Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

This is why...Follow

#27 Oct 18 2005 at 12:40 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,118 posts
Quote:
And comparing this to Santa and Ho Ho Ho? I don't see how that is really comparable.


What's not to understand? Santa Claus is a representation of a Christian holiday. Essentially Santa is to Christmas what the Easter Bunny is to Easter; Pagan and/or European cultural influences merged with Christian beliefs celebrated on significant Christian Holidays.

Granted, over time just about anything and everything Christian Holiday related has been transformed into a twisted consumerised hull of it's former self, the core meaning of each Holiday hold true to those who are Christians. To celebrate Christmas is to celebrate Christ and the traditions that come along with it. If you have a problem with someone saying a prayer in public, then IMO you shouldn't be allowed an Easter basket and neither should your children.

I'm not what one could call a religious man, though I respect those that wish to practice their own. As long as it nobody pushes their ideology on me I'm of the belief that people can serve their higher being any way they wish.

As for the OP, while saying things like "This country was founded on Christian principles" aren't valid defences, Harvey is correct that the vast majority of church goers in the US are in fact Christians of some denomination or other. We are, for the most part, a Christian nation, though in line with our freedom, everyone here can worship the deity of their choosing.

If players, coaches, fans, etc. want to pray by all means go nuts. As long as nobody is being recruited or treated differently for not participating there is nothing wrong a little prayer.

#28 Oct 18 2005 at 12:48 PM Rating: Decent
*****
12,975 posts
I don't see why we can't just leave it at "A moment of silence."

No matter what religion you are, that is one thing that all the religions (That I know of.) could share and respect. I don't think anyone could seriously get angry over everyone having a moment of silence to reflect on things. That's the point of most religions anyways, is it not? Self-Reflection and the bettering of oneself.

Eh, what the hell do I know, I'm not even religious.
#29 Oct 18 2005 at 12:48 PM Rating: Decent
Prayer isn't outlawed in school. You can pray anytime you feel like it.

Institutional condoned or led prayer is the issue here.

Why is that so hard for some people to grasp?

#30 Oct 18 2005 at 12:54 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
14,454 posts
technically not Jacob. All those symbolisms for the holidays were taken from pagan holidays and adjusted for the christian holidays. Technically, every christian holiday is not on the date they should be. Instead they were interlapped with already pagan holidays to make the transition easier for those who refused to let go of the old ways.

Christmas? Represents Winter Solstice. The image of a jolly fat elf is pagan, though the name is from a christaian saint. The easter bunny? Represents fertility on the holiday of easter, a pagan goddess who represented fertility and birth. Has nothing to do with the christian symbolism of the holiday at all. But thats for another thread, and something we have discussed many times before.

Allenjj, why not have the option to pray instead of making it mandatory for all to listen to something they dont believe? WHats wrong with a time of silence, where those who wish to pray can do so and those who dont can reflect in their own way? That way no one is imposing ANYTHING on anyone.
#31 Oct 18 2005 at 1:36 PM Rating: Good
DSD wrote:
Allenjj, why not have the option to pray instead of making it mandatory for all to listen to something they dont believe? WHats wrong with a time of silence, where those who wish to pray can do so and those who dont can reflect in their own way?


That's the problem right there. The first amendment grants freedom of speech, not freedom of speech unless what you're saying might be heard by someone who might get offended. If that were the case I could sue anyone who said anything I didn't agree with.

Freedom of speech means that I can walk up to George Bush and call him an idiot. Well, I can't, but a civilian can. George Bush has the right to pray, even if others can hear him.

There's nothing wrong with a moment of silence if that's what you want to do. But there's nothing wrong with praying if that's what you want to do also.

DSD wrote:
That way no one is imposing ANYTHING on anyone.


What's wrong with imposing things on people? We live in a society where idea's are imposed upon us every day. Tommy Hilfiger, Nike, Wendy's, Ford, Cosmo, and MTV all tell us what to buy, think, fell, and believe. There's no difference between the rights of businesses to advertise their beliefs and the rights of individual's to express their beliefs.

Like I said before, as long as the school doesn't mandate prayer before football games there is no legal recourse to prevent individual's from vocally expressing their beliefs.
#32 Oct 18 2005 at 1:38 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
What's wrong with imposing things on people? We live in a society where idea's are imposed upon us every day. Tommy Hilfiger, Nike, Wendy's, Ford, Cosmo, and MTV all tell us what to buy, think, fell, and believe. There's no difference between the rights of businesses to advertise their beliefs and the rights of individual's to express their beliefs.


One battle at a time, compadre.

Advertising will get its own day in court.

Just because something exists doesn't make it a good thing.
#33 Oct 18 2005 at 1:42 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
14,454 posts
Your examples of imposing are skewed. They are advertisements, yes, but you can "choose" not to watch the tv and commercials when they are on.You have a choice on whether or not those are imposed on you. Wheras prayer in a public place, esp a part of the gov where the seperation of church and state are the way it has been and should be, you can not turn off public prayer when you wish to watch a football game if someone is speaking publically of a religion that is not your own.

While you may have the freedom of speech, I have the freedom of choosing what religion, if any, I wish to seek comfort in. Why is it that the only prayers are from Judeo Christian relgions? If you had said to me " We will have public prayer and all religions will eb involved" thenI might not have much of a problem. you would be giving equal weight to all faiths. But since thats not the case, then I do have a problem with public events supporting only one faith, not all, in a place governed by the government

Edited, Tue Oct 18 14:57:07 2005 by deadsidedemon
#34 Oct 18 2005 at 1:43 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
One battle at a time, compadre.

Advertising will get its own day in court.


It shouldn't and neither should this. It's not an example of a violation of church/state laws, it's an attempt to take away right protected under the constitution. People have every right to pray, even at school functions. Just as advertiser's have the right to try and ruin every episode of Smallville I watch with their evil, evil commercials.

Thank His Noodly Appendige for DVR.
#35 Oct 18 2005 at 1:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
not watching TV has decreased my brain rot by 95%!

too bad reading and posting in the asylum overcompensated for that neuron damage
____________________________
Do what now?
#36 Oct 18 2005 at 1:49 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

More illogical forwarded e-mail garbage.

Move on.


#37 Oct 18 2005 at 1:49 PM Rating: Good
DSD wrote:
If you had said to me " We will have public prayer and all religions will eb involved" thenI might not have much of a problem. you would be giving equal weight to all faiths. But since thats not the case, then I do have a problem with public events supporting only one faith, not all, in a place governed by the government


That logic is flawed because in many cases the will of the majority is followed. Take the presidency for example. By your logic, Bush and Kerry would both have to be president because all views must be given equal venue, not just those of the majority.

It's much like life on a ship. There will be a catholic chaplin, and a prodastant chaplin. There won't be a jewish, or morman, or wiccan chaplin. The exception to this is if 10% or more of the crew follows one of these religions, a chaplin will be brought onboard.

While it's nice to imagine living in a world where everyone got what they wanted all the time, the best we can do is follow the will of the majority.
#38 Oct 18 2005 at 1:52 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
14,454 posts
allenjj wrote:
Quote:
One battle at a time, compadre.

Advertising will get its own day in court.


It shouldn't and neither should this. It's not an example of a violation of church/state laws, it's an attempt to take away right protected under the constitution. People have every right to pray, even at school functions. Just as advertiser's have the right to try and ruin every episode of Smallville I watch with their evil, evil commercials.

Thank His Noodly Appendige for DVR.


How is having a moment of silence for all to do as they wished taking away your right to pray? Do you have to actually listen to someone read it aloud for it to count? No, you're just harumphing on the fact that others may feel uncomfortable listening to YOUR and YOURS alone faiths prayers while others are left in the dark. And yes, it is an example of violition of the seperation of church and state laws if it infringes on the rights of others. Unless you add every single faith out there to the prayer list it is a favoritism of one faith only, seperating even more the mixing pot of people we have that live in this country
#39 Oct 18 2005 at 1:54 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
While it's nice to imagine living in a world where everyone got what they wanted all the time, the best we can do is follow the will of the majority.


That just made Baby Spaghetti Monster Jesus cry.

Ugh.
#40 Oct 18 2005 at 1:55 PM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
Quote:
While it's nice to imagine living in a world where everyone got what they wanted all the time, the best we can do is follow the will of the majority.


I'd rather have no mercy for the majority
____________________________
Do what now?
#41 Oct 18 2005 at 1:59 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
14,454 posts
allenjj wrote:

While it's nice to imagine living in a world where everyone got what they wanted all the time, the best we can do is follow the will of the majority.


Not when you need to respect the rights of everyone in a GOVERNING BODY. The governement is set up to protect the rights of all upstanding citizens, not just the catholics and christians. Your mentality in this is what gets those of us who usually respect everyones right for their choice so riled up. You claim that because the majority of people wish for judeo christian prayer in school it should be done, without regards to everyone elses opinion and thoughts. You do not see those not of your faith running into your church and claiming non religious factors. SO why should we feel comfortable when your church is not enough for you and you feel it is your right to force your beliefs on us? Why should I, a person who does not conform to your faith, HAVE to listen to something I dont believe in, when I take my son to hs football game? Why should I have to listen to a prayer of one faith only when I may be Jewish, muslim, wiccan, or nothing? Why is it that I must suffer to listen to your faith in a place that is supposed to be for all faiths. School is not a church. It is not a mosque. It is a place for everyone to be treated equally to get an education. Sports is funded by the government, not by your local churches.
#42 Oct 18 2005 at 2:21 PM Rating: Good
DSD wrote:
You claim that because the majority of people wish for judeo christian prayer in school it should be done, without regards to everyone elses opinion and thoughts.


No, my claim is that because the majority of people wish for it, they have the right to do it. Just as you have the right to publicly pray to a flying spaghetti monster if you want. It's freedom. Freedom to express your beliefs regardless of whether or not others like it.

DSD wrote:
Why should I, a person who does not conform to your faith, HAVE to listen to something I dont believe in, when I take my son to hs football game?


For the same reason that I have to listen to an atheist professor drone on and on about his beliefs if I want to pass my college courses; it's their right.

DSD wrote:
School is not a church. It is not a mosque. It is a place for everyone to be treated equally to get an education. Sports is funded by the government, not by your local churches.


An excellent point, but not a valid one for this discussion. The point of contention I'm making is that individual people have the right to express their beliefs, no mateer who's listening or who might be offended.

#43 Oct 18 2005 at 2:28 PM Rating: Decent
**
991 posts
What if a public school team was playing a Christian team on the Christian team's home field and a prayer was said. Do you think people from the public school would be offended?

And you refer to prayer as a suffering? Is prayer really THAT bad that you must cover your ears? Is it enough to make your ears bleed? I don't really understand how it is a "suffering". It isn't torture. It is words to a higher power. If you don't want to hear it, don't listen. Wait in the parking lot and get to the field as the kickoff happens.

Lady deadsidedemon wrote:
Why should I, a person who does not conform to your faith, HAVE to listen to something I dont believe in, when I take my son to hs football game? Why should I have to listen to a prayer of one faith only when I may be Jewish, muslim, wiccan, or nothing?


Why shouldn't you?
#44 Oct 18 2005 at 2:50 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
Quote:
An excellent point, but not a valid one for this discussion. The point of contention I'm making is that individual people have the right to express their beliefs, no mateer who's listening or who might be offended.


Thats not what your point sounds like. Your point has been that you feel it should be completely fine to have judeo christian prayer a part of a public, governement based event. At least that is how I am perceiving it. Because if your point was what you just said, then you would have no problems with accepting a moment of silence where everyone in the stands could do as they pleased publically, just without someone up on a podium reciting a prayer that many of us may not follow. Express your beliefs all you want, but I am expressing my own by balking at being told I HAVE to listen to your prayer at a public non religious event.


Mearyk wrote:
What if a public school team was playing a Christian team on the Christian team's home field and a prayer was said. Do you think people from the public school would be offended?



Show me how many times a public school plays against a private school. Im not a soccer mom so maybe Im in the wrong with this, but in my years of highschool not once did our public school play against a private christian school so the point is moot. If its a private non religious school playing against a private religious school, then I have no qualms. My tax dollars are not a part of the issue when trying to keep church and state seperated.

Mearyk wrote:


And you refer to prayer as a suffering? Is prayer really THAT bad that you must cover your ears? Is it enough to make your ears bleed? I don't really understand how it is a "suffering". It isn't torture. It is words to a higher power. If you don't want to hear it, don't listen. Wait in the parking lot and get to the field as the kickoff happens.



Its the fact that I, being not of the same religion, would have to listen to one faiths prayers without the representation of all others. To me, it is just one more way to show that this country, even in government funded events, is straying from the seperation of church and state, and pointing a favoritism to only one religion, and not encompassing all, which is what our caonstitution was founded on. So yes, if you are discluding all other faiths and the beliefs of the entire country, and focusing only on one faith in a government funded event, then its a suffering for all who do not see the way you do and it is a slight against us.

Mearyk wrote:


Why shouldn't you?


because since it is a seperation of church and state in a government funded event it should not be there. Why shouldnt you keep your prayers where they belong? Why is it so hard for you to understand another persons opinion in the matter? You're not asking for equal rights for all faiths, only your own. If you feel that strongly about prayer in events, then put your own kid in a private school and pay for the privelage of recited prayer. My tax dollars do not pay to hear about someone elses religion in a non religion atmosphere
#45 Oct 18 2005 at 2:54 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,254 posts
Quote:
How is having a moment of silence for all to do as they wished taking away your right to pray?


I believe that prayer is a community affair and that in praise and worship it would be better if a group of people were doing it together.

We strive in this country to protect the rights of the minority but I refuse to believe that it should be taken to the extent that it denies or overwrites any of the majority's rights.

Quote:
Why should I, a person who does not conform to your faith, HAVE to listen to something I dont believe in, when I take my son to hs football game? Why should I have to listen to a prayer of one faith only when I may be Jewish, muslim, wiccan, or nothing?


I have to listen to people I don't want to all the time. Cry me a river. If the government starts protecting people from things that the "people" do not want to hear then ***** the slipery slope and toss civil liberties (free speech in particular) right off the cliff.
#46 Oct 18 2005 at 2:58 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
DSD, I thought you had graduated already?

Smiley: confused
#47 Oct 18 2005 at 3:07 PM Rating: Good


Quote:
For the same reason that I have to listen to an atheist professor drone on and on about his beliefs if I want to pass my college courses; it's their right.


I view college a little differently. Every child is required by law to attend school until they are 18 (or so, there are circumstances to change this, but you get the point). You chose to go to college, and you chose what college you wanted to attend.

So a child is required by law to attend school, and then, lets assume they take band. If they do, they are required to attend football games. Or maybe the school just prays before assemblys. Either way, the child is required to be on that campus and they are praying outloud. No, the words aren't vile, or dangerous, but they aren't nearly everyone's belief system. You can't turn it off. The state makes them be there, and church is getting involved. A moment of silence could work, because then everyone can quietly think their own prayer to themselves, or think nothing at all.

I understand what people are getting at with Freedom of Speech, but does that really entail forcing someones belief system on someone else? Is that what it is all about?


#48 Oct 18 2005 at 3:08 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
Quote:
I have to listen to people I don't want to all the time


andI bet it makes you oh so happy to listen to it too. Now realize thats what many of us feel and magnify it, knowing that our faith is being ignored for only one and obviously most favored religion of our country. Great to know that our country is based on allowing us to worship as we choose, so long as we are forced to listen to the "favorite" religions only prayers in a nonreligious, public, tax dollared paid event.

My tax dollars are going to a governement that should not be including only one religion into their thought base. I am not paying to a country that visibly supports one religion. I am paying to a country that is supposed to allow equal rights for all faiths. Until or unless you relent and allow everyone else who wishes to pray from their own faiths into the mix as well, you're only continuing to split the already engulfing bipolar of the people in this country.

As I said, take your money and put your kid into a private school, if it means so much to you to hear prayer at events. You have the choice in that matter. I dont, except to put my son in a public school and hope that they keep it seperated from a religion I may not believe in
#49 Oct 18 2005 at 3:09 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
AngryUndead wrote:
If the government starts protecting people from things that the "people" do not want to hear then ***** the slipery slope and toss civil liberties (free speech in particular) right off the cliff.
SLIPPERY CLIFF!!!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#50 Oct 18 2005 at 3:12 PM Rating: Decent
DSD wrote:
I am paying to a country that is supposed to allow equal rights for all faiths. Until or unless you relent and allow everyone else who wishes to pray from their own faiths into the mix as well, you're only continuing to split the already engulfing bipolar of the people in this country.


I guess we just feel differently about it. The way I see it is, I would have no problem listening to a muslim, or jewish, or whatever prayer before a game. Even if that was the only prayer spoken. Given that, I have no problem with hearing a christian prayer either.

To me it's just people exercising their rights.
#51 Oct 18 2005 at 3:15 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
allenjj wrote:
DSD wrote:
I am paying to a country that is supposed to allow equal rights for all faiths. Until or unless you relent and allow everyone else who wishes to pray from their own faiths into the mix as well, you're only continuing to split the already engulfing bipolar of the people in this country.


I guess we just feel differently about it. The way I see it is, I would have no problem listening to a muslim, or jewish, or whatever prayer before a game. Even if that was the only prayer spoken. Given that, I have no problem with hearing a christian prayer either.

To me it's just people exercising their rights.


and I think you mistake me. I would have less of a problem if all faiths were represented in the prayer mix. But you and I both know that won't happen. It will always only be a judeo christian prayer. I still wouldnt be jumping for joy if everyone was represented, but I would be less against the idea.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 198 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (198)