Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Saw IIFollow

QuoteReply
#1 Oct 30 2005 at 5:08 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1592257813098
Scholar
****
5,135 posts
I saw Chand went to check it out this weekend in another thread.

Was it as good as the first?

▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#2 Oct 30 2005 at 5:25 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1622420402685
Scholar
*****
19,369 posts
I liked it.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#3 Oct 30 2005 at 6:39 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1591849933089
**
424 posts
me did to, it freaked me's out.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#4 Oct 31 2005 at 2:26 AM Rating: Good
__DEL__1602461939638
View User Forum
Sage
***
3,825 posts
Quote:
I saw Chand went to check it out this weekend in another thread.

Was it as good as the first?


Was Saw I good?
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#5 Oct 31 2005 at 6:10 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1591832485594
View User Forum
Sage
***
1,300 posts
It was filmed and done the exact friggen way as the first, but as far as movies like that go, it was great!

Many didn't like Saw I, but I always thought the twists and stuff were pretty fun. You can say that this movie brings the 'story' full circle.

It was totally worth the money I could have paid for it. (Friends with connections at your opponents theater is awesome)
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#6 Oct 31 2005 at 7:49 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1591823764022
Sage
***
2,232 posts
Saw 2 is a fun movie, not as good as #1 in terms of focus though. My fiance and I felt that there was just to many people involved whereas in 1 it was focused on Dr Gordon and Adam. But the ending to SAW 2 is definately something you either will catch onto right away OR it will slap you in the face type surprise.

Overall good movie.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#7 Oct 31 2005 at 11:00 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1591800079794
Scholar
***
3,980 posts
Quote:
Was Saw I good?


If you enjoy ****** acting, half-rate directing, and sub-par plot lines.

Of course that doesnt rule out the possibility of me renting the sequal in a month.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#8 Nov 01 2005 at 5:43 AM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1591836600111
Scholar
*
233 posts
I was really disappointed with it. Did not have the same ingenuity as the last. On it's own, it's an ok film. A sequel, not so good. Sad though that it was the same writer. Seems like the movie studio rushed a script to capatalize on the success of the first Saw.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#9 Nov 01 2005 at 8:18 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1591823764022
Sage
***
2,232 posts
Quote:
Seems like the movie studio rushed a script to capatalize on the success of the first Saw.


You just successfully exposed Hollywood's mentality in all it's glory for about 90% of the movies it pumps out..
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#10 Nov 01 2005 at 9:47 PM Rating: Default
__DEL__1592277690778
Scholar
***
1,362 posts
Predictable outcome, flashy effects, bad acting.
What more could you ask for^^
▲ Page top
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 274 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (274)
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC