberts is quite as moderate as O'Connor, but then we didn't know how moderate O'Connor was when she was appointed. Difference being that her replacement is the Chief Justice. It's a pretty balanced set of replacements if you look at both justice slots together IMO.


Course, I have no more knowledge of Alito then anyone else. I literally just read this while in a meeting about an hour ago...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#10 Oct 31 2005 at 9:48 PM Rating: Decent
Give it a few years and, considering history, it is likely someone will make a left turn. Seven of the nine have been appointed by Republicans and by and large the court is giving the right a harder time then the left.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 227 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (227)