Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Let's talk stalkingFollow

#1 Oct 25 2005 at 12:23 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
"She knew he would kill her someday."

Three incidents of domestic violence/attempted kidnapping on record; multiple threats against her life; failure to report to a court-mandated program. Yet he never served a day in prison, and was only jailed long enough to post bond and be released OR.

What gives?
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#2 Oct 25 2005 at 12:27 PM Rating: Good
***
3,118 posts
No, you don't understand. Beating your ex is OK, just as long as you don't rape her.
#3 Oct 25 2005 at 12:41 PM Rating: Decent
Ugh.

You really do have to drag a dead body behind your car to get arrested here.

#4 Oct 25 2005 at 12:45 PM Rating: Decent
Funny how the legal system punishes the victims more than the criminals these days.
#5 Oct 25 2005 at 12:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Prince pickleprince wrote:
Ugh.

You really do have to drag a dead body behind your car to get arrested here.



And even then you get cited for littering.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#6 Oct 25 2005 at 12:46 PM Rating: Decent
Samira wrote:
Prince pickleprince wrote:
Ugh.

You really do have to drag a dead body behind your car to get arrested here.



And even then you get cited for littering.


Smiley: yikes

Yep.

#7 Oct 25 2005 at 1:09 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,863 posts
The legal system's figurative head is way up it's ***.

A guy I work with rents a house and had a female roommate. Things were cool until the landlord got in touch, wondering why rent hadn't been paid. Guy mentions that it was the roomie's turn to pay this month, they do a quick check and find no rent has been paid.

So Guy talks to his roommate and she apologizes, things are weird, she lost track of time, she'll pay it tomorrow.

Tomorrow comes and goes. A week later Guy notices a weird debt on his checking account for the full rent typically paid on the house. He checks in with the landlord to find that one of his checks had been used to pay, and that his signature had been forged.

Guy goes and files charges relating to fraud. Also has the landlord evict his roommate.

Roommate leaves that weekend and promptly disappears.

The landlord has a court date set as he has a few felony charges relating to fraud and theft that must be dealt with. Court date comes and goes; the roommate skips out on it and nobody knows where she is. A friend of hers says he got a call from her, and she said she was in El Paso, TX.

Police get in touch Wednesday following this court date, as apparently Guy's roommate had stolen some things from work. She worked at Ft Detrick, MD - happy little army base where a lot of our active bioweapons work is done. (uh oh.) Guy proceeds to inventory his house and realizes that he's had a few things stolen from him as well.

He goes back to court today to file some additional charges with the magistrate. While he's there, he asks the magistrate what happens if his former roommate skips out on their court date (seeing as how she skipped the previous one).

The magistrate told him that they could issue a bench warrant, but that the prosecuting attorney could also simply drop the charges entirely.


Granted, this is for a non-violent crime. Granted, the impact to other people has pretty much been nullified by corrective action on the part of Guy and his landlord. That said, I find it ludicrous that any prosecuting attorney would drop multiple felony charges; a bench warrant should absolutely be issued on the off-chance that this roommate gets picked up for some other violation in the future. Justice can be delayed, but justice should not be ignored.

'Broken' doesn't begin to describe the system.
#8 Oct 25 2005 at 1:14 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,700 posts
Quote:
I find it ludicrous that any prosecuting attorney would drop multiple felony charges; a bench warrant should absolutely be issued on the off-chance that this roommate gets picked up for some other violation in the future. Justice can be delayed, but justice should not be ignored.


There is no law stating they have to prosecute.

The prosecuting attorney would only drop the charges if your friend decides he doesn't want to drag all this crap out over a period of time and he decides to drop the charges... after all, he started the charges in the first place.

Attorneys only drop charges when they know there is a no-win situation or their client changes their mind. The rest is up to the state/other legal entity to take charge of.
#9 Oct 25 2005 at 2:03 PM Rating: Good
What I would like to know is how on earth she pissed him off that bad...I mean that big of a gudge is just odd.
#10 Oct 25 2005 at 2:07 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Quote:
What I would like to know is how on earth she pissed him off that bad...I mean that big of a gudge is just odd.


Yeah...I agree. She must have really not listened. Maybe she didn't get his beer fast enough. Either way, she probably was asking for it.




Smiley: disappointed
#11 Oct 25 2005 at 2:13 PM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
Quote:
What I would like to know is how on earth she pissed him off that bad...I mean that big of a gudge is just odd.


Really not odd at all. Many men and women do not learn how relationships are supposed to work in childhood. He felt that he owned her, similar to an appliance. He was unable to fathom how his "woman" could reject him. If every time you tried to turn on your TV it refused and instead kept turning around to face the neighbors house wouldn't you eventually get upset and smash it? If you can't watch it then no one can, right?

Domestic abuse happens all over this country every day. It's like a child throwing a tantrum and smashing his toys. Unfortunatly, many of these men never learn and move from one woman appliance to the next. Many of these women don't feel they have a way out of the relationship, they feel helpless and alone so they take it day after day.

This unfortunatly leads to lax law enforcement, cops are reluctant to get involved only to find that they are back at it 3 days later after he explains to his "woman" how much he has changed.

This culture of domestic violence is something many people have been working to change for many years. As with most any cause public awareness is the biggest hurdle.
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
#12 Oct 25 2005 at 2:51 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Quote:
Slaying suspect's violent past
8 felony convictions, but he'd never been sentenced to prison

Did California get rid of the Three Strikes law?


#13 Oct 25 2005 at 3:05 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Nope.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#14 Oct 25 2005 at 3:12 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
It's in SF. There are no laws there.
#15 Oct 25 2005 at 3:31 PM Rating: Good
**
395 posts
Ok, new to this part of the message board... saw this and it is frightening on many levels, not just the fact that I already worry enough about my daughter - but have seen how lightly they have treated stalkers in the past (not sure if they have changed any of the laws in the past few years).

One of my best friends was stalked by her ex-fiance after she called it off, I remember her telling me the last thing he told her was "It isnt over until I say it is over." - the ownership thing I suppose. I was scared for her then - and hopefully - if this is how easily they get off, he will stay away from her (it happened several years ago, and I felt helpless as she would talk to me on the phone just because).

All she was told at the time is they couldnt do anything unless he did something.. and simply stalking/following did not fall under him doing something (apparently it had to be a physical attack?)

She mentioned new stalking laws, but this is in Texas - but, it seems even with new laws and policies they still find a way to manipulate the system.
#16 Oct 25 2005 at 3:39 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
She mentioned new stalking laws, but this is in Texas - but, it seems even with new laws and policies they still find a way to manipulate the system.


This is the part that's troubling to me, as well. There are stalking laws here. The cops, at least, seem to have responded appropriately in each instance.

It's the judges who kept letting him back out on the street, for time served or on his own recognizance. I do not understand why he was allowed to go free after several different instances of kidnapping, false imprisonment, abusing her and threatening her life.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#17 Oct 25 2005 at 3:49 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
10,802 posts
NephthysWanderer the Charming wrote:
It's in SF. There are no laws there.


San Francisco is notorious for these kinds of cases. But remember a few years ago how the city and surrounding area just converged on the case of a man throwing a small dog into oncoming traffic? But it seems like no one blinked an eye with this.
#18 Oct 25 2005 at 3:50 PM Rating: Decent
trickybeck wrote:
Quote:
Slaying suspect's violent past
8 felony convictions, but he'd never been sentenced to prison

Did California get rid of the Three Strikes law?


Didn't they change it NOT to include "victimless" crimes?
#19 Oct 25 2005 at 3:51 PM Rating: Decent
It kinda makes me sick when I see how restrictive such states as New York and California are on carrying weapons. You can't even order Kusari type weapons in the State of California.

It makes you wonder.. I mean, if the criminal justice system can't and won't take care of the problems with stalking and domestic abuse, then why do the states restric peoples right to bear arms? If only that lady had a pistol with her.. I mean, at least she could have had a fighting chance, but she's dead now so we'll never know.

I paid for my girl to get her concealed handgun license. There's just too much sick shi[/u]t in this world that happens to people who aren't prepared for danger. It's sad, but its also undeniably true.
#20 Oct 25 2005 at 3:54 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Prince pickleprince wrote:
trickybeck wrote:
Quote:
Slaying suspect's violent past
8 felony convictions, but he'd never been sentenced to prison

Did California get rid of the Three Strikes law?


Didn't they change it NOT to include "victimless" crimes?


It's on the table to disable it for non-violent crimes, but hasn't passed yet as far as I've heard. Maybe on the ballot for November.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#21 Oct 25 2005 at 4:04 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
trickybeck wrote:
Quote:
Slaying suspect's violent past
8 felony convictions, but he'd never been sentenced to prison

Did California get rid of the Three Strikes law?




I was wondering the same thing. I know that 3 felonies alone won't do it but, three violent felonies will. At least this is what I thought. Correct me if I am wrong but, a felony domestic violence would involve some sort of a violent act.
#22 Oct 25 2005 at 4:21 PM Rating: Good
**
395 posts
I dont see how any of the crimes were "victimless" either - especially since she was the victim.

It seems his attorney knew exactly what he should and had to say not to mention how to act in front of the judges when he actually did appear.

Did the judges even know about his past crimes when he was in front of them? Its like they didnt have a clue.
#23 Oct 25 2005 at 4:45 PM Rating: Decent
AanyaRamuh wrote:
I dont see how any of the crimes were "victimless" either - especially since she was the victim.


No one said that, Mr./Ms. Jumpy McConclusion.

Edited, Tue Oct 25 18:00:07 2005 by pickleprince
#24 Oct 26 2005 at 12:25 AM Rating: Good
**
395 posts
Quote:


Quote:

AanyaRamuh wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I dont see how any of the crimes were "victimless" either - especially since she was the victim.
------------------------------------------------------------------------



No one said that, Mr./Ms. Jumpy McConclusion.


Never said any one said they were victimless - just wonder how that one exclusion would effect him getting off so many times and through this kind of law.

What does the state consider "victimless"?

If he doesnt physically hurt her? or does the harrasment over the phone count? For a long time, they could not do anything (or would not) until there was a physical crime.

Even then, there seems to be more than enough :/ but, how were they filed? and if each judge seemed to let him off - how much information is truly there for them to see.



P.S. Its Ms. :P and


#25 Oct 26 2005 at 12:30 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
What does the state consider "victimless"?


Drug possession. Prostitution. Gambling. Things like that.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#26 Oct 26 2005 at 1:08 AM Rating: Decent
@#%^ing DRK
*****
13,143 posts
Nothing says 'I love you' like a restraining order~





edit: Blah, stupid baggy tired eyes

Edited, Wed Oct 26 03:34:46 2005 by SilentPaskil
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 268 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (268)